Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of initial conditions on the liquefaction strength of an earth structure

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liquefaction has been the major source of damage for structures and infrastructures in most recent earthquakes, as it induces loss of strength and stiffness in soils, resulting in settlement of buildings, landslides, and failure of pipelines and earth dams. Such a phenomenon is primarily associated with saturated cohesionless soils and strong-motion seismic events able to induce pore water pressure build-up. Even though the degree of soil saturation is strictly related to the oscillation of groundwater table and to the interaction flows (namely precipitation and evaporation) between the exposed surface and the atmosphere, the initial distribution of pore water pressure is commonly simplified in liquefaction potential analysis and the presence of unsaturated soil layers is almost always neglected. To try to fill this gap, this work investigates the effect of the initial distribution of pore water pressure on the liquefaction strength evaluation, considering the potential presence of unsaturated soil layers. The work uses as case-study a well-investigated inhabited levee damaged by the 2012 Emilia earthquake. The initial distribution of pore water pressure within the dyke is carried out by solving the Richards equation in steady-state and transient conditions, assuming as boundary conditions the evolution of potential flows recorded at the site in the time period including the earthquake event. The cyclic resistance of unsaturated soils is considered during the execution of dynamic analyses in effective stress conditions. Results of the analyses show that initial conditions influence the liquefaction strength of earth structure and that neglecting the cyclic resistance of unsaturated soils is not a conservative assumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M, Ab W (1998) Crop evapotranspiration — guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Paper No. 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An N, Hemmati S, Cui Y (2017) Numerical analysis of soil volumetric water content and temperature variations in an embankment due to soil-atmosphere interaction. Comput Geotech 83:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrus RD, Stokoe KHII (2000) Liquefaction Resistance of Soils from Shear-Wave Velocity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(11):1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015)

  • Aubertin M, Mbonimpa M, Bussière M, Chapuis RP (2003) Development of a model to predict the water retention curve using basic geotechnical properties. Technical report EPMRT-2003-01. École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, 51 pp

  • Bian H, Shahrour I (2009) Numerical model for unsaturated sandy soils under cyclic loading: application to liquefaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blight GE (1997) Interactions between the atmosphere and the earth. Géotechnique 47:713–767. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.4.713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs KM, Smethurst JA, Powrie W, O’Brien AS (2016) The influence of tree root water uptake on the long term hydrology of a clay fill railway embankment. Transport Geotech 9:31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi G, Colleselli F, Danese D, Giani G, Mancuso C, Montrasio L et al (2013) Research study of the hydraulic behaviour of the Po River embankments. Can Geotech J 50:947–960. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradonna A, Tropeano G, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2016) A simplified method for pore pressure buildup prediction: from laboratory cyclic tests to the 1D soil response analysis in effective stress conditions. Procedia Eng 158:302–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradonna A, Tropeano G, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2018a) Interpreting the deformation phenomena of a levee damaged during the 2012 Emilia earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradonna A, Tropeano G, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2018b) Development of a simplified model for pore water pressure build-up induced by cyclic loading. Bull Earthq Eng 16(9):3627–3652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0354-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradonna A, Bilotta E, d'Onofrio A, Flora A, Silvestri F (2018c) A simplified procedure for evaluating post-seismic settlements in liquefiable soils. In: Proc of the 5th Conference on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, GEESDV, Austin, 10–13 June 2018, volume GPS 290, pp 51–59

  • Chiaradonna A, Lirer S, Flora A (2019) A damage-based liquefaction potential index for microzonation studies. Engineering Geology (under review)

  • Cubrinovski M, Rhodes A, Ntritsos N, van Ballegooy S (2019) System Response of Liquefiable Deposits. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 124:212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries DA (1963) Thermal properties of soils. In: Wijk WR (ed) Physics of plant environment. North Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, p 382

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Ludovico M, Chiaradonna A, Bilotta E, Flora A, Prota A (2019) Empirical damage and liquefaction fragility curves from 2012 Emilia earthquake data. Earthquake Spectra (under review)

  • Eseller-Bayat E, Yegian MK, Alshawabkeh A, Gokyer S (2013) Liquefaction response of partially saturated sands. II: empirical model. J Geotech Geoenviron 139(6):863–871

  • Flora A, Chiaradonna A, Bilotta E, Fasano G, Mele L, Lirer S, Pingue L, Fanti F (2019) Field tests to assess the effectiveness of ground improvement for liquefaction mitigation. In: Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (VII ICEGE), Rome (Italy), June 2019. ISBN: 978-0-367-14328-2 (Hbk), eISBN: 978-0-429-03127-4 (eBook)

  • Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H, Fredlund MD (2012) Unsaturated soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam D, Santucci de Magistris F, Fabbrocino G (2017) Soil liquefaction in Kathmandu valley due to 25 April 2015 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 97:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GEO-SLOPE International (2007a) Seepage modeling with SEEP/W. An engineering methodology. User manual. GEO-SLOPE International ,Calgary, Alberta, Canada

  • GEO-SLOPE International (2007b) Vadose zone modeling with VADOSE/W. An engineering methodology. User manual. GEO-SLOPE International, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

  • Gottardi G, Gragnano CG, Rocchi I, Bittelli M (2016) Assessing River embankment stability under transient seepage conditions. Procedia Eng 158:350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall CA, Hernandez G, Darby KM, van Paassen L, Kavazanjian E, DEJong J, Wilson D (2018) Centrifuge model testing of liquefaction mitigation via denitrification-induced desaturation. In: Proc of the 5th Conference on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, GEESDV, Austin, 10-13 June 2018, volume GPS 290, pp 117–126

  • Johansen O (1975) Thermal conductivity of soils. Ph.D Thesis, Trondheim, Norway: Universitetsbiblioteket

  • Kondner RL, Zelasko JS (1963) Hyperbolic stress-strain formulation of sands. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Panamerican Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Sao Paulo, Brazil, vol 1. Associação Brasileira de Mecânica dos Solos, pp 289–324

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlemeyer RL, Lysmer J (1973) Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. J Soil Mech Found Div 99(SM5):421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancuso C, Vassallo R, d’Onofrio A (2002) Small strain behaviour of soils in controlled suction conditions. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Recife, Brazil

  • Martin GR, Finn WDL, Seed RB (1978) Effects of system compliance on liquefaction tests. J Geotech Eng Div 104(4):463–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Masing G (1926) Eigenspannungen und Verfertigung beim Messing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Applied Mechanics, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 323–335

  • Mele L, Flora A (2019) On the prediction of liquefaction resistance of unsaturated sands. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 125:105689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.05.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele L, Tian JT, Lirer S, Flora A, Koseki J (2018) Liquefaction resistance of unsaturated sands: experimental evidence and theoretical interpretation. Géotechnique 69(6):1–44. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mualem Y (1976) Hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, predictions and formulas. Methods of soil analysis. Agron Monogr 9(31):799–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div 85(EM7):67–94

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman PA (2015) Precipitation extremes under climate change. Curr Clim Chang Rep 1(2):49–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0009-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano L, Reder A, Rianna G (2018) Effects of vegetation on hydrological response of silty volcanic covers. Can Geotech J [Published online]. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder A (2016) Interazione delle coltri piroclastiche con l'atmosfera e il substrato. PhD Dissertation in Geotechnical Engineering, University of Napoli Federico II (in Italian)

  • Reder A, Iturbide M, Herrera S, Rianna G, Mercogliano P, Gutierrez JM (2018a) Assessing variations of extreme indices inducing weather-hazards on critical infrastructures over Europe—the INTACT framework. Clim Chang 148(1-2):123–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2184-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder A, Rianna G, Pagano L (2018b) Physically based approaches incorporating evaporation for early warning predictions of rainfall-induced landslides. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:613–631. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-613-2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rianna G, Reder A, Mercogliano P, Pagano L (2017) Evaluation of variations in frequency of landslide events affecting pyroclastic covers in Campania region under the effect of climate changes. Hydrology 4(3):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4030034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards LA (1931) Capillary conduction of liquid through porous media. J Appl Phys 1:318–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonni L, Gottardi G, Amoroso S, Bardotti R, Bonzi L, Chiaradonna A, d’Onofrio A, Fioravante V, Ghinelli A, Giretti D, Lanzo G, Madiai C, Marchi M, Martelli L, Monaco P, Porcino D, Razzano R, Rosselli S, Severi P, Silvestri F, Simeoni L, Vannucchi G, Aversa S (2015) Analisi dei fenomeni deformativi indotti dalla sequenza sismica emiliana del 2012 su un tratto di argine del Canale Diversivo di Burana. Italian Geotech J 49(2):28–58 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tropeano G, Chiaradonna A, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2016) An innovative computer code for 1D seismic response analysis including shear strength of soils. Géotechnique 66(2):95–105. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.SIP.15.P.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropeano G, Chiaradonna A, d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F (2019) A numerical model for non-linear coupled analysis on seismic response of liquefiable soils. Comput Geotech 105:211–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsukamoto Y, Kawabe S, Matsumoto J, Hagiwara S (2014) Cyclic resistance of two unsaturated silty sands against soil liquefaction. Soils Found 54(6):1094–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassallo R, Mancuso C, Vinale F (2007) Effects of net stress and suction history on the small strain stiffness of a compacted clayey silt. Can Geotech J 44:447–462. https://doi.org/10.1139/T06-129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernay M, Morvan M, Breul P (2016) Influence of saturation degree and role of suction in unsaturated soils behaviour: application to liquefaction. E3S Web of Conferences 9:14002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160914002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GW, Fredlund DG, Barbour SL (1994) Coupled soil-atmosphere modelling for soil evaporation. Can Geotech J 31(2):151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Muraleetharan KK, Liu C (2016) Liquefaction of unsaturated sands. Int J Geomech 16(6):D4015002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000605

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Chiaradonna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiaradonna, A., Reder, A. Influence of initial conditions on the liquefaction strength of an earth structure. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79, 687–698 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01594-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01594-z

Keywords

Navigation