Advertisement

Food Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 1047–1055 | Cite as

Study on kinetics of flow characteristics in hot air drying of pineapple

  • Pak Malaikritsanachalee
  • Withu Choosri
  • Touchpong Choosri
Article
  • 133 Downloads

Abstract

The aim was to evaluate the kinetic parameters, total color differences (∆E*) and browning index differences (∆BI) of air flow pineapple drying. The experiments were performed on air temperatures at 60 and 70 °C, and air velocities at 1.5 and 2.0 m/s. The kinetic parameter (k) increased when air temperature was increased for all air velocity. The effective diffusivity coefficient (Deff) increased as high as the temperature of the heating medium. The variation of Deff of swirling flow was ranging from 6.72 × 10−9 to 10.23 × 10−9 m2/s, while the variation of Deff of non-swirling flow was ranging from 6.40 × 10−9 to 9.42 × 10−9 m2/s. The drying time of swirling flow was shorter than non-swirling flow in each drying condition. Moreover, the ∆E* and ∆BI of pineapple in swirling flow were lower than that obtained from non-swirling flow. Therefore, the convective drying using swirling flow can be minimized for drying time and color deterioration.

Keywords

Pineapple Drying kinetic Effective diffusivity coefficient Browning index differences Total color differences 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by a new researcher grants from Ministry of Science and Technology of the National Science and Technology Development Agency-NSTDA (SCH-NR2014-161).

References

  1. 1.
    Agarry SE, Ajani AO, Aremu MO. Thin layer drying kinetics of pineapple: Effect of blanching temperature–time combination. Nig. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 21(1): 1–10 (2013).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akpinar EK, Midilli A, Bicer Y. Single layer drying behavior of potato slices in a convective cyclone dryer and mathematical modeling. Energ. Convers. Manage. 44: 1689–1705 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akpinar EK. Evaluation of convective heat transfer coefficient of various crops in cyclone type dryer. Energ. Convers. Manage. 46: 2439–2454 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    AOAC. Official methods of analysis. AOAC Official Method 935.29. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD (2000).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Babalis SJ, Papanicolaou E, Kyriakis N, Belessiotis VG. Evaluation of thin-layer drying model for describing drying kinetics of figs (Ficuscarica). J. Food Eng. 75: 205–214 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Çakmak G, Yildiz C. Design of a new solar dryer system with swirling flow for drying seeded grape. Int. Commun. Heat Mass. 36: 984–990 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang F, Dhir VK. Mechanisms of heat transfer enhancement and slow decay of swirl in tubes using tangential injection. Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl. 16(2): 78–87 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen HE, Peng HY, Chen BH. Changes of carotenoids, color and vitamin A contents during processing of carrot juice. J. Agr. Food Chem. 43(7): 1912–1918 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chutintrasri B, Noomhorm A. Color degradation kinetics of pineapple puree during thermal processing. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 40(2): 300–306 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cortellino G, Pani P, Torreggiani D. Crispy air-dried pineapple rings: optimization of processing parameters. Procedia Food Sci. 1: 1324–1330 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crank J. The mathematics of diffusion. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1975).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dutta PP, Baruah DC. Drying modelling and experimentation of Assam black tea (Camellia sinensis) with producer gas as a fuel. Appl. Therm. Eng. 63: 495–502 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    FAO. FoSTAT Database Collections, Agricultural Data, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2012. www.faostat.fao.org. Accessed June 23, 2015.
  14. 14.
    Henderson SM, Pabis S. Grain drying theory I: temperature effect on drying coefficient. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 6: 169–174 (1961).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hosseinpour S, Rafiee S, Mohtasebi SS, Aghbashlo M. Application of computer vision technique for on-line monitoring of shrimp color changes during drying. J. Food Eng. 115: 99–114 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huntington DH. The influence of the spray drying process on product properties. Dry. Technol. 22(6): 1261–1287 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Javed KH, Mahmud T, Purba E. Enhancement of mass transfer in a spray tower using swirling gas flow. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 84(6): 465–477 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kha TC, Nguyen MH, Roach PD, Stathopoulos CE. Microencapsulation of gac oil: Optimization of spray drying conditions using response surface methodology. Powder technol. 264: 298–309 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kowalski SJ, Rajewska K. Convective drying enhanced with microwave and infrared radiation. Dry. Technol. 27(7): 878–887 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kowalski SJ, Szadzińska J, Łechtańska J. Non-stationary drying of carrot: Effect on product quality. J. Food Eng. 118: 393–399 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lewis WK. The rate of drying solid materials. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 13(5): 427–432 (1921).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martinez MV, Whitaker JR. The biochemistry and control of enzymatic browning. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 6(6): 195–200 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Özbey M, Söylemez MS. Effect of swirling flow on fluidized bed drying of wheat grains. Energ. Convers. Manage. 46: 1495–1512 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Page GE. Factors influencing the maximum rates of air drying shelled corn in thin layers. M.S. thesis. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, Lafayette, USA. (1949).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pasban A, Sadrnia H, Mohebbi M, Shahidi SA. Spectral method for simulating 3D heat and mass transfer during drying of apple slices. J. Food Eng. 212: 201–212 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pothula AK, Igathinathane C, Shen J, Nichols K, Archer D. Milled industrial beet color kinetics and total soluble solid contents by image analysis. Ind. Crop. Prod. 65: 159–169 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rafiee S, Sharifi M, KeyhaniA, Omid M, Jafari A, Mohtasebi SS, Mobli H. Modeling effective moisture diffusivity of orange slices (Thompson Cv.). Int. J. Food Prop. 13: 32–40 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramallo LA, Mascheroni RH. Quality evaluation of pineapple fruit during drying process. Food Bioprod. Process. 90: 275–283 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rattanathanalerk M, Chiewchan N, Srichumpoung W. Effect of thermal processing on the quality loss of pineapple juice. J. Food Eng. 66: 259–265 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rayaguru K, Routray W. Mathematical modelling of thin layer drying kinetics of stone apple slices. Int. Food Res. J. 19(4): 1503–1510 (2012).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sedahmed GH, Abdel-Aziz MH, Abdo MSE, Hassan MS, Konsowa AH. Mass and heat transfer the surface of a gas sparged pool of liquid to an immiscible liquid under swirling flow and potential applications. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 125: 88–95 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singleton VL, Gortner WA, Young HY. Carotenoid pigments of pineapple fruit. I. Acid-catalyzed isomerization of the Pigments. J. Food Sci. 26(1): 49–52 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tang Y, Min J, Wu X. Selection of convective moisture transfer driving potential and its impacts upon porous plate air-drying characteristics. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 116: 371–376 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yagcioglu A, Degirmencioglu A, Cagatay F. Drying characteristics of laurel leaves under different conditions. In Başçetinçelik A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Agricultural Mechanization and Energy, 26–27 May, Adana, Turkey. Faculty of Agriculture, Çukurova University. pp. 565–569 (1999).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhu A, Shen X. The model and mass transfer characteristics of convection drying of peach slices. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 72: 345–351 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Food Science and Technology and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pak Malaikritsanachalee
    • 1
  • Withu Choosri
    • 2
  • Touchpong Choosri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial TechnologySilpakorn UniversityNakhon PathomThailand
  2. 2.Department of Food Technology, Faculty of ScienceRamkhamhaeng UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations