Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arthropod Diversity and Community Structure in Relation to Land Use in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Declining biodiversity in agro-ecosystems, caused by intensification of production or expansion of monocultures, is associated with the emergence of agricultural pests. Understanding how land-use and management control crop-associated biodiversity is, therefore, one of the key steps towards the prediction and maintenance of natural pest-control. Here we report on relationships between land-use variables and arthropod community attributes (for example, species diversity, abundance and guild structure) across a diversification gradient in a rice-dominated landscape in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. We show that rice habitats contained the most diverse arthropod communities, compared with other uncultivated and cultivated land-use types. In addition, arthropod species density and Simpson’s diversity in flower, vegetable and fruit habitats was positively related to rice cover in the local landscape. However, across the landscape as a whole, reduction in heterogeneity and the amount of uncultivated cover was associated, generally, with a loss of diversity. Furthermore, arthropod species density in tillering and flowering stages of rice was positively related to crop and vegetation richness, respectively, in the local landscape. Differential effects on feeding guilds were also observed in rice-associated communities with the proportional abundance of predators increasing and the proportional abundance of detritivores decreasing with increased landscape rice cover. Thus, we identify a range of rather complex, sometimes contradictory patterns concerning the impact of rice cover and landscape heterogeneity on arthropod community attributes. Importantly, we conclude that that land-use change associated with expansion of monoculture rice need not automatically impact diversity and functioning of the arthropod community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri M 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst and Environ 74:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA 1991. Increasing biodiversity to improve insect pest management in agro-ecosystems. In: Hawksworth D (eds). The biodiversity of microorganisms and invertebrates: its role in sustainable agriculture. Wallingford (UK): CAB International. pp 165–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA, Letourneau DK. 1982. Vegetation management and biological control in agroecosystems. Crop Prot 1:405–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arida GS, Heong KL. 1992. Blower-Vac: a new suction apparatus for sampling rice arthropods. Int Rice Res Newsl 17:30–1

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambaradeniya CNB, Edirisinghe JP, De Silva DN, Gunatilleke CVS, Ranawana KB, Wijekoon S (2004) Biodiversity associated with an irrigated rice agro-ecosystem in Sri Lanka. Biodivers Conserv 13:1715–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Harvey CT, Gross K, Ives AR. 2003. Biodiversity and biocontrol: emergent impacts of a multi-enemy assemblage on pest suppression and crop yield in an agroecosystem. Ecol Lett 6:857–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JE, Schoenly K, Heong KL, Justo H, Arida G et al. 1994. A food-web approach to evaluating the effect of insecticide spraying on insect pest population-dynamics in a Philippine irrigated rice ecosystem. J Appl Ecol 31:747–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ. 2002. Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Chichester: Wiley. 761 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC. 1997. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington (DC): Island Press. 392 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Drechsler M, Settele J. 2001. Predator-prey interactions in rice ecosystems: effects of guild composition, trophic relationships, and land use changes—a model study exemplified for Philippine rice terraces. Ecol Model 137:135–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott NC, Kieckhefer RW, Lee JH, French BW. 1999. Influence of within-field and landscape factors on aphid predator populations in wheat. Landsc Ecol 14:239–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke DL, Denno RF. 2004 Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429:407–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heong KL, Aquino GB, Barrion AT. 1991. Arthropod community structures of rice ecosystems in the Philipines. Bull Entomol Res 81:407–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heong KL, Aquino GB, Barrion AT. 1992. Population dynamics of plant- and leafhoppers and their natural enemies in rice ecosystems in the Philippines. Crop Prot 11:371–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen ID, Fahrig L. 1997. Response of generalist and specialist insect herbivores to landscape spatial structure. Landsc Ecol 12:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruess A, Tscharntke T. 1994. Habitat fragmentation, species loss, and biological-control. Science 264:1581–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruess A, Tscharntke T. 2000. Species richness and parasitism in a fragmented landscape: experiments and field studies with insects on Vicia sepium. Oecologia 122:129–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, DeVries P, Walla T. 2000. When species accumulation curves intersect: implications for ranking diversity using small samples. Oikos 89:601–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loevinsohn ME, Bandong JB, Alviola AA. 1993. Asynchrony in cultivation among Philippine rice farmers—causes and prospects for change. Agric Syst 41:419–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran A. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell. 256 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney H, Lubchenco J, Dirzo R, Sala O. 1995. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: basic principles. In: Heywood V (eds). Global biodiversity assessment. London: Cambridge University Press. pp 279–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds DR, Mukhopadhyay S, Riley JR, Das BK, Nath PS, Mandal SK. 1999. Seasonal variation in the windborne movement of insect pests over northeast India. Int J Pest Manage 45:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter JF, Mills AP, Rosenberg LJ. 1998. Weather associated with autumn and winter migrations of rice pests and other insects in south-eastern and eastern Asia. Bull Entomol Res 88:189–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Schläpfer F, Schmid B, Seidl I. 1999. Expert estimates about effects of biodiversity on ecosystem processes and services. Oikos 84:346–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenly K. 1998. Analysis of invertebrate biodiversity in a Philippine farmer’s irrigated rice field. Environ Entomol 27:11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenly K, Cohen J, Heong KL, Arida G, Barrion A, Litsinger JA. 1994. Quantifying the impact of insecticides on food web structure of rice-arthropod populations in a Philippine farmer’s irrigated field. In: Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. London: Chapman and Hall

  • Schoenly K, Cohen J, Heong KL, Litsinger JA, Aquino GB, Barrion A, Arida G. 1996. Food web dynamics of irrigated rice fields at five elevations in Luzon, Philippines. Bull Entomol Res 86:451–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle WH, Ariawan H, Astruti ET, Cahyana W, Hakim AL, Hindayana D, Lestari AS, Sartanto P. 1996. Managing tropical pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 77:1975–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson E. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE, Way MJ. 1970. Ecological background to pest management. In: Rabb RL, Guthrie FE (eds). Concepts of pest management. Raleigh: North Carolina State University. pp 6–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland K, Samu F. 2000. Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: a review. Entomol Exp Appl 95:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thies C, Tscharntke T. 1999. Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems. Science 285:893–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas MB (1999) Ecological approaches and development of ‘truly integrated’ pest management. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 96:5944–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Kruess A. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and biological control. In: Hawkins B, Cornell HV (eds). Theoretical approaches to biological control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp 190–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Mele P, Hai TV, Thas O, Van Huis A. 2002. Influence of pesticide information sources on citrus farmers’ knowledge, perceptions and practices in pest management, Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Int J Pest Manage 48:169–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK. 1991. Biodiversity as a resource for biological control. In: Hawksworth D (eds). The biodiversity of microorganisms and invertebrates: its role in sustainable agriculture. Wallingford UK: CAB International. pp 149–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Way MJ, Heong KL. 1994. The role of biodiversity in the dynamics and management of insect pests of tropical irrigated rice—a review. Bull Entomol Res 84:567–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibull AC, Östman O, Granqvist A. 2003. Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management. Biodivers Conserv 12:1335–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby A, Thomas MB. 2002a. Are the ecological concepts of assembly and function of biodiversity useful frameworks for understanding natural pest control? Agric Forest Entomol 4:237–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby A, Thomas MB. 2002b. Natural enemy diversity and natural pest control: patterns of pest emergence with agricultural intensification. Ecol Lett 5:353–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Alberto Barrion for help with arthropod identification, and William Settle and one anonymous referee for constructive criticism of our manuscript. A list of taxa recorded in the study is available from the corresponding author upon request. Data collection was funded by the Asia Development Bank and analysis and interpretation of the data was funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries [R7570 Crop Protection Research Programme]. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Wilby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilby, A., Lan, L.P., Heong, K.L. et al. Arthropod Diversity and Community Structure in Relation to Land Use in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Ecosystems 9, 538–549 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-0131-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-0131-0

Keywords

Navigation