Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unsolicited post-prescription antibiotic review in surgical and medical wards: factors associated with counselling and physicians’ compliance

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to describe the impact of an early review of antibiotic prescriptions in a hospital using unsolicited infectious disease physician (IDP) counselling, identify areas for improvement and examine factors associated with physicians’ non-compliance. The prescriptions of 15 selected antibiotics from surgical or medical wards were screened daily and reviewed between days 3 and 5 by a single IDP during an 8-month period to identify those likely needing counselling. Improved antibiotic use was sought by encouraging ward physicians to withdraw or de-escalate therapy, promoting oral switch or reducing the duration of therapy whenever appropriate. Variables potentially associated with IDP counselling and physicians’ non-compliance were tested using bivariate analysis and then entered in a logistic regression model. Among 857 prescriptions analysed, 54.6 % prompted unsolicited counselling, mostly for stopping therapy (18.8 %), reducing its duration (18.0 %) or de-escalation (13.0 %). Variables independently associated with IDP counselling included antibiotic combination (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.27 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.80–15.45]; p = 0.002), non-clinically documented infection (aOR, 4.98 [95 % CI, 2.81–8.82]; p < 0.001) and microbiologically documented infection (aOR, 2.04 [95 % CI, 1.51–2.75]; p < 0.001). The physicians’ compliance rate was 77.3 %. Variables independently associated with physicians’ non-compliance to the IDP recommendation were the surgical speciality of the ward physician (aOR, 1.91 [95 % CI, 1.17–3.12]; p = 0.009) and advice to reduce the duration of therapy (aOR, 1.88 [95 % CI, 1.12–3.15]; p = 0.017). An unsolicited post-prescription antibiotic review can be successfully implemented with a high rate of physicians’ compliance. Areas for targeting improvement measures include prescriptions in surgical wards and shortening the duration of therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE Jr et al (2007) Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 44:159–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MacDougall C, Polk RE (2005) Antimicrobial stewardship programs in health care systems. Clin Microbiol Rev 18:638–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Owens RC Jr (2008) Antimicrobial stewardship: concepts and strategies in the 21st century. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 61:110–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lesprit P, Duong T, Girou E, Hemery F, Brun-Buisson C (2009) Impact of a computer-generated alert system prompting review of antibiotic use in hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 63:1058–1063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lesprit P, Landelle C, Girou E, Brun-Buisson C (2010) Reassessment of intravenous antibiotic therapy using a reminder or direct counselling. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:789–795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sellier E, Pavese P, Gennai S, Stahl JP, Labarère J, François P (2010) Factors and outcomes associated with physicians’ adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations for inpatients. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:156–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pulcini C, Pradier C, Samat-Long C et al (2006) Factors associated with adherence to infectious diseases advice in two intensive care units. J Antimicrob Chemother 57:546–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carling P, Fung T, Killion A, Terrin N, Barza M (2003) Favorable impact of a multidisciplinary antibiotic management program conducted during 7 years. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24:699–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Camins BC, King MD, Wells JB et al (2009) Impact of an antimicrobial utilization program on antimicrobial use at a large teaching hospital: a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30:931–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim BN (2005) Compliance with an infectious disease specialist’s advisory consultations on targeted antibiotic usage. J Infect Chemother 11:84–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cosgrove SE, Patel A, Song X et al (2007) Impact of different methods of feedback to clinicians after postprescription antimicrobial review based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 12 Steps to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance Among Hospitalized Adults. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 28:641–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schlesinger Y, Paltiel O, Yinnon AM (1988) Analysis and impact of infectious disease consultations in a general hospital. J Hosp Infect 40:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lemmen SW, Häfner H, Kotterik S, Lütticken R, Töpper R (2000) Influence of an infectious disease service on antibiotic prescription behavior and selection of multiresistant pathogens. Infection 28:384–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gómez J, Conde Cavero SJ, Hernández Cardona JL et al (1996) The influence of the opinion of an infectious disease consultant on the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment in a general hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 38:309–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fowler VG Jr, Sanders LL, Sexton DJ et al (1998) Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia according to compliance with recommendations of infectious diseases specialists: experience with 244 patients. Clin Infect Dis 27:478–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Byl B, Clevenbergh P, Jacobs F et al (1999) Impact of infectious diseases specialists and microbiological data on the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy for bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 29:60–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenkins TC, Price CS, Sabel AL, Mehler PS, Burman WJ (2008) Impact of routine infectious diseases service consultation on the evaluation, management, and outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 46:1000–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yinnon AM (2001) Whither infectious diseases consultations? Analysis of 14,005 consultations from a 5-year period. Clin Infect Dis 33:1661–1667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mol PGM, Wieringa JE, NannanPanday PV et al (2005) Improving compliance with hospital antibiotic guidelines: a time-series intervention analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:550–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lo E, Rezai K, Evans AT et al (2004) Why don’t they listen? Adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations. Clin Infect Dis 38:1212–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glowacki RC, Schwartz DN, Itokazu GS, Wisniewski MF, Kieszkowski P, Weinstein RA (2003) Antibiotic combinations with redundant antimicrobial spectra: clinical epidemiology and pilot intervention of computer-assisted surveillance. Clin Infect Dis 37:59–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pulcini C, Cua E, Lieutier F, Landraud L, Dellamonica P, Roger PM (2007) Antibiotic misuse: a prospective clinical audit in a French university hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 26:277–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Méan M, Pavese P, Tudela E, Dinh-Van KA, Mallaret MR, Stahl JP (2006) Consultations with infectious disease specialists for patients in a teaching hospital: adherence in 174 cases. Presse Med 35:1461–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sipahi OR, Tasbakan M, Pullukcu H et al (2007) Accuracy of consultations performed by infectious diseases trainees and factors associated with adherence to them. Int J Infect Dis 11:518–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tenenbaum MJ (2004) Infectious diseases consultative recommendations: if heard, they can be listened to. Clin Infect Dis 38:1219–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Madariaga MG (2006) Non-adherence to infectious disease consultations: are surgeons to blame? J Antimicrob Chemother 57:1019–1020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chastre J, Wolff M, Fagon JY et al (2003) Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized trial. JAMA 290:2588–2598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guillemot D, Carbon C, Balkau B et al (1998) Low dosage and long treatment duration of beta-lactam: risk factors for carriage of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. JAMA 279:365–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayashi Y, Paterson DL (2011) Strategies for reduction in duration of antibiotic use in hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis 52:1232–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Amadeo B, Dumartin C, Parneix P, Fourrier-Réglat A, Rogues AM (2011) Relationship between antibiotic consumption and antibiotic policy: an adjusted analysis in the French healthcare system. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:434–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Davey P, Brown E, Fenelon L et al. (2005) Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):1–116

Download references

Funding

None.

Transparency declarations

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Lesprit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lesprit, P., Landelle, C. & Brun-Buisson, C. Unsolicited post-prescription antibiotic review in surgical and medical wards: factors associated with counselling and physicians’ compliance. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32, 227–235 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1734-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1734-3

Keywords

Navigation