Discrete approximation of two-stage stochastic and distributionally robust linear complementarity problems

  • Xiaojun Chen
  • Hailin Sun
  • Huifu Xu
Full Length Paper Series A


In this paper, we propose a discretization scheme for the two-stage stochastic linear complementarity problem (LCP) where the underlying random data are continuously distributed. Under some moderate conditions, we derive qualitative and quantitative convergence for the solutions obtained from solving the discretized two-stage stochastic LCP (SLCP). We explain how the discretized two-stage SLCP may be solved by the well-known progressive hedging method (PHM). Moreover, we extend the discussion by considering a two-stage distributionally robust LCP (DRLCP) with moment constraints and proposing a discretization scheme for the DRLCP. As an application, we show how the SLCP and DRLCP models can be used to study equilibrium arising from two-stage duopoly game where each player plans to set up its optimal capacity at present with anticipated competition for production in future.


Two-stage stochastic linear complementarity problem Discrete approximation Error bound Distributionally robust linear complementarity problem Ex post equilibrium 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90C15 90C33 65K15 


  1. 1.
    Anderson, E., Xu, H., Zhang, D.: Varying confidence levels for CVaR risk measures and minimax limits, manuscript, University of Sydney (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aghassi, M., Bertsimas, D.: Robust game theorey. Math. Program. 107, 231–273 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aumann, R.J.: Integrals of set-valued functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 12, 1–12 (1965)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Birge, J.R., Louveaux, F.: Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, X., Fukushima, M.: Expected residual minimization method for stochastic linear complementarity problems. Math. Oper. Res. 30, 1022–1038 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, X., Pong, T.K., Wets, R.: Two-stage stochastic variational inequalities: an ERM-solution procedure. Math. Program. 165, 71–111 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, X., Wets, R., Zhang, Y.: Stochastic variational inequalities: residual minimization smoothing/sample average approximations. SIAM J. Optim. 22, 649–673 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, X., Xiang, S.: Computation of error bounds for P-matrix linear complementarity problem. Math. Program. 106, 513–525 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, X., Xiang, S.: Perturbation bounds of P-matrix linear complementarity problems. SIAM J. Optim. 18, 1250–1265 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, X., Xiang, S.: Newton iterations in implicit time-stepping scheme for differential linear complementarity systems. Math. Program. 138, 579–606 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clarke, F.H.: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. Wiley, New York (1983)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cottle, R.W., Pang, J.-S., Stone, R.E.: The Linear Complementarity Problem. Academic Press, New York (1992)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crémer, J., McLean, R.: Optimal selling strategies under uncertainty for a discriminating monopolist when demands are interdependent. Econometrica 53, 345–362 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Wolf, D., Smeers, Y.: A stochastic version of a Stackelverg-Nash-Cournot equilibrium model. Manag. Sci. 43, 190–197 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Facchinei, F., Pang, J.-S.: Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems. Springer, New York (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gürkan, G., Özge, A.Y., Robinson, S.M.: Sample-path solution of stochastic variational inequalities. Math. Program. 84, 313–333 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hadjisavvas, N., Komlósi, S., Schaible, S.: Handbook of Generalized Convexity and Generalized Monotonicity. Springer, Boston (2005)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holmström, B., Myerson, R.: Efficient and durable decision rules with incomplete information. Econometrica 51, 1799–1820 (1983)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiang, H., Xu, H.: Stochastic approximation approaches to the stochastic variational inequality problem. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 53, 1462–1475 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, Y., Pichler, A., Xu, H.: Discrete approximation and quantification in distributionally robust optimization, to appear in Math. Oper. Res. (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    Luna, J.P., Sagastizbal, C., Solodov, M.: An approximation scheme for a class of risk-averse stochastic equilibrium problems. Math. Program. 157, 451–481 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 24.
    Ralph, D., Smeers, Y.: Pricing risk under risk measures: an introduction to stochastic-endogenous equilibria. Social Science Research Network (2011).
  23. 25.
    Ralph, D., Xu, H.: Convergence of stationary points of sample average two stage stochastic programs: a generalized equation approach. Math. Oper. Res. 36, 568–592 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 27.
    Rockafellar, R.T., Wets, R.J.-B.: Scenarios and policy aggregation in optimization under uncertainty. Math. Oper. Res. 16, 119–147 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 28.
    Rockafellar, R.T., Wets, R.J.-B.: Stochastic variational inequalities: single-stage to multistage. Math. Program. 165, 331–360 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 29.
    Rockafellar, R.T., Sun, J.: Solving monotone stochastic variational inequalities and complementarity problems by progressive hedging, to appear in Math. Program. (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 30.
    Rosen, J.B.: Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave \(N\)-person games. Econometrica 33, 520–534 (1965)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 31.
    Sherali, H.D., Soyster, A.L., Murphy, F.H.: Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot equilibria: characterizations and computations. Oper. Res. 31, 253–276 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 32.
    Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., Ruszczyński, A.: Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory. SIAM, Philadelphia (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 33.
    Wogrin, S., Hobbs, B.F., Ralph, D., Centeno, E., Barquin, J.: Open versus closed loop capacity equilibria in electricity markets under perfect and oligopolistic competition. Math. Program. 140, 295–322 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 34.
    Xu, H.: Uniform exponential convergence of sample average random functions under general sampling with applications in stochastic programming. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 368, 692–710 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 35.
    Xu, H.: An MPCC approach for stochastic Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot equilibrium. Optimization 54, 27–57 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 36.
    Xu, H., Liu, Y., Sun, S.: Distributionally robust optimization with matrix moment constraints: lagrange duality and cutting plane methods, to appear in Math. Program. (2017)Google Scholar
  34. 37.
    Xu, H.: Sample average approximation methods for a class of stochastic variational inequality problems. Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res. 27, 103–119 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 38.
    Xu, H.: An implicit programming approach for a class of stochastic mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 16, 670–696 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature and Mathematical Optimization Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongHong Kong
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  3. 3.School of MathematicsUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations