Current municipal solid waste management in the cities of Astana and Almaty of Kazakhstan and evaluation of alternative management scenarios

  • V. J. Inglezakis
  • K. Moustakas
  • G. Khamitova
  • D. Tokmurzin
  • Y. Sarbassov
  • R. Rakhmatulina
  • B. Serik
  • Y. Abikak
  • S. G. Poulopoulos
Original Paper
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The present paper provides a detailed analysis of the current situation on municipal solid waste (MSW) management in Kazakhstan with focus on the two major cities, Astana and Almaty, the current and former capital of the country. Untill recently, ninety-seven percent of the MSW was disposed in open dumps and substandard authorized landfills. Ninety-three percent of the 4530 municipal waste disposal landfills were not permitted, while from the 307 authorized waste disposal facilities, only the one in the city of Astana was designed in accordance with international standards (2015). Core legislation, current management policy, existing and planned facilities and infrastructure, as well as solid waste quantity and composition are discussed. The analysis is complemented by the implementation of a decision support software tool, which provides insights in waste management needs and evaluates the alternative waste management plans. Six alternative scenarios were evaluated, and the results obtained demonstrate that the optimum scenario is separation at source for both biowaste, which is composted and packaging waste processed via the materials recovery facility. Regarding the residual waste, the optimum scenario for Astana is mechanical biological treatment (MBT)-composting-recyclables and waste-to-energy for the refuse-derived fuel (RDF). For Almaty, 80% of the waste should be processed through MBT-composting-recyclables, and 20% via incineration and RDF. The results obtained can contribute to solid waste management planning in Kazakhstan and other Central Asian countries.

Keywords

Municipal solid waste Decision support software tool Almaty Astana Kazakhstan 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by the internal fund for research of Nazarbayev University (ORAU), project title “Development of municipal solid waste combustion and incineration technology for Astana (Kazakhstan) and investigation of municipal solid waste blending effects on reactivity of coals in CFB combustion and gasification processes” (Research Council Decision No. 98 of 04.04.2017). Also, the research team would like to thank Professor George Stavrakakis, Technical University of Crete, Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering (Greece), for his permission to make use of the DSS tool. The tool was developed by TUC in collaboration with Dr. Vassilis J. Inglezakis and other experts in the framework of the BALWASTE project, LIFE07ENV/RO/686, funded by the European Commission (2009–2011).

References

  1. Aleluia J, Ferrão P (2016) Characterization of urban waste management practices in developing Asian countries: a new analytical framework based on waste characteristics and urban dimension. Waste Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.008 Google Scholar
  2. Alhumoud JM (2005) Municipal solid waste recycling in the Gulf Co-operation Council states. Resour Conserv Recycl 45:142–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Jarallah R, Aleisa E (2014) A baseline study characterizing the municipal solid waste in the State of Kuwait. Waste Manag 34:952–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambăruş M et al (2012) Application of an innovative decision support software tool for assessing different waste management scenarios for the case of North–East Region in Romania. In: International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management, Athens, Greece, 28–29 June 2012Google Scholar
  5. ASD (2013) About municipal waste within their public collection and disposal, sorting and depositing of waste. Almaty Statistics Department, AlmatyGoogle Scholar
  6. Bani M, Rashid Z, Hamid K, Harbawi M, Alias A, Aris M (2009) The development of decision support system for waste management; a review. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 49:161–168Google Scholar
  7. Burnley SJ, Ellis JC, Flowerdew R, Poll AJ, Prosser H (2007) Assessing the composition of municipal solid waste in Wales. Resour Conserv Recycl 49:264–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang NB, Qi C, Islam K, Hossain F (2012) Comparisons between global warming potential and cost–benefit criteria for optimal planning of a municipal solid waste management system. J Clean Prod 2:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen H, Zhang L, Zhou J, Hu J (2011) Development of municipal solid waste management practices in different geographical units and urban systems in China. Environ Eng 10:945–949Google Scholar
  10. Coelho L, Lange L, Coelho H (2017) Multi-criteria decision making to support waste management: a critical review of current practices and methods. Waste Manag Res 35:3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Concept (2013) Concept for transition of the Republic of Kazakhstan to Green Economy, Approved by Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan on May 30, 2013 #557Google Scholar
  12. Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A31999L0031
  13. de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Jabbour CJC, Sarkis J, Govindan K (2014) Brazil’s new national policy on solid waste: challenges and opportunities. Clean Technol Environ 16:7–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deus RM, Battistelle RAG, Silva GHR (2017) Scenario evaluation for the management of household solid waste in small Brazilian municipalities. Clean Technol Environ 19:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (Text with EEA relevance). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008L0098
  16. European Parliament and Council Directive 1994/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A31994L0062
  17. Garnett K, Cooper T, Longhurst P, Jude S, Tyrrel S (2017) A conceptual framework for negotiating public involvement in municipal waste management decision-making in the UK. Waste Manag 66:210–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garrido-Baserba M, Reif R, Molinos-Senante M, Larrea L, Castillo A, Verdaguer M, Poch M (2016) Application of a multi-criteria decision model to select of design choices for WWTPs. Clean Technol Environ 18:1097–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghinea C, Petraru M, Bressers HTA, Gavrilescu M (2012) Environmental evaluation of waste management scenarios—significance of the boundaries. J Environ Eng Landsc 20:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Han GSA, Bektaş N, Öncel MS (2010) Separate collection practice of packaging waste as an example of Kücükcekmece, Istanbul, Turkey. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:1317–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. He G, Mol APJ, Lu Y (2016) Wasted cities in urbanizing China. Environ Dev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.12.003i Google Scholar
  22. Hokkanen J, Salminen P (1997) Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 98:19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inglezakis V et al (2014) Analysis Of current situation in municipal waste management and implementation of decision support software in the Astana, Kazakhstan. In: 5th International Symposium on Energy from Biomass and Waste (Venice 2014 Symposium), Venice, Italy, 17–20 Nov 2014Google Scholar
  24. Inglezakis V, Ambăruş M, Ardeleanu N, Moustakas K, Loizidou M (2016) Waste management in Romania: current data and application of a decision support tool. Environ Eng Manag J 15:511–519Google Scholar
  25. IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, chapter 2: waste generation, composition and management data. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  26. Karak T, Bhagat R, Bhattacharyya P (2012) Municipal solid waste generation, composition, and management: the world scenario. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42:1509–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kayakutlu G, Daim T, Kunt M, Altay A, Suharto Y (2017) Scenarios for regional waste management. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 74:1323–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khajuria A, Yamamoto U, Morioka T (2010) Estimation of municipal solid waste generation and landfill area in Asian developing countries. J Environ Biol 31:649–654Google Scholar
  29. Khan MUH, Jain S, Vaezi M, Kumar A (2016) Development of a decision model for the techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste utilization pathways. Waste Manag 48:548–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim SJ (2002) Korean waste management and eco-efficient symbiosis—a case study of Kwangmyong City. Clean Technol Environ 3:371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Magrinho A, Semiao A (2008) Estimation of residual MSW heating value as a function of waste component recycling. Waste Manag 28:2675–2683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mancini G, Nicosia FG, Luciano A, Viotti P, Fino D (2017) An approach to an insular self-contained waste management system with the aim of maximizing recovery while limiting transportation costs. Waste Biomass Valoriz 8:1617–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martinez-Sanchez V, Kromann MA, Astrup TF (2015) Life cycle costing of waste management systems: overview, calculation principles and case studies. Waste Manag 36:343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MEE (2015) National waste management plan. Ministry of Environment and Energy, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  35. MEWR (2014) The modernization program of municipal solid waste management in the 2014–2050 years, Government Resolution Republic of Kazakhstan on June 9, 2014 No. 634. Ministry of Environment and Water ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  36. MHI (2014) Study on Economic Partnership Projects in Developing Countries in FY2013, Study on Waste-to-Energy Project in Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan, Final Report. Mitsubishi Heavy IndustriesGoogle Scholar
  37. Milutinovic B, Stefanovic G, Milutinovic S, Cojbasic Z (2016) Application of fuzzy logic for evaluation of the level of social acceptance of waste treatment. Clean Technol Environ 18:1863–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moh YC, Manaf LA (2014) Overview of household solid waste recycling policy status and challenges in Malaysia. Resour Conserv Recycl 82:50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MRD (2012) JSC “Kazakhstan Centre for Modernization and Development of Housing and Public Utilities”, LLP “Kazakhstan Scientific Center of Development of Housing and Public Utilities” (2012). Report on research work on “Developing the scientific bases and the technologies for solid waste treatment. Ministry of Regional Development, Astana, KazakhstanGoogle Scholar
  40. NSC (2016) Accurate number of population of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2009–2015. National Statistic Committee, Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, stat.gov.kzGoogle Scholar
  41. Oliveira LSBL, Oliveira DSBL, Bezerra BS, Pereira BS, Battistelle RAG (2017) Environmental analysis of organic waste treatment focusing on composting scenarios. J Clean Prod 155:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Orazbayev ZZ, Yermekov TY, Dolgov MV (2013) Research and feasibility of parameters of consumption and production of wastes utilization. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, KazakhstanGoogle Scholar
  43. Panagiotidou N, Stavrakakis GS, Venetis C (2012) Sustainable waste management planning with the use of a decision support software tool based on the application of the PROMETHEE II method. In: DSS2012—16th IFIP WG8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Systems, Anavissos, Greece, 28–30 June 2012Google Scholar
  44. Saeed MO, Hassan MN, Mujeebu MA (2009) Assessment of municipal solid waste generation and recyclable materials potential in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Waste Manag 29:2209–2213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shareefdeen Z, Elkamel A, Tse S (2015) Review of current technologies used in municipal solid waste-to-energy facilities in Canada. Clean Technol Envir 17:1837–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sim NM, Wilson DC, Velis CA, Smith SR (2013) Waste management and recycling in the former Soviet Union: the City of Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic (Kyrgyzstan). Waste Manag Res 31:106–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sukholthaman P, Sharp A (2016) A system dynamics model to evaluate effects of source separation of municipal solid waste management: a case of Bangkok, Thailand. Waste Manag 52:50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vermenicheva TB, Saribekova LM, Heaven S (1999) Municipal solid waste in Kazakhstan: urban waste management problems in a transition economy. Wastes Manag 1999:27–40Google Scholar
  49. Vinodh S, Jayakrishna K, Kumar V, Dutta R (2014) Development of decision support system for sustainability evaluation: a case study. Clean Technol Environ 16:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang DQ, Tan SK, Gersberg RM (2010) Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges. J Environ Manag 91:1623–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Environmental Science and Technology Group (ESTg)Nazarbayev UniversityAstanaKazakhstan
  2. 2.Unit of Environmental Science and Technology, School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  3. 3.Laboratory of Energy, Ecology and ClimatePI “National Laboratory Astana”AstanaKazakhstan
  4. 4.School of Chemical EngineeringKazakh-British Technical UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations