Skip to main content
Log in

The reliability of CPTu and DMT for the mechanical characterisation of soft tailings

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, the stability and the safe cover and closure of soft tailings has become one of the most challenging topics in geotechnical and environmental engineering. For appropriate analysis and modelling, geotechnical properties of tailings should be well defined. Due to low strength, viscous nature and poor trafficability, as well as due to the specific geometrical properties of fine particles and pore water chemistry in tailings, different test methods and their modification and improvements must be used for valid and reliable characterisation of tailings. This paper analyses and compares the results of different field test methods, piezocone penetration test (CPTu), flat dilatometer test (DMT) and field vane test (FVT), performed on the red gypsum sludge and complementary laboratory tests. CPTu and DMT measurements were evaluated using procedures developed for soils and the obtained mechanical properties were compared with those measured in the laboratory. The significant distinctions between different test methods and different empirical correlations were analysed taking into account differences in index properties of soils and the red gypsum sludge. Based on analysis, some modifications of conventional empirical correlations were proposed for field tests results interpretation and sludge characterisation. The obtained data also show the advantages and limitations of some conventional methods and prove the need for further development in that field of geotechnical investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) (2011) ASTM D2487, standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) (2013) ASTM D4648/D4648M, standard test methods for laboratory miniature vane shear test for saturated fine-grained clayey soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • da Fonseca AV (2012) Application of in situ testing in tailing dams, emphasis on liquefaction: case-history. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on geotechnical and geophysical site characterization (ISC’4), Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco, Brazil, September 2012, pp 181–203

  • Dienstmann G, Schnaid F, Maghous S, DeJong J (2018) Piezocone penetration rate effects in transient gold tailings. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 144:4017116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Committee for Standardization (2007) EN 1997-2:2007. Eurocode 7 - geotechnical design - part 2: ground investigation and testing. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Hight DW, Georgiannou VN, Ford CJ (1994) Characterization of clayey sands. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on the behavior of offshore structures (BOSS’94), Cambridge, MA, July 1994, pp 321–40

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2012) EN ISO 22476-1:2012. Geotechnical investigation and testing - field testing - part 1: electrical cone and piezocone penetration test. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004) ISO/TS 17892-1:2004. Geotechnical investigation and testing - laboratory testing of soil - part 1: determination of water content. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004) ISO/TS 17892-2:2004. Geotechnical investigation and testing - laboratory testing of soil - part 2: determination of density of fine-grained soil. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004) ISO/TS 17892-3:2004. Geotechnical investigation and testing - laboratory testing of soil - part 3: determination of particle density - pycnometer method. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004) ISO/TS 17892-4:2004. Geotechnical investigation and testing - laboratory testing of soil - part 4: determination of particle size distribution. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004) ISO/TS 17892-5:2004. Geotechnical investigation and testing - laboratory testing of soil - part 5: incremental loading oedometer test. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004) ISO/TS 17892-6:2004. Geotechnical investigation and testing - laboratory testing of soil - part 6: fall cone test. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004) ISO/TS 17892-10:2004. Geotechnical investigation and testing - laboratory testing of soil - part 10: direct shear tests. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004) ISO/TS 17892-12:2004. Geotechnical investigation and testing - laboratory testing of soil - part 12: determination of Atterberg limits. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2005) ISO/TS 22476-11:2005. Geotechnical investigation and testing - field testing - part 11: flat dilatometer test. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2014) prEN ISO 22476-9:2014. Ground investigation and testing - field testing - part 9: field vane test. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski M (2014) Soil mechanics and the observational method: challenges at the Zelazny Most copper tailings disposal facility. Géotechnique 64(8):590–619. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.14.RL.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung BC, Gardoni P, Biscontin A (2008) Probabilistic soil identification based on cone penetration tests. Géotechnique 58(7):591–603. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.7.591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamei T, Iwasaki K (1995) Evaluation of undrained shear strength of cohesive soils using a flat dilatometer. Soils Found 35(2):111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku CS, Juang CH, Ou CY (2010) Reliability of CPT Ic as an index for mechanical behaviour classification of soils. Géotechnique 60(11):861–875. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.09.P.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd CC, Foott R, Ishihara K, Schlosser F, Poulos HG (1977) Stress-deformation and strength characteristics. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 10–15 July 1977. Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol 2, pp 421–494

  • Marchetti S (1980) In situ tests by flat dilatometer. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 106(GT3):299–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti S (1997) The flat dilatometer design applications. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international geotechnical engineering conference, Cairo, Egypt, 5–8 January 1997. Cairo University, pp 421–448

  • Marchetti S (2011) Discussion of “CPT-DMT correlations” by P. K. Robertson. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(4):441–442. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti S (2015) Some 2015 updates to the TC16 DMT report 2001. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on the flat dilatometer (DMT ’15), Rome, Italy, June 2015, pp 14–16

  • Marchetti S, Crapps DK (1981) Flat dilatometer manual. Internal report of G.P.E. Inc.

  • Marchetti S, Monaco P, Totani G, Calabrese M (2001) The flat dilatometer test (DMT) in soil investigations. Report of the ISSMGE Technical Committee 16 on Ground Property Characterisation from In-situ Testing. In: Proceedings of the international conference on in situ measurement of soil properties and case histories (In-Situ 2001), Bali, Indonesia, 21–24 May 2001. Graduate Program, Parahyangan Catholic University, pp 7–48

  • Masala S, Dhadli N (2012) Correlations of shear strengths of soft oil sands tailings assessed by different in situ methods. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international oil sands tailings conference, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, January 2013. https://sites.google.com/a/ualberta.ca/iostc2012

  • Mayne PW (2005) Integrated ground behavior: in-situ and lab tests. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on deformation characteristics of geomaterials, Lyon, France, 22–24 September 2005. Taylor & Francis Group, London, vol 2, pp 155–177

  • Mayne PW (2014) KN2: interpretation of geotechnical parameters from seismic piezocone tests. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on cone penetration testing (CPT’14), Las Vegas, Nevada, 12–14 May 2014. ISSMGE Technical Committee TC, vol 102, pp 47–73

  • Mayne PW, Coop MR, Springman SM, Huang AB, Zornberg JG (2009) Geomaterial behavior and testing. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering (ICSMGE 2009), Alexandria, Egypt, 5–9 October 2009. IOS Press, vol 4, pp 2777–2872

  • Mesri G (1975) New design procedure for stability of soft clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 101(GT4):409–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesri G, Stark TD, Ajlouni MA, Chen CS (1997) Secondary compression of peat with or without surcharging. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(5):411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkovšek A, Majes B, Mladenovič A (2008) The influence of the mineralogical and physical properties of chemical gypsum on the compaction behavior and stability of the gypsum mono-landfill bodies—a case study from Slovenia. In: Proceedings of the 1st middle European conference on landfill technology, Budapest, Hungary, 6–8 February 2008. Hungarian Academy of Sciences, pp 257–264

  • Robertson PK (1990) Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 27(1):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK (2009a) Interpretation of cone penetration tests—a unified approach. Can Geotech J 46(11):1337–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK (2009b) CPT–DMT correlations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(11):1762–1771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK (2011) Closure to “CPT–DMT correlations” by P. K. Robertson. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(4):443–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Cabal KL (2010) Estimating soil unit weight from CPT. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on cone penetration testing (CPT’10), Huntington Beach, CA, 9–11 May 2010. http://www.cpt10.com, accessed 30/7/2015

  • Robertson PK, Cabal KL (2015) Guide to cone penetration testing for geotechnical engineering, 6th edn. Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc., Signal Hill, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Campanella RG (1983) Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part I: sand. Can Geotech J 20(4):718–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnaid F, Odebrecht E (2015) Challenges in the interpretation of the DMT in tailings. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on the flat dilatometer (DMT ’15), Rome, Italy, June 2015

  • Schnaid F, Lehane BM, Fahey M (2004) In situ test characterization of unusual geomaterials. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on site characterization, Porto, Portugal, September 2004, keynote lecture, vol 1, pp 49–74

  • Schnaid F, Bedin J, Filho LMC (2007) Piezocone in silty tailing materials. Stud Geotech Mech 29:151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaid F, Bedin J, Nierwinski HP, Odebrecht E (2015) On the characterization and classification of bauxite tailings. Soils Rocks 37:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Tućan F (1930) Specijalna mineralogija. Državna Štamparija Kraljevine Jugoslavije, Beograd, pp 314–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Wels C, Robertson AM, Jakubick AT (2000) A review of dry cover placement on extremely weak, compressible tailings. CIM Bull 93(1043):111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Wroth CP (1984) Interpretation of in situ soil tests. Géotechnique 34(4):449–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Robertson PK, Brachman RWI (2002) Estimating liquefaction-induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground. Can Geotech J 39(5):1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-047

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matej Maček.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maček, M., Smolar, J. & Petkovšek, A. The reliability of CPTu and DMT for the mechanical characterisation of soft tailings. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 2237–2252 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1299-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1299-1

Keywords

Navigation