Skip to main content
Log in

Every member of the core is as respectful as any other

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Economic Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We strategically separate different core outcomes. The natural counterparts of a core allocation in a strategic environment are the α-core, the β-core and the strong equilibrium, modified by assuming that utility is transferable in a strategic context as well. Given a core allocation ω of a convex transferable utility (TU) game \(v\), we associate a strategic coalition formation game with \( \left( {v, \omega } \right) \) in which ω survives, while most other core allocations are eliminated. If the TU game is strictly convex, the core allocations respected by the TU-α-core, the TU-β-core and the TU-strong equilibrium shrink to ω only in the canonical family of coalition formation games associated with \( \left( {v, \omega } \right) \). A mechanism, which strategically separates core outcomes from noncore outcomes for each convex TU game according to the TU-strong equilibrium notion is reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Player 1 is the row player as usual, where the first components in each cell refer to his payoff at that outcome. Player 2 is the column player whose payoffs are represented by the second component in each cell.

  2. This construction was also given by von Neumann and Morgenstern (1944).

References

  • Aumann R (1961) The core of a cooperative game without side payments. Trans Am Math Soc 98:539–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede Y, Koray S (2016) Strategic separation of core outcomes under semitransferability of utility. Personal communication, Bilkent University, Turkey

  • Kalai E, Postlewaite A, Roberts J (1979) A group incentive compatible mechanism yielding core allocations. J Econ Theory 20:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagunoff RD (1994) A simple noncooperative core story. Games Econ Behav 7:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Castrillo JD (1992) Cooperative outcomes through noncooperative games. Games Econ Behav 7:428–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry M, Reny PJ (1994) A noncooperative view of coalition formation and the core. Econometrica 62:795–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten R (1975) Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in the extensive games. Int J Game Theory 4:25–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano R (1995) A market to implement the core. J Econ Theory 67:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

BIDEB-2211 Graduate Scholarship Program of the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK) and Foundation for Economic Design are gratefully acknowledged for financial support to Y.D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Semih Koray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dede, Y., Koray, S. Every member of the core is as respectful as any other. Rev Econ Design 22, 55–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-018-0211-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-018-0211-6

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation