Skip to main content
Log in

Ranking of countries in sporting events using two-stage data envelopment analysis models: a case of Summer Olympic Games 2016

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After important sport events as the Summer Olympic Games (SOG) are, the participating countries are ranked according to the number of gold, silver and bronze medals. A lexicographic ranking is usually applied in official reports which leads to higher ranking of countries with one gold and no other medals comparing to countries without any gold but with several silver or bronze medals. Moreover, this ranking does not take into account the specific conditions of the countries (population, economic strength measured by gross domestic product and tradition in sports). The aim of the paper is not only to evaluate the absolute achievements of the countries but evaluate their performance with respect to the resources they can spent. A two-stage data envelopment analysis model is formulated and solved by an original slack-based measure procedure. The first stage evaluates the performance of the countries in training of athletes and the second stage evaluates the achievements of the nominated athletes. The models with variable returns to scale and weight restrictions are applied. The models and their results are illustrated on the case of Olympic Games 2016 and compared with results given by traditional approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 39:1261–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30:1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Liang L, Zhu J (2009) Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches. Eur J Oper Res 193:600–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churilov L, Flitman A (2006) Towards fair ranking of Olympics achievements: the case of Sydney 2000. Comput Oper Res 33:2057–2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán I, Morrow S (2007) Measuring efficiency and productivity in professional football teams: evidence from the English Premier League. Cent Eur J Oper Res 15:309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonsky J (2012) Multicriteria approaches for ranking of efficient units in DEA models. Cent Eur J Oper Res 20:435–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonsky J (2014) MS Excel based software support tools for decision problems with multiple criteria. Procedia Econ Finance 12:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Hwang SN (2008) Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 185:418–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Liang L, Chen Y, Morita H (2008) Models for measuring and benchmarking Olympics achievements. Omega 36:933–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Lei X, Dai Q, Liang L (2015) Performance evaluation of participating nation at the 2012 London Summer Olympics by a two-stage data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 243:964–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lins MPE, Gomes EG, de Mello JCS, de Mello AJS (2003) Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model. Eur J Oper Res 148:312–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano S, Villa G, Guerrero F, Cortés P (2002) Measuring the performance of nations at the Summer Olympics using data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 53:501–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardani A, Jusoh A, Nor K, Khalifah Z, Zakwan N, Valipour A (2015) Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications—a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ Res Ekonomska Istrazivanja 28:516–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirouyehzad H, Yazdani F (2014) Performance evaluation and ranking of participation Asian countries in 2012 London Olympic Games through data envelopment analysis. J Data Envel Anal Decis Sci 3:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedemann T, Francksen T, Latacz-Lohmann U (2011) Assessing the performance of German Bundesliga football players: a non-parametric metafrontier approach. Cent Eur J Oper Res 19:571–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Liang L, Yang F (2009a) Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation method. Eur J Oper Res 197:722–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Liang L, Chen Y (2009b) DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings. Omega 37:909–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Li X, Meng W, Liu W (2009) Measuring the performance of nations at the Olympic Games using DEA models with different preferences. J Oper Res Soc 60:983–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is supported by the Czech Science Foundation, Project No. 16-01821S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josef Jablonsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jablonsky, J. Ranking of countries in sporting events using two-stage data envelopment analysis models: a case of Summer Olympic Games 2016. Cent Eur J Oper Res 26, 951–966 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0537-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0537-8

Keywords

Navigation