Abstract
The main objective of this research is to test the hypothesis that the two-step structural equation modelling (SEM) and artificial neural network (ANN) approach enables better in-depth research results as compared to the single-step SEM approach. This approach was used to determine which factors have statistically significant influence on extended use of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. The research model and the hypothesized relationships are based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Majority of research on ERP acceptance has been conducted with SEM based research approaches. The purpose of this paper is to extend basic TAM research which is traditionally based on SEM technique with ANN approach. In the first step of the present research the SEM technique was used to determine which factors have statistically significant influence on extended use of the ERP systems; in the second step, ANN models were used to rank the relative influence of significant predictors obtained from SEM. The main finding of this research is that the use of multi-analytical two step SEM–ANN approach provides two important benefits. First, it enables additional verification of the results obtained by the SEM analysis. Second, this approach enables capturing not only linear but also complex nonlinear relationships between antecedents and dependent variables and more precise measure of relative influence of each predictor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahani A, Rahim NZA, Nilasi M (2017) Forecasting social CRM adoption in SMEs: a combined SEM–neural network method. Comput Hum Behav 75:560–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.032
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.032
Amoako-Gyampah K, Salam AF (2004) An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inf Manag 41:731–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010
Bradley J, Lee CC (2007) ERP training and user satisfaction: a case study. Int J Enterp Inf Syst 3(4):33–55. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2007100103
Bueno S, Salmeron JL (2008) TAM-based success modelling in ERP. Interact Comput 20(6):515–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.08.003
Calisir F, Gumussoy CA, Bayram A (2009) Predicting the behavioural intention to use enterprise resource planning systems—an exploratory extension of the technology acceptance model. Manag Res News 32(7):597–613. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170910965215
Chan FTS, Chong AYL (2012) A SEM–neural network approach for understanding determinants of interorganizational system standard adoption and performances. Decis Support Syst 54:621–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.009
Chin WW (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modelling. MIS Q 22(1):7–16
Chin WW et al (1996) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo study and voice mail emotion/adoption study. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth international conference on information systems, Cleveland, OH
Chong AYL (2013a) Predicting m-commerce adoption determinants: a neural network approach. Expert Syst Appl 40:523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.068
Chong AYL (2013b) A two-staged SEM–neural network approach for understanding and predicting the determinants of m-commerce adoption. Expert Syst Appl 40(4):1240–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.067
Chong AYL, Bai R (2014) Predicting open IOS adoption in SMEs: an integrated SEM–neural network approach. Expert Syst Appl 41(1):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.023
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurements errors. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50
Garson GD (2016) Partial least squares: regression and structural equation models. Statistical Associates Publishers, Asheboro
Gnana Sheela K, Deepa SN (2013) Review on methods to fix number of hidden neurons in neural networks. Math Probl Eng 2013:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/425740
Hackle P, Wsestlud A (2000) On structural equation modelling for customer satisfaction measurement. Total Qual Manag 11:820–825
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Chall Int Mark 20:277–319
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant vaidity in variance-based structural equation modelling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA (2016) Using PLS path modelling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Ind Manag Data Syst 116(1):2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Hew T-S, Leong L-Y, Ooi K-B, Chong AY-L (2016) Predicting drivers of mobile entertainment adoption: a two-stage SEM–artificial-neural-network analysis. J Comput Inf Syst 56(4):352–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1164497
Hew J-J, Badaruddin MNBA, Moorthy MK (2017) Crafting a smartphone repurchase decision making process: do brand attachment and gender matter? Telemat Inform 34(4):34–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.12.009
Hew J-J, Leong L-Y, Tan GW-H, Lee V-H, Ooi K-B (2018) Mobile social tourism shopping: a dual-stage analysis of a multi-mediation model. Tour Manag 66:121–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.10.005
Hsieh JJPA, Wang W (2007) Explaining employees’ extended use of complex information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 16(3):216–227. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000663
Hsu S-H, Chen W-H, Hsieh M-J (2006) Robustness testing of PLS, LISREL, EQS and ANN-based SEM for measuring customer satisfaction. Total Qual Manag 17(3):355–371
Hwang YJ (2005) Investigating enterprise systems adopting: uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation and the technology acceptance model. Eur J Inf Syst 14(2):150–161. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000532
Jimoh L, Eshiemokhai E, Hambali Z (2014) Bibliometric analysis of international journal of research in education, 2004–2012. Inf Knowl Manag 4(12):42–48
Kwahk K-Y, Lee JN (2008) The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: theoretical bases and empirical validation. Inf Manag 45(7):474–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.07.002
Lee DH, Lee SM, Olson DL, Chung SH (2010) The effect of organizational support on ERP implementation. Ind Manag Data Syst 110(2):269–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011020340
Leong L-Y, Hew T-S, Tan GWH, Ooi KB (2013) Predicting the determinants of the NFC-enabled mobile credit card acceptance: a neural network approach. Expert Syst Appl 40:5604–5620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.018
Leong L-Y, Hew T-S, Lee V-H, Ooi K-B (2015) An SEM–artificial-neural-network analysis of the relationships between SERVPERF, customer satisfaction and loyalty among low-cost and full service airline. Expert Syst Appl 42:6620–6634
Li Y, He T, Song Y, Yang Z, Zhou R (2018) Factors impacting donors’ intention to donate to charitable crowd-funding projects in china: a UTAUT-based model. Inf Commun Soc 21(3):404–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1282530
Liébana-Cabanillas F, Marinković V, Kalinić Z (2017) A SEM–neural network approach for predicting antecedents of m-commerce acceptance. Int J Inf Manag 37:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.10.008
Liébana-Cabanillas F, Marinkovic V, Ramos de Luna I, Kalinic Z (2018) Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: a hybrid SEM–neural network approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change 5:254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.015
Liu L, Ma Q (2006) Perceived system performance: a test of an extended technology acceptance model. J Organ End User Comput 18(3):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/1161345.1161354
Lu J, Chun-Sheng Y, Liu C, Yao JE (2003) Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Res Electron Network Appl Policy 13(3):206–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240310478222
Mei B, Brown GTL, Teo T (2018) Toward an understanding of preservice english as a foreign language teachers’ acceptance of computer-assisted language learning 2.0 in the People’s republic of China. J Educ Comput Res 56(1):74–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117700144
Nah FF, Tan X, Teh SH (2004) An empirical investigation on end-users’ acceptance of enterprise systems. Inf Resour Manag J 17(3):32–53. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2004070103
Negnevitsky M (2011) Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Essex
Ooi K-B, Tan GWH (2016) Mobile technology acceptance model: an investigation using mobile users to explore smartphone credit card. Expert Syst Appl 59:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.015
Panahian H (2011) Stock market index forecasting by neural networks models and nonlinear multiple regression modeling: study of Iran’s capital market. Am J Sci Res 18:35–51
Priyadarshinee P, Raut RD, Jha MK, Gardas BB (2017) Understanding and predicting the determinants of cloud computing adoption: a two staged hybrid SEM–neural networks approach. Comput Hum Behav 76:341–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.027
Pu X, Chan FTS, Chong AYL (2016) Development of a unified open e-logistics standards diffusion model for manufacturing supply chain integrations. In: PACIS 2016 proceedings Pacific Asia conference on information systems
Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker J-M (2015) SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. http://www.smartpls.com. Accessed 8 Feb 2016
Roy SK, Balaji MS, Kesharwani A, Sekhon H (2017) Predicting Internet banking adoption in India: a perceived risk perspective. J Strateg Mark 25(5–6):418–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2016.1148771
Sánchez-Mena A, Martí-Parreño J, Aldás-Manzano J (2018) Teachers’ intention to use educational video games: the moderating role of gender and age. Innov Educ Teach Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1433547
Scherer R, Tondeur J, Siddiq F, Baran E (2018) The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: comparing structural equation modelling approaches. Comput Hum Behav 80:67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003
Sezgin E, Özkan-Yildirim S, Yildirim S (2018) Understanding the perception towards using mHealth applications in practice: physicians’ perspective. Inf Dev 34(2):182–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916684180
Sharma SK (2017) Integrating cognitive antecedents into TAM to explain mobile banking behavioral intention: a SEM–neural network modelling. Inf Syst Front. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9775-x
Sharma SK, Joshi A, Sharma H (2016) A multi-analytical approach to predict the Facebook usage in higher education. Comput Hum Behav 55:340–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.020
Shibata K, Ikeda Y (2009) Effect of number of hidden neurons on learning in large-scale layered neural networks. In: Proceedings of the ICROS-SICE international joint conference 2009 (ICCASSICE’09), pp 5008–5013
Shih YY, Huang SS (2009) The actual usage of ERP systems: an extended technology acceptance perspective. J Res Pract Inf Technol 41(3):263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010
Shivers-Blackwell SL, Charles AC (2006) Ready, set, go: examining student readiness to use ERP technology. J Manag Dev 25(8):795–805. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610684268
Sim JJ, Tan GW-H, Wong JCJ, Ooi K-B, Hew T-S (2014) Understanding and predicting the motivators of mobile music acceptance—a multi stage MRA-Artificial neural network approach. Telemat Inform 31:569–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.11.005
Sternad S, Bobek S (2013) TAM-based external factors related to ERP solutions acceptance in organizations. Int J Inf Syst Proj Manag 1(4):25–38
Sternad S, Bobek S (2014) ERP business solutions acceptance in companies. In: Chatterjee SR (ed) Managing in recovering markets (Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics). Springer, New Delhi, pp 283–294
Sternad S, Gradišar M, Bobek S (2011) The influence of external factors on routine ERP usage. Ind Manag Data Syst 111(9):1511–1530. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111182818
Sun Y, Bhattacherjee A, Ma Q (2009) Extending technology usage to work settings: the role of perceived work compatibility in ERP implementation. Inf Manag 46(6):351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.06.003-
Tabachnick GB, Fidell LS (2013) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson, Boston
Tan GW-H, Ooi K-B, Leong L-Y, Lin B (2014) Predicting the drivers of behavioral intention to use mobile learning: a hybrid SEM–neural networks approach. Comput Hum Behav 36:198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.052
Teo A-C, Tan GW-H, Ooi K-B, Hew T-S, Yew K-T (2015) The effects of convenience and speed in m-payment. Ind Manag Data Syst 115(2):311–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2014-0231
Trenn S (2008) Multilayer perceptrons: approximation order and necessary number of hidden units. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 19(5):836–844
Umble EJ, Haft RR, Umble MM (2002) Enterprise resource planning: implementation procedures and CSF. Eur J Oper Res 146(2):241–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00547-7
Uzoka FME, Abiola RO, Nyangeresi R (2008) Influence of product and organizational constructs on erp acquisition using an extended technology acceptance model. Int J Enterp Inf Syst 4(2):67–83. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2008040105
Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2011) Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsl 7(3):50–54
Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci 39(2):273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–205. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wallace TF, Kremzar MH (2001) ERP: making it happen—the implementer’s guide to success with enterprise resource planning. Wiley, New York
Yadav R, Sharma SK, Tarhini A (2016) A multi-analytical approach to understand and predict the mobile commerce adoption. J Enterp Inf Manag 29(2):222–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2015-0034
Youngberg E, Olsen D, Hauser K (2009) Determinants of professionally autonomous end user acceptance in an enterprise resource planning system environment. Int J Inf Manage 29(2):138–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.06.001
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, as a part of Research Project III-44010, titled: Intelligent Systems for Software Product Development and Business Support based on Models and by the Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding No. P5-0023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sternad Zabukovšek, S., Kalinic, Z., Bobek, S. et al. SEM–ANN based research of factors’ impact on extended use of ERP systems. Cent Eur J Oper Res 27, 703–735 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0592-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0592-1