Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of mechanical behaviour from mineralogical composition of Sakesar limestone, Central Salt Range, Pakistan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Petrographic and mechanical properties of early Eocene Sakesar limestone have been investigated to establish the relationship between these parameters. Microscopic study revealed the presence of micrite (51.38%), sparite (12.90%), dolomite (12.95%), and allochems (20.88%) in the limestone samples. The strength parameters such as unconfined compressive strength (UCS), point load test (PLT), and Schmidt rebound hammer values (R n ) were determined in the rock mechanics laboratory. Regression analyses were carried out to establish correlation between limestone constituents and the strength parameters. The UCS and other mechanical properties showed moderate inverse relationship with sparite and allochems, whereas micrite and dolomite indicate a positive correlation with UCS. To get significant correlations for cumulative micrite + dolomite and sparite + allochems, percentages and strength parameters were arranged in decreasing order. The fixed threshold for the cumulative values of micrite and dolomite were ≥80, 70–80, 60–70, 50–60 and <50%. Percentage of these constituents and the corresponding mechanical parameters were arranged on these thresholds. The cumulative modal constituents of the limestone were plotted against the mechanical parameters. Correlation among these values allowed developing equations for prediction of mechanical behaviour from mineralogical composition of Sakesar Limestone with more than 95% accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akram MS (2010) Physical and numerical investigation of conglomeratic rocks. (Ph.D. Thesis). School of Mining Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

  • Akram M, Bakar MZA (2007) Correlation between uniaxial compressive strength and point load index for Salt-Range rocks. Pak J Engg Sci 1:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram MS, Sharrock G, Mitra R (2011) Physical and numerical investigation of conglomerates. In: 2nd international FLAC/DEM symposium, February 14–16, 2011, Melbourne, Australia

  • ASTM (2000) Standard testing method for determination of the point load strength index of rock. Annual Book of ASTM standards. Am Soci Test Mat Philadelphia ASTM 04.08 (D5731-02)

  • ASTM (2001) Standard testing method for determination of rock hardness by rebound hammer method. Annual Book of ASTM standards. Am Soci Test Mat, Philadelphia ASTM 04.09 (D5873-00)

  • Bell FG (1978) Physical and mechanical properties of the Fell sandstones. Northumberl Engl Eng Geol 12(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broch E, Franklin JA (1972) Point load strength test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 9:669–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Konietzky H (2014) Simulation of heterogeneity, creep, damage and lifetime for loaded brittle rocks. Tectonophysics 633:164–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Konietzky H, Abbas SM (2015) Numerical simulation of time-independent and -dependent fracturing in sandstone. Eng Geol 193(2):118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coward MP, Butler RWH (1985) Thrust tectonics and the deep structure of the Pakistan Himalaya. Geology 13:417–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Air Force Weapons Lab Tech Report AFWL-TR 65–116, Kirtland Base

  • Dincer I, Acar A, Cobanoglu I, Uras Y (2004) Correlation between Schmidt hardness, uniaxial compressive strength and Young’s mudulus for andesite, basalt and tuffs t 141–148. In: Brown ET (ed) Pergamon Press, Oxford Bull Eng Geol Env 141–148. doi:110.1007/s10064-10004-10230-10060

  • Dincer I, Acer A, Ural S (2008) Estimation of strength and deformation properties of quaternary caliche deposits. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:353–366. doi:310.1007/s10064-10008-10146-10061

  • Dunham RJ (1962) Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. In: Ham WE (ed) Classification of carbonate rocks. Am Assoc Petrol Geol Mem 1:108–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich R, Weinberg B (1970) An exact method for characterisation of grain shape. Sed Petrol 40:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazi S, Mountney NP (2009) Facies and architectural element analysis of a meandering fluvial succession. The Permian Warchha Sandstone, Salt Range, Pakistan. Sed Geol 221:99–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazi S, Butt AA, Khan KA (2004) Microfacies and Foraminiferal Assemblage of the Lower Eocene Nammal Formation, Nilawahan Gorge, Salt Range, Pakistan. Geol Bull Punjab Univ 39:75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazi S, Butt AA, Asharf M (2006) Microfacies analysis and diagenesis of the Lower Eocene Sakesar Limestone, Nilawahan Gorge, Salt Range, Pakistan. J Nepal Geol Soc 33:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazi S, Ali A, Hanif T, Sharif S, Sajid Z, Aziz T (2014a) Microfacies and depositional setting of the Early Eocene Chore Gali Formation, Central Salt Range, Pakistan. Pak Jr Sci 66(2)

  • Ghazi S, Khalid P, Butt A A, Sharif S, Hanif T (2014b) Sedimentary Facies and depositional environment of the Lower Eocene shallow shelf carbonate deposit, the Sakesar Limestone, Salt Range, Pakistan. In: 3rd Annual Intern Conf Geol Earth Sci (GEOS 2014), Singapore

  • Gondal MM, Ahsan N, Javed AZ (2009) Engineering properties of potential aggregate resources from eastern and central salt range. Geol Bull Punjab Univ, Pakistan, p 44

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V (2009) Non-destructive testing for some higher Himalayan rocks in the Satluj valley. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68:409–416. doi:10.1007/s10064-009-0211-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AS, Seshagiri Rao K (1998) Index properties of weathered rocks. Inter-relationships and applicability. Bull Eng Geol Environ 57(2):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes I, Mellor M (1970) Uniaxial testing in rock mechanics laboratories. Eng Geol 4:177–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Underground Excavations in Rock. Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongyuan L, Shaoquan K, Lindqvist P (2004) Microscope Rock Texture Characterization and Simulation of Rock Aggregate Properties. SGU Project 60-1362/2004

  • Hugman RHH, Friedman M (1979) Effect of texture and composition on mechanical behaviour of experimentally deformed carbonate rocks. Am Assoc Petrol Geol Bull 63:1478–1489

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue M, Ohomi M (1970) Study on the strength of rocks by the Schmidt hammer test. Rock Mech Jpn 1:177–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Irfan TY (1996) Mineralogy fabric properties and classification of weathered granites in Hong Kong. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 29:5–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1981) Rock characterization, testing and monitoring: ISRM suggested methods. Published for the Commission on Testing Methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics by Pergamon Press, Oxford

  • ISRM (1985) Suggested method for determining point load strength. Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Rock Mech Min Sci 38:981–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S, Gunaydin O (2007) Empirical methods to predict the abrasion resistance. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66:449–455. doi:10.1007/s10064-007-0093-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S, Gunaydin O, Fener M (2005) The effect of porosity on the relation between uniaxial compressive strength and point load index. Rock Mech Min Sci 42:584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakus M, Kumral M, Kilic O (2005) Predicting elastic properties of intact rocks from index tests using multiple regression modelling. Rock Mech Min Sci 42:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmi AH, Rana RA (1982) Tectonic map of Pakistan. Geol Surv Pak Quetta Scale 1:2,000,000

  • Kilic A, Teymen A (2008) Determination of mechanical properties of rocks using simple methods. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:237–244. doi:10.1007/s10064-008-0128-3

  • Kurtulus C, Irmak ST (2010) Physics and mechanical properties of Gokceada. Imbros (NE Aegean sea) Island andesites. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:321–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Aubertin M (2003) A general relationship between porosity and uniaxial strength of engineering materials. Can J Civil Eng 30:644–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng J, Pan J (2007) Correlation between petrographic characteristics and failure duration in clastic rocks. Eng Geol 89:258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem M, Khalid P, Sanaullah M, Din ZU (2014a) Physio-mechanical and aggregate properties of limestones from Pakistan. Acta Geod Geophys 49:369–380. doi:10.1007/s40328-014-0054-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem M, Bin Saddiq RA, Anwar M, Khalid P (2014b) Mechanical properties and petrographic characteristics of Margala Hill limestone and Lockhart limestone of Rumli area, Islamabad Pakistan. Acta Geod Geophys 49:441–454. doi:10.1007/s40328-014-0068-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson WA (1974) Grain size dependence of yield stress in marble. J Geophys Res 79(32):4859–4862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onodera TF, Asoka KHM (1980) Relation between texture and mechanical properties of crystalline rocks. Assoc Eng Geol 22:173–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Potro R, Hurlimann M (2009) A comparison of different indirect techniques to evaluate volcanic intact rock strength. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42:931–938. doi:10.1007/s10063-10008-10001-10065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prikryl R (2001) Some micro structural aspects of strength variation in rocks. Rock Mech Min Sci 38:671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabzadeh MA, Moosavinasab Z, Rakhshandehroo G (2011) Effects of rock classes and porosity on the relation between uniaxial compressive strength and some rock properties for carbonate rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng. doi:10.1007/s00603-00011-00169-y (Published online)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatakakis N, Koukis G, Tsiambao G, Papanakli S (2007) Index properties and strength variation controlled bymicrostructure for sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 97:80–90 Published Online

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachpazis C (1990) Correlating Schmidt hardness with compressive strength and Young’s Modulus of carbonate rocks. Int Assoc Eng Geol Bull 42:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar G and Dejong K A (1979) Arcs, oroclines, suntaxes- the curvatures of Mountain Belts in Pakistan. In: Farah A, DeJong KA (ed) Geodynamics of Pakistan. Geol Surv Pak Quetta, pp 341–350

  • Shah SMI (2009) Stratigraphy of Pakistan. Ministry of Petroleum and natural Resources, Geol Surv Pakistan, Quetta, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheorey PR, Barat D, Das MN, Mukherjee KP, Singh B (1984) Schmidt hammer rebound data for estimation of large scale in situ coal strength. Rock Mech Min Sci 21:39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smorodinov MI, Motovilov EA, Volkov VA (1970) Determinations of correlation relationships between strength and some physical characteristics of rocks. In: Proc 2nd Int Cong Rock Mech Belgrade, Yugoslavia, vol 2, pp 35–37

  • Tan X, Konietzky H, Chen W (2016) Numerical Simulation of heterogeneous rock using discrete element model based on digital image processing. Rock Mech Rock Eng. doi:10.1007/s00603-016-1030-0

  • Tugrul A, Zarif IH (1999) Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with engineering properties of selected granitic rocks from Turkey. Eng Geol 51:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams H, Turner FJ, Gilbert CM (1982) Petrography, An Introduction to the Study of Rocks in Thin Sections. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeats RS, Lawrence RD (1984) Tectonics of the Himalaya thrust belt in northern Pakistan. In: Haq BU, Milliman JD (eds) Marine Geology and Oceanography of Arabian Sea and Coastal Pakistan. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, pp 177–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz ISH (2002) Correlation of Schmidt hardness with unconfined compressive strength and Young’s modulus in gypsum from Sivas (Turkey). Eng Geol 66:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are in acknowledgement of the University of the Punjab for annual Research Project Grant (2012–2013) and also the Mines and Minerals Department for facilitating this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Akram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akram, M.S., Farooq, S., Naeem, M. et al. Prediction of mechanical behaviour from mineralogical composition of Sakesar limestone, Central Salt Range, Pakistan. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76, 601–615 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-1002-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-1002-3

Keywords

Navigation