Skip to main content
Log in

Reported quality of randomized controlled trials in neglect rehabilitation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the reported quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of neglect rehabilitation using a standardized scale. A search of seven electronic databases was carried out. Selected articles were scored using the PEDro scale and classified as high or low quality study both with the original cut off of 6 and a modified cut off of 5. A linear regression analysis between year of publication and quality rate was used to test whether the quality of the studies improved with time. A total of 18 RCTs were selected. Six articles (33.3%) and 10 articles (55.56%) were classified as having high quality when the original cut off or the modified cut off of the PEDro scale were used, respectively. Analysis shows no time-related changes in PEDro scores. The results show that reported quality is moderate for RCTs in neglect rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swan L (2001) Unilateral spatial neglect. Phys Ther 81:1572–1580

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pierce SR, Buxbaum LJ (2002) Treatments of unilateral neglect: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:256–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherney LR, Halper AS, Kwasnica CM et al (2001) Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere stroke: relationship with unilateral neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:322–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lincoln NB (1995) The assessment and treatment of disorders of visual perception. Rev Clin Gerontol 5:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowen A, Lincoln NB (2007) Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD003586. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003586.pub2

  6. Huwiler-Müntener K, Jüni P et al (2002) Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. JAMA 287:2801–2804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C et al (2002) Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother 48:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Maher CG et al (2000) PEDro: a database of randomised trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Man Ther 5:223–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Armijo Olivo S, Macedo LG, Gadotti EG et al (2008) Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther 88:156–175

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maher G, Sherrington C, Herbert R et al (2003) Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 83:713–721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinberg J, Diller L, Gordon W et al (1977) Visual scanning training effect on reading-related tasks in acquired right brain damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 58:479–486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinberg J, Piasetsky E, Diller L et al (1982) Treating perceptual organization deficits in non neglecting RBD stroke patients. J Clin Neuropsychol 4:59–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinberg J, Diller L, Gordon WA et al (1979) Training sensory awareness and spatial organization in people with right brain damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 60:491–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lincoln NB, Whiting SE, Cockburn J et al (1985) An evaluation of perceptual retraining. Int Rehabil Med 7:99–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hommel M, Peres B, Pollak P et al (1990) Effects of passive tactile and auditory stimuli on left visual neglect. Arch Neurol 47:573–576

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rossi PW, Kheyfets S, Reding MJ (1990) Fresnel prisms improve visual perception in stroke patients with homonymous hemianopia or unilateral visual neglect. Neurology 40:1597–1599

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robertson IH, Gray JM, Pentland B et al (1990) Microcomputer-based rehabilitation for unilateral left visual neglect: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71:663–668

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cubelli R, Inzaghi G, de Tanti A (1993) La rieducazione della negligenza spaziale unilaterale: verifica sperimentale della sua efficacia [Italian]. Eura Medicophys 29:111–121

    Google Scholar 

  19. Antonucci G, Guariglia C, Judica A et al (1995) Effectiveness of neglect rehabilitation in a randomized group study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 17:383–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fanthome Y, Lincoln NB, Drummond A et al (1995) The treatment of visual neglect using feedback of eye movements: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 17:413–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiart L, Come AB, Debelleix et al (1997) Unilateral neglect syndrome rehabilitation by trunk rotation and scanning training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78:424–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalra L, Perez I, Gupta S et al (1997) The influence of visual neglect on stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 28:1386–1391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beis JM, Andre JM, Baumgarten A et al (1999) Eye patching in unilateral spatial neglect: efficacy of two methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:71–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Edmans JA, Webster J, Lincoln NB (2000) A comparison of two approaches in the treatment of perceptual problems after stroke. Clin Rehabil 14:230–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rusconi ML, Meinecke C, Sbrissa P et al (2002) Different cognitive trainings in the rehabilitation of visuo-spatial neglect. Eura Medicophys 38:159–166

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zeloni G, Farne A, Baccini M (2002) Viewing less to see better. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:195–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cherney LR, Halper AS, Papachronis D (2003) Two approaches to treating unilateral neglect after right hemisphere stroke: a preliminary investigation. Top Stroke Rehabil 9:22–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fong KN, Chan MK et al (2007) The effect of voluntary trunk rotation and half-field eye-patching for patients with unilateral neglect in stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 21:729–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maher CG (2000) A systematic review of workplace interventions to prevent low back pain. Aust J Physiother 46:259–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Foley NC et al (2005) The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad scale in stroke rehabilitation literature. J Clin Epidemiol 58:668–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Paci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paci, M., Matulli, G., Baccini, M. et al. Reported quality of randomized controlled trials in neglect rehabilitation. Neurol Sci 31, 159–163 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-009-0198-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-009-0198-4

Keywords

Navigation