Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

V S profile: measured versus empirical correlations—a Lower Tagus river valley example

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last decades, there has been an increase in the use of geophysical tests for geotechnical characterization. The relatively low cost and the large volume analysed by non-invasive geophysical testing makes them very attractive for a site investigation plan combined with borings and other geotechnical tests. In some countries, for instance Portugal, the use of multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) and other surface wave methodologies is still limited. This work shows results obtained with the use of MASW in the geotechnical investigation of the foundation soils of a viaduct and a bridge, part of the IC3 route, with a total length of about 10 km. The study area is located very near the “Lower Tagus valley” active fault and above thick alluvial deposits. Comparisons of MASW with other in situ tests show that the results are in good agreement. The N(SPT)-V S correlations are still in use worldwide for practical purposes, but not always considering all the important parameters as the standard penetration test (SPT) energy measurement. In this paper, we discuss the usability of empirical correlations to obtain the shear wave velocity from SPT results, using the results from the case study presented. The large variability of results obtained proves the importance of measuring the shear wave velocity with geophysical tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akin MK, Kramer SL, Topal T (2011) “Empirical correlations of shear wave velocity (V S) and penetration resistance (SPT-N) for different soils in an earthquake-prone area (Erbaa-Turkey). Eng Geol 119:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansal A, Erdik M, Kurtulus A, Erken A, Sesetyan K, Siyahi B, Springman S, Laue J (2003) Microzonation in Turkey. Reference information. State of the art, MERM Project; World Institute for Disaster Risk Management

  • ASTM D-1586–99 (1999) Standard test method for penetration test and split-barrel sampling of soils. Subcommittee: D18.02, Book of standards volume: 04.08

  • ASTM D 4633–05 (2005) Standard test method for energy measurement for dynamic penetrometers. Subcommittee: D18.02

  • Athanasopoulos GA (1995) Empirical correlations Vso-NSPT for soils of Greece: a comparative study of reliability. In: Proceedings of seventh international conference on Soil Dynamics, Earthquake Engineering. Computation Mechanics Publications, Southampton, Boston, pp 19–25

  • Bellana N (2009) Shear wave velocity as a function of SPT penetration resistance and vertical effective stress at California bridges sites. Master thesis in Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of California LA

  • Boore DM (2004) Estimating Vs (30) (or NEHRP site classes) from shallow velocity models (depths > 30 m). BSSA 94(2):591–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Cenorgeo (2007) IC3—Vila Nova da Barquinha/Chamusca—New Tagus river crossover. Geological and geotechnical study. Execution Project. (in Portuguese)

  • Cercato M (2009) Addressing non-uniqueness in linearized nultichannel surface wave inversion. Geophys Prospect 57:27–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constable SC, Parker RL, Constable CG (1987) Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52(3):289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeJong JT (2007) Site characterization—guidelines for estimating Vs based on in situ tests. Stage 1—interin report. Soil Interactions Laboratory. UC DAVIS, p 22

  • Dikmen U (2009) Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soils. J Geophys Eng 6:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dineva S, Batlo J, Mihaylov D, van Eck T (2002) Source parameters of four strong earthquakes in Bulgaria and Portugal at the beginning of the 20th century. J Seismolog 6(1):99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobry R, Borcherdt RD, Crouse CB, Idriss IM, Joyner WB, Martin GR, Power MS, Rinne EE, Seed RB (2000) New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions (1994/1997 NEHRP and 1997 UBC). Earthquake Spectra 16:41–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin JW (1965) Computation of modal solutions in layered, elastic media at high frequencies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 55(2):335–358

    Google Scholar 

  • EC7 (2007). Eurocode 7. Geotechnical design. Part 2: ground investigation and testing. EN 1997-2:2007. CEN

  • EC8 (2010) Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. NP EN 1998-1. CEN

  • Fujiwara T (1972) Estimation of ground movements in actual destructive earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the fourth European symposium on Earthquake Engineering, London, pp 125–132

  • Hanumantharao C, Ramana GV (2008) Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India. J Earth Syst Sci 117(S2):719–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasancebi N, Ulusay R (2006) Evaluation of site amplification and site period using different methods for an earthquake-prone settlement in Western Turkey. Eng Geol 87:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasancebi N, Ulusay R (2007) Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisada Y (1994) An efficient method for computing green’s functions for a layered half-space with sources and receivers at close depths. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(5):1456–1472

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai T, Tonouchi K (1982) Correlation of N-value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus. In: Proceedings of the second European symposium of penetration testing, Amsterdam, pp 57–72

  • International Code Council (2000) International Building Code. Falls Church, VA

  • International Conference of Building Officials (1997) Uniforme Building Code. Whittier, CA

  • ISO 22476-3:2005 (2005) Geotechnical investigation and testing—field testing—Parte 3: standard penetration test. CEN; Brussels

  • İyisan R (1996) Correlations between shear wave velocity and in situ penetration test results. Digest 96:371–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari MK, Asghari A, Rahmani I (1997) Empirical correlation between shear wave velocity (V s) and SPT-N value for south of Tehran soils. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on civil engineering, Tehran, Iran (in Persian)

  • Jafari MK, Shafiee A, Ramzkhah A (2002) Dynamic properties of the fine grained soils in South of Tehran. JSEE 4(1):25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski M, Yamashita K, Lo Presti D (2000) Stiffness nonlinearity of three sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(10):929–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine RJ (1992) Observations on the kinematic nature of soil stiffness at small strains. Soils Found 32:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine RJ, Potts DM, Fourie AB, Burland JB (1986) Studies of the influence of nonlinear stress-strain characteristics in soil structure interaction. Geotechnique 36:377–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalteziotis N, Sabatakakis N, Vassiliou J (1992) Evaluation of dynamic characteristics of Greek soil formations. In: Second Hellenic Conference on Geotechnical Engineering, vol 2, 239–246 (in Greek)

  • Kanai K (1966) Conference on Cone Penetrometer. The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey

  • Kohata Y, Tatsuoka F, Wang L, Jiang GL, Hoque E, Kodaka T (1997) Modelling the non-linear deformation properties of stiff geomaterials. Geotechnique 47(3):563–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiku H, Yoshida N, Yasuda S, Irisawa T, Nakazawa H, Shimizu Y, Ansal A, Erkan A (2001) In-situ penetration tests and soil profiling in Adapazari, Turkey. In: Proceedings of the ICSMGE/TC4 satellite conference on lessons learned from recent strong earthquakes, pp 259–265

  • Lai CG (1998) Simultaneous inversion of Rayleigh phase velocity and Attenuation for near-surface site characterization, Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Lai CG, Foti S, Rix GJ (2005) Propagation of data uncertainty in surface wave inversion. J Environ Eng Geophys 10(2):219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH-H (1992) Analysis of the multicollinearity of regression equations of shear wave velocities. Soils Found 32(1):205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes IMF (2005) Small strain characterization of soils. Application of the surface wave method. PhD Thesis in Geology (specialty Geotechnics), University of Lisbon, p 369 (in Portuguese)

  • Madiai C (1999) Il manuale internazionale TC4 per zonazione dei rischi geotecnici: un esempio de applicazione al caso italiano. In: Crespellani T (ed) Problemi di ingegneria geotecnica nelle aree sismiche. Advanced Professional Training, International Centre of Mechanical Sciences (CISM), Udine

    Google Scholar 

  • Mhaske SY, Choudhury D (2011) Geospatial contour mapping of shear wave velocity for Mumbai city. Natural hazards. Published online 12/03/2011. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9758-z

  • O’Neill A (2003) Full-waveform reflectivity for modelling, inversion and appraisal of seismic surface wave dispersion in shallow site investigations”. PhD Thesis, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, University of Western Australia, p 420

  • Ohba S, Toriumi I (1970) Dynamic response characteristics of Osaka Plain. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting AIJ (in Japanese)

  • Ohsaki Y, Iwasaki R (1973) On dynamic shear moduli and Poisson’s ratio of soil deposits. Soil Found 13(4):61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristics soil indexes. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 6:167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitilakis K, Raptakis D, Lontzetidis K, Tika-Vassilikou T, Jongmans D (1999) Geotechnical and geophysical description of Euro-Seistests, using field and laboratory tests, and moderate strong ground motions. J Earthquake Eng 3(3):381–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JM (1997) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. New York, Wiley, p 796

    Google Scholar 

  • Rix GJ (2004) Near surface site characterization using surface waves. Lecture notes of the course surface waves in geomechanics: direct and inverse modelling for soils and rocks. CISM, Udine, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  • Rix GJ, Lai CG (2005) SWAMI—surface wave modal inversion (Program)

  • Santos JA, Lopes I (2006) IC3—Vila Nova da Barquinha/Chamusca. Seismic testing using the surface wave method. Final Report. Study made for TECNASOL. ICIST Report EP nº53/06 (in Portuguese)

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1981) Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. ASCE National Convention, Missouri, pp 81–544

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng ASCE 109(3):458–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SGP (1977) Geological Map of Portugal, scale 1/50 000, 27-D (Abrantes). Direcção Geral de Minas dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal (in Portuguese)

  • Sisman H (1995) An investigation on relationships between shear wave velocity, and SPT and pressuremeter test results. M.Sc. Thesis, Ankara University, Geophysical Department, Ankara (in Turkish)

  • Skempton AW (1986) Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and overconsolidation. Géotechnique 36(3):425–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobbia C (2003) Surface wave method. Acquisition, processing and inversion PhD Thesis, Politecnico di Torino, p 317

  • Sykora DW (1987) Examination of existing shear wave velocity and shear modulus correlations in soils. Final Report. US Army Corps of Engineers, Geotechnical Laboratory

  • Tatsuoka F (2000) “Impacts on Geotechnical Engineering of several recent findings from Laboratory stress-strain tests on geomaterials”, The 2000 Burmister Lecture. Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, Columbia 72

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaker TP, Rao KS (2011) Development of statistical correlation between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance using MASW technique, 2011 Pam-Am CGS Geotechnical Conference, p 8

  • Yokota K, Imai T, Konno M (1991) Dynamic deformation characteristics of soils determined by laboratory tests. Oyo Tee Rep 3:13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors want to acknowledge the company EP—Estradas de Portugal, S.A. for the authorization to publish the data presented here. Pedro Chitas Martins is also acknowledged by the help in the field acquisitions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Superior Técnico, ICIST, DECIVIL, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001, Lisbon, Portugal

    Isabel Lopes

  2. Instituto Superior Técnico, DECIVIL, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001, Lisbon, Portugal

    Jaime A. Santos & Rui Carrilho Gomes

Authors
  1. Isabel Lopes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaime A. Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rui Carrilho Gomes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Lopes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopes, I., Santos, J.A. & Gomes, R.C. V S profile: measured versus empirical correlations—a Lower Tagus river valley example. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73, 1127–1139 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0578-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0578-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation