Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preparation of land use planning model using GIS based on AHP: case study Adana-Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An environmental and earthquake sensitive planning approach requires a suitability evaluation based upon geo-environmental analysis before the planning phase. In land use evaluation analysis the local data from different disciplines must be synthesized as the priority and importance of the geo environmental criteria change according to the use of the site. Geographical information systems (GIS) using multiple criteria methods allow the determination of priorities and the importance of local/non-local data for the most efficient use of land. In this study six land use categories of Adana, one of the most earthquake prone provinces of Turkey, were determined by the use of an analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and GSI. These are high rise blocks, multi storey buildings, low storey buildings, industrial sites, waste disposal sites and green land.

Résumé

Une approche de planification sensible à l’environement et au tremblement de terre, necessite une évaluation de la conformité qui dépend sur l’évaluation géoenvironnementale avant sa planification. Il faut faire une syntèse des données procédant de differentes disciplines pour les analyses de l’évaluation de la conformité. Dans ces analyses, la pesanteur et la priorité des critères geoenvironnementaux dépend sur la manière d’utilisation de la terre. Système d’information géographique (SIG) permet déterminer la pesanteur et la priorité des critères geoenvironnementaux, en faisant la syntèse et l’ analyse des données locationales et non-locationales au choix de meilleure manière d’utilisation de la terre. Dans ce context, à Adana, une des ville les plus dangereuses de la Turquie au regard du tremblement de terre, les catégories d’utilisation des sols de la ville ont été déterminées en utilisant SIG à traver de la méthode de processus analytique hiérarchique (PAH). Selon cela, l’utilisation de terre de la ville a été catégorisée dans six classes; les bâtiments hauts, les bâtiments moyens, les batiments bas, les zones industrielles, les zones de stockage des déchets et les espaces verts.

Özet

Çevre ve deprem duyarlı bir planlama yaklaşımı, planlama öncesinde jeoçevresel değerlendirmeye dayalı bir uygunluk değerlendirmesini gerektirir. Uygunluk değerlendirme analizlerinde ise, farklı disiplinlere ait mekansal veri ve bilgiler birlikte sentezlenmelidir. Bu analizlerde jeoçevresel kriterlerin önceliği ve ağırlığı arazi kullanımının türüne göre değişir. Coğrafi bilgi sistemleri (GIS), çoklu kriter analiz yöntemleriyle entegre edilerek, en doğru arazi kullanımının seçiminde mekansal ve mekansal olmayan verilerin birlikte analiz ve sentezini yaparak, jeoçevresel kriterlerin öncelik ve ağırlıklarının belirlenmesini sağlar. Bu bağlamda, ülkenin deprem açısından tehlike içeren kentlerinden birisi olan Adana kenti için model bir çalışma yapılarak, kentin arazi kullanım kategorileri GIS yardımıyla analitik hiyerarşi süreci (AHP) yöntemi kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Buna göre, kentin arazi kullanımı; yüksek bloklar, orta katlı binalar, az katlı binalar, sanayi alanları, atık depolama alanları ve açık yeşil alanlar olarak altı sınıfta kategorize edilmiştir (sınıflanmıştır).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Shalabi MA, Mansor SB, Ahmed NB, Shiriff R (2006) GIS based multicriteria approaches to housing site suitability assessment. Shaping the change, XXIII FIG congress, Munich, Germany, October 8–13

  • Araújo CC, Macedo AB (2002) Multicriteria geologic data analysis for mineral favorability mapping: application to a metal sulphide mineralized area, Ribeira Valley Metallogenic Province, Brazil. Nat Resour Res 11(1):29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydemir Ş, Aydemir SE, Ökten N, Öksüz AM, Sancar C, Özyaba M (1999) Kentsel alanların planlanması ve tasarımı, KTÜ_Mimarlık Fakültesi., Ders notları, No: 54, Trabzon

  • Banai-Kashani R (1989) A new method for site suitability analysis: the analytic hierarchy process. Environ Manag 13(6):685–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayülke N (2008) 27 Haziran 1998 Adana Ceyhan Depreminde Yapısal Hasar. http://www.deprem.gov.tr/deprem.htm

  • Çobanoğlu İ (2005) “Adana İli ve Yakın Çevresinin Jeoteknik Koşullarının Statik ve Sismik Durumlar İçin Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri İle Değerlendirilmesi”, Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Adana 40–47:320–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Çobanoğlu I, Bozdağ Ş, Kumsar H, Çobanoğlu D (2006) Coğrafi bilgi sistemi kullanılarak Adana ili yerleşim alanının hidrojeolojik özellikleri ve su kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi, Bilgi Teknolojileri Kongresi IV Akademik Bilişim 2006

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Zhang XH (2001) GIS based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: a case study. Eng Geol 61:257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darvishsefan AA, Setoodeh A, Makhdom M (2004) Environmental consideration in railway route selection with GIS (case study: Rasht-Anzali railway in İran), Map Asia 2004, Beijing, China

  • Jabr WM, El-Awar FA (2004) GIS and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for siting water harvesting. ESRI proceedings. http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc04/docs/pap1539.pdf

  • Kolat Ç, Doyuran V, Ayday C, Süzen ML (2006) Preparation of a geotechnical microzonation model using geographical information systems based on multicriteria decision analysis. Eng Geol 87:241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinoni O (2004) Implementation of the analytical hierarchy process with VBA in ArcGIS. Comput Geosci 30:637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinoni O (2005) A discussion on the computational limitations of outranking methods for land-use suitability assessment. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(1):69–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinoni O, Lang S, Lerch C, Hoppe A (2005) Sustainable land-use decision making from the geological point of view: an example for the use of geo-resources in a metropolitan area., ISAHP 2005, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 8–10

  • Metin S (1984) “1/100 000 Ölçekli Açınsama Nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları: Elbistan J 19 Paftası”, MTA Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, Ankara, 5–7

  • Ozmen B, Nurlu M, Guler H (1997) CBS ile deprem bolgelerinin incelenmesi’ Bayindirlik 577 ve Iskan Bakanligi, Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(3):9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24:19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi YW (1993) Urban land use suitability assessment: a case study of Anshan City, China. Chin J Land Sci Chin Soc Land Sci 7(5):28–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockaway JD, Smith RJ (1994) Geomorphic assessment for a waste disposal facilitiy. In: Proceeding of the seventh international IAEG congress. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 2393–2402

  • Tekeli O, Ürgün BM, Yetiş C (1984) 1/100,000 Ölçekli Açınsama Nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları: Kozan J 20 Paftası, MTA Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, Ankara, pp 10–17

  • Tıbbi Atıkların Kontrolü Yönetmeliği (1983) http://www.cevreorman.gov.tr/yasa/yonetmelik.asp. alındığı tarih: 7 Aug 2008

  • TUIK (2004) “Adana İli 2000 Yılı Nüfus Sayım Sonuçları”, TUİK, Ankara, 21–25. Research 48:9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ülker R, Celep Z, Hoşgör Z, Eyidoğan H, Erken A, Kaypak B (1998) Adana-Ceyhan Depremi Hakkında İTÜ Öngörüşü, İTÜ, İstanbul, pp 16–18

  • Ulusay R, Kuru T (2004) 1998 Adana-Ceyhan (Turkey) earthquake and a preliminary microzonation based on liquefaction potential for Ceyhan Town. Nat Hazards 32:59–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulusay R, Kuru T, Isik NS (2005) Engineering geological aspects of the Adana-Ceyhan earthquake of Turkey with prime consideration on ground behavior at Ceyhan Town. Proceedings of the IAEG sponsored international symposium on latest natural disasters—new challenges for engineering geology, geotechnics and civil protection, 5–8 September, Sofia, Bulgaria (on CD)

  • Yetiş C, Demirkol C, Lagap H, Ünlügenç UC (1991) 1/100,000 Ölçekli Açınsama Nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları: Kozan K 20 Paftası, MTA Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, Ankara, pp 10–17

  • Zhang F, Yang Q, Jia X, Liu J, Wang B (2006) Land-use optimization by geological hazard assessment in Nanjing City, China, IAEG 2006, paper number 324, Natthingam

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sule Tudes.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material (DOC 21839 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tudes, S., Yigiter, N.D. Preparation of land use planning model using GIS based on AHP: case study Adana-Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69, 235–245 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0247-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0247-5

Keywords

Mots clés

Anahtar kelimeler

Navigation