Abdominal wall hernia surgery in The Netherlands: a national survey

Abstract

Purpose

In The Netherlands, the quality of abdominal wall hernia surgery is largely unknown due to the lack of a hernia registry. This study was designed to assess the current state of abdominal wall hernia surgery in The Netherlands, to create a starting point for future evaluation of new quality measures.

Methods

Dutch hernia management indicators and recently proposed European Hernia Society (EHS) requirements for accredited/certified hernia centers were used. The number of Dutch hospitals that meet the four main EHS requirements (on volume, experience, use of a registry and quality control) was assessed by analyzing governmental information and the results of a survey amongst all 1.554 Dutch general surgeons.

Results

The survey was representative with 426 respondents (27%) from all 75 hospitals. Fifty-one percent of the hospitals had a median inguinal repair volume of more than 290 (14–1.238) per year. An open or laparo-endoscopic inguinal repair technique was not related to hospital volume. Experienced hernia surgeons, use of a registry and a structured quality control were reported to be present in, respectively, 97%, 39%, and 15% of the hospitals. Consensus in answers between the respondents per hospital was low (< 20%). Two hospitals (3%) met all four requirements for accreditation.

Conclusion

This descriptive analysis demonstrates that hernia surgery in the Netherlands is performed in every hospital, by all types of surgeons, using many different techniques. If the suggested EHS requirements are used as a measuring rod, only 3% of the Dutch hospitals could be accredited as a hernia center.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Kockerling F, Sheen AJ, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Cuccurullo D, Fortelny R, Friis-Andersen H, Gillion JF, Gorjanc J, Kopelman D, Lopez-Cano M, Morales-Conde S, Osterberg J, Reinpold W, Simmermacher RKJ, Smietanski M, Weyhe D, Simons MP (2019) Accreditation and certification requirements for hernia centers and surgeons: the ACCESS project. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1873-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Federation of Medical Specialists in The Netherlands. Vision document medical specialist 2025: ambition, trust, cooperation. https://www.demedischspecialist.nl/sites/default/files/FMS_visiedoc_MS2025%28eng%29_2017_PL_v02%28lr%29.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2019

  3. 3.

    Burwell SM (2015) Setting value-based payment goals—HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care. N Engl J Med 372(10):897–899. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1500445

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Porter ME (2009) A strategy for health care reform—toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med 361(2):109–112. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0904131

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kyle-Leinhase I, Köckerling F, Jørgensen LN, Montgomery A, Gillion JF, Rodriguez JAP, Hope W, Muysoms F (2018) Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 22(4):561–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1724-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kockerling F, Berger D, Jost JO (2014) What is a Certified Hernia Center? The example of the German Hernia Society and German Society of General and Visceral Surgery. Front Surg 1:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2014.00026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Stabilini C, Cavallaro G, Bocchi P, Campanelli G, Carlucci M, Ceci F, Crovella F, Cuccurullo D, Fei L, Gianetta E, Gossetti F, Greco DP, Iorio O, Ipponi P, Marioni A, Merola G, Negro P, Palombo D, Bracale U (2018) Defining the characteristics of certified hernia centers in Italy: the Italian society of hernia and abdominal wall surgery workgroup consensus on systematic reviews of the best available evidences. Int J Surg (Lond, Engl) 54(Pt A):222–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Simons MP, de Lange D, Beets GL, van Geldere D, Heij HA, Go PM (2003) The ‘Inguinal Hernia’ guideline of the Association of Surgeons of The Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 147(43):2111–2117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dutch Association of Surgeons. standardization of surgical treatments (Normering Chirurgische Behandelingen) document 7.1 May 2018, pp 8–10. https://heelkunde.nl/sites/heelkunde.nl/files/Normen%207.1%20definitief.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2019

  10. 10.

    Working Group Incisional Hernias (2018) National guideline for treatment of incisional ventral hernias. https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/?query=Littekenbreuken&specialism=21. Accessed 7 Sept 2019

  11. 11.

    Björnberg A. Euro health consumer index 2017 report, p 9. https://healthpowerhouse.com/media/EHCI-2017/EHCI-2017-report.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2019

  12. 12.

    HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, Berger D, Berrevoet F, Brandsma HT, Bury K, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, Dietz UA, Fortelny RH, Frei-Lanter C, Hansson B, Helgstrand F, Hotouras A, Janes A, Kroese LF, Lambrecht JR, Kyle-Leinhase I, Lopez-Cano M, Maggiori L, Mandala V, Miserez M, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Prudhomme M, Rautio T, Smart N, Smietanski M, Szczepkowski M, Stabilini C, Muysoms FE (2018) European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia 22(1):183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1697-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik R, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Timman R, van der Ham AC, Dawson I, Charbon JA, Schuhmacher C, Mihaljevic A, Izbicki JR, Fikatas P, Knebel P, Fortelny RH, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Jeekel HJ (2017) Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 390(10094):567–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31332-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kaufmann R, Halm JA, Eker HH, Klitsie PJ, Nieuwenhuizen J, van Geldere D, Simons MP, van der Harst E, van ‘t Riet M, van der Holt B, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2018) Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet (London, England) 391(10123):860–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30298-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    de Goede B, Wijsmuller AR, van Ramshorst GH, van Kempen BJ, Hop WCJ, Klitsie PJ, Scheltinga MR, de Haan J, Mastboom WJB, van der Harst E, Simons MP, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2018) Watchful waiting versus surgery of mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic inguinal hernia in men aged 50 years and older: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267(1):42–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Donabedian A (1988) The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 260(12):1743–1748

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dutch Healthcare Authority (Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit). Volume of inguinal, umbilical, epigastric and incisional hernias 2012–2018. https://www.opendisdata.nl/. Accessed 1 Dec 2018

  19. 19.

    Healthcare Institute Netherlands (Zorginstituut Nederland). Openbaar databestand MSZ verslagjaar 2017—draaitabel per indicator (zip, 732 kB). Open TAB “Liesbreukoperaties”. https://www.zorginzicht.nl/openbare-data/open-data-ziekenhuizen-en-zelfstandige-behandelcentra—medisch-specialistische-zorg. Accessed 1 Dec 2018

  20. 20.

    Köckerling F, Bittner R, Kraft B, Hukauf M, Kuthe A, Schug-Pass C (2017) Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair? Surg Endosc 31(2):573–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5001-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Janes A, Jeekel J, Lopez-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Smietanski M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F, Carbonell AM, Chang A, Franklin M, Kercher KW, Lammers BJ, Parra-Davilla E, Roll S, Towfigh S, van Geffen E, Conze J, van Goor H (2014) Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 18(1):7–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1168-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ventral Hernia Working G, Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148(3):544–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kanters AE, Krpata DM, Blatnik JA, Novitsky YM, Rosen MJ (2012) Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):787–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Petro CC, Novitsky YW (2016) Classification of hernias, chapter II. In: Novitsky YW (ed) Hernias surgery current principles, pp 15–22. ISBN 978-3-319-27468-3

  26. 26.

    Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346(15):1128–1137. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa012337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nimptsch U, Mansky T (2017) Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014. BMJ Open 7(9):e016184. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen MB, Iversen MG, Wara P, Rosenberg J, Friis-Andersen HF, Jorgensen LN (2009) Nationwide study of early outcomes after incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg 96(12):1452–1457. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6728

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Morche J, Mathes T, Pieper D (2016) Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5(1):204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0376-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Nordin P, WVD Linden (2008) Volume of procedures and risk of recurrence after repair of groin hernia: national register study. BMJ 336(7650):934–937. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39525.514572.25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Aquina CT, Fleming FJ, Becerra AZ, Xu Z, Hensley BJ, Noyes K, Monson JRT, Jusko TA (2017) Explaining variation in ventral and inguinal hernia repair outcomes: a population-based analysis. Surgery 162(3):628–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kievit J (2017) Zorg en Kwaliteit: van individu naar systeem, naar beide. https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/64125/Afscheidscollege_Kievit.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 7 Sept 2019

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Wegdam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

JW, TdVR, SN and MS declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the Elkerliek Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain studies directly involving human participants, as it is a descriptive study of the results of an electronic survey amongst Dutch surgeons, not patients.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent was not necessary.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wegdam, J.A., de Vries Reilingh, T.S., Nienhuijs, S.W. et al. Abdominal wall hernia surgery in The Netherlands: a national survey. Hernia 24, 601–611 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02048-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ventral hernia
  • Quality measures
  • Certification requirements
  • Accreditation