Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determination of the presence of microstructure in a soil using a seismic dilatometer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article shows an approach for investigating the presence of microstructure in a soil based on the results obtained by seismic dilatometer (SDMT). Three main parameters are considered: intermediate dilatometer test (DMT) parameters material index (ID) and horizontal stress index (KD) and small strain stiffness (G0) obtained by shear wave velocity (Vs) measurements. The approach is engineering-oriented since it is simple, fast, inexpensive, and based directly on in situ measurements. We found that with increasing microstructure (cementation and aging) the ratio of measured to estimated G0 increases, which could be used to improve interpretation of empirically determined geotechnical parameters from DMT results. Applications of a DMT-based, CPT-based and Vs-based correlations for determination of effective peak friction angle of sands, with and without presence of microstructure, are evaluated. Finally, we propose an approach to reducing the influence of microstructure on K0–KD correlation in a clay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso EE, Gens A, Josa A (1990) A constitutive model for partially saturated soils. Geotechnique 40(3):405–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoroso S, Rodrigues C, Viana da Fonseca A, Cruz N (2015) Liquefaction evaluation of Aveiro sands from SCPTU and SDMT Tests. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the flat dilatometer DMT'15, Roma, pp 293–300

  • Andrus RD, Hayati H, Mohanan NP (2009) Correcting liquefaction resistance for Aged Sands using measured to estimated velocity ratio. J Geotech Geoenviron 135(6):735–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen B-P, Yan Y-J (2014) Influence of structure on shear characteristics of the unsaturated loess in Lanzhou, China. Eng Geol 168:46–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berisavljevic D, Berisavljevic Z, Čebašek V, Šušić N (2014) Characterisation of collapsing loess by seismic dilatometer. Eng Geol 181:180–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berisavljevic D, Rakic D, Susic N, 2015. SDMT – a tool for in situ identification of collapsible soils. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Flat Dilatometer DMT'15, Roma, pp 457–463

  • Briaud JL, Miran J (1992) The flat dilatometer test. Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Publication No. FHWASA-91-044, p 102

  • Burland JB (1990) On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays. Geotechnique 40(3):329–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanella RG, Robertson PK (1991) Use and interpretation of research dilatometer. Can Geotech J 28:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotecchia F, Chandler RJ (1997) The influence of structure on the pre-failure behaviour of a natural clay. Geotechnique 47(3):523–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz N, Rodrigez C, Viana da Fonseca A (2012) Detecting the present of cementation structures in soils, based in DMT interpreted charts. In: Couthino, Mayne (eds) In geotechnical and geophysical site characterization. Taylor and Francis group, London, pp 1723–1728

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuccovillo T, Coop MR (1997) Yielding and pre-failure deformation of structured sands. Geotechnique 47(3):491–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devincenzi MJ, Canicio M (2001) Geotechnical characterization by in situ tests of a loess-like deposit in its natural state and after saturation. Proceedings of the International Conference on In-Situ Measurement of Soil Properties and Case Histories, Bali, Indonesia, 159–166

  • Diaz-Rodriguez JA, Santamarina JC (2001) Mexico City soil behavior at different strains: observations and physical interpretation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(9):783–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoglu TH, Mitchell JK (1973) Static penetration resistance of soils. Prepared for NASA Headquarters, Washington, D. C. under NASA Grant NGR 05–003-406, "Lunar Soil Properties and Soil Mechanics"

  • Fernandez A, Santamarina JC (2001) Effect of cementation on the small strain parameters of sands. Can Geotech J 38(1):191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasparre A, Coop MR (2008) Quantification of the effects of structure on the compression of a stiff clay. Can Geotech J 45:1324–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacheti HL, Peixoto ASP, De Mio G, Carvalho D (2006) Flat dilatometer testing in Brazilian tropical soils. In: Failmezger RA, Anderson JB (eds). Second International Conference on the Flat Dilatometer, Washington. Vol. 1. ASCE, Washington, DC p 103–110

  • Hayati H, Andrus RD (2009) Updated liquefaction resistance correction factors for Aged Sands. J Geotech Geoenviron 135(11):1683–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heineck KS, Coop MR, Consoli NC (2005) Effect of microreinforcement of soils from very small to large shear strains. J Geotech Geoenviron 131(8):1024–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski M, Ghionna V, Lancellotta R, Pasqualini E (1988) New Correlations of Penetration Tests for Design Practice. Proc. ISOPT- 1, Orlando, Florida,z 1:263–296

  • Jamiolkowski M, Lo Presti DCF, Manassero M (2001) Evaluation of relative density and shear strength of sands from cone penetration test (CPT) and flat dilatometer test (DMT). ASCE Geotechnical Spec Publ 119:201–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M, Zhang F, Hu H, Cui Y, Peng J (2014) Structural characterization of natural loess and remolded loess under triaxial tests. Eng Geol 181:249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jotisankasa A, Ridley A, Coop MR (2007) Collapse behavior of compacted Silty clay in suction-monitored Oedometer apparatus. J Geotech Geoenviron 133(7):867–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Mayne PW (1990) Estimating soil properties for foundation design. EPRI report EL-6800. Palo Alto, Electric Power Research Institute, p 306

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacasse S, Lunne T (1988) Calibration of dilatometer correlations. Proceedings of ISOPT-1, Orlando, FL, Vol. 1, 539–548

  • Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1969) Soil mechanics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson R (1989) Dilatometerförsök (dilatometer tests) [in Swedish]. Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Information No. 10, Linköping

  • Leroueil S, Vaughan PR (1990) The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks. Geotechnique 40(3):467–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunne T, Powell JJM, Hauge EA, Uglow IM, Mokkelbost KH (1990) Correlation of dilatometer readings to lateral stress. Paper submitted to specialty session on measurement of lateral stress. 69th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutenegger AJ, Donchev P (1983) Flat dilatometer testing in some meta-stable loess soils. Proc Int Symp In-Situ Testing Soil Rock Properties 2:337–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti S (1980) In situ tests by flat dilatometer. J Geotech Eng 106(3):299–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti S (1997) The flat dilatometer: design applications. Proceedings of the Third International Geotechnical Engineering Conference, Cairo University, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Research Laboratory, Egypt: 423–448

  • Marchetti S (2014) The seismic dilatometer for in situ soil investigations. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference IGC-2014, Kakinada, India

  • Marchetti S (2015) Some 2015 updates to the TC16 DMT report 2001. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Flat Dilatometer DMT'15, Roma, pp 43–65

  • Marchetti S, Monaco P, Totani G, Calabrese M (2001) The flat dilatometer (DMT) in soil investigations (ISSMGE TC16). Proceedings of the International Conference on In-Situ Measurement of Soil Properties and Case Histories, Bali, Indonesia, 95–131

  • Marchetti S, Monaco P, Totani G, Marchetti D (2008) In situ tests by seismic dilatometer (SDMT). In Laier JE, Crapps DK, Hussein MH (eds), From research to practice in geotechnical engineering, ASCE Geotech. Special Publication No. 180 (honoring Dr. John H. Schmertmann), pp 292–311

  • Mayne PW (2015) Peak friction angle of undisturbed sands using DMT. 3rd International Conference on the Flat Dilatometer DMT'15, Roma, pp 237–242

  • Mayne PW (2014) Interpretation of geotechnical parameters from seismic piezocone tests. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Las Vegas, Nevada, 47–73

  • Mlynarek Z, Wierzbicki J, Manka M. (2015) Geotechnical parameters of loess soils from CPTU and SDMT. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the flat dilatometer DMT'15, Roma, pp 481–488

  • Monaco P, Marchetti S, Totani G, Marchetti D (2009) Interrelationship between small strain modulus G0 and operative modulus. In: Kokusho T, Tsukamoto Y, Yoshimine M (eds) Performance-based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering- from case history to practice, proc. IS-Tokyo 2009, Tsukuba, Japan, June 15–17. Taylor & Francis Group, London (CD-Rom), pp 1315–1323

  • Mulabdic M, Minazek K (2015) Use of dilatometer in unusual difficult soils – a case study. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Flat Dilatometer DMT'15, Roma, pp 497–504

  • Ortigao JAR (1994) Dilatometer tests in Brasilia porous clay. 7th International Congress of the International Association of Engineering Geology, Lisbon, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortigao JAR, Cunha RP, Alves LS (1995) In situ tests in Brasilia porous clay. Can Geotech J 33:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestana JM, Salvati LA (2006) Small-strain behavior of granular soils. I: model for cemented and Uncemented Sands and gravels. J Geotech Geoenviron 132(8):1071–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell JJM, Uglow IM (1988) The interpretation of the Marchetti Dilatometer Test in UK clays. ICE Proceedings of the Conference on Penetration Testing in the UK, University of Birmingham, Paper No. 34, 269–273

  • Rinaldi VA, Redolfi ER, Santamarina JC (1998) Characterization of collapsible soils with combined geophysical and penetration testing. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Site Characterization, ISC ‘98, vol. 1, Atlanta (GA)

  • Rinaldi VA, Santamarina JC (2008) Cemented soils: small strain stiffness. In: Burns, Mayne and Santamarina (eds) IOS-Millpress. Deformational Characteristics of Geomaterials 1:267–274

  • Rivera-Cruz I, Howie J, Vargas-Herrera LA, Coto-Loria M, Luna-Gonzalez O (2012) A new approach for identification of soil behaviour type from seismic dilatometer (SDMT) data. In: Couthino, Mayne X (eds) In geotechnical and geophysical site characterization. Taylor and Francis group, London, pp 947–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK (2010) Estimating in-situ state parameter and friction angle in sandy soils from CPT. 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT’10, Huntington Beach (CA)

  • Robertson PK (2012) Interpretation of in-situ tests – some insights. J.K. Mitchell Lecture, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Site Characterization, ISC’4, Porto de Galinhas, Brazil, 3–24

  • Robertson PK (2015) Soil behavior type using the DMT. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Flat Dilatometer DMT'15, Roma, pp 243–250

  • Robertson PK (2016) Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system — an update. Can Geotech J 53:1910–1927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha BP, Castro BAC, Giacheti GL (2015) Seismic DMT Test in a non-text book type geomaterial. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Flat Dilatometer DMT'15, Roma, pp 505–512

  • Sally JP (1991) Measurement of in situ lateral stress during full displacement penetration tests [Ph.D. Thesis]. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, pp 485

  • Schmertmann JH (1978) Guidelines for cone penetration test, performance and design. Report FHWA-TS-78-209, Washington, 145

  • Schmertmann JH (1988) Guidelines for using the CPT, CPTU and Marchetti DMT for geotechnical design. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research and Special Studies, Report No. FHWA-PA- 87 023+24, Vol. 3–4

  • Schnaid F (2005) Geo-characterisation and properties of natural soils by in situ tests. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 1, Osaka, Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 3–45

  • Schnaid F, Odebrech E (2015) Challenges in the interpretation of the DMT in tailings. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Flat Dilatometer DMT'15, Roma, pp 13–23

  • Schneider JA, Moss RES (2011) Linking cyclic stress and cyclic strain based methods for assesment of cyclic liquefaction triggering in sands. Geotechnique Lett 1:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MG, Houlsby GT (1995) Interpretation of the Marchetti dilatometer in clay. Proc 11th ECSMFE 1:247–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzielli M, Mayne PW, Cassidy MJ (2013) Probabilistic assessment of design strengths for sands from in-situ testing data, Modern geotechnical design codes of practice, advances in Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical Engineering (series), vol 1. IOS Millpress, Amsterdam, pp 214–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Viana da Fonseca A, Carvalho J, Ferreira C, Santos JA, Almeida F, Pereira E, Feliciano J, Grade J, Oliveira A (2006) Characterization of a profile of residual soil from granite combining geological, geophysical and mechanical testing techniques. Geotech Geol Eng 24:1307–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamuro JA, Wood FM, Lade PV (2008) Effect of depositional method on the microstructure of silty sand. Can Geotech J 45:1538–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu HS (2004) In situ soil testing: from mechanics to interpretation. 1st J. K. Mitchell Lecture, Proceedings of ISC-2, Porto. 1, 3–38

  • Yun TS, Santamarina JC (2005) Decementation, softening, and collapse: changes in small-strain shear stiffness in k0 loading. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviro Eng 131(3):350–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Transportation CIP Ltd, 6/IV Nemanjina Street, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

    Dušan Berisavljević

  2. Corridors of Serbia Ltd., Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

    Zoran Berisavljević

Authors
  1. Dušan Berisavljević
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zoran Berisavljević
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dušan Berisavljević.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berisavljević, D., Berisavljević, Z. Determination of the presence of microstructure in a soil using a seismic dilatometer. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 1709–1725 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1234-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1234-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation