Journal of Wood Science

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 161–172 | Cite as

Utilization of sweet sorghum bagasse and citric acid for manufacturing of particleboard II: influences of pressing temperature and time on particleboard properties

  • Sukma Surya Kusumah
  • Kenji Umemura
  • Ikhsan Guswenrivo
  • Tsuyoshi Yoshimura
  • Kozo Kanayama
Original article

Abstract

Development of environmentally friendly particleboard made from sweet sorghum bagasse and citric acid has recently attracted attention. In this study, we investigated the effects of pressing temperature and time on physical properties, such as dry bending (DB), internal bond strength (IB), and thickness swelling (TS) of particleboard. Wet bending (WB), screw-holding power (SH), biological durability, and formaldehyde emission of particleboard manufactured under effective pressing temperature and time were also evaluated. Particleboards bonded with phenol formaldehyde (PF) resin and polymeric 4,4′-methylenediphenyl isocyanate (pMDI) were manufactured as references. Effective pressing temperature and time were 200 °C and 10 min, respectively. It was clarified that DB, IB, and TS satisfied the type 18 requirements of the JIS A 5908 (2003), and were comparable to those of particleboard bonded with PF and pMDI. The WB and SH of particleboard did not satisfy type 18 of JIS. Particleboard manufactured under effective pressing conditions had good biological durability and low formaldehyde emission. Based on the results of infrared spectra measurement, the degree of ester linkages increased with increased pressing temperature and time.

Keywords

Citric acid Particleboard Pressing temperature and time Sweet sorghum bagasse 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) and Sakigake-Kyoto University for financial support of the study, the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) for supplying raw materials, and Oshika Co., Ltd. for supplying adhesives.

References

  1. 1.
    FAO (2009) State of the world’s forests: global demand for wood product. Science New York Society, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    FAO (2015) Forest product statictic: 2014 global forest products: facts and figures. Forest Economic, Policy and product Division, FAO Forest Department, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nath DC, Mwchahary DD (2012) Population increase and deforestation: a study in Kokrajhar district of Assam, India. Int J Sci Res Publ 20:1–12Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    FAS (2016) World agricultural production. In: United States Dep. Agric. http://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.pdf. Accessed 6 Oct 2016
  5. 5.
    Theerarattananoon K, Xu F, Wilson J, Ballard R, Mckinney L, Staggenborg S, Vadlani P, Pei Zj, Wang D (2011) Physical properties of pellets made from sorghum stalk, corn stover, wheat straw, and big bluestem. Ind Crops Prod 33:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linden JC, Henk LL, Murphy VG, Smith DH, Gabrielsen BC, Tangerdy RP, Czako L (1987) Preservation of potential fermentables in sweet sorghum by ensiling. Biotechnol Bioeng 30:860–867CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pizzi A (2006) Recent developments in eco-efficient bio-based adhesives for wood bonding: opportunities and issues. J Adhes Sci Technol 20:829–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kojima Y, Ishino A, Kobori H, Suzuki S, Ito H, Makise R, Huguchi I, Okamoto M (2015) Reinforcement of wood flour board containing ligno-cellulose nanofiber made from recycled wood. J Wood Sci 61:492–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang I, Kuo M, Myers DJ, Pu A (2006) Comparison of protein-based adhesive resins for wood composites. J Wood Sci 52:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mansouri N-E El, Pizzi A, Salvado J (2007) Lignin-based polycondensation resins for wood adhesives. J Appl Polym Sci 103:1690–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krug D, Tobisch S (2010) Use of proteins as binders for wood-based panel [Einsatz von Proteinen als Bindemittel für Holzwerkstoffe]. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 68:289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoong YB, Paridah MT, Loh YF, Jalaludin H, Chuah LA (2011) A new source of natural adhesive: Acacia mangium bark extracts co-polymerized with phenol–formaldehyde (PF) for bonding Mempisang (Annonaceae spp.) veneers. Int J Adhes Adhes 31:164–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Umemura K, Ueda T, Munawar SS, Kawai S (2012) Application of citric acid as natural adhesive for wood. J Appl Polym Sci 123:1991–1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Umemura K, Sugihara O, Kawai S (2013) Investigation of a new natural adhesive composed of citric acid and sucrose for particleboard. J Wood Sci 59:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Umemura K, Sugihara O, Kawai S (2014) Investigation of a new natural adhesive composed of citric acid and sucrose for particleboard II: effects of board density and pressing temperature. J Wood Sci 61:40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Widyorini R, Umemura K, Isnan R, Putra DR, Awaludin A, Prayitno TA (2016) Manufacture and properties of citric acid-bonded particleboard made from bamboo materials. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 74:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liao R, Xu J, Umemura K (2016) Low density sugarcane bagasse particleboard bonded and additive content. BioResources 11:2174–2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kusumah SS, Umemura K, Yoshioka K, Miyafuji H, Kanayama K (2016) Utilization of sweet sorghum bagasse and citric acid for manufacturing of particleboard I: effects of pre-drying treatment and citric acid content on the board properties. Ind Crop Prod 84:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    JIS A 5908 (2003) Particleboard (in Japanase). Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, p 451Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Japan Wood Preserving Association (JWPA) (2001) JWPA JWPSTW- P 1. Introduction of wood preservation (in Japanese). JWPA, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    JIS K 1571 (2004) Test methods for determining the effectiveness of wood preservatives and their performance requirements (in English). Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, pp 1–37Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    JIS A 1460 (2001) Building boards. Determination of formaldehyde emission-desiccator method (in Japanese). Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, p 258Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang F, Fei B, Wu Z, Peng L, yu Y (2014) Selected properties of corrugated particleboards made from bamboo waste (Phyllostachys edulis) laminated with medium-density fiberboard panels. BioResources 9:1085–1096Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barbooti MM, Al-Sammerrai DA (1986) Thermal decomposition of citric acid. Thermochim Acta 98:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Azeredo HMC, Kontou-Vrettou C, Moates GK, Wellner N, Cross K, Pereira PHF, Waldron KW (2015) Wheat straw hemicellulose films as affected by citric acid. Food Hydrocoll 50:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roffael E, Rauch W (1972) Production of particleboards using sulfite black liquor as binder. III. Possibilitiies of shortening the post-thermal treatment for sulfite liquor bonded particleboards of 9 mm thickness. Holzforschung 26:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Umemura K, Ueda T, Kawai S (2012) Effects of moulding temperature on the physical properties of wood-based moulding bonded with citric acid. For Prod J 62:63–68Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xu X, Yao F, Wu Q, Zhou D (2009) The influence of wax-sizing on dimension stability and mechanical properties of bagasse particleboard. Ind Crops Prod 29:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hosseinaei O, Wang S, Enayati AA, Rials TG (2012) Effects of hemicellulose extraction on properties of wood flour and wood-plastic composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 43:686–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Feng X, Xiao Z, Sui S, Wang Q, Xie Y (2014) Esterification of wood with citric acid: The catalytic effects of sodium hypophosphite (SHP). Holzforschung 68:427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gambhir ML, Jamwal N (2014) Building and construction material: testing and quality control. McGraw Hill, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Indrayani Y, Setyawati D, Munawar SS, Umemura K, Yoshimura T (2015) Evaluation of termite resistance of medium density fiberboard (MDF) Manufacture from agricultural fiber bonded with citric acid. Procedia. Environ Sci 28:778–782Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Papadopoulos AN, Avtzis DN, Avtzis ND (2008) The biological effectiveness of wood modified with linear chain carboxylic acid anhydrides against the subterranean termites Reticulitermes flavipes. Holz als Roh - und Werkst 66:249–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Despot R, Hasan M, Jug M (2008) Biological durability of wood modified by citric acid. Drv Ind 59:55–59Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yang CQ, Xu Y, Wang D (1996) FT-IR spectroscopy study of the polycarboxylic acids used for paper wet strength improvement. Ind Eng Chem Res 35:4037–4042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Žagar E, Grdadolnik J (2003) An infrared spectroscopic study of H-bond network in hyperbranched polyester polyol. J Mol Struct 658:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hassan ML, Rowell RM, Fadl NA, Yacoub SF, Christainsen AW (2000) Thermoplasticization of bagasse. I. Preparation and characterization of esterified bagasse fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 76:561–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bagheri L, Yarmand M, Madadlou A, Mousavi ME (2014) Transglutaminase-induced or citric acid-mediated cross-linking of whey proteins to tune the characteristics of subsequently desolvated sub-micron and nano-scaled particles. J Microencapsul 31:636–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Groen H, Roberts KJ (2001) Nucleation, growth, and pseudo-polymorphic behavior of citric acid as monitored in situ by attenuated total reflection fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Society 10723–10730Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rhim J, Park H, Lee C, Jun J, Kim D LY (2004) Crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes containing sulfonic acid group: proton and methanol transport through membranes. J Memb Sci 238:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Wood Research Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Sustainable Materials, Research Institute for Sustainable HumanosphereKyoto UniversityUjiJapan
  2. 2.Research Center for BiomaterialIndonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI)CibinongIndonesia
  3. 3.Laboratory of Innovative Humano-habitability, Research Institute for Sustainable HumanosphereKyoto UniversityUjiJapan

Personalised recommendations