Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the of Selective attention and exploration at individual level

From: If horses had toes: demonstrating mirror self recognition at group level in Equus caballus

Horses Selective attention Exploration
CM OM Χ2; p CM OM Χ2; p
Antonia 2.0 271.6 Χ2 = 263.7; p < .0001 4.3 263.0 Χ2 = 248.4; p < .0001
Arramon 9.3 175.5 Χ2 = 147.7; p < .0001 21.6 339.5 Χ2 = 278.1; p < .0001
Ercole 395.2 345.3 Χ2 = 3.2; p = 0.072 10.6 584.4 Χ2 = 551.4; p < .0001
Falco2 555.3 1068.7 Χ2 = 161.7; p < .0001 0.0 0.0 N/A
King 59.0 110.8 Χ2 = 15.2; p < .0001 11.0 438.0 Χ2 = 314.5; p < .0001
Naidjia 184.7 436.8 Χ2 = 101.5; p < .0001 36.6 67.2 Χ2 = 8.44; p = 0.004
Oliver 144.1 481.4 Χ2 = 180.2; p < .0001 0.0 571.3 Χ2 = 569.3; p < .0001
Oti 56.9 288.5 Χ2 = 154.0; p < .0001 35.8 436.4 Χ2 = 338.2; p < .0001
Serafine 42.1 425.0 Χ2 = 312.2; p < .0001 26.9 349.4 Χ2 = 274.7; p < .0001
Shaif 20.6 745.5 Χ2 = 684.0; p < .0001 0.0 39.8 Χ2 = 37.8; p < .0001
Sunshine 42.4 270.8 Χ2 = 165.1; p < .0001 125.5 0.0 Χ2 = 123.5; p < .0001
  1. Results of the individual analyses (Chi-Square, Χ2; p values) of Selective Attention and Exploration in Covered Mirror (CM) and Open Mirror conditions (OM). Values in CM and OM columns are reported in seconds. N/A: not shown as having a meaningful interpretation. N/A: not applicable