Abstract
This paper focuses on the flexibility feature of the Flexible and Interactive Tradeoff (FITradeoff) multicriteria method for preference modeling. This method is based on the additive aggregation of criteria and using partial (incomplete; imprecise) information to be obtained from a Decision Maker (DM). The flexibility in FITradeoff for preference modeling has already considered two different perspectives: holistic evaluations and elicitation by decomposition based on the classical tradeoff procedure. This paper introduces a new feature in the flexibility of FITradeoff by combining and integrating these two paradigms: Holistic evaluations and elicitation by decomposition. This combination improves the preference modeling process, since it increases its efficiency and consistency. The use of results from behavioral studies is briefly presented. These results include those that arise from using neuroscience tools in order to modulate changes in the design of the Decision Support System and also from improving the decision process by supporting the way the analyst can interact with the DM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bana e Costa CA, De Corte J-M, Vansnick J-C (2005) On the mathematical foundation of MACBETH. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, New York, pp 409–437
Barberis N, Xiong W (2009) What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. J Finance 64(2):751–784
Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Springer, Berlin
Borcherding K, Eppel T, von Winterfeldt D (1991) Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement. Manag Sci 37(12):1603–1619
Camilo DGG, de Souza RP, Frazão TDC, da Costa Junior JF (2020) Multi-criteria analysis in the health area: selection of the most appropriate triage system for the emergency care units in natal. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 20(1):1–16
Carrillo PAA, Roselli LRP, Frej EA, de Almeida AT (2018) Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method. Ann Oper Res 270:1–16
Chuang H, Lin C, Chen Y (2015) Exploring the triple reciprocity nature of organizational value cocreation behavior using multicriteria decision making analysis. Math Probl Eng 2015:1–15
Ciomek K, Kadzinski M, Tervonen T (2017) Heuristics for selecting pair-wise elicitation questions in multiple criteria choice problems. Eur J Oper Res 262:693–707
de Almeida AT, Roselli LRP (2017) Visualization for decision support in FITradeoff method: exploring its evaluation with cognitive neuroscience. Lecture notes in business information processing, 282nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–73
de Almeida AT, Roselli LRP (2020) NeuroIS to improve the FITradeoff decision-making process and decision support system. In: Proceedings of the NeuroIS retreat 2020
de Almeida AT, Cavalcante CAV, Alencar MH, Ferreira RJP, de Almeida-Filho AT, Garcez TV (2015) Multicriteria and multiobjective models for risk, reliability and maintenance decision analysis. Springer, Berlin
de Almeida AT, Almeida JA, Costa APCS, Almeida-Filho AT (2016) A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff. Eur J Oper Res 250(1):179–191
de Almeida AT, Roselli LRP, Costa APCS, Goncalves JMS, Andrade AL (2018) Decision process improvement based on behavioral experiments of multi-attribute choices with graphical visualization. In: Society of NeuroEconomics, 16th, proceedings, Philadelphia, US
de Almeida A, Roselli L, Costa Morais D, Costa A (2020a) Neuroscience tools for behavioural studies in group decision and negotiation. In: Kilgour DM, Eden C (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, Berlin
de Almeida A, Frej EA, Costa Morais D, Costa A (2020b) Multiple criteria group decisions with partial information about preference. In: Kilgour DM, Eden C (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, Berlin
de Gusmao APH, Pereira Medeiros C (2016) A model for selecting a strategic information system using the FITradeoff. Math Prob Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7850960
de Loof E, Vassena E, Janssens C, de Taeye L, Meurs A, Van Roost D, Verguts T (2019) Preparing for hard times: scalp and intracranial physiological signatures of proactive cognitive control. Psychophysiology 56:10
de Macedo PP, de Miranda Mota CM, Sola AVH (2018) Meeting the Brazilian energy efficiency law: a flexible and interactive multicriteria proposal to replace non-efficient motors. Sustain Cities Soc 41:822–832
Dell’Ovo M, Frej EA, Oppio A, Capolongo S, Morais DC, de Almeida AT (2017) Multicriteria decision making for healthcare facilities location with visualization based on FITradeoff method. In: International conference on decision support system technology. Springer, Cham, pp 32–44
Dimoka A, Pavlou PA, Davis FD (2007) Neuro-IS: the potential of cognitive neuroscience for information systems research. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on information systems, pp 1–20
Camara e Silva L, Daher SDFD, Santiago KTM, Costa APCS (2019) Selection of an integrated security area for locating a state military police station based on MCDM/A method. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, pp 1530–1534
Edwards W, Barron FH (1994) SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 60(3):306–325
Eisenführ F, Weber M, Langer T (2010) Rational decision making. Springer, Heidelberg
Fehr E, Camerer CF (2007) Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends Cogn Sci 11(10):419–427
Fossile DK, Frej EA, da Costa SEG, de Lima EP, de Almeida AT (2020) Selecting the most viable renewable energy source for Brazilian ports using the FITradeoff method. J Clean Prod 260:121107
Frej EA, de Almeida AT (2016) Multicriteria group decision model for supplier selection in a food industry. In: Proceedings of international conference on group decision and negotiation, vol 1, Bellingham, US, pp 60–62
Frej EA, Roselli LRP, Araújo de Almeida J, de Almeida AT (2017) A multicriteria decision model for supplier selection in a food industry based on FITradeoff method. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4541914
Frej EA, de Almeida AT, Costa APCS (2019) Using data visualization for ranking alternatives with partial information and interactive tradeoff elicitation. Oper Res 19:1–23
Frej EA, Ekel P, de Almeida AT (2021) A benefit-to-cost ratio based approach for portfolio selection under multiple criteria with incomplete preference information. Inf Sci 545:487–498
Glimcher PW, Rustichini A (2004) Neuroeconomics: the consilience of brain and decision. Science 5695:447–452
Górecka D, Roszkowska E, Wachowicz T (2016) The MARS approach in the verbal and holistic evaluation of the negotiation template. Gr Decis Negot 25(6):1097–1136
Goucher-Lambert K, Moss J, Cagan J (2017) Inside the mind: using neuroimaging to understand moral product preference judgments involving sustainability. J Mech Des 139(4):041–103
Greco S, Słowiński R, Zielniewicz P (2013) Putting dominance-based rough set approach and robust ordinal regression together. Decis Support Syst 54(2):891–903
Hines WW, Montgomery DC (1990) Probability and statistics in engineering and management science. Wiley, New York
Holm A, Lukander K, Korpela J, Sallinen M, Müller KMI (2009) Estimating brain load from the EEG. Sci World J 9:639–651
Hunt LT, Dolan RJ, Behrens TE (2014) Hierarchical competitions subserving multi-attribute choice. Nat Neurosci 17(11):1613
Jacquet-Lagreze E, Siskos J (1982) Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method. Eur J Oper Res 10(2):151–164
Kadziński M, Ciomek K, Słowiński R (2015) Modeling assignment-based pairwise comparisons within integrated framework for value-driven multiple criteria sorting. Eur J Oper Res 241(3):830–841
Kang THA, Júnior AMDCS, de Almeida AT (2018) Evaluating electric power generation technologies: a multicriteria analysis based on the FITradeoff method. Energy 165:10–20
Kang THA, Frej EA, de Almeida AT (2020) Flexible and interactive tradeoff elicitation for multicriteria sorting problems. Asia Pac J Oper Res 37:2050020
Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decision analysis with multiple conflicting objectives. Wiley, New York
Kenning P, Plassmann H (2005) NeuroEconomics: an overview from an economic perspective. Brain Res Bull 67(5):343–354
Khushaba RN, Wise C, Kodagoda S, Louviere J, Kahn BE, Townsend C (2013) Consumer neuroscience: assessing the brain response to marketing stimuli using electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking. Expert Syst Appl 40(9):3803–3812
Korhonen P, Wallenius J (1997) Behavioral issues in MCDM: neglected research questions. Multicriteria analysis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 412–422
Lima ES, Viegas RA, Costa APCS (2017) A multicriteria method based approach to the BPMM selection problem. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, pp 3334–3339
Linkov I, Cormier S, Gold J, Satterstrom FK, Bridges T (2012) Using our brains to develop better policy. Risk Anal Int J 32(3):374–380
Loewenstein G, Rick S, Cohen JD (2008) Neuroeconomics. Annu Rev Psychol 59:647–672
Macdonald JSP, Mathan S, Yeung N (2011) Trial-by-trial variations in subjective attentional state are reflected in ongoing prestimulus EEG alpha oscillations. Front Psychol 2:82
Mendes JAJ, Frej EA, de Almeida AT, Almeida JA (2020) Evaluation of flexible and interactive tradeoff method based on numerical simulation experiments. Pesquisa Operacional 40:1–25
Monte MBS, Morais DC (2019) A decision model for identifying and solving problems in an urban water supply system. Water Resour Manag 33(14):4835–4848
Morin C (2011) Neuromarketing: the new science of consumer behavior. Society 48(2):131–135
Nermend K (2017) The implementation of cognitive neuroscience techniques for fatigue evaluation in participants of the decision-making process. In: Neuroeconomic and behavioral aspects of decision making. Springer, Cham, pp 329–339
Özerol G, Karasakal E (2008) A parallel between regret theory and outranking methods for multicriteria decision making under imprecise information. Theory Decis 65(1):45–70
Pergher I, Frej EA, Roselli LRP, de Almeida AT (2020) Integrating simulation and FITradeoff method for scheduling rules selection in job-shop production systems. Int J Prod Econ 227:107669
Riedl R, Davis FD, Hevner AR (2014) Towards a NeuroIS research methodology: intensifying the discussion on methods, tools, and measurement. J Assoc Inf Syst 15(10):4
Roselli LRP, de Almeida AT (2019a) Investigating graphical visualization in FITradeoff method with neuroscience using EEG and eye-tracker. Local proceedings for group decision and negotiation. In: 19th international conference on group decision and negotiation, Loughborough
Roselli LRP, de Almeida AT (2019b) Analyzing graphical visualization for multi-attribute decision making using EEG and eye-tracker. In: NeuroPsychoEconomics conference, Rome. Poster section
Roselli LRP, de Almeida AT (2020a) Analysis of graphical visualizations for multi-criteria decision making in FITradeoff method using a decision neuroscience experiment. Lecture notes in business information processing, 384th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 42–54
Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T. (2020b). Improvements in the FITradeoff decision support system for ranking order problematic based in a behavioral study with NeuroIS tools. In: Davis FD et al (eds) Lecture notes in information systems and organization, LNISO, 43edn. NeuroIS, pp 1–12
Roselli LRP, Frej EA, de Almeida AT (2018a) Neuroscience experiment for graphical visualization in the FITradeoff decision support system. In: Chen Y, Kersten G, Vetschera R, Xu H (eds) Group decision and negotiation in an uncertain world. GDN 2018. Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 315
Roselli LRP, Frej EA, de Almeida AT (2018b) Improving graphical visualization in the FITradeoff DSS using neuroscience experiment. In: 2018 INFORMS international conference. Proceedings of the 2018 INFORMS international conference, Taipei
Roselli LRP, de Almeida AT, Frej EA (2019a) Decision neuroscience for improving data visualization of decision support in the FITradeoff method. Oper Res Int J 19:1–21
Roselli LRP, Pereira LS, Silva ALCL, de Almeida AT, Morais DC, Costa APCS (2019b) Neuroscience experiment applied to investigate decision-maker behavior in the tradeoff elicitation procedure. Ann Oper Res 289:1–18
Silva ALCL, Costa APCS (2019) FITradeoff decision support system: an exploratory study with neuroscience tools. In: NeuroIS retreat 2019, Viena. NeuroIS retreat
Silva MM, de Gusmão APH, de Andrade CTA, Silva W (2019) The integration of VFT and FITradeoff multicriteria method for the selection of WCM projects. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, pp 1513–1517
Silva ALCL, Costa APCS, de Almeida AT (2021) Exploring cognitive aspects of FITradeof method using neuroscience tools. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03894-0
Siskos E, Askounis D, Psarras J (2014) Multicriteria decision support for global e-government evaluation. Omega 46:51–63
Siskos Y, Grigoroudis E, Matsatsinis NF (2016) UTA methods. In: Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira J (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis. International series in operations research & management science, vol 233. Springer, New York
Smith DV, Huettel SA (2010) Decision neuroscience: neuroeconomics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 1(6):854–871
Tikidji-Hamburyan RA, Kropat E, Weber G-W (2020) Preface: operations research in neuroscience II. Ann Oper Res 289(1):1–4
Trepel C, Fox CR, Poldrack RA (2005) Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk. Cogn Brain Res 23(1):34–50
Waegeman W, De Baets B, Boullart L (2009) Kernel-based learning methods for preference aggregation. 4OR 7(2):169–189
Wallenius H, Wallenius J (2020) Implications of world mega trends for MCDM research. In: Ben Amor S, de Almeida A, de Miranda J, Aktas E (eds) Advanced studies in multi-criteria decision making. Series in operations research, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, pp 1–10
Weber M (1987) Decision making with incomplete information. Eur J Oper Res 28(1):44–57
Weber M, Borcherding K (1993) Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multi attribute decision making. Eur J Oper Res 67:1–12
Zhao Y, Zhao X, Wang L, Chen Y, Zhang X (2016) Does elicitation method matter? Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence from capacity allocation game. Prod Oper Manag 25(5):919–934
Acknowledgements
This work had partial support from the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) and FACEPE (Foundation for Research in the State of Pernambuco).
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco under Grant Nos. APQ-0484-3.08/17, APQ-0370-3.08/14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Almeida, A.T., Frej, E.A. & Roselli, L.R.P. Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff. Cent Eur J Oper Res 29, 7–47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00728-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00728-z