Advertisement

Novel portable platform for molecular detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in faeces: a diagnostic accuracy study

  • J. J. HirvonenEmail author
  • P. MateroEmail author
  • C. Siebert
  • J. Kauppila
  • R. Vuento
  • H. Tuokko
  • S. Boisset
Original Article

Abstract

Background

A novel portable platform for nucleic acid amplification enables rapid detection of diarrhoea causing toxigenic Clostridium difficile directly from faeces, even in resource-limited settings. We evaluated the accuracy and precision of the new commercial molecular test system.

Methods

One thousand one hundred and sixty faecal samples from patients suspected of having Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) were analysed using the Orion GenRead C. difficile test system (Orion Diagnostica Oy, Espoo, Finland) and comparative methods in three teaching hospital laboratories in Finland and France. The precision of the Orion GenRead C. difficile test system was evaluated in a reproducibility study with a set of blind-coded samples. The test system is based on a new isothermal amplification technology (Strand Invasion Based Amplification, SIBA®) and detection of the tcdB gene of C. difficile. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and the overall agreement according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations.

Findings

The overall agreement of the Orion GenRead C. difficile test when compared to the comparative methods in routine use in the participating laboratories was between 96.7% and 98.8%. In the reproducibility study; the total percent agreement between three laboratories was 99.8%.

Interpretation

The identification of toxigenic C. difficile from faeces with the light-weight portable Orion GenRead test system was highly sensitive and specific, and the results were reproducible in the participating laboratories. This platform could enable fast and accurate molecular pathogen detection even in resource-limited or point-of-care settings.

Keywords

Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Rapid Diagnostic Test Result Toxigenic Culture Nucleic Acid Amplification Technology Xpert Assay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all Nordlab Oulu, Fimlab Laboratories, and CHU clinical and laboratory staff who helped conducting the study; especially, we thank Liisa Venho, Marika Huttu, Sari Ansaranta, and Tiina Malila for excellent technical assistance in conducting the analyses of the clinical specimens. We also thank Orion Diagnostica for providing the instrument and reagents for the Orion GenRead test system.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was not funded by any external party. The study was performed using the clinical microbiology services of Nordlab Oulu, Fimlab Laboratories, and Grenoble CHU.

Conflicts of interest

Pirjo Matero has been employed by Orion Diagnostica since June 2010. At present, Pirjo Matero is on a leave of absence from Orion Diagnostica to conduct PhD studies at the University of Helsinki. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

Neither human participants nor animals were involved in this study.

