Advertisement

Reconstruction of landslide model from ERT, geotechnical, and field data, Nargeschal landslide, Iran

  • Sadegh RezaeiEmail author
  • Issa Shooshpasha
  • Hamed Rezaei
Original Paper
  • 198 Downloads

Abstract

Landslides are natural hazards that cause severe casualties and financial losses. There are various methods used to analyze landslides; among these, geotechnical and geophysical methods are widely used due to their accuracy and low cost, respectively. In this study, 2D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) surveys, geotechnical, and field data are used to define the subsurface structure and the geometry of the Nargeschal landslide. To determine the most appropriate array, ERT measurements were performed by Wenner-alpha (Wa), Wenner-Schlumberger (WS), and dipole-dipole (DD) arrays. Furthermore, the relationship between electrical resistivity with change in the degree of saturation and landslide hydrology was investigated by completing multiple surveys at the same location, at different times. Landslide 3D geometry and hydrology were identified by ERT results. Moreover, geotechnical data was used to investigate the Nargeschal landslide and to interpret the ERT pseudo sections. The data from boreholes were used to constrain the depth and consequently the resistivity range that characterize the basal slip surface of the landslide in the ERT pseudo sections. The results of geotechnical investigations indicated that the landslide material had moisture content very close to the plastic limit, with a higher clay fraction and low shear strength at the slip surface. Finally, it must be noted that the simultaneous use of the ERT survey, geotechnical methods, and field investigations led to a complete and accurate characterization of the Nargeschal landslide.

Keywords

Landslide Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) Geotechnical investigation Slip surface geometry Hydrology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the reviewers for constructive comments and their valuable suggestion which helped us to improve the manuscript.

References

  1. Ahmad R, Earle AH, Hugues P, Maharaj R, Robinson E (1993) Landslide damage to the board river water supply pipeline, Bromley hill, Jamaica: case study of a landslide caused by hurricane Gilbert. B Int Assoc Eng Geol 47:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akpan AE, Ilori AO, Essien NU (2015) Geophysical investigation of Obot Ekpo landslide site, Cross River state. Nigeria J Afr Earth Sci 109:154–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arman A, Samtani N, Castelli R, Munfakh G (1997) Geotechnical and foundation engineering, module 1–subsurface investigations. Publication No FHWA NHI-97:21Google Scholar
  4. Aryal A, Brooks BA, Reid ME (2015) Landslide subsurface slip geometry inferred from 3-D surface displacement fields. Geophys Res Lett 42(5):1411–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bery AA, Ismail NEH (2018) Empirical correlation between electrical resistivity and engineering properties of soils. Soil Mech Found Eng 54(6):425–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braga AC, Malagutti FW, Dourado JC, Chang HK (1999) Correlation of electrical resistivity and induced polarization data with geotechnical survey standard penetration test measurements. J Environ Eng Geoph 4:123–130Google Scholar
  7. Capizzi P, Martorana R (2014) Integration of constrained electrical and seismic tomographies to study the landslide affecting the cathedral of Agrigento. J Geophys Eng 11(4):045009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlini M, Chelli A, Francese R, Giacomelli S, Giorgi M, Quagliarini A, Carpena A, Tellini C (2018) Landslides types controlled by tectonics-induced evolution of valley slopes (northern Apennines, Italy). Landslides 15(2):283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choobbasti AJ, Rezaei S, Farrokhzad F (2013) Evaluation of site response characteristics using microtremors. Gradev 65:731–741Google Scholar
  10. Coşkun N, Çakır Ö, Erduran M, Kutlu YA, Çetiner ZS (2016) A potential landslide area investigated by 2.5 D electrical resistivity tomography: case study from Çanakkale, Turkey. Arab J Geosci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2026-x
  11. Crawford MM, Zhu J, Webb SE (2015) Geologic, geotechnical, and geophysical investigation of a shallow landslide. Eastern Kentucky Environ Eng Geosci 21:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dai Z, Wang F, Cheng Q, Wang Y, Yang H, Lin Q, Kongming Y, Feicheng L, Li K (2018) A giant historical landslide on the eastern margin of the Tibetan plateau. B Eng Geol Eenviron.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1226-x
  13. De Bari C, Lapenna V, Perrone A, Puglisi C, Sdao F (2011) Digital photogrammetric analysis and electrical resistivity tomography for investigating the Picerno landslide (Basilicata region, southern Italy). Geomorphology 133:34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devi A, Israil M, Anbalagan R, Gupta PK (2017) Subsurface soil characterization using geoelectrical and geotechnical investigations at a bridge site in Uttarakhand Himalayan region. J Appl Geophys 144:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dostál I, Putiška R, Kušnirák D (2014) Determination of shear surface of landslides using electrical resistivity tomography. Contr Geophys Geod 44:133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fang HY (2013) Foundation engineering handbook. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Fressard M, Maquaire O, Thiery Y, Davidson R, Lissak C (2016) Multi-method characterisation of an active landslide: case study in the pays d'Auge plateau (Normandy, France). Geomorphology 270:22–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedel S, Thielen A, Springman SM (2006) Investigation of a slope endangered by rainfall-induced landslides using 3D resistivity tomography and geotechnical testing. J Appl Geophys 60:100–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallipoli M, Lapenna V, Lorenzo P, Mucciarelli M, Perrone A, Piscitelli S, Sdao F (2000) Comparison of geological and geophysical prospecting techniques in the study of a landslide in southern Italy. J Environ Eng Geoph 4:117–128Google Scholar
  20. Glade T, Crozier MJ (2005) The nature of landslide hazard impact. In: Glade T, Anderson M, Crozier M (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, Chichester, pp 43–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grandjean G, Gourry JC, Sanchez O, Bitri A, Garambois S (2011) Structural study of the Ballandaz landslide (French alps) using geophysical imagery. J Appl Geophys 75(3):531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guerriero L, Coe JA, Revellino P, Grelle G, Pinto F, Guadagno FM (2014) Influence of slip-surface geometry on earth-flow deformation, Montaguto earth flow, southern Italy. Geomorphology 219:285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guerriero L, Revellino P, Luongo A, Focareta M, Grelle G, Guadagno FM (2016) The mount Pizzuto earth flow: deformational pattern and recent thrusting evolution. J Maps 12(5):1187–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guerriero L, Bertello L, Cardozo N, Berti M, Grelle G, Revellino P (2017) Unsteady sediment discharge in earth flows: a case study from the mount Pizzuto earth flow, southern Italy. Geomorphology 295:260–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gullà G, Aceto L, Antronico L, Borrelli L, Coscarelli R, Perri F (2018) A smart geotechnical model in emergency conditions: a case study of a medium-deep landslide in southern Italy. Eng Geol 234:138–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gunn DA, Chambers JE, Uhlemann S, Wilkinson PB, Meldrum PI, Dijkstra TA, Haslam E, Kirkham M, Wragg J, Holyoake S, Hughes PN (2015) Moisture monitoring in clay embankments using electrical resistivity tomography. Constr Build Mater 92:82–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hibert C, Grandjean G, Bitri A, Travelletti J, Malet JP (2012) Characterizing landslides through geophysical data fusion: example of the La Valette landslide (France). Eng Geol 128:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hu J, Li S, Li L, Shi S, Zhou Z, Liu H, He P (2017) Field, experimental, and numerical investigation of a rockfall above a tunnel portal in southwestern China. B Eng Geol Eenviron.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1152-y
  29. Işık NS, Doyuran V, Ulusay R (2004) Assessment of a coastal landslide subjected to building loads at Sinop, Black Sea region, Turkey, and stabilization measures. Eng Geol 75:69–88Google Scholar
  30. Krzeminska DM, Bogaard TA, Van Asch TW, Van Beek LPH (2012) A conceptual model of the hydrological influence of fissures on landslide activity. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 16(6):1561–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolay PK, Burra SG, Kumar S (2018) Effect of salt and NAPL on electrical resistivity of fine-grained soil-sand mixtures. Int J Geotech Eng 12(1):13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  33. Ling C, Xu Q, Zhang Q, Ran J, Lv H (2016) Application of electrical resistivity tomography for investigating the internal structure of a translational landslide and characterizing its groundwater circulation (Kualiangzi landslide, Southwest China). J Appl Geophys 131:154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loke MH (2004) Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. Geotomo software, Penang, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  35. Loke MH, Chambers JE, Rucker DF, Kuras O, Wilkinson PB (2013) Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. J Appl Geophys 95:135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lv H, Ling C, Hu BX, Ran J, Zheng Y, Xu Q, Tong J (2017) Characterizing groundwater flow in a translational rock landslide of southwestern China. B Eng Geol Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1212-3
  37. Martín-Crespo T, Gómez-Ortiz D, Martín-Velázquez S, Martínez-Pagán P, De Ignacio C, Lillo J, Faz Á (2018) Geoenvironmental characterization of unstable abandoned mine tailings combining geophysical and geochemical methods (Cartagena-La Union district, Spain). Eng Geol 232:135–146Google Scholar
  38. Merritt AJ, Chambers JE, Murphy W, Wilkinson PB, West LJ, Gunn DA, Meldrum PI, Kirkahm M, Dixon N (2014) 3D ground model development for an active landslide in Lias mudrocks using geophysical, remote sensing and geotechnical methods. Landslides 11:537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mori T, Tobita Y, Okimura T (2013) Damages of hillside embankments in Sendai City during the 2011 great East Japan earthquake. In: Ugai K, Yagi H, Wakai A (eds) Earthquake-induced landslides, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oh S, Sun CG (2008) Combined analysis of electrical resistivity and geotechnical SPT blow counts for the safety assessment of fill dam. Environ Geol 54:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perrone A, Lapenna V, Piscitelli S (2014) Electrical resistivity tomography technique for landslide investigation: a review. Earth-Sci Rev 135:65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pourghasemi HR, Moradi HR, Mohammadi M, Pradhan B, Mostafazadeh R, Goli Jirandeh A (2012) Landslide hazard assessment using remote sensing data, GIS and weights-of-evidence model (south of Golestan Province, Iran). Asia Pacific Conf Environ Sci Technol, Adv Biomed Eng 6:30–36Google Scholar
  43. Prountzopoulos G, Fortsakis P, Seferoglou K, Chrysochoidis F, Vassilopoulou I, Perleros V (2014) Assessment of failure mechanism and rehabilitation of a landslide within Marly formations in NW Greece: from the site investigation to the geotechnical design. Geotech Geol Eng 32:1485–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rezaei S, Choobbasti AJ (2014) Liquefaction assessment using microtremor measurement, conventional method and artificial neural network (case study: Babol, Iran). Front Struct Civ Eng 8(3):292–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rezaei S, Choobbasti AJ, Soleimani Kutanaei S (2015) Site effect assessment using microtremor measurement, equivalent linear method and artificial neural network (case study: Babol, Iran). Arab J Geosci 8:1453–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rezaei S, Choobbasti AJ (2017a) Application of microtremor measurements to a site effect study. Earthq Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-017-0187-2
  47. Rezaei S, Choobbasti AJ (2017b) Evaluation of local site effect from microtremor measurements in Babol city, Iran. J Seismol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9718-5
  48. Rezaei S, Shooshpasha I, Rezaei H (2018) Evaluation of landslides using ambient noise measurements (case study: Nargeschal landslide). Int J of Geotech Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1431354
  49. Ronchetti F, Borgatti L, Cervi F, Gorgoni C, Piccinini L, Vincenzi V, Corsini A (2009) Groundwater processes in a complex landslide, northern Apennines, Italy. Nat Hazard Earth Sys 9(3):895–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rønning JS, Ganerød GV, Dalsegg E, Reiser F (2014) Resistivity mapping as a tool for identification and characterisation of weakness zones in crystalline bedrock: definition and testing of an interpretational model. B Eng Geol Eenviron 73:1225–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sass O, Bell R, Glade T (2008) Comparison of GPR, 2D-resistivity and traditional techniques for the subsurface exploration of the Öschingen landslide, Swabian Alb (Germany). Geomorphology 93(1):89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Senthilkumar V, Chandrasekaran SS, Maji VB (2017) Geotechnical characterization and analysis of rainfall—induced 2009 landslide at Marappalam area of Nilgiris district, Tamil Nadu state, India. Landslides.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0839-2
  53. Siddiqui FI, Osman SBABS (2013) Simple and multiple regression models for relationship between electrical resistivity and various soil properties for soil characterization. Environ Earth Sci 70:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soto J, Galve JP, Palenzuela JA, Azañón JM, Tamay J, Irigaray C (2017) A multi-method approach for the characterization of landslides in an intramontane basin in the Andes (Loja, Ecuador). Landslides.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0830-y
  55. Sudha K, Israil M, Mittal S, Rai J (2009) Soil characterization using electrical resistivity tomography and geotechnical investigations. J Appl Geophys 67:74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Suryo EA (2013) Real-time prediction of rainfall induced instability of residual soil slopes associated with deep cracks. Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  57. Szokoli K, Szarka L, Metwaly M, Kalmár J, Prácser E, Szalai S (2017) Characterisation of a landslide by its fracture system using electric resistivity tomography and pressure probe methods. Acta Geod Geophys.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-017-0199-3
  58. Topal T, Akin M (2009) Geotechnical assessment of a landslide along a natural gas pipeline for possible remediations (Karacabey-Turkey). Environ Geol 57:611–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Topsakal E, Topal T (2015) Slope stability assessment of a re-activated landslide on the Artvin-Savsat junction of a provincial road in Meydancik, Turkey. Arab J Geosci 8:1769–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Uhlemann S, Wilkinson PB, Maurer H, Wagner FM, Johnson TC, Chambers JE (2018) Optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography: combined optimization of measurement configuration and electrode placement. Geophys J Int.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy128
  61. Watlet A, Kaufmann O, Triantafyllou A, Poulain A, Chambers JE, Meldrum PI, Wilkinson PB, Hallet V, Quinif Y, Van Ruymbeke M, Van Camp M (2018) Imaging groundwater infiltration dynamics in the karst vadose zone with long-term ERT monitoring. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 22(2):1563–1592Google Scholar
  62. Wei Z, Yin G, Wan L, Shen L (2008) Case history of controlling a landslide at Panluo open-pit mine in China. Environ Geol 54:699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams RA, Pratt TL (1996) Detection of the base of Slumgullion landslide, Colorado, by seismic reflection. In: Varned DJ, savage WZ (ed) the Slumgullion earth flow: a large-scale natural laboratory. US geological survey, Denver, pp 77–83Google Scholar
  64. Xu D, Hu XY, Shan CL, Li RH (2016) Landslide monitoring in southwestern China via time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography. Appl Geophys 13:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yalcin A (2011) A geotechnical study on the landslides in the Trabzon Province, NE, Turkey. Appl Clay Sci 52:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yalcinkaya E, Alp H, Ozel O, Gorgun E, Martino S, Lenti L, Bourdeau C, Bigarre P, Coccia S (2016) Near-surface geophysical methods for investigating the Buyukcekmece landslide in Istanbul, Turkey. J Appl Geophys 134:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yannah M, Martens K, Van Camp M, Walraevens K (2017) Geophysical exploration of an old dumpsite in the perspective of enhanced landfill mining in Kermt area, Belgium. B Eng Geol Eenviron.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1169-2
  68. Yılmaz S, Narman C (2015) 2-D electrical resistivity imaging for investigating an active landslide along a ridgeway in Burdur region, southern Turkey. Arab J Geosci 8:3343–3349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yin Y, Li B, Wang W, Zhan L, Xue Q, Gao Y, Zhang N, Chen H, Liu T, Li A (2016) Mechanism of the December 2015 catastrophic landslide at the Shenzhen landfill and controlling geotechnical risks of urbanization. Engineering 2:230–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zarroca M, Linares R, Roqué C, Rosell J, Gutiérrez F (2014) Integrated geophysical and morphostratigraphic approach to investigate a coseismic (?) translational slide responsible for the destruction of the Montclús village (Spanish Pyrenees). Landslides 11:655–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Civil EngineeringBabol University of TechnologyBabolIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering GeologyGolestan UniversityGorganIran

Personalised recommendations