Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1735–1743 | Cite as

On the limiting factor of impregnation methods for developing Cu/CeO2 anodes for solid oxide fuel cells

  • Wenyuan Li
  • Bo Guan
  • Mingliang Liu
  • Bo Wei
  • Xingbo Zhu
  • Zhihong Wang
  • Zhe Lü
Original Paper


The efficiency of impregnation methods for making Cu-based solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) is qualitatively characterized for the first time through a conformal coating model. It is found that the low-efficiency results from the uneven distribution of Cu instead of the small loading. Most of the Cu deposits form isolated islands, e.g., in a 20.4 vol.% Cu-loaded anode, 81% Cu is isolated from each other. In order to address the limited impregnation efficiency, two different procedures are adopted to fabricate the practical Cu/CeO2 anodes, namely, simultaneous and sequential impregnation procedures. It is found that CeO2 works as a solid dispersant, improving the Cu distribution drastically. Compared to the Cu-only anode, more than a threefold improvement of impregnation efficiency is achieved by both methods. The anode made by the sequential impregnation yields the best performance in CH4 at 700 °C, 170 mW cm−2, which represents an 18% enhancement over that of the simultaneous impregnation, or 340% over the Cu-only anode. These findings demonstrate that it is of importance to optimize the Cu impregnation to yield a highly active anode, and the sequential impregnation method is a promising procedure to break the efficiency-limiting factor and produce a high-performance anode with minimized fabrication effort.


Aqueous impregnation Cu-CeO2 anode Electrode performance Microstructure optimization Hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells 



This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2007AA05Z139) and by Natural Science Foundation of China (20901020, 51372057).


  1. 1.
    Zhang C, Grass ME, McDaniel AH, DeCaluwe SC, Gabaly FE, Liu Z, McCarty KF, Farrow RL, Linne MA, Hussain Z, Jackson GS, Bluhm H, Eichhorn BW (2010) Measuring fundamental properties in operating solid oxide electrochemical cells by using in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Nat Mater 9:944–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li W, Gong M, Liu X (2013) H2 oxidation on doped yttrium chromites/yttrium stabilized zirconia anode of solid oxide fuel cell. J Power Sources 241:494–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li W, Gong M, Liu X (2014) Characterization of doped yttrium chromites as electrodes for solid oxide fuel cell by impedance method. J Electrochem Soc 161:F551–F560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guan B, Li W, Zhang X, Liu X (2015) Surface oxygen exchange properties of Sr doped La2NiO4+δ as SOFC cathode: thin-film electrical conductivity relaxation investigation. ECS Trans 68:801–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang T, Liu J, Yu Y, Lee Y-L, Finklea H, Liu X, Abernathy HW, Hackett GA (2017) Modeling of the oxygen reduction reaction for dense LSM thin films. PCCP 19:30464–30472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li W, Guan B, Yang T, Zhang N, Zhang X, Liu X (2017) On the bulk transport process and its impact on the electrode behavior of mixed conducting electrodes for SOFCs. PCCP 19:23218–23228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang T, Liu J, Finklea HO, Abernathy H, Hackett GA (2017) Multi-physics simulation of SOFC button cell with multi-step charge transfer model in composite LSM/YSZ cathode. ECS Trans 78:2699–2709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atkinson A, Barnett S, Gorte RJ, Irvine JTS, Mcevoy AJ, Mogensen M, Singhal SC, Vohs J (2004) Advanced anodes for high-temperature fuel cells. Nat Mater 3:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pan W, Lü Z, Chen K, Huang X, Wei B, Li W, Wang Z, Su W (2010) Novel polymer fibers prepared by electrospinning for use as the pore-former for the anode of solid oxide fuel cell. Electrochim Acta 55:5538–5544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guan B, Lü Z, Wang G, Wei B, Li W, Huang X (2012) A performance study of solid oxide fuel cells with BaZr0. 1Ce0. 7Y0. 2O3–δ electrolyte developed by spray-modified pressing method. Fuel Cells 141–145Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tian Y, Lü Z, Wei B, Wang Z, Liu M, Li W, Huang X, Su W (2011) A non-sealed solid oxide fuel cell micro-stack with two gas channels. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:7251–7256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zheng M, Wang S, Li M, Xia C (2017) H2 and CO oxidation process at the three-phase boundary of Cu-ceria cermet anode for solid oxide fuel cell. J Power Sources 345:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorte RJ, Park S, Vohs JM, Wang CH (2000) Anodes for direct oxidation of dry hydrocarbons in a solid-oxide fuel cell. Adv Mater 12:1465–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Toebes ML, Bitter JH, Van Dillen AJ, de Jong KP (2002) Impact of the structure and reactivity of nickel particles on the catalytic growth of carbon nanofibers. Catal Today 76:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baker R, Harris P, Henderson J, Thomas R (1975) Formation of carbonaceous deposits from the reaction of methane over nickel. Carbon 13:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buccheri M, Hill J (2014) Evaluation of a Cu/YSZ and Ni/YSZ bilayer anode for the direct utilization of methane in a solid-oxide fuel cell. Fuel Cells 14:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McIntosh S, Gorte RJ (2004) Direct hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells. Chem Rev 104:4845–4865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park EW, Moon H, Park MS, Hyun SH (2009) Fabrication and characterization of Cu-Ni-YSZ SOFC anodes for direct use of methane via Cu-electroplating. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:5537–5545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sarıboğa V, Öksüzömer MF (2016) Cu-CeO 2 anodes for solid oxide fuel cells: determination of infiltration characteristics. J Alloys Compd 688:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim H, Rosa C, Boaro M, Vohs J, Gorte R (2002) Fabrication of highly porous Yttria-stabilized zirconia by acid leaching nickel from a nickel yttria-stabilized zirconia cermet. J Am Ceram Soc 85:1473–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gorte RJ, Vohs JM, McIntosh S (2004) Recent developments on anodes for direct fuel utilization in SOFC. Solid State Ionics 175:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gorte RJ, Vohs JM (2003) Novel SOFC anodes for the direct electrochemical oxidation of hydrocarbons. J Catal 216:477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McIntosh S, Vohs JM, Gorte RJ (2003) Effect of precious-metal dopants on SOFC anodes for direct utilization of hydrocarbons. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 6:A240–A243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jung SW, Lu C, He HP, Ahn KY, Gorte RJ, Vohs JM (2006) Influence of composition and Cu impregnation method on the performance of Cu/CeO2/YSZ SOFC anodes. J Power Sources 154:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhu X, Lv Z, Wei B, Liu M, Huang X, Su W (2010) A comparison of La0. 75Sr0. 25Cr0. 5Mn0. 5O3-[delta] and Ni impregnated porous YSZ anodes fabricated in two different ways for SOFCs. Electrochim Acta 55:3932–3938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li W, Lü Z, Zhu X, Guan B, Wei B, Guan C, Su W (2011) Effect of adding urea on performance of Cu/CeO2/yttria-stabilized zirconia anodes for solid oxide fuel cells prepared by impregnation method. Electrochim Acta 56:2230–2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen K, Lü Z, Ai N, Huang X, Zhang Y, Xin X, Zhu R, Su W (2006) Development of yttria-stabilized zirconia thin films via slurry spin coating for intermediate-to-low temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 160:436–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gerstl M, Navickas E, Friedbacher G, Kubel F, Ahrens M, Fleig J (2011) The separation of grain and grain boundary impedance in thin yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) layers. Solid State Ionics 185:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li W, Gong M, Liu X (2013) H2 oxidation on doped yttrium chromites anode of solid oxide fuel cell. ECS Trans 57:1479–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Verbraeken MC, Cheung C, Suard E, Irvine JTS (2015) High H− ionic conductivity in barium hydride. Nat Mater 14:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kuo C-H, Gupta PK (1995) Rigidity and conductivity percolation thresholds in particulate composites. Acta Metall Mater 43:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li W, Guan B, Zhang X, Yan J, Zhou Y, Liu X (2016) New mechanistic insight into the oxygen reduction reaction on Ruddlesden-Popper cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. PCCP 18:8502–8511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li W, Guan B, Yan J, Zhang N, Zhang X, Liu X (2016) Enhanced surface exchange activity and electrode performance of (La 2− 2x Sr 2x)(Ni 1− x Mn x) O 4+ δ cathode for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 318:178–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yang T, Sezer H, Celik IB, Finklea HO, Gerdes K (2015) Prediction of SOFC performance with or without experiments: a study on minimum requirements for experimental data. ECS Trans 68:2397–2411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guan B, Li W, Zhang H, Liu X (2015) Oxygen reduction reaction kinetics in Sr-doped La2NiO4+δ Ruddlesden-Popper phase as cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 162:F707–F712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yang T, Sezer H, Celik IB, Finklea HO, Gerdes K (2017) Prediction of SOFC performance with or without experiments: a study on minimum requirements for experimental data. Int J Electrochem Sci 12:6801–6828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yang T, Celik IB, Sezer H, Lee S, Gerdes K (2015) Investigation of infiltration via multi-physics simulation tool with realistic microstructure properties. ECS Trans 66:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sezer H, Celik IB, Yang T (2015) Electrochemical behavior of phosphine induced anode performance degradation in a planar SOFC: a numerical study. ECS Trans 68:2515–2525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lou X, Liu Z, Wang S, Xiu Y, Wong C, Liu M (2010) Controlling the morphology and uniformity of a catalyst-infiltrated cathode for solid oxide fuel cells by tuning wetting property. J Power Sources 195:419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang S, Lu GM (1998) Role of CeO 2 in Ni/CeO 2–Al 2 O 3 catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Appl Catal B Environ 19:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Duh J, Chien W, Chiou B (1989) Wettability in ZrO2-Ni and ZrO2-Cu bonding. J Mater Sci Lett 8:405–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations