Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by support vector machines approaches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liquefaction of loose, saturated granular soils during earthquakes poses a major hazard in many regions of the world. Determining the liquefaction potential of soils induced by earthquakes is a major concern and an essential criterion in the design process of civil engineering structures. The present study examines the potential of support vector machines (SVMs) for assessing liquefaction potential based on cone penetration test (CPT) field data. A hybrid model based on a combination of SVMs and particle swarm optimization (PSO) is proposed in this study to improve the forecasting performance. PSO was employed in selecting the appropriate SVM parameters to enhance forecasting accuracy. Nine parameters, such as earthquake magnitude, the water table, the total vertical stress, the effective vertical stress, the depth, the peak acceleration at the ground surface, the cyclic stress ratio, the mean grain size and the measured CPT tip resistance, were used as input parameters. Prediction results demonstrate that the classification accuracy rates of the developed PSO–SVM approach surpass those of a grid search and many other approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee T, Das S (2012) Multi-sensor data fusion using support vector machine for motor fault detection. Inf Sci 217:96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Mejia LH, Idriss IM (1997) Liquefaction at Moss Landing during Loma Prieta earthquake. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(5):453–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chern SG, Lee CY (2009) CPT-based simplified liquefaction assessment by using fuzzy-neural network. J Mar Sci Technol 17(4):326–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibike YB, Velickov S, Solomatine D, Abbott MB (2001) Model induction with support vector machines: introduction and applications. J Comput Civ Eng 15(3):208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrokhzad F, Choobbasti AJ, Barari A (2012) Liquefaction microzonation of Babol city using artificial neural network. J King Saud Univ Sci 24(1):89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Das S, Kundu D, Suresh K, Panigrahi BK, Cui ZH (2012) An inertia-adaptive particle swarm system with particle mobility factor for improved global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 21(2):237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh ATC (1995) Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 120(9):1467–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Jiang XM (2010) Field-observed phenomena of seismic liquefaction and subsidence during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Nat Hazards 54:839–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Yu M (2013) Review of soil liquefaction characteristics during major earthquakes of the twenty-first century. Nat Hazards 65:2375–2384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Zhang WJ, Mao WW, Jin C (2011) Flow analysis of liquefied soils based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Nat Hazards 59:1547–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juang CH, Yuan HM, Lee DH, Lin PS (2003) Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(11):66–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE international conference on neural networks 4, Perth, Australia. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, pp 1942–1948

  • Law KT, Cao YL, He GN (1990) An energy approach for assessing seismic liquefaction potential. Can Geotech J 27:320–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CY, Chern SG (2013) Application of a support vector machine for liquefaction assessment. J Mar Sci Technol 21(3):318–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y, Lee C (2003) Classification of multiple cancer types by multicategory support vector machines using gene expression data. Bioinformatics 19:1132–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao SC, Veneziano D, Whitman RV (1988) Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability. J Geotech Eng 114(4):389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maalouf M, Khoury N, Trafalis TB (2008) Support vector regression to predict asphalt mix performance. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30:983–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh P (2006) Support vector machines-based modelling of seismic liquefaction potential. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30:983–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maria JS (2011) Applying artificial neural networks for analysis of geotechnical problems. Comput Assist Mech Eng Sci 18:231–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Mert T (2013) A comparative study on computer aided liquefaction analysis methods. Int J for Hous Sci 37(2):121–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Muduli PK, Das SK (2014a) CPT-based seismic liquefaction potential evaluation using multi-gene genetic programming approach. Indian Geotech J 44(1):86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muduli PK, Das SK (2014b) Evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil based on standard penetration test using multi-gene genetic programming model. Acta Geophys 62(3):529–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mughieda O, Bani HK, Safieh B (2009) Liquefaction assessment by artificial neural networks based on CPT. Int J Geotech Eng 2:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir M, Das S, Maity D, Sengupta S, Halder U, Suganthan PN (2012) A dynamic neighborhood learning based particle swarm optimizer for global numerical optimization. Inf Sci 209:16–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park D, Rilett LR (1999) Forecasting freeway link ravel times with a multi-layer feed forward neural network. Comput Aided Civ Inf 14:358–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan D, Singh TN, Purwar N, Badre KS, Gulati A, Gupta S (2008) Artificial neural network and liquefaction susceptibility assessment: a case study using the 2001 Bhuj earthquake data, Gujarat, India. Comput Geosci 12:491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35(3):442–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sami M, de Patrick B (2005) Minimum principle and related numerical scheme for simulating initial flow and subsequent propagation of liquefied ground. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 29:1065–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samui P, Sitharam TG (2011) Machine learning modelling for prediction soil liquefaction susceptibility. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(9):1249–1273

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arrango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field data. J Geotech Eng 109:458–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trafalis TB, Ince H (2000) Support vector machine for regression and applications to financial forecasting. IJCNN 6:348–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Trafalis TB, Ince H, Richman M (2003) Tornado detection with support vector machines. Int Conf Comput Sci Melb Austria 2660:289–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xu HB, Chen GH (2013) An intelligent fault identification method of rolling bearings based on LSSVM optimized by improved PSO. Mech Syst Signal Process 35:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue XH, Yang XG (2013) Application of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of soil liquefaction. Nat Hazards 67:901–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, No. 24 South Sect. 1, Yihuan Road, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

    Xinhua Xue & Xingguo Yang

Authors
  1. Xinhua Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xingguo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinhua Xue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xue, X., Yang, X. Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by support vector machines approaches. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75, 153–162 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0741-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0741-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation