To examine the hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30 day outcomes of hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release (hrTAR) compared with open transversus abdominis release (oTAR).
Patients receiving hrTAR were selected from the AHSQC database and propensity matched with a contemporary cohort of oTAR patients.
The cohort included 95 hrTAR and 285 oTAR patients. There was a significantly shorter median LOS in the hrTAR cohort (3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). The rate of surgical site occurrences in the hrTAR cohort was also lower than for oTAR (5% vs. 15%, p = 0.015). Readmission rates were not different between hrTAR and oTAR (6% vs. 8%, p = 0.65).
hrTAR demonstrates improved LOS compared to oTAR as well as fewer surgical site related occurrences. Further studies are needed to investigate the etiology behind the improved LOS and to confirm appropriate long-term outcomes from hybrid robotic TAR.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Novitsky YW, Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB (2016) Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg 264:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001673
Novitsky YW, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB, Rosen MJ (2012) Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 204:709–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.02.008
Wegdam JA, Thoolen JMM, Nienhuijs SW, de Bouvy N, de Vries Reilingh TS (2019) Systematic review of transversus abdominis release in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia 23:5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1870-5
Martin-Del-Campo LA, Weltz AS, Belyansky I, Novitsky YW (2018) Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release. Surg Endosc 32:840–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5752-1
Carbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS, Ballecer CD, Janczyk RJ, Herrera J, Huang LC, Phillips S, Rosen MJ, Poulose BK (2018) Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Ann Surg 267:210–217. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002244
Gonzalez A, Escobar E, Romero R, Walker G, Mejias J, Gallas M, Dickens E, Johnson CJ, Rabaza J, Kudsi OY (2017) Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes. Surg Endosc 31:1342–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5118-0
Bittner JG, Alrefai S, Vy M, Mabe M, Del Prado PAR, Clingempeel NL (2018) Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 32:727–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5729-0
Halka JT, Vasyluk A, Demare A, Iacco A, Janczyk R (2019) Hybrid robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release versus open transversus abdominis release: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Hernia 23:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1858-1
Prabhu AS et al (2018) Is it time to reconsider postoperative epidural analgesia in patients undergoing elective ventral hernia repair? Ann Surg 267(5):971–976
Halka JT, Vasyluk A, DeMare AM, Janczyk RJ, Iacco AA (2018) Robotic and hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release may be performed with low length of stay and wound morbidity. Am J Surg 215:462–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.10.053
Warren JA, Carbonell AM, Jones LK, McGuire A, Hand WR, Cancellaro VA, Ewing JA, Cobb WS (2019) Length of stay and opioid dose requirement with transversus abdominis plane block vs. epidural analgesia for ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 228:680–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.017
Walker PA, May AC, Mo J, Cherla DV, Santillan MR, Kim S, Ryan H, Shah SK, Wilson EB, Tsuda S (2018) Multicenter review of robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: is there a role for robotics? Surg Endosc 32:1901–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5882-5
Henriksen NA, Jensen KK, Muysoms F (2019) Robot-assisted abdominal wall surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Hernia 23(1):17–27
Scheuerlein H, Thiessen A, Schug-Pass C, Kockerling F (2018) What do we know about component separation techniques for abdominal wall hernia repair? Front Surg 5:24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2018.00024
Miskovic A, Lumb AB (2017) Postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth 118(3):317–334
Weltz AS et al (2017) Operative outcomes after open abdominal wall reconstruction with retromuscular mesh fixation using fibrin glue versus transfascial sutures. Am Surg 83(9):937–942
Etemad SA et al (2018) Mechanical vs. non-mechanical mesh fixation in open retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. J Am Coll Surg 227:S106
ClinicalTrials.gov (Internet). Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). (2020) Identifier NCT03938688, randomized control trial comparing transfascial suture for mesh fixation to no mesh fixation. Available on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03938688?term=cleveland+clinic&cond=Ventral+Hernia&draw=2&rank=3
No funding was received for this study from the public or private sector.
Availability of data and material
Individual participant data used in this study are available on request from the American Hernias Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC).
Conflict of interest
Randy J. Janczyk, MD: Has received honoraria from Intuitive Surgical. Anthony A. Iacco, MD: Has received honoraria from Intuitive Surgical. Robert Abdu DO: Declares no conflict of interest. Andrew Vasyluk, MD: Declares no conflict of interest. Narra Reddy MD: Declares no conflict of interest. Joshua T. Halka, MD: Declares no conflict of interest. Alexander DeMare MD: Declares no conflict of interest.
This study fulfilled federal requirements for exemption from institutional review board approval (HIC2016-319).
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
A waiver of consent was granted by the institutional review board.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Abdu, R., Vasyluk, A., Reddy, N. et al. Hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release versus open: propensity-matched analysis of 30-day outcomes. Hernia (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02249-9
- Transversus abdominis release
- Abdominal wall reconstruction