Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of the configuration of a baffle–avalanche wall system on rock avalanches in Tibet Zhangmu: discrete element analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock avalanches with a high mobility and kinetic energy pose a potential geological risk to surrounding buildings. Baffles and avalanche walls are effective ways to protect these buildings. However, the primary focus of previous studies has been on baffles or avalanche walls alone, and there have been very few studies investigating the effectiveness of a combination of baffles and avalanche walls as a countermeasure against rock avalanches. In addition, previous studies on lab-scale tests and numerical analyses often did not take the actual topography effects into consideration. In this study we adopted a numerical simulation approach based on an actual project in the town of Zhangmu, Tibet, with the aim to investigate the effect of different configurations of a combined baffle–avalanche wall system on impeding the kinetic energy of rock avalanches. A series of numerical analyses with discrete element methods (DEM) were conducted. First, the effect of three different pile groups on the reduction of the effect of the rock avalanche was studied using the numerical modeling study. Secondly, the influence of the size of the retaining wall on the maximum impact force of the rock avalanche was studied. Finally, a DEM modeling study on the energy dissipation capacity of the baffle–avalanche wall system was conducted. The results demonstrate that an arrangement of different baffle–avalanche wall systems will produce different results in terms of dissipating the energy of rock avalanches: when the wall is long enough to block all rock masses, enhancing baffle density will decrease the maximum impact force exerted on the avalanche wall; however, if the wall is just long enough to protect the target region, reducing baffle density will decrease the maximum impact force exerted on the avalanche wall. The results of this study are significant in terms of providing guidelines for the design of baffle–avalanche wall systems for protection against rock avalanches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ai J, Chen J-F, Rotter JM, Ooi JY (2011) Assessment of rolling resistance models in discreteelement simulations. Powder Technol 206(3):269–282

  • Aydan Ö (2016) Some considerations on a large landslide at the left Bank of the Aratozawa dam Caused by the 2008 Iwate–Miyagi intraplate earthquake. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(6):2525–2539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzoni A, De Freitas MH (1995) Prediction of rockfall trajectories with the aid of in situ test. Rock Mech Rock Eng 28(2):111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi Y, He S, Li X et al (2016a) Effects of segregation in binary granular mixture avalanches down inclined chutes impinging on defending structures. Environ. Earth Sci 75(3):263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi Y, He S, Li X et al (2016b) Geo-engineered buffer capacity of two-layered absorbing system under the impact of rock avalanches based on discrete element method. J Mt Sci 13(5):917–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi Y, Du Y, He S, Sun X, Wang D, Li X, Liang H, Wu Y (2018) Numerical analysis of effect of baffle configuration on impact force exerted from rock avalanches. Landslides 15(5):1029–1043

  • Choi CE, Ng CWW, Law RPH et al (2014) Computational investigation of baffle configuration on impedance of channelized debris flow. Can Geotech J 52(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosenza E, Cozzolino L, Pianese D, Fabbrocino G, Acanfora M (2006) Concrete structures for mitigation of debris-flow hazard in the Montoro Inferiore Area, Southern Italy. 2nd International Congress, IFSC, Naples, pp 1–12

  • Cox SC, Allen SK (2009) Vampire rock avalanches of January 2008 and 2003, southern alps, New Zealand. Landslides 6(2):161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies TR, McSaveney MJ (1999) Runout of dry granular avalanches. Can Geotech J 36(2):313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies TR, McSaveney MJ (2002) Dynamic simulation of the motion of fragmenting rock avalanches. Can Geotech J 39(4):789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denlinger RP, Iverson RM (2004) Granular avalanches across irregular three-dimensional terrain: 1. Theory and computation. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 109:F1. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JF000085

  • Grämiger LM, Moore JR, Vockenhuber C et al (2016) Two early Holocene rock avalanches in the Bernese alps (Rinderhorn, Switzerland). Geomorphology 268:207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He SM, Liu W, Wang J (2015) Dynamic simulation of landslide based on thermo-poro-elastic approach. Comput Geosci 75:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Evans SG (2004) Entrainment of debris in rock avalanches: an analysis of a long run-out mechanism. Geol Soc Am Bull 116(9–10):1240–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11(2):167–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itasca Consulting Group Inc (2016) PFC3D particle flow code in 3 dimensions. User’s guide. Itasca Consulting Group Inc, Minneapolis

  • Jóhannesson T, Gauer P, Issler P, et al (2009) The design of avalanche protection dams: recent practical and theoretical developments. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2777/12871

  • Li B, Xing A, Xu C (2017) Simulation of a long-runout rock avalanche triggered by the Lushan earthquake in the Tangjia Valley, Tianquan, Sichuan, China. Eng Geol 218:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, He S, Luo Y et al (2010) Discrete element modeling of debris avalanche impact on retaining walls. J Mt Sci 7(3):276–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, He S (2018) A two-layer model for the intrusion of two-phase debris flow into a river. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 51(1):113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollon G, Richefeu V, Villard P et al (2015) Discrete modelling of rock avalanches: sensitivity to block and slope geometries. Granul Matter 17(5):645–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Choi CE, Kwan JSH et al (2014) Effects of baffle transverse blockage on landslide debris impedance. Proc Earth Planet Sci 9:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Choi CE, Song D et al (2015) Physical modeling of baffles influence on landslide debris mobility. Landslides 12(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi S, Xu Q, Zhang B et al (2011) Source characteristics of long runout rock avalanches triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China. J Asian Earth Sci 40(4):896–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salciarini D, Tamagnini C, Conversini P (2009) Numerical approaches for rockfall analysis: a comparison. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Cairns, Australia, p 2706–2712

  • Savage SB, Hutter K (1989) The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline. J Fluid Mech 199:177–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strom AL (2004) Rock avalanches of the Ardon River valley at the southern foot of the rocky range, northern Caucasus, north Osetia. Landslides 1(3):237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokashiki N, Aydan Ö (2011) Kita-Uebaru natural rock slope failure and its back analysis. Environ Earth Sci 62(1):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulusay R, Aydan Ö, Kılıc R (2007) Geotechnical assessment of the 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Turkey). Eng Geol 89(1–2):112–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wensrich CM, Katterfeld A (2012) Rolling friction as a technique for modelling particle shape in DEM. Powder Technol 217:409–417

  • Xing A, Yuan X, Xu Q, et al (2017) Characteristics and numerical runout modelling of a catastrophic rock avalanche triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake in the Wenjia valley, Mianzhu, Sichuan, China. Landslides 14(1):83–98

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Project of National Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 41472325, Grant No. 41472293, Grant No. 91430105). This research has also received financial support from the Sichuan Science and Technology Support Program (Grant No. 2016SZ0067).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YuZhang Bi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bi, Y., He, S., Du, Y. et al. Effects of the configuration of a baffle–avalanche wall system on rock avalanches in Tibet Zhangmu: discrete element analysis. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 2267–2282 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1284-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1284-8

Keywords

Navigation