Advertisement

Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 741–757 | Cite as

Inclusive wealth, total factor productivity, and sustainability: an empirical analysis

  • Masayuki Sato
  • Kenta Tanaka
  • Shunsuke Managi
Research Article
  • 145 Downloads

Abstract

Sustainability can be assessed by non-declining inclusive wealth, which refers to man-made capital, human capital, natural capital, and all other types of capital that are sources of human well-being. As the previous studies—including Arrow et al. (J Econ Perspect 18(3):147–172, 2004) and the Inclusive Wealth Report (2012 and 2014)—suggest, total factor productivity (TFP) is one determinant of inclusive wealth, because it is related to the resource allocation mechanism. TFP is one important component of sustainability. When considering the contribution of TFP toward inclusive wealth, attention needs to be paid to the improvement in the usage of human and natural capital as well as the traditional man-made capital. However, in the previous studies, only man-made capital and labor force have been considered. This study extends current measures of sustainability by capturing the efficient utilization of natural resources, giving us inclusive wealth-based TFP. Therefore, in contrast to conventional TFP measures, we consider both human and natural capital in addition to man-made capital. We examine 43 countries and find that a new indicator which asserts countries previously considered sustainable by earlier studies such as Arrow et al. (J Econ Perspect 18(3):147–172, 2004) as no longer sustainable.

Keywords

Sustainable development Inclusive wealth Malmquist index Efficiency Total factor productivity 

JEL Classification

Q56 O33 O47 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors also would like to express their gratitude to two anonymous reviewers and the editor for constructive and helpful comments and suggestions to improve the paper. This research was financially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research (26000001) by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

References

  1. Ali AI, Seiford LM (1990) Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Oper Res Lett 9(6):403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Mäler K-G (2003) Evaluating projects and assessing sustainable development in imperfect economies. Environ Resour Econ 26(4):647–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Goulder L, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Heal G, Levin S, Mäler K-G, Schneider S, Starrett D, Walker B (2004) Are we consuming too much? J Econ Perspect 18(3):147–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Goulder L, Munford K, Oleson K (2012) Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environ Dev Econ 17:317–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt N, Schreyer P, Zipperer V (2014) Productivity Measurement with Natural Capital and Bad Outputs. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1154, OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins S, Bosworth B (1996) Economic growth in East Asia: accumulation versus assimilation. Brook Pap Econ Activ 2:135–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dasgupta P (2004) Human well-being and the natural environment. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Dasgupta P (2007) Economics: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dietz S, Neumayer E, Soysa I (2007) Corruption, the resource curse and genuine saving. Environ Dev Econ 12:33–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engelbrecht (2016) Comprehensive versus inclusive wealth accounting and the assessment of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 129:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fujii H, Managi S (2016) An evaluation of inclusive capital stock for urban planning. Ecosyst Health Sustain 2(10)Google Scholar
  12. Hamilton K, Atkinson G (2006) Wealth, welfare and sustainability. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamilton K, Clemens M (1999) Genuine savings rates in developing countries. World Bank Econ Rev 13(2):333–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jumbri IA, Managi S (2016) Global data. In: Managi S (ed) The wealth of nations and regions. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  15. Kerstens K, Van de Woestyne I (2011) Negative data in DEA: a simple proportional distance function approach. J Oper Res Soc 62(7):1413–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klenow PJ, Rodriguez-Clare A (1997) The neoclassical revival in growth economics: has it gone too far? In: Bernanke B, Rotemberg J (eds) NBER macroeconomics annual 1997. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Kunte A, Hamilton K, Dixon J, Clemens M (1998) Estimating national wealth: methodology and results. World Bank Discussion PaperGoogle Scholar
  18. Managi S (2003) Luenberger and Malmquist productivity indices in Japan, 1955–1995. Appl Econ Lett 10:581–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neumayer E (2000) Resource accounting in measures of unsustainability: challenging the World Bank’s conclusions. Environ Resour Econ 15(3):257–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pearce DW, Atkinson GD (1993) Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability. Ecol Econ 8(2):103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sato M (2015) Growth of inclusive wealth. In: Managi S (ed) The economics of green growth. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  22. UNU-IHDP and UNEP (2012) Inclusive wealth report 2012. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. UNU-IHDP and UNEP (2014) Inclusive wealth report 2014. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. World Bank (2006) Where is the wealth of nations?. World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Xepapadeas A, Vouvaki D (2009) Total factor productivity growth when factors of production generate environmental externalities. Fond Eni Enrico Mattei Work Pap 281:1–31Google Scholar
  27. Yamaguchi R (2016) Theoretical and conceptual aspects of green and wealth acounting. In: Managi S (ed) The wealth of nations and regions. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Human Development and EnvironmentKobe UniversityKobeJapan
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsMusashi UniversityTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of EngineeringKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations