Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of clinical criteria for referral to head imaging in the neurologic emergency setting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In recent decades, diagnostic imaging became an important generator of large increases in medical spending. Inappropriate head CT referrals also increase population irradiation and unnecessarily burden and frighten patients.

Objective

To validate previously proposed clinical criteria for referral to head imaging (age > 55 years, focal neurological deficit, changed mental state, nausea or vomiting, coagulation disorder, cancer) in a setting of emergency neurological service.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed electronic records of 500 consecutive referrals to neurological emergency and 500 referrals to emergency head imaging. In patients with several referrals, only results of the first evaluation were further analyzed. We calculated relations between clinical predictors, referrals, and findings of head imaging.

Results

Of 486 first referrals of consecutive patients, 216 (44%) were referred to the emergency, and 100 (21%) to non-emergency head imaging. Remaining 170 (35%) were not referred to head imaging. Clinical predictors of pathologic head imaging fulfilled 77%, 41%, and 43% of patients, respectively. Pathologic head imaging had 153 of 490 (31%) referred patients. Referral criteria fulfilled 146 (sensitivity 95%) of them. Intracranial pathology was found in 7 of 125 patients not fulfilling referral criteria (negative predictive value 94%): 3 reported transient neurological symptoms, 2 sudden headache, and 2 headache with nausea and vomiting.

Conclusion

We confirmed utility of previously proposed clinical criteria for referral to head CT in emergency neurological setting. In addition, we found transient neurological symptoms, sudden severe headache, and headache with nausea or vomiting as additional independent indications for emergency head imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iglehart JK (2009) Health insurers and medical-imaging policy--a work in progress. N Engl J Med 360:1030–1037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Salisbury SR, Forman HP (2011) National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995-2007. Radiology 258:164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Prevedello LM, Raja AS, Zane RD, Sodickson A, Lipsitz S, Schneider L, Hanson R, Mukundan S, Khorasani R (2012) Variation in use of head computed tomography by emergency physicians. Am J Med 125:356–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng AHY, Campbell S, Chartier LB, Goddard T, Magee K, McEwen J, Kapur AK, Holroyd BR, Upadhye S, Couperthwaite S, Rowe BH (2017) Choosing Wisely Canada(R): five tests, procedures and treatments to question in emergency medicine. CJEM 19:S9–S17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang X, You JJ (2013) Head CT for nontrauma patients in the emergency department: clinical predictors of abnormal findings. Radiology 266:783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bent C, Lee PS, Shen PY, Bang H, Bobinski M (2015) Clinical scoring system may improve yield of head CT of non-trauma emergency department patients. Emerg Radiol 22:511–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Q, Young J, Bernasconi E, Cavassini M, Vernazza P, Hirschel B, Weber R, Furrer H, Stoeckle M, Bucher HC, Fux C (2013) The prevalence of erectile dysfunction and its association with antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected men: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Antivir Ther 18:337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Edlow JA, Panagos PD, Godwin SA, Thomas TL, Decker WW (2008) Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute headache. Ann Emerg Med 52:407–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cornblath WT (2014) Diplopia due to ocular motor cranial neuropathies. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 20:966–980

    Google Scholar 

  11. Southerland AM (2017) Clinical evaluation of the patient with acute stroke. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 23:40–61

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harden CL, Huff JS, Schwartz TH, Dubinsky RM, Zimmerman RD, Weinstein S, Foltin JC, Theodore WH (2007) Reassessment: neuroimaging in the emergency patient presenting with seizure (an evidence-based review): report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 69:1772–1780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunn MJ, Breen DP, Davenport RJ, Gray AJ (2005) Early management of adults with an uncomplicated first generalised seizure. Emerg Med J 22:237–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dumas MD, Pexman JH, Kreeft JH (1994) Computed tomography evaluation of patients with chronic headache. CMAJ 151:1447–1452

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell CS, Osborn RE, Grosskreutz SR (1993) Computed tomography in the headache patient: is routine evaluation really necessary? Headache 33:82–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Sivilotti ML, Bullard MJ, Lee JS, Eisenhauer M, Symington C, Mortensen M, Sutherland J, Lesiuk H, Wells GA (2010) High risk clinical characteristics for subarachnoid haemorrhage in patients with acute headache: prospective cohort study. BMJ 341:c5204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramirez-Lassepas M, Espinosa CE, Cicero JJ, Johnston KL, Cipolle RJ, Barber DL (1997) Predictors of intracranial pathologic findings in patients who seek emergency care because of headache. Arch Neurol 54:1506–1509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandeman EM, Hernandez Mdel C, Morris Z, Bastin ME, Murray C, Gow AJ, Corley J, Henderson R, Deary IJ, Starr JM, Wardlaw JM (2013) Incidental findings on brain MR imaging in older community-dwelling subjects are common but serious medical consequences are rare: a cohort study. PLoS One 8:e71467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Vanja Erčulj for the help with statistical analyses and Dr. Dianne Jones for language review.

Funding

One of the authors (SP) was supported by the Republic of Slovenia Research Agency, Grant No. P3-0338.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Podnar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

The study was approved by the relevant research ethics committee that waived the necessity of obtaining written informed consent from patients.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Žužek, P., Rigler, I. & Podnar, S. Validation of clinical criteria for referral to head imaging in the neurologic emergency setting. Neurol Sci 40, 2541–2548 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04009-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04009-9

Keywords

Navigation