Advertisement

Virtual Reality

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 91–102 | Cite as

Virtual dives into the underwater archaeological treasures of South Italy

  • Fabio Bruno
  • Loris Barbieri
  • Antonio Lagudi
  • Marco Cozza
  • Alessandro Cozza
  • Raffaele Peluso
  • Maurizio Muzzupappa
S.I. : VR and AR Serious Games

Abstract

The paper presents a virtual diving system based on a virtual reality (VR) application for the exploitation of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. The virtual diving experience has been designed to entertain users, but its added pedagogical value is explicitly emphasized too. In fact, the ludic activities, consisting in the simulation of a real diving session from the point of view of a scuba diver, are following a storyline described by a virtual diving companion who guides users during the exploration of the underwater archaeological site. The virtual diving system provides general and historical-cultural contents, but also information about the flora and fauna of the specific submerged site to the users. The results collected through user studies demonstrate that the proposed VR system is able to provide a playful learning experience, with a high emotional impact, and it has been well appreciated by a large variety of audiences, even by younger and inexperienced users.

Keywords

Serious games Virtual reality Virtual diving system Underwater Cultural Heritage Underwater archaeological sites 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The VISAS project (Ref. Start-Up PAC02L2-00040) has been financed by the MIUR under the PAC Programme. The authors would like to thank the Marine Protected Area of Capo Rizzuto, the Soprintendenza per i Beni culturali e ambientali del Mare della Sicilia for the permission to conduct the experimentation in the sites of Cala Minnola and the Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici della Calabria for the site of Punta Scifo.

References

  1. Addison AC (2001) Virtual heritage: technology in the service of culture. In: Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Virtual reality, archeology, and cultural heritage, pp 343–354. ACMGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson EF, McLoughlin L, Liarokapis F, Peters C, Petridis P, De Freitas S (2010) Developing serious games for cultural heritage: a state-of-the-art review. Virtual Real 14(4):255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbieri L, Bruno F, Muzzupappa M (2017) Virtual museum system evaluation through user studies. J Cult Herit. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.005 Google Scholar
  4. Barcelo M, Forte DH (2000) Virtual reality in archaeology. In: Sanders DH (ed) BAR International Series 843. Archeopress, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellotti F, Berta R, De Gloria A, D’ursi A, Fiore V (2012) A serious game model for cultural heritage. J Comput Cult Herit (JOCCH) 5(4):17Google Scholar
  6. Berlyne DE (1970) Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Atten Percept Psychophys 8(5):279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blue Growth Study (2013) Study in support of policy measures for maritime and coastal tourism at EU level. Specific contract under FWC MARE/2012/06–SC D1/2013/01-SI2.648530. Rotterdam/Brussels, 15 Sept 2013Google Scholar
  8. Borsci S, Macredie RD, Barnett J, Martin J, Kuljis J, Young T (2013) Reviewing and extending the five-user assumption: a grounded procedure for interaction evaluation. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact (TOCHI) 20(5):29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruno F, Bruno S, De Sensi G, Luchi ML, Mancuso S, Muzzupappa M (2010) From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: a complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition. J Cult Herit 11(1):42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2009.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruno F, Lagudi A, Muzzupappa M, Lupia M, Cario G, Barbieri L, Passaro S, Saggiomo R (2016a) Project VISAS—Virtual and augmented exploitation of Submerged Archaeological Sites: overview and first results. Mar Technol Soc J (MTS) 50(4):119–129. doi: 10.4031/MTSJ.50.4.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruno F, Lagudi A, Barbieri L, Muzzupappa M, Ritacco G, Cozza A, Cozza M, Peluso R, Lupia M, Cario G (2016) Virtual and augmented reality tools to improve the exploitation of underwater archaeological sites by diver and non-diver tourists. Digital heritage. Progress in cultural heritage: documentation, preservation, and protection. In: 6th International conference, EuroMed 2016, Nicosia, Cyprus, Proceedings, Part I, vol 10058 pp 269–280. 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-48496-9_22
  12. Chapman P, Conte G, Drap P, Gambogi P, Gauch F, Hanke K, Richards J (2006) Venus, virtual exploration of underwater sites. In: Proceeding of joint event CIPA/VAST/EG/Euro-MedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapman P, Roussel D, Drap P, Haydar M (2008) Virtual exploration of underwater archaeological sites. Visualization and interaction in mixed reality environments. In: Ashley KR-EM, Hermon S, Proenca A (eds) Proceedings of VAST: International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage. pp 141–148. doi: 10.2312/VAST/VAST08/141-148
  14. Coenen T, Mostmans L, Naessens K (2013) MuseUs: case study of a pervasive cultural heritage serious game. J Comput Cult Herit (JOCCH) 6(2):8Google Scholar
  15. De Paolis LT, Aloisio G, Celentano MG, Oliva L, Vecchio P (2011) Mediaevo project: a serious game for the edutainment. In: 2011 3rd International conference on computer research and development (ICCRD), vol 4, pp 524–529. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  16. Djaouti D, Alvarez J, Rampnoux O, Charvillat V, Jessel JP (2009) Serious games and cultural heritage: a case study of prehistoric caves. In: 15th International conference on virtual systems and multimedia, 2009. VSMM’09, pp 221–226. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  17. Dumas J, Sorce J, Virzi R (1995) Expert reviews: how many experts is enough? In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 39th annual meeting HFES, pp 309–312. doi: 10.1177/154193129503900402
  18. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415(6870):429–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ESA (2016) 2016 Sales, demographic and usage data—essential facts about the computer and video game industry. Entertainment Software Association, Washington, D.C., p 3Google Scholar
  20. EU Commission (2014) European commission directorate general for maritime Affairs and fisheries, A European strategy for more growth and jobs in coastal and maritime tourism, communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European and economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, 20/02/2014Google Scholar
  21. Haydar M, Roussel D, Maïdi M, Otmane S, Mallem M (2011) Virtual and augmented reality for cultural computing and heritage: a case study of virtual exploration of underwater archaeological site. Virtual Real 15(4):311–327. doi: 10.1007/s10055-010-0176-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang WHY, Soman D (2013) A Practitioner’s Guide to Gamification of Education. Behavioural Economics in Action Report Series, Rotman School of Management, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunter JW (2009) Underwater archaeology: the NAS guide to principles and practice. Australas Hist Archaeol 27:127Google Scholar
  24. ISO 13407 (1999) Human-centred design processes for interactive systemsGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobson J, Handron K, Holden L (2009) Narrative and content combine in a learning game for virtual heritage. Distance Educ 9(2):7–26Google Scholar
  26. Kapp KM (2012) The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  27. Katsouri I, Tzanavari A, Herakleous K, Poullis C (2015) Visualizing and assessing hypotheses for marine archaeology in a VR CAVE environment. J Comput Cult Herit (JOCCH) 8(2):10. doi: 10.1145/2665072 Google Scholar
  28. Lagudi A, Bianco G, Muzzupappa M, Bruno F (2016) An alignment method for the integration of underwater 3D data captured by a stereovision system and an acoustic camera. Sensors 16(4):536. doi: 10.3390/s16040536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lepouras G, Vassilakis C (2005) Virtual museums for all: employing game technology for edutainment. Virtual Real 8:96–106. doi: 10.1007/s10055-004-0141-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis JR (1994) Sample sizes for usability studies: additional considerations. Hum Factors 36:368–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis JR (2006) Usability testing. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. Wiley, New York, pp 1275–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liarokapis F, Kouřil P, Agrafiotis P, Demesticha S, Chmelík J, Skarlatos D (2017) 3D modelling and mapping for virtual exploitation of underwater archaeology assets. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLII-2/W3:425–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morschheuser B, Werder K, Hamari J, Abe J (2017) How to gamify? Development of a method for gamification. In: Proceedings of the 50th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), pp 4–7Google Scholar
  34. Mortara M, Catalano CE, Bellotti F, Fiucci G, Houry-Panchetti M, Petridis P (2014) Learning cultural heritage by serious games. J Cult Herit 15(3):318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pavlidis G, Koutsoudis A, Arnaoutoglou F, Tsioukas V, Chamzas C (2007) Methods for 3D digitization of cultural heritage. J Cult Herit 8(1):93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2006.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rock I, Victor J (1964) Vision and touch: an experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science 143(3606):594–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roussou M (2002) Virtual heritage: from the research lab to the broad public. Bar Int Ser 1075:93–100Google Scholar
  38. Sauro J, Lewis JR (2016) Quantifying the user experience: practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann published by Elsevier Inc, Burlington. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802308-2.00001-1 Google Scholar
  39. Shaffer DW, Squire KR, Halverson R, Gee JP (2005) Video games and the future of learning. Phi delta kappan 87(2):105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silvia PJ (2006) Exploring the psychology of interest. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simon N (2010) The participatory museum. Museum 2.0 Santa Cruz, California. ISBN-13:978-0-615-34650-2Google Scholar
  42. Spence C, Nicholls ME, Driver J (2001) The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Percept Psychophys 63(2):330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stone RJ (1999) Virtual heritage: the willing suspension of disbelief for the moment. World Heritage Review. UNESCO, Madrid, pp 18–27Google Scholar
  44. Stone R, White D, Guest R, Francis B (2009) The virtual scylla: an exploration of “serious games”, artificial life and simulation complexity. Virtual Real 13(1):13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner CW, Lewis JR, Nielsen J (2006) Determining usability test sample size. Int encycl ergon hum factors 3:3084–3088. doi: 10.1201/9780849375477.ch597 Google Scholar
  46. Van Dam A, Laidlaw DH, Simpson RM (2002) Experiments in immersive virtual reality for scientific visualization. Comput Graph 26(4):535–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vansteenkiste M, Lens W, Deci EL (2006) Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educ Psychol 41(1):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Varinlioğlu G (2011) Data collection for a virtual museum on the underwater survey at kaş, Turkey. Int J Naut Archaeol 40(1):182–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-9270.2010.00304.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vote E, Feliz DA, Laidlaw DH, Joukowsky MS (2002) Discovering petra: archaeological analysis in VR. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 22(5):38–50. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2002.1028725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wei T, Li Y (2010) Design of educational game: a literature review. Transactions on edutainment IV. Springer, Berlin, pp 266–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams DF, Keay SJ (2005) Roman Amphorae: a digital resource. Archaeol Data Serv. doi: 10.5284/1000021 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Bruno
    • 1
  • Loris Barbieri
    • 1
  • Antonio Lagudi
    • 1
  • Marco Cozza
    • 2
  • Alessandro Cozza
    • 2
  • Raffaele Peluso
    • 2
  • Maurizio Muzzupappa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MechanicalEnergy and Industrial Engineering (DIMEG) University of CalabriaRendeItaly
  2. 2.3D Research SrlRendeItaly

Personalised recommendations