Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving performance of repetitive computer-based tasks through visual stimuli tailored to the individual

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When humans conduct simple and repetitive tasks, their task performance can decrease depending on time. At this time, by deciding stimulus timing and delivering stimuli to humans, speed and accuracy of the task can be improved. To clearly investigate the effectiveness of such stimuli, we designed this study as repetitive tasks on a PC that could be conducted simply and were not much affected by other environmental variables. For our experiment, a total of 20 participants were asked to perform mouse pointing and keyboard typing tasks; usual speed and accuracy of each participant on each task were determined after completing the task. Next, the participant’s level of concentration was assessed using several metrics. When concentration was deemed to have declined during the task, a stimulus was delivered to the participant in the form of a screen flash, which resulted in an increased focus on the task. Through the proposed approach, speed was boosted by 11.6% on a pointing task and 3.8% on a typing task. Moreover, these results were found to be statistically significant in analysis of variance and paired t test. Our experiments and studies focus on improvements in reaction time caused by effect of stimulus and our presented approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.hancom.com/hanfriends/friendsTyping.do.

References

  • Alder GS (2007) Examining the relationship between feedback and performance in a monitored environment: a clarification and extension of feedback intervention theory. J High Technol Manag Res 17(2):157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alder GS, Tompkins PK (1997) Electronic performance monitoring an organizational justice and concertive control perspective. Manag Commun Q 10(3):259–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose ML, Alder GS (2000) Designing, implementing, and utilizing computerized performance monitoring: enhancing organizational justice. Res Pers Hum Resour Manag 18:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • American Management Association (1998) Workplace testing and monitoring. American Management Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ana Justel DP, Zamar R (1997) A multivariate Kolmogorov–Smirnov test of goodness of fit. Stat Probab Lett 35(3):251–259

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj JS, Heuman DM, Sterling RK, Sanyal AJ, Siddiqui M, Matherly S, Luketic V, Stravitz RT, Fuchs M, Thacker LR, Gilles H, White MB, Unser A, Hovermale J, Gavis E, Noble NA, Wade JB (2015) Validation of encephalapp, smartphone-based Stroop test, for the diagnosis of covert hepatic encephalopathy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc 13(10):1828–1835

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolia RS, D’Angelo WR, McKinley RL (1999) Aurally aided visual search in three-dimensional space. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 41(4):664–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer N (1995) The effects of monitoring individual and group performance on the distribution of effort across tasks. J Appl Soc Psychol 25(9):760–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent D (1971) Decisión and stress. Academic Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies DR, Parasuraman R (1982) The psychology of vigilance. Academic Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Diederich A, Colonius H (2004) Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time. Percept Psychophys 66(8):1388–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald FM, Donald CHM (2015) Task disengagement and implications for vigilance performance in CCTV surveillance. Cognit Technol Work 17(1):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergen M, Saban S, Kirmizi-Alsan E, Uslu A, Keskin-Ergen Y, Demiralp T (2014) Time frequency analysis of the event-related potentials associated with the Stroop test. Int J Psychophysiol 94(3):463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givens B (1996) Privacy: entitlement or illusion? Pers J 75(7):18–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R, Higgins C (1989) Monitoring service workers via computer: the effect on employees, productivity, and service. Natl Product Rev 8(2):101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlaw PS, Prundeanu C (1997) The impact of federal legislation to limit electronic monitoring. Public Pers Manag 26(2):227–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock P, Hart S (2002) What can human factors/ergonomics offer? Ergon Des 10(1):6–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes W (2013) Tukey’s test. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Russell PN (2011a) The effects of arousing negative and neutral picture stimuli on target detection in a vigilance task. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 53(2):132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Russell PN (2011b) Working memory load and the vigilance decrement. Exp Brain Res 212(3):429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershenson M (1962) Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation. J Exp Psychol 63(3):289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg RVL (1987) Engineering statistics. MacMillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh M, Abe G, Yamamura T (2014) Effects of arousing attention on distracted driver’s following behaviour under uncertainty. Cognit Technol Work 16(2):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-013-0264-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell RE, Bennett N (1994) Electronic surveillance as employee control: a procedural justice interpretation. J High Technol Manag Res 5(1):39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komaki JL (1986) Toward effective supervision: an operant analysis and comparison of managers at work. J Appl Psychol 71(2):270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovach KA, Conner SJ, Livneh T, Scallan KM, Schwartz RL (2000) Electronic communication in the workplace—something’s got to give. Bus Horiz 43(4):59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis C (1999) American workers beware: big brother is watching. USA TODAY-NEW YORK- 127:20–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly T, Robertson IH, Galloway M, Hawkins K (1999) The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia 37(6):661–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller HC, Kubicki S, Caffier D, Kolski C, Naveteur J (2016) The stroop and reverse Stroop effects as measured by an interactive tabletop. Int J Hum Comput Interact 32(5):363–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1150642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson WT, Hettinger LJ, Cunningham JA, Brickman BJ, Haas MW, McKinley RL (1998) Effects of localized auditory information on visual target detection performance using a helmet-mounted display. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 40(3):452–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ossowski U, Malinen S, Helton WS (2011) The effects of emotional stimuli on target detection: indirect and direct resource costs. Conscious Cognit 20(4):1649–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiner AJ, Hollands JG, Jamieson GA (2017) Target detection and identification performance using an automatic target detection system. Hum Factors 59(2):242–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816670768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT, Yiend J (1997) Oops!’: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 35(6):747–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton JM (2000) Traditional and electronic monitoring from an organizational justice perspective. J Bus Psychol 15(1):129–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton NA, Harrison DJ, Taylor-Burge KL, Porter LJ (2000) Sorting the wheat from the chaff: a study of the detection of alarms. Cognit Technol Work 2(3):134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanie XK, Tsang SN, Chan AH, Liu S (2017) Hand- and foot-controlled dual-tracking task performance together with a discrete spatial stimulus-response compatibility task. Int J Hum Comput Interact 33(1):21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1232226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RA, Fister JK, Barnett ZP, Nidiffer AR, Wallace MT (2012) Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance. Exp Brain Res 219(1):121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18(6):643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson DR, Besner D, Smilek D (2015) A resource-control account of sustained attention. Perspect Psychol Sci 10(1):82–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614556681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warm J (1984) Sustained attention in human performance. Human performance and cognition series. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Warm JS, Parasuraman R, Matthews G (2008) Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 50(3):433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD, Hollands JG (1999) Engineering psychology and human performance, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson LK, Meredith MA, Stein BE (1996) The role of anterior ectosylvian cortex in cross-modality orientation and approach behavior. Exp Brain Res 112(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by INHA UNIVERSITY Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, South Korea

    Hyun-Gyu Lee & Sang-Chul Lee

Authors
  1. Hyun-Gyu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sang-Chul Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-Chul Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, HG., Lee, SC. Improving performance of repetitive computer-based tasks through visual stimuli tailored to the individual. Cogn Tech Work 20, 153–161 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0454-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0454-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation