Novel system in vitro of classifying oral carcinogenesis based on feature extraction for gray-level co-occurrence matrix using scanned laser pico projector

Abstract

Oral cancer is among the top 10 causes of death due to cancer worldwide. The prognosis for oral cancer patients is not good, with a 5-year survival rate of only 50%. Earlier and more precise classification will help clinicians make a diagnosis and patients survive. With the advancement of technology, computer-aided detection methods are used to help clinicians form therapy strategies. Gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) feature extraction of images describing the spatial distribution of gray levels is widely used in medical imaging analysis. Scanned laser pico projector (SLPP) has advantages such as high intensity, directivity, coherence, and mono-color with low bandwidth. In this study, GLCM feature extraction and SLPP reflex images were combined to make a small, non-staining, noninvasive classification system. According to the various image characteristics in oral carcinogenesis, SLPP reflex images better define the borders and three-dimensional structures and provide effective GLCM features such as contrast, energy, and homogeneity to classify carcinogenesis in dysplastic oral keratinocyte (DOK) and normal oral keratinocyte (NOK) cells. Moreover, it also reliably classifies highly metastatic (HSC-3) and tongue cancer (CAL-27) cells. A promising computer-aided classification system for oral cancer was developed to build a reliable intraoral examination system for in situ computer-aided diagnosis in normal clinics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    (2018) Department of Statistics, 2017 Statistics of Causes of Death, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (R.O.C.). Taipei City. https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-3961-42866-2.html. Accessed 03 Jul 2020

  2. 2.

    (2018) Taiwan’s Leading Causes of Death in 2016, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (R.O.C.). Taipei City. https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-115-33347-2.html. Accessed 03 Jul 2020

  3. 3.

    Goel R, Moore W, Sumer B, Khan S, Sher D, Subramaniam RM (2017) Clinical practice in PET/CT for the management of head and neck squamous cell cancer. Am J Roentgenol 209(2):289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Molina D et al (2016) Influence of gray level and space discretization on brain tumor heterogeneity measures obtained from magnetic resonance images. Comput Biol Med 78:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kammerlander AA et al (2016) T1 mapping by CMR imaging: from histological validation to clinical implication. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9(1):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Phulari RG, Rathore RS, Talegaon TP (2016) Nuclear fractal dimension: a new objective approach for discriminating normal mucosa, dysplasia and carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 20(3):400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Das DK, Mitra P, Chakraborty C, Chatterjee S, Maiti AK, Bose S (2017) Computational approach for mitotic cell detection and its application in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Multidim Syst Sign Process 28(3):1031–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Klatt J et al (2014) Fractal dimension of time-resolved autofluorescence discriminates tumour from healthy tissues in the oral cavity. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 42(6):852–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Babincova M, Sourivong P, Leszczynska D, Babinec P (2004) Effects of GSM microwaves, pulsed magnetic field, and temperature on fractal dimension of brain tumors. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 20(5):1041–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Haralick R, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH (1975) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics 6:610-621. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4309314. Accessed 03 Jul 2020

  11. 11.

    Raheja JL, Kumar S, Chaudhary A (2013) Fabric defect detection based on GLCM and Gabor filter: a comparison. Optik - Int J Light Electron Optics 124(23):6469–6474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Freeman M, Champion M, Madhavan S (2009) Scanned laser pico-projectors: seeing the big picture (with a small device). Optics Photon News 20(5):28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Svilainis L (2018) 22 - LEDs for projectors, in Nitride semiconductor light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (Second Edition) In: J.J. Huang, H.-C. Kuo, and S.-C. Shen, (Eds.) Woodhead Publishing, pp. 737–760. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081019429000228. Accessed 03 Jul 2020

  14. 14.

    Chuang CH, Sung TW, Huang CL, Lo YL (2012) Relative two-dimensional nanoparticle concentration measurement based on scanned laser pico-projection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 173:281–287

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Huang CL, Chuang CH, Lo YL (2013) Evaluation of anisotropic chitosan hydrogels using analytical Mueller matrix method and scanned laser pico-projector. Carbohydr Polym 96(2):487–494

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lin X et al (2013) Surgery-related thrombosis critically affects the brain infarct volume in mice following transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. PLoS One 8(9):e75561

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hajjarian Z, Nia HT, Ahn S, Grodzinsky AJ, Jain RK, Nadkarni SK (2016) Laser speckle rheology for evaluating the viscoelastic properties of hydrogel scaffolds. Sci Rep 6:37949

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lam CT et al (2015) Design of a novel low cost point of care tampon (POCkeT) colposcope for use in resource limited settings. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0135869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Forastiere A, Koch W, Trotti A, Sidransky D (2001) Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 345(26):1890–1900

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lian M-J, Huang C-L (2019) Texture feature extraction of gray-level co-occurrence matrix for metastatic cancer cells using scanned laser pico-projection images. Lasers Med Sci 34(7):1503–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lloyd K, Rosin PL, Marshall D, Moore SC (2017) Detecting violent and abnormal crowd activity using temporal analysis of grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based texture measures. Mach Vis Appl 28(3):361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chang SE, Foster S, Betts D, Marnock WE (1992) DOK, a cell line established from human dysplastic oral mucosa, shows a partially transformed non-malignant phenotype. Int J Cancer 52(6):896–902

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gasparoni A, Fonzi L, Schneider GB, Wertz PW, Johnson GK, Squier CA (2004) Comparison of differentiation markers between normal and two squamous cell carcinoma cell lines in culture. Arch Oral Biol 49(8):653–664

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ohnishi Y, Lieger O, Attygalla M, Iizuka T, Kakudo K (2008) Effects of epidermal growth factor on the invasion activity of the oral cancer cell lines HSC3 and SAS. Oral Oncol 44(12):1155–1159

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chan KS, Koh CG, Li HY (2012) Mitosis-targeted anti-cancer therapies: where they stand, (in eng). Cell Death Dis 3:e411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pastushenko I, Blanpain C (2019) EMT transition states during tumor progression and metastasis. Trends Cell Biol 29(3):212–226

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kanesaka T et al (2018) Computer-aided diagnosis for identifying and delineating early gastric cancers in magnifying narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 87(5):1339–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Naaz F, Haider MR, Shafi S, Yar MS (2019) Anti-tubulin agents of natural origin: targeting taxol, vinca, and colchicine binding domains. Eur J Med Chem 171:310–331

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the College Student Research Scholarship of Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan under grant no. 107-2813-C-006-179-B.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chih-Ling Huang or Tzer-Min Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Approval by Ethical Commission is not needed.

Informed consent

Not applicable since there are no patients involved. All authors have viewed and agreed to the submission.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lian, MJ., Huang, CL. & Lee, TM. Novel system in vitro of classifying oral carcinogenesis based on feature extraction for gray-level co-occurrence matrix using scanned laser pico projector. Lasers Med Sci (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03215-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Carcinogenesis
  • Gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)
  • Oral cancer
  • Scanned laser pico projector (SLPP)