Skip to main content
Log in

Derivation of conventional formula of the third-order aberration for off-axial optical system

  • Special Section: Regular Paper
  • The 11th International Conference on Optics-Photonics Design & Fabrication (ODF’18), Hiroshima, Japan
  • Published:
Optical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A formula of the third-order aberration based on the primary aberration expansion for an off-axial optical system is investigated. The point eikonal analysis and the coordinate system using the surface normal vector lead to a simple wavefront-based expression. Three-ray system employing the central, the principal and an arbitrary ray is examined for the derivation. The rays are forced to reach from the last surface to a virtual image point. Therefore, the contradiction of the optical path lengths brings the wavefront aberration. The extracted third-order aberrations are not strictly the same expressions as the conventional formula but show clearly the features of the five kinds of the primary aberrations along with the term originated by the off-axial layout. The relation between the second-order term and the expanded gaussian matrix for paraxial ray tracing and a term related to field curvature are discussed for off-axial systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herzberger, M.: Modern Geometrical Optics. Interscience Publishers, New York (1958)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Araki, K.: Analysis of off-axial optical systems (1). Opt. Rev. 7, 221 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Araki, K.: Paraxial and aberration analysis of off-axial optical systems. Opt. Rev. 12, 219 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stone, B.D., Forbes, G.W.: Foundations of first-order layout for asymmetric systems: an application of Hamilton’s methods. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 96 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone, B.D., Forbes, G.W.: Characterization of first-order optical properties for asymmetric systems. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 478 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Araki, K.: Analysis of off-axial optical systems (2). Opt. Rev. 7, 326 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wakazono, T., Yatagai, T., Araki, K.: Third-order aberration analysis of an off-axial optical system. Opt. Rev. 23, 61–76 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchdarl, H.A.: System without symmetries: foundations of a theory of Lagrangian aberration coefficients. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 1314 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stone, B.D., Forbes, G.W.: Foundations of second-order layout for asymmetric systems. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 2067 (1992)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Oleszko, M., Hamback, R., Gross, H.: Decomposition of the total wave aberration in generalized optical systems. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 34, 1856 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuerschback, K., Rolland, J.P., Thompson, K.P.: Theory of aberration fields for general optical systems with freeform surfaces. Opt. Express 22, 26585 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson, K.: Description of the third-order optical aberrations of near-circular pupil optical systems without symmetry. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 1389 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsui, Y.: Lens design method (in Japanese). Kyoritsu Publication, Tokyo (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Born, M., Wolf, E.: Principles of Optics, 6th edn. Cambridge University press (1980)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimihiro Saito.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

We assume that the coordinate system is adjusted so that the central image height vector only has y component, i.e., y = (y0,0).

Figure 4 shows the ray height vector and the central ray directions with an angle q to the normal vector of the surface. Using the matrix J listed as formula (8), the relationship between Y, h and h′ in Ref. [3] is expressed as

$${\mathbf{Y}} = \sqrt J^{ - 1} {\mathbf{h}} = \sqrt {J^{\prime}}^{ - 1} {\mathbf{h^{\prime}}},$$
(36)

where

$$J = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & {\cos^{2} \theta } \\ \end{array} } \right).$$
(37)
Fig. 4
figure 4

Coordinate system and relationship between h, h′ in Ref. [3] and Y

The formula (25) is transformed to an expression with respect to h and a in Ref. [3] as follows:

$$2\cos \theta^{\prime} \cdot A\sqrt {J^{\prime}}^{ - 1} {\mathbf{h^{\prime}}} - \sqrt {J^{\prime}}^{ - 1} {\mathbf{\alpha^{\prime}}} = 2\cos \theta \cdot A\sqrt J^{ - 1} {\mathbf{h}} - \sqrt J^{ - 1} {\varvec{\upalpha}},$$
(38)

where the paraxial angle vector a is defined as:

$${\varvec{\upalpha}} = N\frac{{\mathbf{h}}}{L}.$$
(39)

Finally, the formula shown as the formula (13) in Ref. [3] is derived with (36) and (38):

$$\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {h^{\prime}_{y} } \\ {h^{\prime}_{z} } \\ {\alpha^{\prime}_{y} } \\ {\alpha^{\prime}_{z} } \\ \end{array} } \right) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{\cos \theta^{\prime}}}{\cos \theta }} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ {2aN^{*} } & {2cN^{*} \cos \theta } & {\frac{\cos \theta }{{\cos \theta^{\prime}}}} & 0 \\ {2cN^{*} \cos \theta^{\prime}} & {2bN^{*} \cos \theta^{\prime}\cos \theta } & 0 & 1 \\ \end{array} } \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {h_{y} } \\ {h_{z} } \\ {\alpha_{y} } \\ {\alpha_{z} } \\ \end{array} } \right),$$
(40)

where N* is defined as:

$$N^{*} = \frac{{N^{\prime}\cos \theta^{\prime} - N\cos \theta }}{{\cos \theta^{\prime}\cos \theta }}.$$
(41)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saito, K. Derivation of conventional formula of the third-order aberration for off-axial optical system. Opt Rev 26, 406–410 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-019-00516-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-019-00516-4

Navigation