Enhancing fracture-network characterization and discrete-fracture-network simulation with high-resolution surveys using unmanned aerial vehicles

Amélioration de la caractérisation des réseaux de fractures et de la simulation des réseaux de fractures discrètes grâce à des relevés à haute résolution effectués à l’aide de drones

Mejora de la caracterización de la red de fracturas y la simulación de la red de fracturas discretas con relevamientos de alta resolución mediante vehículos aéreos no tripulados

利用无人机进行高分辨率调查增强裂隙网络特性和离散裂缝网络模拟

Caracterização de rede de fraturas melhorada e simulação de rede discreta da fraturas com levantamentos de alta resolução usando veículos aéreos não tripulado

Abstract

A workflow is presented that integrates unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery with discrete fracture network (DFN) geometric characterization and quantification of fluid flow. The DFN analysis allows for reliable characterization and reproduction of the most relevant features of fracture networks, including: identification of orientation sets and their characteristics (mean orientation, dispersion, and prior probability); scale invariance in distributions of fracture length and spatial location/clustering; and the distribution of aperture values used to compute network-scale equivalent permeability. A two-dimensional DFN-generation approach honors field data by explicitly reproducing observed multi-scale fracture clustering using a multiplicative cascade process and power law distribution of fracture length. The influence of aperture on network-scale equivalent permeability is investigated using comparisons between a sublinear aperture-to-length relationship and constant aperture. To assess the applicability of the developed methodology, DFN flow simulations are calibrated to pumping test data. Results suggest that even at small scales, UAV surveys capture the essential geometrical properties required for fluid flow characterization. Both the constant and sublinear aperture scaling approaches provide good matches to the pumping test results with only minimal calibration, indicating that the reproduced networks sufficiently capture the geometric and connectivity properties characteristic of the granitic rocks at the study site. The sublinear aperture scaling case honors the directions of dominant fractures that play a critical role in connecting fracture clusters and provides a realistic representation of network permeability.

Résumé

Une méthode de travail est présentée qui intègre l’imagerie acquise par drone pour la caractérisation géométrique des réseaux de fractures discrètes (DFN) et la quantification de l’écoulement des fluides. L’analyse DFN permet une caractérisation et une reproduction fiables des caractéristiques les plus pertinentes des réseaux de fractures, notamment: l’identification des familles d’orientation et de leurs caractéristiques (orientation moyenne, dispersion et probabilité préalable); l’invariance d’échelle dans les distributions de la longueur des fractures et de la localisation spatiale/des regroupements spatiaux (clusters); et la distribution des valeurs d’ouverture utilisées pour calculer la perméabilité équivalente à l’échelle du réseau. Une approche de génération de DFN bidimensionnels valorise les données de terrain en reproduisant explicitement les clusters de fractures multi-échelles observés en utilisant un processus de cascade multiplicative et une distribution de la longueur de fracture répondant à une loi puissance. L’influence de l’ouverture sur la perméabilité équivalente à l’échelle du réseau est étudiée en utilisant des comparaisons entre une relation sublinéaire ouverture-longueur et une ouverture constante. Pour évaluer l’applicabilité de la méthodologie développée, les simulations d’écoulement dans le DFN sont calibrées sur des données d’essai de pompage. Les résultats suggèrent que, même à petite échelle, les relevés de drones permettent de saisir les propriétés géométriques essentielles requises pour la caractérisation de l’écoulement des fluides. Les approches d’échelle d’ouverture constante et sublinéaire fournissent de bonnes correspondances avec les résultats des essais de pompage, avec seulement un calage minimal, ce qui indique que les réseaux reproduits capturent suffisamment les propriétés géométriques et de connectivité caractéristiques des roches granitiques sur le site d’étude. Le cas de la mise à l’échelle par ouverture sublinéaire met en valeur les directions des fractures dominantes qui jouent un rôle essentiel dans la connexion des clusters de fractures et fournit une représentation réaliste de la perméabilité du réseau.

Resumen

Se presenta un flujo de trabajo que integra las imágenes de los vehículos aéreos no tripulados (UAV) con la caracterización geométrica de la red de fracturas discretas (DFN) y la cuantificación del flujo de fluidos. El análisis de la DFN permite una caracterización y reproducción fiables de los rasgos más relevantes de las redes de fracturas, entre los que se incluyen: la identificación de la orientación de los conjuntos y sus características (orientación media, dispersión y probabilidad a priori); la invariabilidad de escala en las distribuciones de la longitud de las fracturas y la localización/agrupación espacial; y la distribución de los valores de apertura utilizados para calcular la permeabilidad equivalente a la escala de la red. El método de generación bidimensional de DFN respeta los datos de campo reproduciendo explícitamente la agrupación de fracturas observada a escala múltiple mediante un proceso de multiplicación en cascada y la distribución de la longitud de las fracturas según la ley de la energía. La influencia de la apertura en la permeabilidad equivalente a escala de red se investiga mediante comparaciones entre una relación sublinear de apertura a longitud y una apertura constante. Para evaluar la aplicabilidad de la metodología desarrollada, las simulaciones de flujo de DFN se calibran con los datos de las pruebas de bombeo. Los resultados sugieren que, incluso a pequeña escala, los estudios de los vehículos aéreos no tripulados captan las propiedades geométricas esenciales necesarias para la caracterización del flujo de los fluidos. Tanto el método de escalado de apertura constante como el sublinear proporcionan buenas coincidencias con los resultados de las pruebas de bombeo con sólo una calibración mínima, lo que indica que las redes reproducidas captan suficientemente las propiedades geométricas y de conectividad características de las rocas graníticas del sitio de estudio. El caso de la aplicación de la escala de apertura sublinear respeta las direcciones de las fracturas dominantes que desempeñan un papel fundamental en la conexión de las redes de fracturas y proporciona una representación realista de la permeabilidad de las distintas redes.

摘要

提出了一种将无人机(UAV)图像与离散裂隙网络(DFN)几何特征和流体流动量化相结合的工作流程。DFN分析能够可靠地表征和再现裂隙网络的最相关特征, 包括:识别方向集及其特征(平均方向、弥散度和先验概率); 裂缝长度分布和空间位置/聚类的尺度不变性以及用于计算网络尺度等效渗透率的孔径分布。二维DFN生成方法通过使用倍增串级过程和裂缝长度的幂律分布显式再现观测到的多尺度裂缝聚类, 从而实现对现场数据的尊重。通过次线性孔径-长度关系和恒定孔径的对比, 研究了孔径对网络尺度等效渗透率的影响。为了评估所开发方法的适用性, 用抽水试验数据对DFN流量模拟校正。结果表明, 即使在小尺度, 无人机调查仍然能捕获流体流动特征描述所需的几何特征。常数和次线性孔径标度方法均与抽水试验结果吻合良好, 且校准量极少, 表明再生网络能充分反映研究区花岗岩的几何和连通性特征。次线性孔径标度尊重了主裂缝的方向, 主裂缝在裂缝簇的连接中起着关键作用, 为网络渗透率提供了真实的表征。

Resumo

Um fluxo de trabalho que integra imagens de veículos aéreos não tripulados (VANT) com caracterização geométrica da rede de fratura discreta (RFD) e quantificação do fluxo de fluidos é apresentado. A análise da RFD permite a caracterização e a reprodução confiáveis ​​das características mais relevantes das redes de fraturas, incluindo: identificação dos conjuntos de orientação e suas características (orientação média, dispersão e probabilidade prévia); invariância de escala em distribuições de comprimento de fratura e localização/agrupamento espacial; e a distribuição dos valores de abertura usados ​​para calcular a permeabilidade equivalente em escala de rede. Uma abordagem bidimensional da geração da RFD respeita os dados de campo, reproduzindo explicitamente o agrupamento de fraturas observados nas múltiplas escalas usando um processo em cascata multiplicativo e distribuição da lei de potência do comprimento da fratura. A influência da abertura na permeabilidade equivalente em escala de rede é investigada usando comparações entre uma relação sublinear de abertura para comprimento e abertura constante. Para avaliar a aplicabilidade da metodologia desenvolvida, simulações de fluxo na RFD são calibradas com testes de bombeamento. Os resultados sugerem que, mesmo em pequenas escalas, os levantamentos usando VANT capturam as propriedades geométricas essenciais necessárias para a caracterização do fluxo de fluidos. Ambas as abordagens de escalonamento constante e sublinear da abertura fornecem boas comparações aos resultados dos testes de bombeamento com mínima calibração, indicando que as redes reproduzidas capturam suficientemente as propriedades geométricas e de conectividade características das rochas graníticas no local do estudo. O caso do escalonamento sublinear da abertura respeita as direções das fraturas dominantes que desempenham um papel crítico na conexão dos grupos de fraturas e fornece uma representação realista da permeabilidade da rede.

Introduction

Fluid flow and contaminant transport through fractured rocks are increasingly studied using discrete fracture network (DFN) models. The strength of the DFN approach lies in the explicit representation and inclusion of the geometrical properties of individual fractures which allows for a better understanding of fractures contribution to flow and transport (Smith and Schwartz 1984; Renshaw 1999; de Dreuzy et al. 2001; Neuman 2005; Reeves et al. 2008, 2013). Monte Carlo analyses are commonly used to address the spatial variability in fracture network properties and subsequent uncertainty in flow and transport behavior (Berkowitz 2002; Neuman et al. 2007; Reeves et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2016a). Different techniques can be used to generate DFNs, although most studies rely on fracture data collected from outcrops and/or boreholes and then utilize stochastic methods to reproduce site-specific fracture attributes (Andersson and Dverstorp 1987; Patriarche et al. 2007; Reeves et al. 2014; Follin and Hartley 2014). The outcrop-based model relies on a true representation of the fracture network as observed on the outcrop, and preserves the topology and geometry of the fracture network (Odling 1997). However, limitations of outcrop-exposure-based models and the complex three-dimensional (3D) nature of fractures make it impossible to fully characterize fracture networks (Neuman 2005; Reeves et al. 2012).

Stochastic approaches assume that any observed fracture network can be considered as a single statistically equivalent realization of a random and stationary process of network generation (Cacas et al. 1990). Fractures are idealized as straight lines or planar discs/polygons (Baecher et al. 1977), and their geometrical properties (length, orientation, aperture) are considered independent random variables following certain probability distributions (Munier 2004; Lei et al. 2017). Based on these assumptions, synthetic networks can be generated from statistical parameters derived from field measurements. Large data sets are needed to obtain reliable statistical parameters; for instance, fracture length commonly encompasses at least 2–3 orders of magnitude at field sites (Bonnet et al. 2001; Clauset et al. 2009). In practice, it is often challenging to obtain such a dataset due to scale limitations imposed by exposure constraints and the resolution of the survey equipment and/or methodology. As noted by Odling (1997), any fracture map represents a subset of the fracture trace population with a lower limit defined by the resolution of the mapping technique, and the upper limit defined by the size of the observation domain. These limitations naturally lead to data censoring.

Recent advances in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs; commonly called ‘drones’) and image processing (structure from motion) offer the possibility of high-resolution mapping of fractures, and thus detailed characterization of fracture networks (Vasuki et al. 2014). Traditional techniques of field mapping such as airborne or satellite imaging techniques, are often resource intensive, difficult to employ, and suffer from coarse resolution that limits detailed and inclusive characterization of smaller background fractures. Conversely, millimeter- to centimeter-scale resolution can be achieved by flying UAVs at lower altitude. Furthermore, kilometer scale surveys can be performed with UAVs, and can easily include areas where accessibility is a challenge. These capabilities of UAVs greatly improve the ability of researchers to collect essential fracture network data (Carrivick et al. 2013; Vollgger and Cruden 2016).

Natural networks often exhibit complex patterns of spatial clustering (Gillespie et al. 1993; Sanderson and Peacock 2019); however, most DFN studies do not take spatial clustering into account. This limitation arises from conventional outcrop maps that do not offer the resolution necessary to detect and quantify clustering patterns. In the absence of high-quality two-dimensional (2D) data to determine if fracture clustering is present, fractures are typically assumed unclustered and a uniform distribution of fracture centers is assumed (Baecher et al. 1977; Dershowitz et al. 1991). This implies that fracture location can be modeled as a Poisson process (Ross 2010). The Levy-Lee method or the multiplicative cascade process (MCP) can be used to replicate fracture clustering. In the Levy-Lee method, distances between fracture centers are randomly drawn from a power law distribution, with the exponent of the power law representing the fractal mass dimension (Clemo and Smith 1997). The Levy-Lee method is sensitive to domain size and the input and output fractal mass dimensions are often inconsistent for small domain sizes. The second approach uses a multiplicative cascade process to generate a probability field map from which fracture centers are drawn (Schertzer and Lovejoy 1987; Meakin 1991). Unlike the Levy-Lee approach, the MCP approach uses a correlation dimension which better captures geometric patterns of spatial clustering (Cowie et al. 1993).

Fracture aperture is an important geometrical property governing fluid flow at the single fracture scale but is the least studied at the network-scale. This stems from difficulties in obtaining reliable aperture measurements under in-situ stress conditions, as measurements at the outcrop surface cannot be directly correlated to subsurface apertures due to weathering and lack of confining stress, both of which lead to overly dilated fractures. Additionally, roughness along fracture walls makes it challenging to determine if mechanical apertures measured in the field are representative of fluid flow processes. Mechanical aperture is defined as the physical distance normal to fracture walls, whereas hydraulic aperture refers to the cubic law aperture for a fracture that is computed from a measured flow rate (Snow 1965). For most cases, roughness along the fracture walls leads to mechanical apertures that are considerably larger than hydraulic apertures (Raven and Gale 1985; Renshaw 1995; Chen et al. 2000). Several mathematical and empirical expressions have been proposed to correlate mechanical and hydraulic apertures (e.g. Witherspoon et al. 1980; Hakami 1995; Olsson and Barton 2001).

Several studies have focused on fracture characterization using UAVs (Hardebol and Bertotti 2013; Tavani et al. 2014; Duelis Viana et al. 2016), spatial clustering representation (Darcel et al. 2003; de Dreuzy et al. 2004), and fractures aperture modeling (Olsson and Barton 2001; Olson 2003); but combining all of these components remains challenging. For instance, Bisdom et al. (2017) combined detailed UAV mapping with sublinear aperture to length scaling; however, they used a deterministic approach to generate the DFN and the equivalent network permeability was not compared with field data.

This study investigates the use of UAVs to improve fracture network characterization and integrates these results into stochastic DFN simulations. The proposed integrated approach uses a multiplicative cascade process to reproduce fracture clustering, and models aperture according to a sublinear aperture to length relation. To assess the relevance of this approach, network-scale equivalent permeabilities obtained from stochastically generated DFNs are compared with pumping test results. Results of this study will serve as a basis to develop a watershed-scale surface water/groundwater model that investigates the impacts of climate change on water resources in northern Togo. Like other regions in West Africa, the subsurface in northern Togo is underlain by fractured rock aquifers with low storage capacity. Changes in land use, demographic stress, and projected climate variability over West Africa raise questions regarding groundwater sustainability. Specifically, the DFN results will be used in the spatial discretization of the model and to assign permeability values that capture the anisotropy and permeability of the fractured bedrock.

Study site

The survey site is in northern Togo situated between longitudes 0°07′–0°19′ and latitudes 10°48′–10°58′ (Fig. 1). The geology of northern Togo is made up of two domains: the West African Craton (WAC) to the north, and the Volta Basin to the south (Eglinger et al. 2017). The WAC consists of Archean to Paleoproterozoic crystalline rocks that were last deformed ~2,000 Ma ago during the Eburnean orogeny (Kalsbeek et al. 2008). The Volta basin lies unconformably on the southeastern margin of the WAC and dips 1–10° to the southeast. Strata of the Volta Basin have been affected by the Pan-African orogeny (~600 Ma) and show an ENE bedding orientation. The Volta Basin strata are divided into three supergroups, which presented from youngest to oldest are: the Tamale, Oti, and Bombouaka supergroups. Only the Bombouaka supergroup has surface expressions in the study region. The Bombouaka supergroup consists of coarse-grained quartzitic and feldspathic sandstones, interbedded with clayey-silty layers. It is overlain by the Oti supergroup, which consists of shales and greywackes. The Tamale supergoup is largely composed of conglomerates.

Fig. 1
figure1

a Geologic map of the study region showing the West African Craton and the Volta sedimentary basin. The box denoted by the letter A represents the location of the drone survey site. b Geologic cross-section along transect T–T′. From the NW to the SE, the granitic rocks of the West African Craton are shown at the base and the sandstone unit of the Bombouaka supergroup at the top

Deformation features in northern Togo are the result of the Eburnean and Pan-African Orogenies. The Eburnean orogeny evolved in two stages (Feybesse et al. 1990). The first stage is a NW–SE crustal shortening (2.2~2.19 Ga) that generated vertical foliations and steeply dipping mylonite zones. This stage was followed by a transcurrent tectonic regime. Indicators of the transcurrent regime consist of NE–SW strike slip faults, NE–SW and NW–SE en echelon faults, and NW–SE tension veins (Lompo 2010). The Pan-African orogeny, unlike the Eburnean orogeny, was predominantly a compressional event with at least four phases (NE–SW, ENE–WSW, SE–NW, and SSE–NNW shortening); these are recorded by west verging thrust planes and conjugated strike slip faults (Tairou et al. 2012).

The survey site is located in the WAC and consists of light-colored granodiorite composed mainly of plagioclase, quartz, and amphibole. The texture is phaneritic and quartz veins are observed at the site (Fig. 2). The outcrop is highly fractured with no shear displacement observable. The joints (Fig. 2) have a primary NE–SW orientation and an irregular spacing pattern. The secondary fracture orientation is ESE–WNW. The crosscutting and abutting relationships observed (Fig. 2) suggest that the ESE–WNW set formed prior to the NE–SW set. This location was chosen because it represents one of the places where the WAC crops out with a good exposure in northern Togo.

Fig. 2
figure2

Example of a joints and b quartz veins observed at the study site. c Abutting and crosscutting relationships between the two predominant sets

Given the low primary rock permeability, groundwater flow in the region is controlled by secondary permeability associated with fracturing and weathering. Results from single-well pumping tests yield a permeability range of 7.9 × 10−15–1.6 × 10−12 m2 in the crystalline rocks of the WAC (Appendix Table 5). The region has a Tropical Savanna climate (Köppen classification) with an average annual precipitation (1992–2016) of 1104 mm/year. The vegetation consists of sparse deciduous shrubs and woodlands which is ideal for outcrop surveys.

Methods

A drone survey was conducted to map fractures in well exposed, horizontal outcrop in the WAC. Fracture traces on the outcrop map were first digitized, and then followed by statistical analyses of fracture attributes (i.e., orientation, length, and spatial correlation). Fracture statistics were then used to generate multiple 2D synthetic network realizations. Fluid flow was computed within each network by solving head at fracture intersections. Two scenarios were used to model aperture: (1) constant aperture and (2) a sublinear aperture to length scaling. Principal components of the permeability tensor were averaged over all flow simulations to determine the network-scale equivalent permeability. The equivalent permeability was calibrated to single-well pumping test results by adjusting either aperture in the constant aperture case or the Young’s modulus in the aperture-length scaling relation.

Drone survey

The study outcrop was surveyed using a DJI Phantom 4 Pro quadrocopter. The latter was equipped with a camera that features a 2.54 mm, 20 megapixels CMOS sensor. Table 1 gives the camera specifications. Prior to the survey, the Drone Deploy application was used to define flight grids. The side and front overlaps were set to 70% to ensure a seamless stitching of adjacent photos and an accurate photogrammetric model. Once the side and front overlaps are specified, Drone Deploy determines the flight speed and frequency at which photos are taken. Flight altitude is adjusted until the target ground resolution is achieved. The following equation gives the relationship between resolution and flight altitude (Vollgger and Cruden 2016):

$$ \mathrm{GR}=\frac{H\times {W}_{\mathrm{s}}}{f\times {W}_{\mathrm{i}}} $$
(1)

where GR is the ground resolution in m/pixel, H is the vertical distance above ground level in m, Ws is the width of the camera sensor in mm, Wi is the image width in pixels, and f is the focal length of the sensor in mm. In practice, before surveying, the outcrop is inspected to determine the smallest feature of interest. This information is then used to estimate the appropriate flight altitude. Flight altitude was set to 20 m which corresponds to a ground resolution of 0.63 cm/pixel.

Table 1 Camera parameters

Camera locations during the survey were determined using the Phantom 4 Pro v2.0 onboard GPS receiver. The field site is located in a remote region of Togo without survey benchmarks to constrain the georeferenced grid with ground control points as commonly employed in UAV surveys (James and Robson 2012; Bemis et al. 2014; Vollgger and Cruden 2016). As an alternative, the orientation and length of seven targets were recorded during the survey and later used to assess the accuracy of the drone map. This approach allows one to derive error estimates specific to fracture length and orientation. In addition to the drone survey, manual outcrop measurements of fracture length, orientation, spacing, and aperture are recorded for verification. The measurement transects are set perpendicular to the main orientation sets for reliable estimation of true fracture spacing and equal representation of fracture sets. Length and orientation are measured for each fracture intersecting the transect.

Drone data processing

Drone images are processed using the photogrammetric approach (Vollgger and Cruden 2016) which uses overlapping photos to reconstruct 3D structures, orthomosaic, and digital elevation models (DEM). Agisoft Metashape software (version 1.5.2) is used to process images. The first processing step identifies common features (tie points) in adjacent photos, using Structure from Motion algorithms (Fig. 3). Once tie points are detected, photos are aligned, and the geometry of the scene is reconstructed by determining camera positions and orientation. A sparse point cloud (3.5 × 105 points) is generated as a result of the first step. The quality of the photo alignment can be inferred from the reprojection error, with low reprojection error values indicating good photo alignment. The reprojection error in this survey is 0.337 pixel which is equivalent to a 57-μm offset between the original and aligned photos. For reference, the USGS (2017) recommends 0.3 pixel as reprojection error goal for general UAV imaging purposes. Length error relative to the seven targets (Fig. 4) measured in the field varies between 10 and 20 cm and orientation error varies between 1 and 3° (Table 2). The orientation error is lower than the tolerance limit (3–5°) generally accepted for orientation measurements (Vasuki et al. 2014; Novakova and Pavlis 2017). Fracture characterization for DFN generation involves best-fit parameterization of both fracture orientation and length to probability distributions, and hence, these small error values are inconsequential. Next, the sparse point cloud is densified by extracting the position of all points in the aligned photos. The dense point cloud (2.5 × 108 points) is then converted into a meshed surface that serves as the basis for deriving DEM and orthomosaic maps.

Fig. 3
figure3

Image processing steps in Agisoft Metashape: a tie points are used to align photos and generate the sparse point cloud model (349,899 points), and b densification (247,789,963 points) of the sparse point cloud model and generation of the orthomosaic map

Fig. 4
figure4

Survey site showing the seven control target locations

Table 2 Control targets’ length and orientation. SD standard deviation

Fracture patterns are analyzed using FracPaQ v2.4 (Healy et al. 2017). Given the small size of the survey area, fracture traces are digitized manually from the image for better results in FracPaQ. Automated and semi-automated fracture tracing algorithms are generally time efficient, but are prone to artifacts and thus quality control and manual adjustments are required (Gustafsson 1994; Bisdom et al. 2017). Sampling biases often associated with manual interpretations are minimized by digitizing at the same level of magnification (×1.5). When fractures are curved, they are interpreted as a straight line joining the two endpoints (Fig. 5). Fracture mapping is a classical example of natural data censoring. Fracture tracing is limited only to areas with good exposure, and no extrapolations were made for regions covered by soil. Fracture traces are then saved as scalable vector graphics file which serves as input for FracPaQ. The default length unit in FracPaQ is pixel, the conversion to SI unit is based on a scale factor (9.6 mm/pixel), which is expressed as the ratio of the pixel dimension of the input image and the known field dimension.

Fig. 5
figure5

Visual interpretation of joints

Statistical analysis

The survey site has a low topographic gradient and the study outcrop lacks vertical exposure necessary to determine fracture attributes in the vertical dimension. Additionally, borehole geophysics were not performed on any of the wells in the area, including the wells that generated the pumping test data. Thus, the statistical analysis is restricted to 2D fracture data. The statistical analysis approach first defines fracture set orientations within the fracture population, analyzes for the distribution of fracture length, and examines trends in fracture spacing. Directional data are analyzed to determine the orientation of each fracture set. Fracture length data exhibit linear trends on a log-log plot and are fit to a power law distribution. Trends in the observed fracture clustering are captured by determining the two-point correlation dimension. Spatial occupancy (a surrogate for fracture density) is quantified using the fractal box-counting method.

Orientation sets are identified by plotting fracture strike on a rose diagraam. For each orientation set, the mean orientation (θm) is computed following the method proposed by Mardia (1972). To implement Mardia’s method, orientation data are first organized into bins with the corresponding frequencies. The mean orientation (θm) is given by:

$$ {\theta}_{\mathrm{m}}=\arctan \left(\frac{S}{C}\right) $$
(2)

where

$$ C=\frac{1}{n}{\sum}_{i=1}^k{f}_i\mathrm{Cos}{\theta}_i $$
(3)

and

$$ S=\frac{1}{n}{\sum}_{i=1}^k{f}_i\mathrm{Sin}{\theta}_i $$
(4)

where n is the number of orientation elements in a set, fi is the frequency, θi is the bin value, and θm is the mean orientation. The dispersion κ of orientations around the mean is computed using a maximum likelihood approach (Fisher 1995; Berens 2009).

Previous studies have found that fracture length spans multiple orders of magnitude and is best described by a power-law (Davy 1993; Marrett 1996; Renshaw 1996, 1999; Odling 1997; Bonnet et al. 2001). Power-law distributions of fracture length infer that a characteristic length in the fracture growth process is undefined (Sornette and Davy 1991). This is advantageous for outcrop studies where a power-law exponent can be determined locally from smaller-scale data and extrapolated to describe fracture length at subregional scales. Lognormal distributions of fracture length have also been proposed, but these distributions can arise from censoring of the largest fracture length values due to limited outcrop exposure or lithological layering (Odling et al. 1999). In practice, the inverse cumulative distribution of fracture length is plotted, also known as a survival function (Ross 2010). If length exhibits power law scaling, the tail of the largest values will exhibit a linear trend on a dual logarithmic plot. The slope of the linear trend represents the power-law exponent, and the minimum fracture length value can be determined from the lower threshold of the power law trend.

Accurate characterization of the spatial organization of fractures within a rock mass is important for reproducing fracture connectivity and quantification of fluid flow. In this study, the fracture network exhibits spatial clustering, and the computed correlation dimension is used to describe the spatial organization of fractures. The correlation dimension (Dc) is determined using the two-point correlation method. First, fracture centers (barycenters) are determined and the distance between pairs of fracture centers is computed (Sornette et al. 1993; Bour and Davy 1999). The two-point correlation function, C2(r), is then determined as follows (Hentschel and Procaccia 1983):

$$ {C}_2(r)=\frac{2{N}_{\mathrm{p}}(r)}{N\left(N-1\right)} $$
(5)

where Np(r) is the number of pairs of fracture centers separated by a straight line distance less than r, and N is the total number of points (barycenters). By plotting the correlation function C2(r) against the radius r, on a dual logarithmic scale, the two-point correlation dimension (Dc) is given by:

$$ {C}_2(r)\approx {r}^{-{D}_{\mathrm{c}}} $$
(6)

A classical box-counting method is used in this study to compute the fractal dimension to provide a scale-invariant estimate of fracture density (Reeves et al. 2008). It is based on fitting the domain of interest with a square grid with box size r. The network is scanned and the total number of boxes (Nb) that contain at least one fracture within the domain of interest is determined (Barton and Larsen 1985). This process is repeated for different values of r. The fractal dimension (D) is obtained by plotting the number of square (Nb) against the box size r, on a logarithmic scale. The fractal dimension corresponds to the slope of the line:

$$ \log \left[{N}_{\mathrm{b}}(r)\right]=a-D\log (r) $$
(7)

where a is the intercept and D is fractal dimension. The box-counting method is applied to a subset of the outcrop where soil is not present and fractures are well exposed.

Discrete fracture network generation

Fracture statistics in section ‘Statistical analysis’ are used to generate multiple 2D fracture network realizations. A DFN size of 40 m × 40 m is used to maintain consistency with the area of the outcrop where fractures are observed. However, some studies found that DFN equivalent permeability can be influenced by DFN size (Kulatilake and Panda 2000; Baghbanan and Jing 2007; Chen et al. 2008; Klimczak et al. 2010). Given the heterogeneous nature of fracture networks, it is often challenging to establish a representative elementary volume (REV). A multiplicative cascade approach (MCP) is used to reproduce the complex spatial distribution of fractures observed in the network by assigning fracture locations. The MCP is an iterative process of fragmentation of a shape into n-subdomains (Schertzer and Lovejoy 1987; Darcel et al. 2003). The MCP is advantageous because it preserves the observed fractal spatial clustering. A detailed description of the MCP method can be found in Moein et al. (2019); a summary of the method is presented here. The number of iterations is a function of domain size and minimum fracture length:

$$ {l}_{\mathrm{m}}=\frac{L}{2^m} $$
(8)

where lm is the minimum fracture length, L is the domain size, and m is the number of iterations.

For the first iteration, the domain is subdivided into four squares which are assigned probabilities such that:

$$ \sum \limits_{i=1}^n\frac{P_i^2}{{\left(\frac{1}{\tau}\right)}^{D\mathrm{c}}}=1 $$
(9)

and

$$ \sum \limits_i^n{P}_i=1 $$
(10)

where Pi is the probability, τ is the ratio of sub-domain side length to domain side length, and Dc is the two-point correlation dimension. For subsequent iterations, each initial square is further subdivided into four, with new probabilities satisfying Eqs. (9) and (10). The final probability is the product of the parent and daughter probabilities (Fig. 6). A probability density map generated from a total of eight iterations is used to reproduce the observed spatial clustering. Fracture centers are extracted from the probability density map using a discrete inverse transform method. To implement the discrete inverse transform method, the probability matrix of the previous step is reorganized into a vector and the cumulative sum of the vector is computed. Next, a vector U containing n uniform numbers between 0 and 1 is generated; n is the number of fractures desired. Each element Ui of U, is matched to the closest element of the cumulative probability vector, based on the following inequality:

$$ {C}_{i-1}\le {U}_i<{C}_i\kern0.75em i=1,\dots ..,n $$
(11)

where C is the cumulative sum probability vector. Some elements of U are likely to give the same element Ci which implies an unrealistic duplication of fracture centers if assigned to the center of the cell. To avoid duplicates, the location of fracture centers is drawn from a uniform distribution over the selected cell.

Fig. 6
figure6

First and second iterations of the multiplicative cascade process. At each iteration, a parent cell is fragmented into four daughter cells. A total of eight iterations is performed for each network realization

Once fracture locations are determined, fracture orientation, length, and aperture are assigned. Fracture orientations are modelled using the Von Mises-Fisher distribution:

$$ f\left(\theta |\mu, \kappa \right)=\frac{{\mathrm{e}}^{\kappa\ \cos \left(\theta -\mu \right)}}{2\uppi {I}_0\left(\kappa \right)} $$
(12)

where I0(κ) is the modified Bessel function of order zero, μ is the mean direction, and κ is an inverse measure of the dispersion around the mean. For each orientation set previously identified, random variates are generated using the envelope-rejection method (Best and Fisher 1979; Berens 2009). The relative abundance of each orientation set is maintained by honoring posterior probabilities.

Fracture length is modeled as a power law (Davy 1993; Bonnet et al. 2001):

$$ F(l)=1-{l}_{\mathrm{min}}^{\alpha }{l}^{-\alpha } $$
(13)

where F(l) is the cumulative distribution function, lmin is the lower power law cutoff and α the power law exponent. A vector U containing n random numbers between 0 and 1 is first generated; n is the number of fracture centers. Length variates are then computed as:

$$ \mathbf{L}={l}_{\mathrm{min}}{\mathbf{U}}^{-\left(\frac{1}{\alpha}\right)} $$
(14)

where L is the length variate vector.

Once all parameters are specified, fractures are added to the network until the observed fractal dimension (D) and density (P21) are satisfied. The latter is given by:

$$ {P}_{21}=\frac{1}{A}\sum \limits_{i=1}^n{l}_i $$
(15)

where A is the area of the domain and li is the length.

The last step consists of assigning aperture to each fracture. Two methods are used to assign aperture: (1) constant aperture applied to all fractures, or (2) aperture is assigned using a sublinear aperture to length scaling model (Olson 2003; Schultz et al. 2008). The sublinear aperture to length is used because it is only applicable to open-mode I fractures (joints), which is the case at this study site. Furthermore, the sublinear relationship is consistent with the linear elastic fracture mechanics and supported by a compilation of joints and veins data sets. The aperture to length scaling model relates fracture length L to maximum displacement by (Schultz et al. 2008):

$$ {D}_{\mathrm{max}}=\eta \sqrt{L} $$
(16)

where Dmax is the maximum displacement orthogonal to fracture walls at the center of the fracture and η is a constant of the form:

$$ \eta =\frac{K_{\mathrm{Ic}}\left(1-{\nu}^2\right)}{E}\ \frac{\sqrt{8}}{\sqrt{\uppi}} $$
(17)

where KIc is the fracture toughness in MPa.m1/2, ν is the Poisson’s ratio, and E is the Young’s modulus in GPa. In the absence of mechanical properties specific to the study site, estimates from other studies were used. The constant η is estimated using a KIc of 1.545 MPa·m1/2 (Atkinson 1984) and a Poisson’s ratio of 0.26 (Tugume et al. 2012). Young’s moduli for granite/granodiorite range between 69 and 91 GPa (Lanaro et al. 2006). These values are specific to granitic rocks characteristic of the study region. Representing joint aperture as an idealized ellipse, Olson (2003) determined that average opening-mode displacement Davg is related to Dmax by:

$$ {D}_{\mathrm{max}}=\frac{\uppi}{4}\ {D}_{\mathrm{avg}} $$
(18)

Substituing Eq. (16) in Eq. (18) gives:

$$ {D}_{\mathrm{avg}}=\frac{\kern0ex \eta \uppi}{4}\kern0.15em \sqrt{L} $$
(19)

Assuming that fracture walls are modeled as two parallel plates (Snow 1965; Witherspoon et al. 1980), Davg in Eq. (19) is equal to hydraulic aperture.

Flow simulations

The flow simulations utilized the DFN model developed by Parashar and Reeves (2012). This model assumes fully saturated fractures (necessary for implementation of the cubic law) and steady state conditions. Furthermore, it is assumed that the matrix is impermeable and flow occurs only through fractures. First, the hydraulic backbone for each fracture network realization is determined using geometric and hydraulic methods that remove dead-ends fractures and isolated clusters (Fig. 7). This is accomplished by sequentially numbering end-points of all fracture segments (a fracture segment is defined as the portion of a fracture spanning between its intersection with other fractures of the network), and then scanning the DFN domain to filter out fracture segments that have at least one end-point unconnected to any other internal node. The volumetric flow within individual fractures is given by Darcy’s law

$$ Q=-T\bullet \nabla h $$
(20)

where Q is the volumetric flow rate per unit fracture width normal to flow direction (m2/s), T is the transmissivity of the fracture in m2/s, and ∇h is the hydraulic gradient.

Fig. 7
figure7

a Example of synthetic network realization and b the corresponding hydraulic backbone. The network contains 1,600 fractures with Dc = 1.47 and a power law exponent of 2.2

Next, hydraulic head is computed at each internal node; internal nodes are defined as intersection points between fractures. Any given internal node can be connected to a maximum of four nodes; however, connections between nodes is highly irregular due to spatial clustering and can lead to sparse, irregular coefficient matrices (Parashar and Reeves 2012). Equation (20) and the conservation of mass principle are applied to all internal nodes of each network. This results in a set of linear algebraic equations where the hydraulic head at the internal nodes is the unknown. These equations are solved iteratively using the minimal residual method (MINRES)—a variant of the conjugate gradient method that can be applied to symmetric indefinite systems—until an internal convergence criterion (relative residual error = 10–7) is reached. Once hydraulic head is determined at each node, Eq. (20) is used again to compute flow in individual fractures. The global flow through the network is the sum of flow values in all fractures. The global flow value can be used to determine the equivalent permeability of the network, if the hydraulic gradient is known.

Two scenarios are used to simulate flow. In the first scenario, representative of the conceptualization of a constant value of aperture, all fractures are assigned the same transmissivity according to the cubic law (Snow 1965):

$$ T=\frac{\rho g}{12\mu }\ {b}^3 $$
(21)

where T is the transmissivity in m2/s, ρ is water density in kg/m3, g is the gravitational acceleration in m/s2, μ is water viscosity in kg.m−1.s−1, and b is the hydraulic aperture in m. In the second scenario, the sublinear aperture to length relationship is used to relate each fracture to its hydraulic aperture to compute a distribution of transmissivity values.

For each network, two constant head boundaries and two linearly varying head boundaries are used to simulate flow through the networks (Fig. 8). These boundary conditions are used to ensure a constant hydraulic gradient distribution throughout the DFN domain. The directional components of the transmissivity tensor are computed by solving for Darcy’s law first in the x-direction and then rotating the network 90° to solve it in the y-direction (Zhang et al. 1996):

$$ \left[\begin{array}{cc}{Q}_{\mathrm{x}\mathrm{x}}& {Q}_{\mathrm{x}\mathrm{y}}\\ {}{Q}_{\mathrm{y}\mathrm{x}}& {Q}_{\mathrm{y}\mathrm{y}}\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}{T}_{\mathrm{x}\mathrm{x}}& {T}_{\mathrm{x}\mathrm{y}}\\ {}{T}_{\mathrm{y}\mathrm{x}}& {T}_{\mathrm{y}\mathrm{y}}\end{array}\right]\ \left[\begin{array}{cc}\nabla {h}_{\mathrm{x}}& 0\\ {}0& \nabla {h}_{\mathrm{y}}\end{array}\right] $$
(22)
Fig. 8
figure8

Linear head boundary conditions for computation of the 2D permeability tensor. a flow from left to right, and b flow from top to bottom

Flow values across each domain boundary are recorded for each boundary configuration per network realization. Given that DFN inputs (length and orientation) are drawn from probability distributions to account for variability within geometric and hydraulic properties, several simulations are needed to account for the variability in the simulated network-scale transmissivity. A total of 50 flow simulations are averaged to determine the equivalent representative permeability tensor.

The principal permeability components kxx’ and kyy’ are obtained by taking the eigenvalues of the 2D permeability tensor:

$$ \left[\begin{array}{cc}{k}_{\mathrm{x}\mathrm{x}}& {k}_{\mathrm{x}\mathrm{y}}\\ {}{k}_{\mathrm{y}\mathrm{x}}& {k}_{\mathrm{y}\mathrm{y}}\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}{k}_{\mathrm{x}{\mathrm{x}}^{\prime }}& 0\\ {}0& {k}_{\mathrm{y}{\mathrm{y}}^{\prime }}\end{array}\right] $$
(23)

where kxx’ and kyy’ are equivalent to the maximum (kmax) and the minimum (kmin) permeability, respectively. The principal direction (ω) of the permeability tensor is obtained as follows (Zhang et al. 1996):

$$ \tan \left(2\omega \right)=\frac{2{k}_{\mathrm{xy}}}{\left({k}_{\mathrm{xx}}+{k}_{\mathrm{yy}}\right)} $$
(24)

The average equivalent permeability is given by:

$$ {k}_{\mathrm{eq}}=\sqrt{k_{\mathrm{xx}\prime}^2+{k}_{\mathrm{yy}\prime}^2} $$
(25)

The geometric mean of permeability values from 24 single well pumping tests serves as a calibration target for network-scale equivalent permeability values. Due to the high transmissivity and low storativity of fractured rock, the effective radius of drawdown, although unknown, most certainly provides permeability estimates from a significantly greater scale than simulated by the DFNs. Theoretical studies have shown that 2D simulations often underestimate permeability, compared to 3D simulations (Min et al. 2004; Lang et al. 2014). This discrepancy is the result of the inherent difference between 3D and 2D network connectivity. For field applications, however, fracture outcrops often lacks vertical exposure and thus, DFN characterization is reduced to 2D. In the absence of vertical exposure, constraining a 3D stochastic DFN becomes challenging. Permeability values from pumping tests were normalized by aquifer thickness to obtain a 2D equivalent permeability, prior to calibration. Furthermore, some studies in the WAC (Tshibubudze et al. 2009; Dabo and Aïfa 2010) indicate that fractures are mostly vertical to subvertical, which implies that connectivity in the horizontal plane controls fluid flow.

For the constant aperture case, a single aperture value is adjusted until the average equivalent permeability matches the pumping test results. The same approach is used for the sublinear aperture to length scaling, but in this case, the Young’s modulus is the adjusted variable. The calibration is considered acceptable when the difference between the simulated values and calibration target is less than 1%.

Results and discussion

Fracture orientation

A total of 1,184 fractures were traced and extracted from the outcrop map (Fig. 9). The rose diagram suggests two predominant orientation sets: N000–039° (NNE–SSW) and N080–130°, which account for 39% and 26% of the fracture population, respectively (Table 3). The remainder of the fracture population shows two sets: N040–079° (18%) and N131–179° (17%). The two predominant sets (N000–039° and N080–130°) are consistent with those found at other locations in the West African Craton (Egal et al. 2002; Hein et al. 2004; Feybesse et al. 2006; Tshibubudze et al. 2009; Dabo and Aïfa 2010). The similarity in these findings suggests that these fractures originated from the same regional tectonic stress event. The preponderance of NNE–SSW trending fractures (39%) indicates the influence of the Eburnean orogeny (Lompo 2010). The two main sets are near orthogonal and this greatly increases probability for fracture intersection in the horizontal plane and the likelihood of forming connected networks for conducting fluid. The formation of interconnected networks is also confirmed by pumping tests in the WAC where rocks of granitic composition have little to no primary porosity and permeability.

Fig. 9
figure9

a Outcrop map showing the scanline locations in red. b Fracture traces map consisting of 1184 traces. Rose diagram A is length-weighted and rose diagram B is unweighted. The red rectangle denotes the region where the box counting method is applied

Table 3 Summary of fracture set parameters

Fracture length and spatial patterns

Fracture length at the field site spans over two orders of magnitude, from 0.07 to 21.21 m. It is highly likely that fractures longer than 21 m exist but are censored by the limited exposure; the ratio of soil area relative to the total area of the rock mass is approximately 15%. Longer fractures are more likely to occur in orientation set 1 (N000–039°) as evidenced by the length-weighted rose diagram (Fig. 9). A power law trend is only observable over slightly greater than one order of magnitude with a power law exponent α equal to 2.2 and lower cutoff lmin of 1.2 m (Fig. 10). The two-point correlation dimension Dc is 1.47 (Fig. 11) and falls at the lower end of values (1.3 ≤ Dc ≤ 2) reported in the literature (Bonnet et al. 2001), suggesting a highly clustered network. The strong clustering combined with the predominance of small fractures indicates a strong dependence on longer fractures to connect otherwise isolated clusters of fractures with higher local densities. For instance, 37.5% of generated network realizations are below the percolation threshold, mainly due to the absence of long fractures to connect isolated clusters. This observation is consistent with the findings of de Dreuzy et al. (2004) that suggest when 2 ≤ α ≤ Dc + 1, the connectivity of the network is sensitive to the occurrence of longer fractures to improve the chances of forming a percolating cluster. The fractal dimension D is 1.6 and the fracture density is 1.7 m/m2 in the subregion of the domain measured (Fig. 11). After testing, it is found that a fractal dimension of 1.6 is equivalent to 1,600 fractures in a domain of 40 m × 40 m with a density of 2.2 m/m2. Note the differences in fracture density for given scales that necessitate the use of a scale-invariant, space-filling fractal dimension for upscaling.

Fig. 10
figure10

Complementary cumulative distribution function of fracture length (all fractures). Red line represents the best-fit power law trend

Fig. 11
figure11

a Plot of the two-point correlation function and the local slope. The slope of the linear regression (red line) gives the correlation dimension Dc = 1.47. The local slope trend is shown with the black triangles. b Number of boxes as a function of radius. The slope of the regression line indicates a fractal dimension of 1.6

Flow simulations

Average permeability computed from the pumping tests (2.2 × 10−13 m2) correlates to a constant aperture of 57 μm and a Young’s modulus of 87 GPa for the sublinear aperture to length relationship (Table 4). The calibrated aperture of 57 μm is in general agreement with the value of 65 μm used in other studies (Min et al. 2004; Baghbanan and Jing 2008; Liu et al. 2016b). The correlated aperture (sublinear scaling) ranges from 17 to 147 μm with an arithmetic mean of 29 μm. Fracture length follows a power law with an exponent of 2.2 and thus, the sublinear scaling aperture distribution is biased towards small values, which explains the discrepancy between the two values. The Young’s modulus is within the range of values (69–91 GPa) for granitic rocks (Lanaro et al. 2006). The maximum permeability kmax is oriented N049° for the sublinear case and N055° for the constant aperture case. The sublinear scaling case aligns best with the predominant orientation observed on the rose diagram. Orientation set 1 accounts for 39% of all fractures and thus, is more likely to contain longer fractures given the power law distribution of fracture length. Correlating aperture with length leads to the propensity for longer fractures along fracture set 1 and concentrated fluid flow in that direction. This effect is less pronounced in the constant aperture case because all fractures are given equal weight to conduct flow, and the overall flow distribution within the network reflect the propagation of the boundary conditions into the network structure (Reeves et al. 2013; Trullenque et al. 2017). In both cases, the maximum permeability does not align perfectly with orientation set 1, because fractures in orientation sets 2 and 4 also contribute to flow.

Table 4 Flow simulation results

The horizontal anisotropy, denoted as the kmax/kmin ratio in Table 4, is 2.8 for the constant aperture case and 2.1 for the sublinear scaling case. If all fractures have equal aperture, the anisotropy of the permeability tensor is solely dependent on network geometry. Conversely, in the sublinear scaling case, the effect of the network geometry on the horizontal anisotropy is reduced since long fractures dominate fluid flow, and these could occur in any direction (Fig. 12). Fracture transmissivity follows a power law distribution with an exponent of 1.48 that scales as two-thirds of the length exponent (Fig. 13). This relationship arises from the cubic relationship between transmissivity and aperture, and the square root relationship between aperture and length:

$$ b\propto {L}^{\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}\kern0.5em $$
(26)

and

$$ T\propto {b}^3 $$
(27)

where b is aperture, L is length, and T is transmissivity.

Fig. 12
figure12

Flow through individual fracture segments illustrate differences between the constant aperture cases (a, c) and the sublinear scaling case (b, d) for two network pairs. Color intensity is proportional to the amount of flow, where dark blue segments conduct the most flow. Note that flow is concentrated in long fractures in the sublinear scaling case

Fig. 13
figure13

Complementary cumulative distribution function of fracture transmissivity. Red line represents the power law fit

Combining Eqs. (26) and (27) gives:

$$ T\propto {L}^{\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)} $$
(28)

The distribution of transmissivity (FT) as a function of the distribution of length (FL) is obtained by the following transformation:

$$ {F}_{\mathrm{T}}=1-{F}_{\mathrm{L}}\left({\psi}^{-1}(t)\right) $$
(29)

where t is the transmissivity variable and ψ is a function such that:

$$ T=\psi (L) $$
(30)

If length follows a power law of the form lα, Eq. (28) yields:

$$ T=1-{t}^{\left(\frac{2}{3}\upalpha \right)} $$
(31)

Manual scanlines vs. outcrop map

Thirty manual measurements (orientation and length) from ten (10) scanlines are compared with the UAV map data. Although the scanlines were scattered throughout the survey area, the manual measurements are likely not fully representative of the entire fracture network. In addition, it was challenging to maintain a consistent way of interpreting fractures in the field vs. the UAV map. Figure 14 shows that the scanline method is biased towards long fractures (shown as a shift in the plot towards larger values) which is consistent with previous studies suggesting that small fractures tend to be underrepresented in scanline measurements (Mauldon et al. 2001; Watkins et al. 2015). Due to the small size of the manual measurements and the subjectivity in scanline locations, only the main orientation sets were recorded (Fig. 14). It took less than 20 min to collect the drone imagery over a survey area of 95 m × 95 m, an area that is not feasible for characterization using manual scanlines. In addition, the one-dimensional (1D) nature of the scanline method precludes spatial pattern analyses (i.e., fractal and spatial correlation dimensions) which according to the results exert considerable control on fracture connectivity and fluid flow. Overall, the scanline approach served to validate the UAV results; however, its relevance in fracture characterization was limited and required significantly more time in the field to conduct.

Fig. 14
figure14

Comparison of length distribution from the scanline and the UAV survey. Length data span approximately one order of magnitude for the manual scanline and two orders of magnitude for the UAV survey

Conclusion

This paper describes a workflow that combines detailed UAV mapping with stochastic DFN simulations. Spatial clustering and its scaling in the characterized network were honored through the use of a multiplicative cascade process. Fracture aperture was modeled using the sublinear scaling relationship and a constant aperture case. The UAV survey was able to resolve features at the centimeter scale. This enabled a detailed statistical analysis of fracture geometry attributes (length, orientation) as well as spatial properties (two-point correlation and fractal dimensions) which are typically unknown for most fractured rock masses as the analysis requires high-quality planar data that 2D transects cannot provide. Stochastic methods were then used to generate multiple realizations of synthetic networks and to solve for the permeability tensor. The equivalent permeability values required only minimal calibration to match pumping test results by changing the aperture value in the constant aperture case and the Young’s modulus in the sublinear scaling case. These results suggest that geometrical and spatial properties of fractures provide a reasonable framework to understand fluid flow in complex fracture networks. Furthermore, the results suggest that a sublinear scaling relationship is an acceptable aperture model in the absence of direct aperture measurements, and more importantly, likely captures the high degree of variability in transmissivity within field-scale DFNs, and better reproduces the dominant directions and patterns of enhanced fluid flow. Complex spatial distributions of fluid flow are particularly important for solute transport investigations.

References

  1. Andersson J, Dverstorp B (1987) Conditional simulations of fluid flow in three-dimensional networks of discrete fractures. Water Resour Res 23:1876–1886. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR023i010p01876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson BK (1984) Subcritical crack growth in geological materials. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 89:4077–4114. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB06p04077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baecher GB, Lanney NA, Einstein HH (1977) Statistical description of rock properties and sampling. In: The 18th US symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria, VA

  4. Baghbanan A, Jing L (2007) Hydraulic properties of fractured rock masses with correlated fracture length and aperture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:704–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baghbanan A, Jing L (2008) Stress effects on permeability in a fractured rock mass with correlated fracture length and aperture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:1320–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barton CC, Larsen E (1985) Fractal geometry of two-dimensional fracture networks at Yucca Mountain, southwestern Nevada: proceedings. Fundamentals of Rock Joints: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fundamentals of Rock Joints, pp 77–84.https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/ees/74. Accessed May 2020

  7. Bemis SP, Micklethwaite S, Turner D, James MR, Akciz S, Thiele ST, Bangash HA (2014) Ground-based and UAV-based photogrammetry: a multi-scale, high-resolution mapping tool for structural geology and paleoseismology. J Struct Geol 69:163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berens P (2009) CircStat: a MATLAB toolbox for circular statistics. J Stat Softw 31:1–21. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v031.i10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berkowitz B (2002) Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: a review. Adv Water Resour 25:861–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00042-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Best DJ, Fisher NI (1979) Efficient simulation of the von mises distribution. Appl Stat 28:152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346732

  11. Bisdom K, Nick HM, Bertotti G (2017) An integrated workflow for stress and flow modelling using outcrop-derived discrete fracture networks. Comput Geosci 103:21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.02.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonnet E, Bour O, Odling NE, Davy P, Main I, Cowie P, Berkowitz B (2001) Scaling of fracture systems in geological media. Rev Geophys 39:347–383. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bour O, Davy P (1999) Clustering and size distributions of fault patterns: theory and measurements. Geophys Res Lett 26:2001–2004. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cacas MC, Ledoux E, de Marsily G, Barbreau A, Calmels P, Gaillard B, Margritta R (1990) Modeling fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network: calibration and validation: 2. the transport model. Water Resour Res 26:491–500. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i003p00491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carrivick JL, Smith MW, Quincey DJ, Carver SJ (2013) Developments in budget remote sensing for the geosciences. Geol Today 29:138–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/gto.12015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Z, Narayan SP, Yang Z, Rahman SS (2000) An experimental investigation of hydraulic behaviour of fractures and joints in granitic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00039-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen S, Feng X, Isam S (2008) Numerical estimation of REV and permeability tensor for fractured rock masses by composite element method. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:1459–1477. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev 51:661–703. https://doi.org/10.1137/070710111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Clemo T, Smith L (1997) A hierarchical model for solute transport in fractured media. Water Resour Res 33:1763–1783. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR01005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cowie PA, Vanneste C, Sornette D (1993) Statistical physics model for the spatiotemporal evolution of faults. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 98:21809–21821. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB02223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dabo M, Aïfa T (2010) Structural styles and tectonic evolution of the Kolia-Boboti sedimentary basin, Kédougou-Kéniéba inlier, eastern Senegal. C R Geosci 342:796–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2010.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Darcel C, Bour O, Davy P, de Dreuzy JR (2003) Connectivity properties of two-dimensional fracture networks with stochastic fractal correlation. Water Resour Res 39(10):1272. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Davy P (1993) On the frequency-length distribution of the San Andreas Fault System. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 98:12141–12151. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB00372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. de Dreuzy J, Davy P, Bour O (2001) Hydraulic properties of two-dimensional random fracture networks following a power law length distribution: 2. permeability of networks based on lognormal distribution of apertures. Water Resour Res 37:2079–2095. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR900010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. de Dreuzy J, Darcel C, Davy P, Bour O (2004) Influence of spatial correlation of fracture centers on the permeability of two-dimensional fracture networks following a power law length distribution. Water Resour Res 40:W01502. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dershowitz WS, Wallmann P, Kindred S (1991) Discrete fracture modelling for the Stripa site characterization and validation drift inflow predictions. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co, Sweden, p 140

  27. Duelis Viana C, Endlein A, Ademar da Cruz Campanha G, Henrique Grohmann C (2016) Algorithms for extraction of structural attitudes from 3D outcrop models. Comput Geosci 90:112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Egal E, Thiéblemont D, Lahondère D, Guerrot C, Costea CA, Iliescu D, Delor C, Goujou JC, Lafon JM, Tegyey M, Diaby S, Kolié P (2002) Late eburnean granitization and tectonics along the western and northwestern margin of the Archean Kénéma–Man domain (Guinea, West African Craton). Precambrian Res 117:57–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00060-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eglinger A, Thébaud N, Zeh A, Davis J, Miller J, Parra-Avila LA, Loucks R, McCuaig C, Belousova E (2017) New insights into the crustal growth of the Paleoproterozoic margin of the Archean Kéména-Man domain, West African Craton (Guinea): implications for gold mineral system. Precambrian Res 292:258–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2016.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Feybesse J-L, Milési J-P, Verhaeghe P, Johan V (1990) Le domaine de Toulepleu-Ity (Côte-d’Ivoire); une unité «birrimienne» charriée sur les gneiss archéens du domaine de Kénéma-Man lors des premiers stades de l’orogène éburnéen. Comptes rendus l’Académie des Sci Série 2, Mécanique, Phys Chim Sci l’univers, Sci la Terre 310:285–291

  31. Feybesse JL, Billa M, Guerrot C, Duguey E, Lescuyer JL, Milesi JP, Bouchot V (2006) The paleoproterozoic Ghanaian province: geodynamic model and ore controls, including regional stress modeling. Precambrian Res 149:149–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fisher NI (1995) Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge University Press, New York

  33. Follin S, Hartley L (2014) Approaches to confirmatory testing of a groundwater flow model for sparsely fractured crystalline rock, exemplified by data from the proposed high-level nuclear waste repository site at Forsmark, Sweden. Hydrogeol J 22:333–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-1079-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gillespie PA, Howard CB, Walsh JJ, Watterson J (1993) Measurement and characterisation of spatial distributions of fractures. Tectonophysics 226:113–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(93)90114-Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gustafsson P (1994) Spot satellite data for exploration of fractured aquifers in a semi-arid area in southeastern Botswana. Hydrogeol J 2:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hakami E (1995) Aperture distribution of rock fractures. PhD Thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 28 pp

  37. Hardebol NJ, Bertotti G (2013) DigiFract: a software and data model implementation for flexible acquisition and processing of fracture data from outcrops. Comput Geosci 54:326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Healy D, Rizzo RE, Cornwell DG, Farrell NJC, Watkins H, Timms NE, Gomez-Rivas E, Smith M (2017) FracPaQ: a MATLABTM toolbox for the quantification of fracture patterns. J Struct Geol 95:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2016.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hein KAA, Morel V, Kagoné O, Kiemde F, Mayes K (2004) Birimian lithological succession and structural evolution in the Goren segment of the Boromo–Goren Greenstone Belt, Burkina Faso. J Afr Earth Sci 39:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hentschel HGE, Procaccia I (1983) The infinite number of generalized dimensions of fractals and strange attractors. Phys D Nonlinear Phenom 8:435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(83)90235-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. James MR, Robson S (2012) Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: accuracy and geoscience application. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 117:F03017. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kalsbeek F, Frei D, Affaton P (2008) Constraints on provenance, stratigraphic correlation and structural context of the Volta basin, Ghana, from detrital zircon geochronology: an Amazonian connection? Sediment Geol 212:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2008.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Klimczak C, Schultz RA, Parashar R, Reeves DM (2010) Cubic law with aperture-length correlation: implications for network scale fluid flow. Hydrogeol J 18:851–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-009-0572-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kulatilake PHSW, Panda BB (2000) Effect of block size and joint geometry on jointed rock hydraulics and REV. J Eng Mech 126:850–858. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:8(850)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lanaro F, Öhman J, Fredriksson A (2006) Rock mechanics modelling of rock mass properties-summary of primary data. Preliminary site description Laxemar subarea-version 1.2. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm

  46. Lang PS, Paluszny A, Zimmerman RW (2014) Permeability tensor of three-dimensional fractured porous rock and a comparison to trace map predictions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:6288–6307. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lei Q, Latham J-P, Tsang C-F (2017) The use of discrete fracture networks for modelling coupled geomechanical and hydrological behaviour of fractured rocks. Comput Geotech 85:151–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.12.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu R, Li B, Jiang Y (2016a) A fractal model based on a new governing equation of fluid flow in fractures for characterizing hydraulic properties of rock fracture networks. Comput Geotech 75:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu R, Yu L, Jiang Y (2016b) Fractal analysis of directional permeability of gas shale fracture networks: a numerical study. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 33:1330–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.05.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lompo M (2010) Paleoproterozoic structural evolution of the Man-Leo Shield (West Africa). Key structures for vertical to transcurrent tectonics. J African Earth Sci 58:19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2010.01.005

  51. Mardia KV (1972) Statistics of directional data. Academic, San Diego

  52. Marrett R (1996) Aggregate properties of fracture populations. J Struct Geol 18:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(96)80042-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mauldon M, Dunne WM, Rohrbaugh MB (2001) Circular scanlines and circular windows: new tools for characterizing the geometry of fracture traces. J Struct Geol 23:247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(00)00094-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Meakin P (1991) Invasion percolation on substrates with correlated disorder. Phys A Stat Mech its Appl 173:305–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(91)90366-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Min K-B, Jing L, Stephansson O (2004) Determining the equivalent permeability tensor for fractured rock masses using a stochastic REV approach: method and application to the field data from Sellafield, UK. Hydrogeol J 12:497–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0331-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Moein AMJ, Valley B, Evans KF (2019) Scaling of fracture patterns in three deep boreholes and implications for constraining fractal discrete fracture network models. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:1723–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-1739-7

  57. Munier R (2004) Statistical analysis of fracture data, adapted for modelling discrete fracture networks-version 2. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm

  58. Neuman SP (2005) Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks. Hydrogeol J 13:124–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0397-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Neuman SP, Blattstein A, Riva M, Tartakovsky DM, Guadagnini A, Ptak T (2007) Type curve interpretation of late-time pumping test data in randomly heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour Res 43:W04201. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR005871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Novakova L, Pavlis TL (2017) Assessment of the precision of smart phones and tablets for measurement of planar orientations: a case study. J Struct Geol 97:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Odling NE (1997) Scaling and connectivity of joint systems in sandstones from western Norway. J Struct Geol 19:1257–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(97)00041-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Odling NE, Gillespie P, Bourgine B, Castaing C, Chiles JP, Christensen NP, Fillion E, Genter A, Olsen C, Thrane L, Trice R, Aarseth E, Walsh JJ, Watterson J (1999) Variations in fracture system geometry and their implications for fluid flow in fractures hydrocarbon reservoirs. Pet Geosci 5:373–384. https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.5.4.373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Olson JE (2003) Sublinear scaling of fracture aperture versus length: an exception or the rule? J Geophys Res Solid Earth 108:B92413. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Olsson R, Barton N (2001) An improved model for hydromechanical coupling during shearing of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00079-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Parashar R, Reeves DM (2012) On iterative techniques for computing flow in large two-dimensional discrete fracture networks. J Comput Appl Math 236:4712–4724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2012.02.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Patriarche D, Pili E, Adler PM, Thovert J (2007) Stereological analysis of fractures in the Roselend Tunnel and permeability determination. Water Resour Res 43:W09421. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Raven KG, Gale JE (1985) Water flow in a natural rock fracture as a function of stress and sample size. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22:251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(85)92952-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Reeves DM, Benson DA, Meerschaert MM (2008) Transport of conservative solutes in simulated fracture networks: 1. synthetic data generation. Water Resour Res 44:W05410. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Reeves DM, Parashar R, Zhang Y (2012) Hydrogeologic characterization of fractured rock masses intended for disposal of radioactive waste. In: Radioactive waste. InTech, London

  70. Reeves DM, Parashar R, Pohll G et al (2013) The use of discrete fracture network simulations in the design of horizontal hillslope drainage networks in fractured rock. Eng Geol 163:132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Reeves DM, Parashar R, Pohlmann K, Russell C, Chapman J (2014) Development and calibration of dual-permeability flow models with discontinuous fault networks. Vadose Zone J 13:1–23. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2013.10.0183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Renshaw CE (1995) On the relationship between mechanical and hydraulic apertures in rough-walled fractures. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 100:24629–24636. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB02159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Renshaw CE (1996) Influence of subcritical fracture growth on the connectivity of fracture networks. Water Resour Res 32:1519–1530. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR00711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Renshaw CE (1999) Connectivity of joint networks with power law length distributions. Water Resour Res 35:2661–2670. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Ross SM (2010) Introduction to probability models. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  76. Sanderson DJ, Peacock DCP (2019) Line sampling of fracture swarms and corridors. J Struct Geol 122:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2019.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Schertzer D, Lovejoy S (1987) Physical modeling and analysis of rain and clouds by anisotropic scaling multiplicative processes. J Geophys Res 92:9693. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD08p09693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Schultz RA, Soliva R, Fossen H, Okubo CH, Reeves DM (2008) Dependence of displacement–length scaling relations for fractures and deformation bands on the volumetric changes across them. J Struct Geol 30:1405–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2008.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Smith L, Schwartz FW (1984) An analysis of the influence of fracture geometry on mass transport in fractured media. Water Resour Res 20:1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i009p01241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Snow DT (1965) A parallel plate model of fractured permeable media. PhD Thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA

  81. Sornette D, Davy P (1991) Fault growth model and the universal fault length distribution. Geophys Res Lett 18:1079–1081. https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL01054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Sornette A, Davy P, Sornette D (1993) Fault growth in brittle-ductile experiments and the mechanics of continental collisions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 98:12111–12139. https://doi.org/10.1029/92JB01740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Tairou MS, Affaton P, Anum S, Fleury TJ (2012) Pan-African Paleostresses and Reactivation of the Eburnean Basement Complex in Southeast Ghana (West Africa). J Geol Res 2012:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/938927

  84. Tavani S, Granado P, Corradetti A, Girundo M, Iannace A, Arbués P, Muñoz JA, Mazzoli S (2014) Building a virtual outcrop, extracting geological information from it, and sharing the results in Google earth via OpenPlot and Photoscan: an example from the Khaviz anticline (Iran). Comput Geosci 63:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Trullenque G, Parashar R, Delcourt C, Collet L, Villard P, Potel S (2017) Properties of a pair of fracture networks produced by triaxial deformation experiments: insights on fluid flow using discrete fracture network models. Hydrogeol J 25:813–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1468-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Tshibubudze A, Hein KAA, Marquis P (2009) The Markoye shear zone in NE Burkina Faso. J Afr Earth Sci 55:245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Tugume F, Nyblade A, Julià J (2012) Moho depths and Poisson’s ratios of Precambrian crust in East Africa: evidence for similarities in Archean and Proterozoic crustal structure. Earth Planet Sci Lett 355–356:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.08.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. USGS (2017) Structure from Motion Photogrammetry Section 1 - Digital Single-Lens Reflex (DSLR) Imagery

  89. Vasuki Y, Holden E-J, Kovesi P, Micklethwaite S (2014) Semi-automatic mapping of geological structures using UAV-based photogrammetric data: an image analysis approach. Comput Geosci 69:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Vollgger SA, Cruden AR (2016) Mapping folds and fractures in basement and cover rocks using UAV photogrammetry, Cape Liptrap and Cape Paterson, Victoria, Australia. J Struct Geol 85:168–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2016.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Watkins H, Bond CE, Healy D, Butler RWH (2015) Appraisal of fracture sampling methods and a new workflow to characterise heterogeneous fracture networks at outcrop. J Struct Geol 72:67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2015.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Witherspoon PA, Wang JSY, Iwai K, Gale JE (1980) Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resour Res 16:1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i006p01016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Zhang X, Sanderson DJ, Harkness RM, Last NC (1996) Evaluation of the 2D permeability tensor for fractured rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33:17–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)00042-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. M.D.T. Gnazou (University of Lome, Togo) for his support in getting the authorization to fly the drone. Special thanks go to Malibda Kpanzou (University of Lome, Togo) for his support in the field. The author would like to thank the two reviewers for their suggestions to improve the earlier version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received financial support from Western Michigan University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahawa Essa Mabossani Akara.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Pumping test results

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akara, M.E.M., Reeves, D.M. & Parashar, R. Enhancing fracture-network characterization and discrete-fracture-network simulation with high-resolution surveys using unmanned aerial vehicles. Hydrogeol J (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02178-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fractured rocks
  • UAV mapping
  • Multiplicative cascade process
  • Sublinear aperture to length scaling
  • Hydraulic properties