Informed consent

All authors have seen and approved the content and have contributed significantly to the work. Jari J. Hirvonen and Pirjo Matero have contributed equally to the designing and supervising the study, analyzing and interpreting the data, and writing and editing of the manuscript. Risto Vuento, Hanna Tuokko, and Jaana Kauppila have contributed in supervising the study, analyzing and interpreting the data, and critically reviewing the manuscript. Claire Siebert took part in analysing and interpratation of the data. Sandrine Boisset took part in designing and supervising the study, analyzing, and interpreting the data, and writing and critically reviewing the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    van Belkum A, Durand G, Peyret M, Chatellier S, Zambardi G, Schrenzel J, Shortridge D, Engelhardt A, Dunne WM Jr (2013) Rapid clinical bacteriology and its future impact. Ann Lab Med 33:14–27. doi: 10.3343/alm.2013.33.1.14 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Procop GW (2007) Molecular diagnostics for the detection and characterization of microbial pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 1:S99–S111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huggett J, Green C, Zumla A (2009) Nucleic acid detection and quantification in the developing world. Biochem Soc Trans 37:419–423. doi: 10.1042/BST0370419 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoser MJ, Mansukoski HK, Morrical SW, Eboiqbodin KE (2014) Strand Invasion Based Amplification (SIBA®): a novel isothermal DNA amplification technology demonstrating high specificity and sensitivity for a single molecule of target analyte.. PLoS One 9:e112656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112656 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T (2000) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28:12, e63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norén T, Alriksson I, Andersson J, Akerlund T, Unemo M (2011) Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard. J Clin Microbiol 49:710–711. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01824-10 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stellrecht KA, Espino AA, Maceira VP, Nattanmai SM, Butt SA, Wroblewski D, Hannett GE, Musser KA (2014) Premarket evaluations of the IMDx C. difficile for Abbott m2000 Assay and the BD Max Cdiff Assay. J Clin Microbiol 52:1423–1428. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03293-13 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eastwood K, Else P, Charlett A, Wilcox M (2009) Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods. J Clin Microbiol 47:3211–3217. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01082-09 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pancholi P, Kelly C, Raczkowski M, Balada-Llasat JM (2012) Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of the cell culture neutralization, Xpert C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile/Epi, and Illumigene C. difficile assays. J Clin Microbiol 50:1331–1335. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06597-11 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buchan BW, Ledeboer NA (2014) Emerging technologies for the clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:783–822. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00003-14 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Paz HD, Brotons P, Muñoz-Almagro C (2014) Molecular isothermal techniques for combating infectious diseases: towards low-cost point-of-care diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 14:827–843. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2014.940319 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peeling RW, McNerney R (2014) Emerging technologies in point-of-care molecular diagnostics for resource-limited settings. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 14:525–534. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2014.915748 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peeling RW, Mabey D (2010) Point-of-care tests for diagnosing infections in the developing world. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:1062–1069. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03279.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pasternack R, Vuorinen P, Kuukankorpi A, Pitkäjärvi T, Miettinen A (1996) Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by Amplicor PCR: comparison of diagnostic performance with urine and cervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 34:995–998PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hirvonen JJ, Kaukoranta SS (2015) Comparison of BD Max Cdiff and GenomEra C. difficile molecular assays for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from stools in conventional sample containers and in FecalSwabs. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34:1005–1009. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2320-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Polage CR, Gyorke CE, Kennedy MA, Leslie JL, Chin DL, Wang S, Nguyen HH, Huang B, Tang YW, Lee LW, Kim K, Taylor S, Romano PS, Panacek EA, Goodell PB, Solnick JV, Cohen SH (2015) Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era. JAMA Intern Med 8:1–10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4114 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khanna S, Pardi DS, Rosenblatt JE, Patel R, Kammer PP, Baddour LM (2012) An evaluation of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile infection by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Gastroenterol 46:846–849. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432273 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sydnor ER, Lenhart A, Trollinger B, Avdic E, Maragakis LL, Carroll KC, Cosgrove SE (2011) Antimicrobial prescribing practices in response to different Clostridium difficile diagnostic methodologies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 32:1133–1136. doi: 10.1086/662381 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kyne L, Warny M, Qamar A, Kelly CP (2000) Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridium difficile and serum levels of IgG antibody against toxin A. N Engl J Med 342:390–397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Samore MH, DeGirolami PC, Tlucko A, Lichtenberg DA, Melvin ZA, Karchmer AW (1994) Clostridium difficile colonization and diarrhea at a tertiary care hospital. Clin Infect Dis 18:181–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leekha S, Aronhalt KC, Sloan LM, Patel R, Orenstein R (2013) Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization in a tertiary care hospital: admission prevalence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control 41:390–393. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.09.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alasmari F, Seiler SM, Hink T, Burnham CA, Dubberke ER (2014) Prevalence and risk factors for asymptomatic Clostridium difficile carriage. Clin Infect Dis 59:216–222. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu258 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Polage CR, Solnick JV, Cohen SH (2012) Nosocomial diarrhea: evaluation and treatment of causes other than Clostridium difficile. Clin Infect Dis 55:982–989. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis551 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guerrero DM, Chou C, Jury LA, Nerandzic MM, Cadnum JC, Donskey CJ (2011) Clinical and infection control implications of Clostridium difficile infection with negative enzyme immunoassay for toxin. Clin Infect Dis 53:287–290. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir361 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fimlab LaboratoriesTampereFinland
  2. 2.Department of Bacteriology and ImmunologyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Laboratoire de BactériologieGrenoble University Hospital CentreGrenoble CedexFrance
  4. 4.NordLab OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations