Advertisement

Hernia

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 445–446 | Cite as

Invited comment to: rates of and methods used at reoperation for recurrence after primary inguinal hernia repair with Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein. Magnusson J, Gustafsson UO, Nygren J, Thorell A

  • S. W. Nienhuijs
Invited commentary

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical approval

This comment did not need approval from an ethic committee.

Human and animal rights

This comment does not contain any studies with participants or animals.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required for this comment.

References

  1. 1.
    Magnusson J, Gustafsson UO, Nygren J (2017) Thorell a rates of and methods used at reoperation for recurrence after primary inguinal hernia repair with Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein. Hernia.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1705-9 (Epub ahead of print]PMID: 29196892) PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Magnusson J, Nygren J, Gustafsson UO, Thorell A (2016) UltraPro Hernia System, Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hernia 20(5):641–648.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1507-5 (Epub 2016 May 18. PMID: 27194437 Br J Surg. 2006 Jan;93(1):33-9) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nienhuijs SW, Rosman C (2015) Long-term outcome after randomizing prolene hernia system, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19(1):77–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1295-8 (Epub 2014 Aug 14 PubMed PMID: 25119563) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catharina Hospital EindhovenEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations