Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the usability of different optical measuring techniques for joint roughness evaluation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The roughness of rock discontinuities is an important input parameter for mechanical models of rock masses. To reliably calculate roughness indices, adequate representations of the surfaces are required. Various optical measuring approaches have been applied in the past. However, many studies lack information on resolution and accuracy of the resulting surface meshes. These qualities are yet important, as they explicitly affect the deduced roughness metrics. Often, the sensors do not achieve the given precision and accuracy. Moreover, no technical standards presently exist for roughness evaluation from optical measuring approaches. Therefore, previous studies are difficult to compare. To overcome these issues, this study offers a comparison of four different techniques and sensors. Here, the focus lies on laboratory use and evaluation of micro-roughness, meaning sample sizes up to 20 cm in length. Stationary structured light scanning (SLS) serves as the reference method. As results, the surface models from dense image matching are very consistent with the reference. Their calculated roughness values accord to a high degree, both for 2D and 3D indices. In addition, roughness indices deduced from models acquired with manually operated SLS show deviations from the reference yet within an acceptable range. Instead, terrestrial laser scanning turned out to be not suitable for micro-roughness evaluation, at least at laboratory scale. Furthermore, in this contribution, an algorithm is applied, which can retrace all possible profile measurements directly from the triangulated surfaces. That way the ambiguity of the profile-based roughness measure joint roughness coefficient (JRC) is made visible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abellan A, Oppikofer T, Jaboyedoff M, Rosser NJ, Lim M, Lato MJ (2014) Terrestrial laser scanning of rock slope instabilities. Earth Surf Process Landf 39:80–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Alameda-Hernández P, Jiménez-Perálvarez J, Palenzuela JA, El Hamdouni R, Irigaray C, Cabrerizo MA, Chacón J (2014) Improvement of the JRC calculation using different parameters obtained through a new survey method applied to rock discontinuities. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:2047–2060

    Google Scholar 

  • Artec (2019) Artec scanners booklet. https://www.artec3d.com/files/pdf/ArtecScanners-Booklet-EURO.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2019

  • Barton N, Bandis S (1982) Effects of block size on the shear behavior of jointed rock. Proceedings 23rd Symp. Rock mechanics, august 25–27, 1982, Berkeley, CA

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10:1–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton NR (1973) Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7:287–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Belem T, Homand-Etienne F, Souley M (2000) Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness. Rock Mech Rock Eng 33:217–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Bistacchi A, Griffith WA, Smith SAF, Di Toro G, Jones R, Nielsen S (2011) Fault roughness at Seismogenic depths from LIDAR and photogrammetric analysis. Pure Appl Geophys 168:2345–2363

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitenc M, Kieffer DS, Khoshelham K, Vezocnik R (2015) Quantification of rock joint roughness using terrestrial laser scanning. Proceedings IAEG XII Congress, September 15-19, 2014, Torino

  • Böhler W, Vicent MB, Marbs A (2003) Investigating laser scanner accuracy. International archives of photogrammetry. Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci 34:696–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm J, Becker S (2007) Automatic marker-free registration of terrestrial laser scans using reflectance features. Proceedings of the 8th conference on optical 3D measurement techniques, Zurich, Switzerland

  • Brown SR (1995) Simple mathematical model of a rough fracture. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 100(B4):5941–5952

    Google Scholar 

  • Cignoni P, Rocchini C, Scopigno R (1998) Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces. Comput Graph Forum 17:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardin N, Feng Q, Stephansson O (2004) Application of a new in situ 3D laser scanner to study the scale effect on the rock joint surface roughness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:329–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardin N, Stephansson O, Jing L (2001) The scale dependence of rock joint surface roughness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:659–669

    Google Scholar 

  • FARO (2019) FARO laser scanner Focus3D X330 tech sheet. http://www.faro.com/download-center. Accessed 07 March 2019

  • Furukawa Y, Hernández C (2015) Multi-view stereo: A tutorial. Found Trends Comput Graph Vision 9:1–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Wong LNY (2015) A modified correlation between roughness parameter Z 2 and the JRC. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:387–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge Y, Tang H, Ez Eldin M, Chen P, Wang L, Wang J (2015) A description for rock joint roughness based on terrestrial laser scanner and image analysis. Sci Rep 5:16999

    Google Scholar 

  • GOM (2019) Webpage of GOM Atos measuring system. https://www.gom.com/metrology-systems/atos.html. Accessed 07 March 2019

  • Grasselli G, Egger P (2003) Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli G, Wirth J, Egger P (2002) Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:789–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Haala N (2011) Multiray photogrammetry and dense image matching. In: Fritsch D (ed) Photogrammetric week ‘11. Wichmann, Berlin, pp 185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Haneberg WC (2007) Directional roughness profiles from three-dimensional photogrammetric or laser scanner point clouds. Proceedings 1st CANUS Rock Mechanics Symposium, May 27–31, 2007, Vancouver

  • Hencher SR, Richards LR (2015) Assessing the shear strength of rock discontinuities at laboratory and field scales. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:883–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmüller H (2005) Accurate and efficient stereo processing by semi-global matching and mutual information. Proceedings IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), June 20–26, 2005, San Diego, CA

  • Hirschmüller H (2008) Stereo processing by semi-global matching and mutual information. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 30:328–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfle B, Geist T, Rutzinger M, Pfeifer N (2007) Glacier surface segmentation using airborne laser scanning point cloud and intensity data. International archives of photogrammetry. Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci 36:W52

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfle B, Pfeifer N (2007) Correction of laser scanning intensity data: data and model-driven approaches. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 62(6):415–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, White I, Thwaite EG, Bendeli A (1988) A noncontact laser system for measuring soil surface topography. J Soil Sci Soc Am 52:350–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi T, Watanabe N, Hirano N, Okamoto A, Tsuchiya N (2015) Beyond-laboratory-scale prediction for channeling flows through subsurface rock fractures with heterogeneous aperture distributions revealed by laboratory evaluation. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:106–124

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1978) Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abstracts 15:319–368

    Google Scholar 

  • JAG3D (2018) (OpenAdjustment) - An OpenSource Least-Squares-Adjustment Tool. http://javagraticule3d.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 22 September 2018

  • Jang H-S, Jang B-A (2015) New method for shear strength determination of unfilled, Unweathered rock joint. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1515–1534

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Li B, Tanabashi Y (2006) Estimating the relation between surface roughness and mechanical properties of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(6):837–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutzi B, Stilla U (2003) Laser pulse analysis for reconstruction and classification of urban objects. Int Arch Photogram Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci 34(3/w8):151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazhdan M, Hoppe H (2013) Screened Poisson surface reconstruction. ACM Trans Graph 32:29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny J, Turner K, Norton B (2006) LIDAR for rock mass characterization: hardware, software, accuracy and best-practices. Proceedings laser and photogrammetric methods for rock face characterization – workshop, June 17–18, 2006, Golden, CO

  • Kim DH, Gratchev I, Balasubramaniam A (2013) Determination of joint roughness coefficient (JRC) for slope stability analysis: a case study from the Gold Coast area, Australia. Landslides 10:657–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Poropat GV, Gratchev I, Balasubramaniam A (2015) Improvement of photogrammetric JRC data distributions based on parabolic error models. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 80:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladanyi B, Archambault G (1970) Simulation of shear behaviour of jointed rock mass. Proceedings 7th Symp. Rock mechanics, June 16–19, 1969, Berkeley, CA

  • Lange DA, Jennings HM, Shah SP (1993) Relationship between fracture surface roughness and fracture behavior of cement paste and mortar. J Am Ceram Soc 76:589–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y-H, Carr JR, Barr DJ, Haas CJ (1990) The fractal dimension as a measure of the roughness of rock discontinuity profiles. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abstracts 27:453–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Huang R (2015) Relationship between joint roughness coefficient and fractal dimension of rock fracture surfaces. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 75:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhang Y (2015) Quantitative estimation of joint roughness coefficient using statistical parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 77:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Tian Y, Liu D, Jiang Y (2017) Updates to JRC-JCS model for estimating the peak shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Eng Geol 228:282–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourakis MIA, Argyros AA (2004) Design and implementation of a generic sparse bundle adjustment software package based on the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Institute of Computer Science, Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann T, Robson S, Kyle SA, Harley IA (2011) Close range photogrammetry: principles, techniques and applications. Whittles Publishing, Dunbeath

    Google Scholar 

  • Maerz NH, Franklin JA, Bennett CP (1990) Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abstracts 27:329–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Mah J, Samson C, McKinnon SD, Thibodeau D (2013) 3D laser imaging for surface roughness analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 58:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsch K, Wujanz D (2016) Determination of roughness parameters based on dense image matching and structured light scanning. Proceedings 2nd Virtual Geoscience Conference, September 22–23, 2016, Bergen

  • Milenkovic M, Pfeifer N, Glira P (2015) Applying terrestrial laser scanning for soil surface roughness assessment. Remote Sens 7:2007–2045

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne D, Hawkes C, Hamilton C (2009) A new tool for the field characterization of joint surfaces. Proceedings 3rd CANUS Rock Mechanics Symposium, May 2009, Toronto

  • Muralha J, Grasselli G, Tatone B, Blümel M, Chryssanthakis P, Yujing J (2014) ISRM suggested method for laboratory determination of the shear strength of rock joints: revised version. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:291–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers NO (1962) Characterization of surface roughness. Wear 5:182–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HT, Fernandez-Steeger TM, Wiatr T, Rodrigues D, Azzam R (2011) Use of terrestrial laser scanning for engineering geological applications on volcanic rock slopes—an example from Madeira island (Portugal). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:807–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson M, Edelbro C, Sharrock G (2012) Small scale joint surface roughness evaluation using digital photogrammetry. Proceedings Eurock2012, May 28–30, 2012, Stockholm

  • Oglesby J, Kolb-Lugo J, Brown S, Harris A, Hudyma N, Johansen D, Bliss A (2017) Comparison of roughness indices from weathered, differentially weathered and Vuggy profiles obtained using laser scanning and photogrammetry. Proceedings 51st U.S. rock mechanics/Geomechanics symposium, 25-28 June, San Francisco, California, USA

  • Pardini G, Gallart F (1998) A combination of laser technology and fractals to analyse soil surface roughness. Eur J Soil Sci 49:197–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollyea RM, Fairley JP (2011) Estimating surface roughness of terrestrial laser scan data using orthogonal distance regression. Geology 39:623–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves MJ (1985) Rock surface roughness and frictional strength. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abstracts 22:429–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegl (2019) Riegl VZ-6000 datasheet. http://www.riegl.com/uploads/tx_pxpriegldownloads/RIEGL_VZ-6000_Datasheet_2018-12-05.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2019

  • Rothermel M, Wenzel K, Fritsch D, Haala N (2012) Sure: photogrammetric surface reconstruction from imagery. Proceedings LC3D Workshop, Berlin (Vol. 8)

  • Soudarissanane S, Lindenbergh R, Menenti M, Teunissen P (2011) Scanning geometry: influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 66(4):389–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturzenegger M, Stead D (2009) Close-range terrestrial digital photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for discontinuity characterization on rock cuts. Eng Geol 106:163–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Surphaser (2017) Surphaser 100HSX data sheet. http://www.surphaser.com/pdf/Surphaser%20100HSX.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2019

  • Tatone BSA, Grasselli G (2009) A method to evaluate the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces in brittle geomaterials. Rev Sci Instrum 80:125110

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatone BSA, Grasselli G (2013) An investigation of discontinuity roughness scale dependency using high-resolution surface measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:657–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogler D, Walsh SDC, Bayer P, Amann F (2017) Comparison of surface properties in natural and artificially generated fractures in a crystalline rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:2891–2909

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosselman G, Maas HG (2010) Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernecke C, Marsch K (2015) Mapping rock surface roughness with photogrammetry. Proceedings Eurock2015, October 7–10, 2015, Salzburg

  • Wujanz D (2012) Towards transparent quality measures in surface based registration processes: effects of deformation onto commercial and scientific implementations. Proceedings of the XXII Congress of the International Society of Photogrammetry and remote Sensing, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wujanz D, Burger M, Mettenleiter M, Neitzel F (2017) An intensity-based stochastic model for terrestrial laser scanners. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 125:146–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu XB, Vayssade B (1991) Joint profiles and their roughness parameters. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abstracts 28:333–336

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Geology, Technische Universität Berlin, Sekr. BH3-1, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 1, 10587, Berlin, Germany

    Kristofer Marsch & Tomas M. Fernandez-Steeger

  2. Geodesy and Adjustment Theory, Technische Universität Berlin, Sekr. H20, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany

    Daniel Wujanz

Authors
  1. Kristofer Marsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Wujanz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tomas M. Fernandez-Steeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristofer Marsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marsch, K., Wujanz, D. & Fernandez-Steeger, T.M. On the usability of different optical measuring techniques for joint roughness evaluation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79, 811–830 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01606-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01606-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation