Advertisement

Neurological Sciences

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 657–661 | Cite as

Assessment of Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS): the dimension of anhedonia in Italian healthy sample

  • Iolanda Martino
  • Gabriella Santangelo
  • Daniela Moschella
  • Luana Marino
  • Rocco Servidio
  • Antonio Augimeri
  • Angela Costabile
  • Giovanni Capoderose
  • Antonio Cerasa
Original Article

Abstract

The Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) is a rapid screening battery created for assessing the presence of anhedonia, namely the inability to experience pleasure. Although, this symptom has widely been investigated in clinical settings, individual differences in anhedonia are also present in healthy population. The aim of present study was to validate the translated Italian version of this test. One thousand six hundred ninety-seven consecutive healthy subjects (55% female) of different ages (age 18–82 years) underwent SHAPS. Participants who showed mild level of anhedonia also completed the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS), Mood Disorders Insight Scale (MDIS), and Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). The SHAPS showed good internal consistency and discriminant validity; moreover, the factorial analysis highlighted that SHAPS had a three-factor structure for explaining the anhedonic construct. 14.9% showed a significant reduction of hedonic tone (SHAPS ≥ 3). Finally, the degree of anhedonia was significantly correlated with BDI and BHS scores, but not with age or gender. Although anhedonia is a prominent feature of many psychiatric and neurological disorders, the presence of this symptom in the healthy population highlighted the importance to develop reliable tool. SHAPS shows good psychometric properties to assess multidimensional anhedonia symptoms also in Italian healthy population.

Keywords

Anhedonia SHAPS Healthy individuals Italian population 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

All participants gave their written informed consent and the local ethics committee approved the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ribot T (1986) La psychologie des sentiment. Felix Alcan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ho N, Sommers M (2013) Anhedonia: a concept analysis. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 27(3):121–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2013.02.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strauss GP, Gold JM (2012) A new perspective on anhedonia in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 169(4):364–373.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11030447 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ritsner MS, Arbitman M, Lisker A (2011) Anhedonia is an important factor of health- related quality-of-life deficit in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 199(11):845–853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fletcher K, Parker G, Paterson A et al (2015) Anhedonia in melancholic and non-melancholic depressive disorders. J Affect Disord 184:81–88CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang J, Huang J, Yang XH et al (2015) Anhedonia in schizophrenia: deficits in both motivation and hedonic capacity. Schizophr Res 168(1–2):465–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Natta L, Melrose R, Harwood D, Sultzer D (2013) An examination of anhedonia separate from depression in Alzheimer’s disease: a preliminary study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 21(3):S78–S79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.12.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Santangelo G, Morgante L, Savica R et al (2009) Anhedonia and cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: Italian validation of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale and its application in the clinical routine practice during the PRIAMO study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 15(8):576–581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loas G, Krystkowiak P, Godefroy O (2012) Anhedonia in Parkinson’s disease: an overview. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 24(4):444–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keller J, Young CB, Kelley E et al (2013) Trait anhedonia is associated with reduced reactivity and connectivity of mesolimbic and paralimbic reward pathways. J Psychiatr Res 47(10):1319–1328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.05.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rizvi SJ, Pizzagalli DA, Sproule BA, Kennedy SH (2016) Assessing anhedonia in depression: potentials and pitfalls. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 65:21–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang H, Harris L, Split M et al (2016) Anhedonia and individual differences in orbitofrontal cortex sulcogyral morphology. Hum Brain Mapp 37(11):3873–3881CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Opel N, Zwanzger P, Redlich R et al (2016) Differing brain structural correlates of familial and environmental risk for major depressive disorder revealed by a combined VBM/pattern recognition approach. Psychol Med 46(2):277–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chapman L, Chapman J, Raulin M (1976) Scales for physical and social anhedonia. J Abnorm Psychol 85:374–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Snaith RP (1993) Anhedonia: a neglected symptom of psychopathology. Psychol Med 23(04):957–966.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700026428 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Snaith RP, Hamilton M, Morley S et al (1995) A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the SnaitheHamilton Pleasure Scale. Br J Psychiatry 167:99–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu WH, Wang LZ, Zhu YH et al (2012) Clinical utility of the Snaith-Hamilton-Pleasure scale in the Chinese settings. BMC Psychiatry 12:184CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Franken IH, Rassin E, Muris P (2007) The assessment of anhedonia in clinical and non-clinical populations: further validation of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). J Affect Disord 99:83–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Franz M, Lemke MR, Meyer T et al (1998) German version of the Snaith-Hamilton-Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-D). Anhedonia in schizophrenic and depressive patients. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 66(09):407–413.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-995279 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loas G, Dubal S, Perot P et al (1997) Validation of the French version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS, Snaith et al. 1995). Determination of the statistical parameters in 208 normal subjects and 103 hospitalized patients presenting with depression or schizophrenia. Encéphale 23:454–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Göritz AS, Reinhold N, Batinic B (2002) Online panels. In: Batinic B, Reips U, Bosnjak M (eds) Online social sciences. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Seattle, pp 27–47Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Assogna F, Cravello L, Caltagirone C, Spalletta G (2011) Anhedonia in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review of the literature. Mov Disord 26(10):1825–1834.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23815 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marin RS, Biedrzycki RC, Firinciogullari S (1991) Reliability and validity of the Apathy evaluation Scale. Psychiatry Res 38(2):143–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(91)90040-V CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK (1996) Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JD (1994) The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-II: convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. J Psychosom Res 38(1):33–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)90006-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sturman ED, Sproule BA (2002) Toward the development of a mood disorders insight scale: modification of Birchwood’s Psychosis Insight Scale. J Affect Disord 77:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L (1974) The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale. J Consult Clin Psychol 42(6):861–865.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037562 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D (1993) Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Qual Life Res 2(6):441–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, Lohr KN, Patrick DL, Perrin E, Stein RE (2002) Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11(3):193–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Matsui K, Tachibana H, Yamanishi T et al (2013) Clinical correlates of anhedonia in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115(12):2524–2527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aguera-Ortiz L, Failde I, Mico JA et al (2011) Pain as a symptom of depression: prevalence and clinical correlates in patients attending psychiatric clinics. J Affect Disord 130(1–2):106–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iolanda Martino
    • 1
  • Gabriella Santangelo
    • 2
  • Daniela Moschella
    • 3
  • Luana Marino
    • 4
  • Rocco Servidio
    • 5
  • Antonio Augimeri
    • 6
  • Angela Costabile
    • 5
  • Giovanni Capoderose
    • 3
  • Antonio Cerasa
    • 1
    • 4
    • 7
  1. 1.National Research Council (IBFM-CNR)Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and PhysiologyCatanzaroItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”NaplesItaly
  3. 3.Ascoc, Psychotherapy School Lamezia TermeLamezia TermeItaly
  4. 4.Department of Sociology“Magna Graecia” UniversityCatanzaroItaly
  5. 5.Department of Languages and Education SciencesUniversity of CalabriaCosenzaItaly
  6. 6.Biotecnomed SCARLCatanzaroItaly
  7. 7.Institute S. Anna-Research in Advanced NeurorehabilitationCrotoneItaly

Personalised recommendations