Food Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 299–312 | Cite as

Properties and applications of starch modifying enzymes for use in the baking industry

  • Sung Hoon Park
  • Yerim Na
  • Jungwoo Kim
  • Shin Dal Kang
  • Kwan-Hwa Park


Enzyme technology has many potential applications in the baking industry because carbohydrate-active enzymes specifically react with carbohydrate components, such as starch, in complex food systems. Amylolytic enzymes are added to starch-based foods, such as baking products, to retain moisture more efficiently and to increase softness, freshness, and shelf life. The major reactions used to modify the structure of food starch include: (1) hydrolysis of α-1, 4 or α-1, 6 glycosidic linkages, (2) disproportionation by the transfer of glucan moieties, and (3) branching by formation of α-1, 6 glycosidic linkage. The catalytic reaction of a single enzyme or a mixture of more than two enzymes has been applied, generating novel starches, with chemical changes in the starch structure, in which the changes of molecular mass, branch chain length distribution, and the ratio of amylose to amylopectin may occur. These developments of enzyme technology highlight the potential to create various structured-starches for the food and baking industry.


Amylolytic enzymes Starch modification Baking industry Disproportionation enzyme Anti-staling agent Glycosyl hydrolase Glycosyl transferase 



Authors thank Dr. Eui-Jeon Woo, Korea Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology for the 3-D structure model of amylases.


  1. 1.
    Chung HJ, Liu Q, Hoover R. The impact of annealing and heat-moisture treatments on rapidly digestible, slowly digestible and resistant starch levels in native and gelatinizedcorn, pea and lentil starches. Carbohydr. Polym. 75: 436–447 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chung HJ, Liu Q, Hoover R. Effect of single and dual hydrothermal treatments on the crystalline structure, thermal properties and nutritional fractions of pea, lentil and navy starches. Food Res. Int. 43: 501–508 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoover R, Manuel H. Effect of heat-moisture treatments on the structure and physicochemical properties of legume starches. Food Res. Int. 29: 731–750 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoover R, Vasanthn T, The effect of annealing on the physicochemical properties of wheat, oat, potato and lentil starches. J. Food Biochem. 17: 303–325 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirsch JB, Kokini JL. Understanding the mechanism of cross-linking agents (POCl3, STMP, and EPI) through swelling behavior and pasting properties of cross-linked waxy maize starches. Cereal Chem. 79: 102–107 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perry PA, Donald AM. The effects of low temperatures on starch granule structure. Polymer. 41: 6361–6373 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kavitha R, BeMiller JN. Characterization of hydroxypropylated potato starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 37: 115–121 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richardson S, Gorton AC. High-performance anion exchange chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry for investigation of the substituent distribution in hydroxypropylated potato amylopectin starch. J. Chromat. 917: 111–121 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang YJ, Wang L. Characterization of acetylated waxy maize starches prepared under catalysis by different alkali and alkaline-earth hydroxides. Starch 54: 25–30 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miguel ASM, Martins-Meyer TS, Figueiredo EVC, Paulo Lobo BW, Dellamora-Ortiz GM. Enzymes in bakery: current and future trends. pp. 287–321. In: Food Industry. Muzzalupo I, InTech, London, U.K. (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Biegelis R. Carbohydrases. pp. 121–158. In: Enzymes in food processing. Nagodawithana T, Reed G, Academic Press Inc. New York, U.S.A. (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kennedy, JF, Knill CJ, Taylor, DW. Maltodextrins. pp. 65–82. In: Handbook of starch hydrolysis products and their derivatives. Keasley MW and Dziedzic SZ, Blackie Academic & Professional, Glasgow, U.K. (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Butler DP, van der Maarel MJEC, Steeneken PAM. Starch-acting enzymes. pp 128–155. In: Starch in food: structure, function and applications. Eliasson AC, CRC Press, Boca Raton, U.S.A. (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh R, Kumar M, Mittal A, Mehta PK. Microbial enzymes: industrial progress in 21st century. 3 Biotech. 6: 174 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang WJ, Powell AD, Oates CG. Pattern of enzyme hydrolysis in raw sago starch: Effects of processing history. Carbohydr. Polym. 26: 91–97 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oates CG, Powell AD. 1996. Bioavailability of carbohydrate material stored in tropical fruit seed. Food Chem. 56: 405–414 (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tari TA, Annapure US, Singhal RS, Kulkarni PR. Starch-based spherical aggregates: Screening of small granule sized starches for entrapment of a model flavouring compound, vallin. Carbohydr. Polym. 53: 45–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daniel JR, Whistler R L. 1990. Fatty sensory qualities of polysaccharides. Cereal Foods World 35: 825 (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim JY, Park DJ, Lim ST. Fragmentation of waxy rice starch granules by enzymatic hydrolysis. Cereal Chem. 85: 182–187 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Angellier CH, Boisseau SM, Dufresne A. Mechanical properties of waxy starch nanocrystal reinforced natural rubber. Macromolecules 38: 9161–9170 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Angellier CH, Putaux JL, Molina B S, Dufresne A, Bertoft E, Perez S. The molecular structure of waxy maize starch nanocrystals. Carbohydr. Res. 344: 1558–1566 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Else AJ, Tronsmo KM, Nieman LA, Moonen JHE. Use of anti-staling enzyme mixture in the preparation of baked bread. U.S. Patent 2013/0059031 A1 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nguyen DH, Tran PL, Ha HS, Lee JS, Hong WS, Le QT, Oh BC, Park SH. Presence of β-amylase in ramie leaf and its anti-staling effect on rice cake, Food Sci. Biotechnol. 24: 37–40. (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hickman BE, Janaswamy S, Yao Y. Properties of starch subjected to partial gelatinization and β-amylolysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57: 666–674 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seo NS, Roh SA, Auh JH, Park JH, Kim YR, Park KH. Structural characterization of rice starch in rice cake modified by Thermus scotoductus 4-α-glucanotransferase (TSαGTase). J. Food Sci. 72: C331–C336 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Din Z, Xiong H, Fei P. Physical and chemical modification of starches – A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 57: 2691–2705 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    BeMiller JN, Huber KC. Physical modification of food starch functionalities. Ann. Review. Food Sci. Technol. 6:19–69 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ashogbon AO, Akintayo ET. Recent trend in the physical and chemical modification of starches from different botanical sources: A review. Starch 66: 41–57 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neelam K, Vijay S, Lalit S. Various techniques for the modification of starch and the applications of its derivatives. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 3(5): 25–31 2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    van der Maarel MJEC, van der Veen B, Uitdehaag JCM, Leemhuis H, Dijkhuizen L, Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the α-amylase family. J. Biotechnol. 94: 137–155 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    van der Maarel MJEC, Leemhuis H. Starch modification with microbial alpha-glucanotransferase enzymes. Carbohydr. Polym. 93: 116–121 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. Carbohydrate-active enzymes: An integrated database approach. In: Recent advances in carbohydrate bioengineering. Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ, Henrissat B, Svensson B (ed), Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England (1999)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Park KH, Park JH, Lee SY, Yoo SH, Kim JW. Enzymatic modification of starch for food industry. In: Carbohydrate-active enzymes: structure, function and applications. Park KH (ed). CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA. Woodhead Pub. Ltd. Cambridge, England (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Henrissat B. A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem.J. 280: 309–316 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Henrissat B, Davies G. Structural and sequence-based classification of glycoside hydrolases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7: 637–644 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Coutinho PM, Deleury E, Davies GJ, Henrissat B. “An evolving hierarchical family classification for glycosyltransferases”. J. Mol. Biol. 328: 307–317. (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Janecek S. New conserved amino acid region of alpha-amylase in the 3rd loop of their (beta/alpha)8-barrel domains. Biochem. J. 288: 1066–1070 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Janecek, S. Close evolutionary relatedness among functionally distantly related members of the (beta/alpha) 8-barrel glycosyl hydrolases suggested by similarity of their fifth conserved sequence region. FEBS Lett. 377: 6–8 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cha HJ, Yoon HG, Kim YW, Lee HS, Kim JW, Kwon K, Cha SS, Cho MJ, Oh BH, Park KH. Molecular and enzymatic characterization of a maltogenic amylase that hydrolyzes and transglycosylates acarbose, Eur. J. Biochem. 253: 251–262 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sinnott ML. Catalytic mechanisms of enzymic glycosyl transfer. Chem. Rev. 9: 1171–1202 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bissaro B, Monsan P, Fauré R, O’Donohue MJ. Glycosynthesis in a waterworld: new insight into the molecular basis of transglycosylation in retaining glycoside hydrolases. Biochem J. 467: 17–35 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Crout DH, Vic G. Glycosidases and glycosyl transferases in glycoside and oligosaccharide synthesis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.: 98–111 (1998)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Singh S, Packwood J, Samuel CJ, Critchley P, Crout D. Glycosidase-catalyzed oligosaccharide synthesis: preparation of N-actylchitooligosaccharides using the β-N-acetylhexosaminidase of Aspergillus oryzae. Carbohydr. Res. 279: 293–305 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Williams S. “Glycoside Hydrolase Family: Transglycosylase” in CAZypedia, available from, Accessed May 1, 2017.
  45. 45.
    Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): An expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: D233–D238 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kaper T, van der Maarel M J E C, Euverink G J, & Dijkhuizen L. Exploring and exploiting starch-modifying amylomaltases from thermophiles. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 32: 279–282 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vocadlo DJ, Davies GJ. Mechanistic insights into glycosidase chemistry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 12: 539– 555 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Boos W, Shuman H. Maltose/maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: transport, metabolism, and regulation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62: 204–229 (1998)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    van der Maarel MJEC, Capron I, Euverink GJW, Bos HT, Kaper T, Binnema DJ, Steeneken PAM. A novel thermostable gelling product made by enzymatic modification of starch. Starch 57: 465–472 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    He L, Park SH, Nguyen DHD, Duong HX, Duong TPC, Tran PL, Jong-Tae Park JT, Ni L, Park KH. Characterization and thermal inactivation kinetics of highly thermostable ramie leaf β–amylase. Enzyme Microbial. Technol. 101: 17–23 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kraus JK, Hebeda RE. Method for retarding staling of baked goods, U.S. Patent: 5,209,938 (1993)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shen GJ, Saha BC, Bhatnagar YE, Zeikus J. Purification and characterization of a novel thermostable beta-amylase from Clostridium thermosulphurogenes. Biochem. J. 254: 835–40 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bang BY, Kim HJ, Kim HY, Baik MY, Ahn SC, Kim JH, Park CS. Cloning and overexpression of 4-α-glucanotransferase from Thermus brockianus (TBGT) in E. coli. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16:1809–1813 (2006)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Daba T, Kojima K, Inouye K, Characterization and solvent engineering of wheat -amylase for enhancing its activity and stability, Enzyme Microb.Technol. 51: 245–251 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kim JS, Cha SS, Kim HJ, Kim TJ, Ha NC, Oh ST, Cho HS, Kim MJ, Lee HS, Kim JW, Choi KY, Park KH, Oh BH. Crystal structure of a maltogenic amylase: Provides insights into a catalytic versatility. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 26279–26286 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Auh JH, Chae HY, Kim YR, Shim KH, Yoo SH, Park KH. Modification of rice starch by selective degradation of amylose using alkalophilic Bacillus cyclomaltodextrinase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54: 2314–2319 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kamasaka H, Sugimoto K, Takata H, Nishimura T, Kuriki T. Bacillus stearothermophilus neopulluanase selective hydrolysis of amylose to maltose in the presence of amylopectin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 1658–1664 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Li X, Li D, Tian H, Park, K.H. Reducing retrogradation of gelatinized rice starch and rice meal under low temperature storage by addition of extremely thermostable maltogenic amylase during their cooking. Food Res. Int. 62: 1134–1140 (2014)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Park SH, Kang HK, Shim JH, Woo EJ, Hong JS, Kim JW, Oh BH, Lee BH, Cha H, Park KH. Modulation of substrate preference of Thermus maltogenic amylase by mutation of the residues at the interface of a dimer. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71: 1564–7 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jobling S. Improving starch for food and industrial applications. Cur. Opinion Plant Biol. 7: 210–218 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sun YW, Jiao GA, Liu ZP, Zhang X, Li JY, Guo XP, Du WM, Du JL, Francis F, Zhao YD, Xia LQ. Generation of high-amylose rice through CRISPR/Cas9- mediated targeted mutagenesis of starch branching enzymes. Front. Plant Sci. 8: 298–312 (2017)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Itoh K, Ozaki H, Okada K, Hori H, Takeda Y, Mitsui T. Introduction of Wx transgene into rice wx mutants leads to both high and low-amylose rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 44: 473–480 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wursch P, Gummy D. Inhibition of amylopectin retrogradation by partial beta-amylolysis. Carbohydr. Res. 256: 129–137 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tsujii Y, Nagafuku N, Miyake A, Uchino M, Takano K. Presence and activity of various amylases in rice: Effect on texture and leached sugar composition during cooking, Food Sci. Technol. Res., 19: 81–87 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Miao M, Li R, Huang C, Jiang B, Zhang T. Impact of β-amylase degradation on properties of sugary maize soluble starch particles. Food Chem. 177: 1–7 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yao Y, Zhang J, Ding X. Partial β-amylolysis retards starch retrogradation in rice products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51: 4066–4071(2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    De Stefani, VA, Turner EW. Modified enzyme system to inhibit bread firming method for preparing same and use of same in bread and other bakery products. U.S. Patent 4 299 848 (1981)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sahlstrom S, Brathen E. Effects of enzyme preparations for baking, mixing time and resting time on bread quality and bread staling. Food Chem. 58: 75–80 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Carroll, JO, Boyce COL, Wong TM, Strance CA. Retardation of bread staling and avoidance of gummy mouthfeel by incorporation of 0.25–5 SKB units/100 grams of cereal or bacterial alpha-amylase and 10-50 PUN of a pullulanase per 100 grams of flour in the dough. U.S. Patent 4 654 216 (1987)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Min BC, Yoon SH, Kim JW, Lee YW, Kim YB, Park KH. Cloning of novel maltooligosaccharide-producing amylases as an antistaling agent for bread. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46: 779–782 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Karim AA, Sufha EH, Zaidul IS. Dual modification of starch via partial enzymatic hydrolysis in the granular state and subsequent hydroxypropylation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56: 10901–10907 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Park JH, Park KH, Jane JL. Physicochemical properties of enzymatically modified maize starch using 4-alpha-glucanotransferase. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 16: 902–909 (2007)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Park JH, Kim HJ, Kim YH, Cha H, Kim YW, Kim TJ, Kim YR, Park KH. The action mode Thermus aquaticus YT-1 4-alpha-glucanotransferase and its chimeric enzymes introduced with starch-binding domain on amylose and amylopectin. Carbohydr. Polym. 67: 164–173 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kim YL, Mun S, Park KH, Shim JY, Kim YR. Physicochemical functionality of 4-α-glucanotransferase-treated rice flour in food application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 60: 422–426 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Nguyen DHD, Tran PL, Li D, Han JA, Hwang JY, Hong WS, Lee JS, Kim YR, Yoo SH, Park JT, Choi YJ, Lee SY, Park KH. Modification of rice grain starch for lump-free cooked rice using thermostable disproportionating enzymes. Food Res. Int. 63: 55–61 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Diderichsen B, Christiansen L. Cloning of a maltogenic alpha-amylase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. FEMS Lett. Microbiol. 56: 53–60 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Christophersen C, Otzen DE, Noman BE, Christensen, Schaefer T. Enzymatic characterization of Novamyl, a thermostable α-amylase. Starch 50: 39–45 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Dauter Z, Dauter M, Brzozowski AM, Christensen S, Borchert TV, Beier L, Wilson KS, Davies GJ. X-ray structure of Novamyl, the five-domain “maltogenic” α-amylase from Bacllus sterothermophilus: Maltose and acarbose complexes at 1.7Å resolution. Biochemistry 38: 8385–8392 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Bier L, Svensen A, Andersen C, Frandsen TP, Borchert TV, Cherry JR. Conversion of the maltogenic α-amylase Novamyl into CGTase. Prot. Eng. 13: 500–513 (2000)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lee SH, Kim YW, Lee S, Auh JH, Yoo SS, Kim TJ, Kim JW, Kim ST, Rho HJ, Choi JH, Kim YB, Park KH. Modulation of cyclizing activity and thermostability of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase and its application as antistaling enzyme. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50: 1411–1415 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Shim JH, Kim YW, Kim TJ, Cha HY, Park JH, Cha HJ, Kim JW, Kim YR, Schaefer T, Spendler T, Moon TW, Park KH. Improvement of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase as an anti-staling enzyme by error-prone PCR. Prot. Eng. Design Select. 17: 205–211 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Shim JH, Seo NS, Roh SA, Kim JW, Cha HJ, Park KH. Improved bread-baking process using Saccharomyces cerevisiae displayed with engineered cyclodextrin glucanotransferase.J. Agr.Food Chem. 55: 4735–4740 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hansen MR, Blennow A, Pedersenc S, Nørgaarda L, Engelsen SB. Gel texture and chain structure of amylomaltase-modified starches compared to gelatin. Food Hydrocoll. 22: 1551–1566 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lee KY, Kim YR, Park KH, Lee HG. 2006. Effects of α-glucanotransferase treatment on the thermo-reversibility and freeze-thaw stability of a rice starch gel. Carbohydr. Polym. 63: 347–354 (2006)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Viet HD, Mun SH, Kim YL, Rho SJ, Park KH, Kim YR. Novel formulation of low-fat spread using rice starch modified by α-glucanotransferase. Food Chem. 208: 132–141 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Lee CK, Le QT, Kim YH, Shim JH, Lee SJ, Park JH, Lee KP, Song SH, Auh JH, Lee SJ, Park KH. Enzymatic synthesis and properties of highly branched rice starch amylose and amylopectin cluster. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56: 126–131 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Cho KH, Auh JH, Kim JH, Ryu JH, Park KH, ParkCS, Yoo SH. Effect of amylose content on corn starch modification by Thermus aquaticus 4-α-glucanotransferase J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 1201–1205 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ríos-Covián D, Ruas-Madiedo P, Margolles A, Gueimonde M, Reyes-Gavilán CG, Salazar N. Intestinal short chain fatty acids and their link with diet and human health. Front Microbiol. 7: 185 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Ao Z, Sinsek S, Zhang G, Venkatachalam M. Starch with a slow digestion property produced by altering its chain length, brach chain density, and crystalline structure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55: 4540–4547 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Jane J, Chen YY, Lee LF, McPherson AE, Wong KS, Radosavljevic M, Kasemsuwan T. Effects of amylopectin branch chain length and amylose content on the gelatinization and pasting properties of starch. Cereal Chem. 76: 629–637 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kim H, Choi S, Park CS, Moon TW. Low digestion property of amylosucrase-modified waxy adlay starch. Food Sci Biotechnol 25: 457- 460 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kim HR, Choi SJ, Park CS, Moon TW. Kinetic studies of in vitro digestion of amylosucrase-modified waxy corn starches based on branch chain length distributions. Food Hydrocolloids. 65: 46–56 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Zhang H, Zhou X, Hea J, Wang T, Xiaohu Luo X, Wang L, Wang R, Chen Z. Impact of amylosucrase modification on the structural and physicochemical properties of native and acid-thinned waxy corn starch. Food Chem. 220: 413–419 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ryu JH, Lee BH, Seo DH, Baik MY, Park CS, Wang R, Yoo SH. Production and characterization of digestion-resistant starch by the reaction of Neisseria polysaccharea amylosucrase. Starch 62: 221–228 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Shin HJ, Choi SJ, Park CS, Moon TW. Preparation of starches with low glycaemic response using amylosucrase and their physicochemical properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 82: 489–497 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Osaki S, Yoshino Z, Tsujisaka Y, Takaku H. Manufacture of oligosaccharides. pp 210–217. In Handbook of amylases and related enzymes: their sources, isolation methods, properties and applications. The amylase research society of Japan, Osaka, Japan (ed.), Pergamon Press, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Kwon MR, Park CS, Auh JH, Cho BM, Yang NS, Park KH. Phospholipid hydrolysate and antistaling amylase effects on retrogradation of starch in bread. J. Food Sci. 59:1072–1076 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Kim IC, Yoo SH, Lee SJ, Oh BH, Kim JW, Park KH. Synthesis of branched oligosaccharides from starch by two amylase cloned from Bacillus licheniformis. Biosci. Biotechnol.Biochem. 58: 416–418 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Kim IC, Cha JH, Kim JR, Jang SY, Seo BC, Cheong TK, Lee DS, Choi YD, Park KH. Catalytic properties of the cloned amylase from Bacillus lichenformis. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 22108–22114 (1992)Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Kim IC, Yoo SH, Lee SJ, Oh BH, Kim JW, Park KH. Synthesis of branched oligosacchareides from starch by two amylases cloned from Bacillus licheniformis. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 58: 416–418 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Cheong TK, Kim TJ, Kim MJ, Choi YD. Kim IC, Kim JW, Park KH. Modulation of Bacillus amylolytic enzymes and production of branched oligosaccharides. pp 43–60. In: Enzymes for Carbohydrate Engineering: Progress in Biotechnology, Vol. volume 12, Park KH, Robyt JF, Choi YD (e Ed.) pp 43–60. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherland (1996)Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Cuong NP, Lee WH, Oh IN, Thuy NM, Kim DG, Park JT, Park KH. 2016 Continuous production of pure maltodextrin from cyclodextrin using immobilized Pyrococcus furiosus thermostable amylase. Process Biochem. 51: 282–287 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Mun S, Kim YL, Kang CG, Park KH, Shim JY, Kim YR. Development of reduced-fat mayonnaise using 4GTase-modified rice starch andxanthan gum. Intl. J. Biol. Macromol. 44: 400–407 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Shinohara ML, Ihara M, Abo M, Hashida M, Takagi S, Beck TC. A novel thermostable branching enzyme from an extremely thermophilic bacterial species, Rhodothermus obamensis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 57: 653–659 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Takata H, Ohdan K, Takaha T, Kuriki T, Okada S. (2003). Properties of branching enzyme from hyperthermophilic bacterium, Aquifex aeolicus, and its potential for production of highly-branched cyclic dextrin. J. Appl. Glycosci. 50: 15–20 (2003)Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    van der Maarel MJEC, Vos A, Sanders P, Dijkhuizen L. (2003). Properties of the glucan branching enzyme of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus. Biocat. Biotrans. 21: 199–207 (2003)Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Palomo M, Kralj S, van der Maarel MJEC, Dijkhuizen L. The unique branching patterns of Deinococcus glycogen branching enzymes are determined by their N-terminal domains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 1355–1362 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    van der Maarel MJEC, Binnema DJ, Semeijn C, Buwalda PL. Novel slowly digestible storage carbohydrate. EP1943908 (2007)Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Dermaux L, Peptitjean C, Wills D. Soluble, highly branched glucosepolymers for enteral and parenteral nutrition and for peritoneal dialysis. WO2007099212 (2007)Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Le QT, Lee CK, Kim YW, Lee SJ, Zhang R, Withers SG, Kim YR, Auj JH, Park KH. Amylolytically-resistant tapioca starch modified by combined treatment of branching enzyme and maltogenic amylase. Carbohydr. Polym. 75: 9–14 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Xu Y, Huang Q, Fu X, Jane J. Modification of starch octenylsuccinate by β-amylase hydrolysis in order to increase its emulsification properties, Food Hydrocolloid 48: 55–61 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Kelly RM, Dijkhuizen L, Leemhuis H. Starch and α-glucan acting enzymes, modulating their properties by directed evolution. J. Biotechnol. 140: 184–193 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Food Science and Technology and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sung Hoon Park
    • 1
  • Yerim Na
    • 1
  • Jungwoo Kim
    • 1
  • Shin Dal Kang
    • 1
  • Kwan-Hwa Park
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Institute of Food and BiotechnologySPC GroupSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Center for Food and Bioconvergence and Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations