Abstract
From early infancy, humans reason about the external world in terms of identifiable, solid, cohesive objects persisting in space and time. This is one of the most fundamental human skills, which may be part of our innate conception of object properties. Although object permanence has been extensively studied across a variety of taxa, little is known about how non-human animals reason about other object properties. In this study, we therefore tested how domestic horses (Equus ferus caballus) intuitively reason about object properties like solidity and height, to locate hidden food. Horses were allowed to look for a food reward behind two opaque screens, only one of which had either the proper height or inclination to hide food rewards. Our results suggest that horses could not intuitively reason about physical object properties, but rather learned to select the screen with the proper height or inclination from the second set of 5 trials.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Aguiar A, Baillargeon R (1999) Perseveration and problem solving in infancy. Adv Child Dev Behav 27:135–180
Aguiar ACA, Baillargeon R (2002) Developments in young infants’ reasoning about occluded objects. Cogn Psychol 45:267–336
Albiach-Serrano A, Bräuer J, Cacchione T, Zickert N, Amici F (2012) The effect of domestication and ontogeny in swine cognition (Sus scrofa scrofa and S. s. domestica). Appl Anim Behav Sci 141:25–35
Baillargeon R (1987) Object permanence in 3½- and 4½-month-old infants. Dev Psychol 23:655–664
Baillargeon R (1995) Physical reasoning in infancy. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 181–204
Baillargeon R, Devos J (1991) Object permanence in young infants: further evidence. Child Dev 62:1227–1246
Baillargeon R, Spelke ES, Wasserman S (1985) Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition 20:191–208
Baragli P, Vitale V, Paoletti E, Mengoli M, Sighieri C (2011) Encoding the object position for assessment of short term spatial memory in horses (Equus caballus). Int J Comp Psychol 24:284–291
Brubaker L, Udell MA (2016) Cognition and learning in horses (Equus caballus): what we know and why we should ask more. Behav Process 126:121–131
Cacchione T, Call J (2010) Do gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) fail to represent objects in the context of cohesion violations? Cognition 116:193–203
Cacchione T, Rakoczy H (2017) Comparative metaphysics: thinking about objects in space and time. In: Call J (ed) Handbook of comparative psychology. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 579–599
Call J (2007) Apes know that hidden objects can affect the orientation of other objects. Cognition 105:1–25
Chiandetti C, Vallortigara G (2011) Intuitive physical reasoning about occluded objects by inexperienced chicks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278:2621–2627
Hanggi EB (2003) Discrimination learning based on relative size concepts in horses (Equus caballus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 83:201–213
Hanggi EB, Ingersoll JF (2009) Long-term memory for categories and concepts in horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 12:451–462
Hespos S, Baillargeon R (2006) Décalage in infants’ knowledge about occlusion and containment events: converging evidence from action tasks. Cognition 99:31–41
Kellman PJ, Spelke ES (1983) Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cogn Psychol 15:483–524
Kundey SMA, Reyes ADL, Taglang C, Baruch A, German R (2010) Domesticated dogs’ (Canis familiaris) use of the solidity principle. Anim Cogn 13:497–505
Mclean AN (2004) Short-term spatial memory in the domestic horse. Appl Anim Behav Sci 85:93–105
Murphy J, Arkins S (2007) Equine learning behaviour. Behav Process 76:1–13
Osthaus B, Proops L, Hocking I, Burden F (2013) Spatial cognition and perseveration by horses, donkeys and mules in a simple A-not-B detour task. Anim Cogn 16:301–305
Pattison KF, Miller HC, Rayburn-Reeves R, Zentall T (2010) The case of the disappearing bone: dogs’ understanding of the physical properties of objects. Behav Process 85:278–282
R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Rakoczy H (2015) Comparative metaphysics: the development of representing natural and normative regularities in human and non-human primates. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 14:683–697
Rochais C, Fureix C, Lesimple C, Hausberger M (2016) Lower attention to daily environment: a novel cue for detecting chronic horses’ back pain? Sci Rep 6:20117
Santos LR, Hauser MD (2002) A non-human primate’s understanding of solidity: dissociations between seeing and acting. Dev Sci 5:1–7
Spelke ES (1990) Principles of object perception. Cogn Sci 14:29–56
Spelke ES, Breinlinger K, Macomber J, Jacobson K (1992) Origins of knowledge. Psychol Rev 99:605–632
Wilcox T, Nadel L, Rosser R (1996) Location memory in healthy preterm and full-term infants. Infant Behav Dev 19:309–323
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haemmerli, S., Thill, C., Amici, F. et al. Domestic horses (Equus ferus caballus) fail to intuitively reason about object properties like solidity and weight. Anim Cogn 21, 441–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1177-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1177-z