Standard Nutrient Agar 1 as a substitute for blood-supplemented Müller–Hinton agar for antibiograms in developing countries

  • N. NiederstebruchEmail author
  • D. Sixt


In the industrial world, the agar diffusion test is a standard procedure for the susceptibility testing of bacteria isolates. Beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. are tested with Müller–Hinton agar supplemented with 5 % blood, a so-called blood agar. The results are interpreted using standardized tables, which only exist for this type of nutrient matrix. Because of a number difficulties, both with respect to technical issues and to manual skills, blood agar is not a feasible option in many developing countries. Beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. also grow on Standard Nutrient Agar 1 (StNA1). This suggests using that type of nutrient medium for running agar diffusion tests. However, there are no standardized tables that can be used for interpreting the diameters of the zones of inhibition on StNA1 1. Using the existing standardized tables for blood agar to interpret cultures on StNA1 1 would be of great benefit under such circumstances where blood agar is not available. With this in mind, we conducted comparative tests to evaluate the growth characteristics of beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. on StNA1 1 compared to Müller–Hinton agar supplemented with 5 % sheep blood. In this study, we were able to show that beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. develop similar zones of inhibition on blood agar and on StNA1 1. Therefore, it is suggested that, for the interpretation of antibiograms of beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. performed on StNA1 1, the standard tables for blood agar can be used.


Blood Agar EUCAST Hinton Agar Standard Table Standard Nutrient Agar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

10096_2012_1735_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (766 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 765 kb)
10096_2012_1735_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (881 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 881 kb)
10096_2012_1735_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (135 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 135 kb)
10096_2012_1735_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (250 kb)
ESM 4 (PDF 249 kb)
10096_2012_1735_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (1.5 mb)
ESM 5 (PDF 1515 kb)
10096_2012_1735_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (151 kb)
ESM 6 (PDF 151 kb)
10096_2012_1735_MOESM7_ESM.pdf (276 kb)
ESM 7 (PDF 275 kb)
10096_2012_1735_MOESM8_ESM.pdf (377 kb)
ESM 8 (PDF 377 kb)
10096_2012_1735_MOESM9_ESM.pdf (392 kb)
ESM 9 (PDF 392 kb)


  1. 1.
    bioMérieux (2002) Product data sheet: 11378 A – DE – 2002/07. Columbia Agar + 5 % Hammelblut (COS) – REF 43041/43049Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    bioMérieux (2004) Product data sheet: 11677 B – DE – 2004/05. Mueller Hinton Agar + 5 % Schafblut (MHS) – REF 43321/43329Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG (2011) Product data sheet: Standard Nutrient Agar 1 (s.s. 11/2011).
  4. 4.
    European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (2009) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. EUCAST disk diffusion method. Version 1.0, December 18, 2009.
  5. 5.
    Jorgensen JH, Swenson JM, Tenover FC, Ferraro MJ, Hindler JA, Murray PR (1994) Development of interpretive criteria and quality control limits for broth microdilution and disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 32(10):2448–2459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korgenski EK, Daly JA (1998) Evaluation of the BIOMIC video reader system for determining interpretive categories of isolates on the basis of disk diffusion susceptibility results. J Clin Microbiol 36(1):302–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muhammad G, Hoblet KH, Bech-Nielsen S, Jackwood DL, Smith KL (1998) Reproducibility of antibiogram of bovine mammary gland staphylococci under conditions of repeated subculturing. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 45(3):189–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Russell FM, Biribo SSN, Selvaraj G, Oppedisano F, Warren S, Seduadua A, Mulholland EK, Carapetis JR (2006) As a bacterial culture medium, citrated sheep blood agar is a practical alternative to citrated human blood agar in laboratories of developing countries. J Clin Microbiol 44(9):3346–3351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thorvilson J, Kohner P, Henry N, Cockerill F 3rd (1997) Comparison of agar dilution, broth dilution, disk diffusion, and the E-test for susceptibility testing of penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 16(5):391–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hospital St. John of GodMabesseneh-LunsarSierra Leone
  2. 2.Globolab e.V. LaboratoryAsslingGermany

Personalised recommendations