Shouldice standard 2020: review of the current literature and results of an international consensus meeting

Abstract

Introduction

For many years the Shouldice technique was the gold standard for inguinal hernia repair. Nowadays mesh repair has been proven to entail better results in randomized trials. Since the first publication 1953 the Repair has been described in detail in many textbooks, articles and You Tube videos. It appears that the original technique is used almost exclusively in the Shouldice Hospital in Thornhill/ Canada and despite the success of the Shouldice Hospital many surgeons inexplicably modify this original technique in their daily practice. In the last couple of years there appears to be an increasing interest in pure tissue repairs for various reasons, often fear of mesh-related pain. The aim of the study was to review the current evidence and to define an updated standard with key principles of the Shouldice repair.

Methods

Because of unpublished evidence regarding many operative details the organizing group decided to create a technical update via a consensus meeting with 13 international designated hernia surgeons from six countries. In preparation of the meeting a review of the current literature regarding Shouldice repair was done by the organizing group. A questionnaire was prepared and sent to all participants before the meeting to get an independent answer on all critical aspects.

Results

All questions regarding a detailed standard of the operation technique could be outlined. As result of the consensus meeting the participants have formulated all key-points of preparation/dissection and repair of the Shouldice technique. For 5 of 6 critical technical surgical steps a strong consensus could be defined in the group. There was no consensus among the group regarding the cremaster resection and the ideal indication for Shouldice repair.

Conclusion

After a 75-year history of the Shouldice repair the technique should continue to merit consideration by all hernia surgeons. After this consensus meeting a clear binding standard of the Shouldice technique for all interested surgeons is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

© W. Hope Textbook of Hernia)

Fig. 4

© W. Hope Textbook of Hernia)

Fig. 5

© W. Hope Textbook of Hernia)

Fig. 6

© W. Hope Textbook of Hernia)

References

  1. 1.

    Shouldice EE (1953) The treatment of Hernia. Ontario Med Rev 20:670–684

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Shouldice EB (2003) The Shouldice repair for groin hernias. Surg Clin North Am 83:1163–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Shearburn EW, Myers RN (1969) Shouldice repair for inguinal hernia. Surgery 66:450–459

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Obney N, Chan CK (1984) Repair of multiple time recurrent inguinal hernias with reference to common causes of recurrences. Contemp Surg 25:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wantz GE (1989) The Canadian repair: personal observations. World J Surg 13:516–521

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bendavid R (2016) Re: Recurrence of inguinal hernias repaired in a large surgical specialty hospital and general hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg 59(1):E3. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.017715

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chan CK, Chan G (2006) The Shouldice technique for the treatment of inguinal hernia. J Minim Access Surg 2(3):124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gorjanc J (2011) The Shouldice repair—experience with first 50 patients. Zdrav Vestn 80:668–675

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kux M, Fuchsjäger N, Schemper M (1995) Shouldice is superior to Bassini inguinal herniorhaphy. Am J Surg 168:15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Schumpelick V, Treutner K-H, Arlt G (1994) Inguinal hernia repair in adults. Lancet 344:375–379

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hay JM et al (1995) Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult a multicenter controlled trial in 1578 patients. Ann Surg 22:719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Treutner KH, Arlt G, Schumpelick V (1999) Shouldice repair for recurrent hernia—a ten-year follow-up. In: Schumpelick V (ed) Incisional hernia, 9th edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 359

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nordin P et al (2002) Randomised trial of Lichtenstein vs Shouldice hernia repair in general surgery practice. Br J Surg 89:45–49

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Danielsson P et al (2003) Randomised study of Lichtenstein with Shoudice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training. Eur J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1080/110241599750007504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Arvidsson D et al (2005) Randomised clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus shouldice repair of primary Inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1085–1091

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Amato B, Moja L, Panico S et al (2012) Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012(4):01543. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001543.pub4 (Published 2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Fischer JE (2013) Hernia repair: why do we continue to perform mesh repair in the face of the human toll of inguinodynia? Am J Surg 206:619–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.03.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lorenz R (2018) Do we really need a renaissance of pure tissue repair? Invited comment to: Desarda’s technique versus Lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Emile S, Elfeki H. Hernia 22:397–398

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lorenz R (2019) Outside of guidelines: successful desarda technique for primary inguinal hernias. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg 2:23–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Köckerling F, Koch A, Adolf D et al (2018) Has shouldice repair in a selected group of patients with inguinal hernia comparable results to lichtenstein, TEP and TAPP techniques? World J Surg 42(7):2001–2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4433-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Köckerling F, Lorenz R, Hukauf M, Grau H, Jacob D, Fortelny R, Koch A (2019) Influencing factors on the outcome in female groin hernia repair: a registry-based multivariable analysis of 15,601 patients. Ann Surg 270(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    WHO handbook for guideline development—2nd ed. (ISBN 978 92 4 154896 0) © World Health Organization 2014, https://www.who.int/publications/guidelines/Chp16_May2016.pdf (accessed 1 Nov, 2019)

  24. 24.

    Ris HB, Aebersold P, Küpfer K, Stucki U, Stirnemann H, Doran J (1987) 10 years’ experience using a modified Shouldice surgical technic for inguinal hernia in adults. II. Which factors modify the recurrence of inguinal hernia? Chirurg 58(2):100–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Töns C, Klinge U, Kupczyk-Joeris D, Rötzscher VM, Schumpelick V (1991) Controlled study of cremaster resection in Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Zentralbl Chir 116(12):737–743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hilgert RE, Dörner A, Wittkugel O (1999) Comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernias: a prospective randomised trial. Eur J Surg 165:333–338

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nordin P, Haapaniemi S, Kald A, Nilsson E (2003) Influence of suture material and surgical technique on risk of reoperation after non-mesh open hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1004–1008

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Peiper C, Junge K, Füting A, Conze J, Bassalay P, Schumpelick V (1998) Intraoperative Messung der Nahtkräfte bei der Shouldice-Reparation primärer Leistenhernien. Chirurg 69:1077–1081

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Weyhe D, Conze J, Kuthe A, Köckerling F, Lammers BJ, Lorenz R, Niebuhr H, Reinpold W, Zarras K, Bittner R (2018) HerniaSurge: international guidelines on treatment of inguinal hernia in adults : comments of the Surgical Working Group Hernia (CAH/DGAV) and the German Hernia Society (DHG) on the most important recommendations. Chirurg 89(8):631–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-018-0673-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Miedema BW, Ibrahim SM, Davis BD, Koivunen DG (2004) A prospective trial of primary inguinal hernia repair by surgical trainees. Hernia 8:28–32

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lockhart K, Teo S, Ng JY, Dhillon M, Teo E, van Driel ML (2018) Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD011517. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bocchi P (1993) Shouldice’s operation: can results in a general surgical unit be the same as those in a highly specialized surgical unit? J Chir (Paris) 130:275–277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Malik A, Bell CM, Stukel TA, Urbach DR (2016) Recurrence of inguinal hernias repaired in a large hernia surgical specialty hospital and general hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg 59:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Barbaro A, Kanhere H, Bessell J, Maddern GJ (2017) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair versus open inguinal hernia repair: 20-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Hernia 21(5):723–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1642-7 (Epub 2017 Sep 1)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Murphy BL, Ubl DS, Zhang J, Habermann EB, Farley DR, Paley K (2018) Trends of inguinal hernia repairs performed for recurrence in the United States. Surgery 163(2):343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.001 (Epub 2017 Sep 15)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Lorenz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

RL, GA, JC, RF, JG, AK, JM, VO, and JC have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, no informed consent is required.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to MD Robert Bendavid (who died on September, 30th, 2019) and MD Dennis R. Klassen (who died on July 29th, 2020).

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 170 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lorenz, R., Arlt, G., Conze, J. et al. Shouldice standard 2020: review of the current literature and results of an international consensus meeting. Hernia (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02365-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Shouldice repair
  • Groin hernia
  • Pure tissue repair