Biosafety materials used in the correct handling of low power laser equipment may interfere on the power delivered at the target tissue and, possibly, on the effects on biological tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interference of the use of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethylene (PEAD) protection materials on the output power of low power lasers. Two low power diode laser devices with different wavelengths (red and infrared) were used. For each wavelength, two protection materials and two evaluation times (before and after protection) were considered. The output power (mW) was measured with the tip positioned in close contact with the power meter receiver. Parametric statistical test, two-way ANOVA for repeated measures (protection material and time), was performed considering the level of significance of 5%. In respect to “time”, all groups had the output power reduced after placing the protective material (p < 0.05). Comparing the protection materials, the PEAD showed a greater reduction in output power than the PVC for both red and infrared wavelengths. It was concluded that, among the biosafety materials tested, PVC is the most suitable for the protection of the tip of the low power lasers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Milligan M, Arudchelvan Y, Gong SG (2017) Effects of two wattages of low-level laser therapy on orthodontic tooth movement. Arch Oral Biol 80:62–68
Carroll JD, Milward MR, Cooper PR, Hadis M, Palin WM (2014 May) Developments in low level light therapy (LLLT) for dentistry. Dent Mater 30(5):465–475
Machado GL, Kather JM (2002) Cross-infection control study used by dentists in Taubaté. Rev Biociênc 8(1):37–44 Portuguese
Porto ICCM, de Brito ACR, Parolia A (2013) Effect of cross infection control barriers used on the light-curing device tips on the cure depth of a resin composite. J Conserv Dent 16(3):224–228
Cavalcanti TM, Almeida-Barros RQ, Catão MHCV, Feitosa APA, Lins RDAU (2011) Knowledge of the physical properties and interaction of laser with biological tissue in dentistry. An Bras Dermatol 86(5):955–960
Henriques ACG, Cazal C, Castro JFL (2010) Action of lasertherapy in the process of cell proliferation and differentiation: literature review. Rev Col Bras Cir 37(4):295–302 Portuguese
Matos R, Novaes TF, Reyes A, De Benedetto MS, Mendes FM, Braga MM (2013) Influence of cross-infection control methods on performance of pen-type laser fluorescence in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci 28:185–192
Carvalho, Claudia Villela de. Controle da Infecção na Odontologia. Disponível em: .Página acessada em 01 de maio de 2020.
Pinelli C, Garcia PPNS, Campos JADB, Dotta EAV, Rabello AP (2011) Biosafety and dentistry: beliefs and attitudes of undergraduates on the control of cross infection. Saúde Soc 20(2):448–461 Portuguese
Pinto KMLP, de Paula CR (2003) Protocol on biosafety in the dental office: cost and time. Revista Biociências 9(4) Portuguese
Cardoso CT, Pinto JR Jr, Pereira EA, Barros LM, Freitas ABDA (2010) Contamination of composite resin tubes handled without protection barrier. Rev Odontol Bras Central 18(48):71–75 Portuguese
Warren DP, Rice HC, Powers JM (2000 Winter) Intensity of curing lights affected by barriers. J Dent Hyg 74(1):20–23
Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Lussi A (2008) The influence of PVC wrapping on the performance of two laser fluorescence devices on occlusal surfaces in vitro. J Am Dent Assoc 139(8):1105–1112
Oosthuysen J, Potgieter E, Blignaut E (2010) Compliance with infection control recommendations in South African dental practices: a review of studies published between 1990 and 2007. Int Dent J 60:181–189
Scott BA, Felix CA, Price RBT (2004) Effect of diposable infection control barriers on light output from dental curing lights. J Can Dent Assoc 70(2):105–110
McAndrew R, Lynch CD, Pavli M, Bannon A, Milward P (2011) The effect of disposable infection control barriers and physical damage on the power output of light curing units and light curing tips. Br Dent J 210:358–359
Coutinho M, Trevizam NC, Takayassu RN, Leme AA, Panfiglio SG (2013) Distance and protective barrier effects on the composite resin degree of conversion. Contemp Clin Dent 4(2):152–155
Coutinho FMB et al (2003) [Polyethylene: Main types, properties and applications]. Polímeros: Ciência e Tecnologia 13(1):01–13. Portuguese
Piva AM, Bahiense Neto M, Wiebeck H (1999) The Recycling of PVC in Brazil. Polímeros 9(4):195–200 Portuguese
Souza MA, Pessan LA, Antonio R Jr (2006) Nanocomposites of polyvinyl chloride (pvc)/organophilic clays. Polímeros 16(4):257–262 Portuguese
Castelhano FJ, Roseghini WFF (2011) [The use of polyvinyl chloride (pvc) in the construction of meteorological miniabrigos for field application]. Revista Brasileira de Climatologia, [Sl] 9:2237–8642. Portuguese
Vinhas GM, Souto-Maior RM, Almeida YMB (2005) Study of modified PVC properties with alkyl and benzyl groups. Polímeros 15(3):207–211 Portuguese
Lins RDAU, Dantas EM, Lucena KCR, Catão MHCV, GranvilleGarcia AF, Carvalho Neto LG (2010) Biostimulating effects of low power laser in the repair process. An Bras Dermatol 85(6):849–855 Portuguese
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rodrigues, F.C.N., de Araújo, J.G.L., dos Santos Araújo, E.M. et al. Influence of biosafety materials of the laser output power. Lasers Med Sci 36, 311–315 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03030-1
- Polyvinyl chloride