Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A molecular dynamics study on Young’s modulus and tribology of carbon nanotube reinforced styrene-butadiene rubber

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Styrene-butadiene rubber is a copolymer widely used in making car tires and has excellent abrasion resistance. The Young’s modulus and tribology of pure styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) polymer and carbon nanotube reinforced polymer composites have been investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. The mechanism of enhanced tribology properties using carbon nanotube has been studied and discussed. The obtained Young’s modulus shows the enhancement in mechanical properties of SBR polymer when carbon nanotubes are used as reinforcement. The concentration, temperature and velocity profiles, radial distribution function, frictional stresses, and cohesive energy density are calculated and analyzed in detail. The Young’s modulus of SBR matrix increases about 29.16% in the presence of the 5% CNT. The atom movement velocity and average cohesive energy density in the friction area of pure SBR matrix was found to be more than that of the CNT/SBR composite.

Initial and final conditions of (a) pure SBR matrix and (b) CNT/SBR matrix subjected toshear loading and frictional stresses of top Fe layers of both pure SBR and CNT/SBR composite

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosen SL, Brazel CS (2012) Fundamental principles of polymeric materials. Wiley, Hoboken, p 126

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ward IM, Sweeney J (2004) An introduction to the mechanical properties of solid polymers. Wiley, Chichester, p 302

    Google Scholar 

  3. David LB, Grefory SW (2006) A low friction and ultra-low wear rate PEEK/PTFE composite. Wear 26:410–418

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li J, Xia Y (2009) The reinforcement effect of carbon fiber on the friction and wear properties of carbon fiber reinforced PA6 composites. Fiber Polym 10:519–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Samyn P, Schoukens G (2009) Thermochemical sliding interactions of short carbon fiber polyimide composites at high PV-conditions. Mater Chem Phys 115:185–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo W, Liu Q, Li Y, Zhou S, Zou H, Liang M (2016) Enhanced mechanical and tribological properties in polyphenylene sulfide/polytetrafluoroethylene composites reinforced by short carbon fiber. Compos Part B Eng 91:579–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu N, Wang J, Yang J, Han G, Yan F (2015) Effects of nano-sized and micro-sized carbon fibers on the interlaminar shear strength and tribological properties of high strength glass fabric/phenolic laminate in water environment. Compos Part B Eng 68:92–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou JH, Sui ZJ, Li P, Chen D, Dai YC, Yuan WK (2006) Structural characterization of carbon nanofibers formed from different carbon-containing gases. Carbon 44:3255–3262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mall S, Lee H, He P, Shi D, Narasimhadevara S, Yeo-Heung Y, Shanov V, Schulz MJ (2007) Characterization of carbon nanotube/nanofiber-reinforced polymer composites using an instrumented indentation technique. Compos Part B Eng 38:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Minaie B, Rodriguez AJ, Guzman ME, Lim CS (2011) Mechanical properties of carbon nanofiber/fiber-reinforced hierarchical polymer composites manufactured with multiscale-reinforcement fabrics. Carbon 49:937–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu Y, Bakis CE, Adair JH (2012) Effects of carbon nanofiller functionalization and distribution on interlaminar fracture toughness of multi-scale reinforced polymer composites. Carbon 50:1316–1331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Finegan IC, Tibbetts GG, Gibson RF (2003) Modeling and characterization of damping in carbon nano-fiber/polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:1629–1635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma S, Chandra R, Kumar P, Kumar N (2016) Mechanical properties of carbon nanofiber reinforced polymer composites-molecular dynamics approach. JOM 68:1717–1727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Park SH, Bandaru PR (2010) Improved mechanical properties of carbon nanotube/polymer composites through the use of carboxyl-epoxide functional group linkages. Polymer 51:5071–5077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Breuer O, Sundaraj U (2004) Big returns from small fibers: a review of polymer/carbon nanotube composites. Polym Compos 25:630–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lourie O, Cox DM, Wagner HD (1998) Buckling and collapse of embedded carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 81:1638–1641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jindal P, Pande S, Sharma P, Mangla V, Chaudhary A, Patel D, Singh BP, Mathur RB, Goyal M (2013) High strain rate behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes-polycarbonate composites. Compos Part B Eng 45:417–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chawla R, Sharma S (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation of carbon nanotube pull-out from polyethylene matrix. Compos. Sci. Technol. 144:169–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma S, Chandra R, Kumar P, Kumar N (2016) Molecular dynamics simulation of functionalized SWCNT-polymer composites. J Compos Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998316628973jcm.sagepub.com

  20. Sharma S, Chandra R, Kumar P, Kumar N (2015) Thermo-mechanical characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforced polycarbonate composites: a molecular dynamics approach. C R Mecanique 343:371–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y, Wang S, He E, Quan W (2016) The effect of sliding velocity on the tribological properties of polymer/carbon nanotube composites. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.077

  22. Li HL, Wang C, Dong B, Gao GY, Xu MW (2008) A study on microhardness and tribological behavior of carbon nanotubes reinforced AMMA-CNTs copolymer nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng A 478:314–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Y, Wang S, Wang Q (2017) Enhancement of tribological properties of polymer composites reinforced by functionalized graphene. Compos Part B Eng 120:83–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Y, Wang S, Wang Q, Xing M (2016) Molecular dynamics simulations of tribology properties of NBR (nitrile-butadiene rubber) /carbon nanotube composites. Compos Part B 97:62–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rigby D, Sun H, Eichinger BE (1997) Computer simulations of poly(ethylene oxide): force field, pvt diagram and cyclization behaviour. Polym Int 44:311–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li Y, Wu Y, Luo Y, Chan TW, Li Z, Wu S (2015) A combined experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study on the structures and properties of three types of styrene butadiene rubber. Mater Today Commun 4:35–41

  27. Zhang J, Liang Y, Yan J, Lou Z (2007) Study of the molecular weight dependence of glass transition temperature for amorphous poly(L-lactide) by molecular dynamics simulation. Polymer 48(16):4900–4905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fletcher R, Reeves CM (1964) Function minimization by conjugate gradients. Comput. J. 7(2):149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Andersen HC (1980) Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J. Chem. Phys. 72(4):2384–2393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Berendsen HJ, Postma JV, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola ARHJ, Haak JR (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81(8):3684–3690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Verlet L (1967) Computer" experiments" on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Phys Rev 159(1):98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharma S, Chandra R, Kumar P, Kumar N (2015) Molecular dynamics simulation of polymer/carbon nanotube composites. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 28(4):409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang W, Qing Y, Zhong W, Sui G, Yang X (2017) Mechanism of modulus improvement for epoxy resin matrices: a molecular dynamics simulation. React Funct Polym 111:60–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Girun N, Ahmadun FR, Rashid SA, Ali Atieh M (2007) Multi-Wall carbon nanotubes/styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) nanocomposite. Fuller, Nanotub, Car N 15(3):207–214

  35. Li Y, Wang S, Arash B, Wang Q (2016) A study on tribology of nitrile-butadiene rubber composites by incorporation of carbon nanotubes: molecular dynamics simulations. Carbon 100:145–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Delle Site L, Abrams CF, Alavi A, Kremer K (2002) Polymers near metal surfaces: selective adsorption and global conformations. Phys Rev Lett 89:156103/1–156103/4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Koch N, Kahn A, Ghijsen J, Pireaux JJ, Schwartz J, Johnson RL, Elschner A (2003) Conjugated organic molecules on metal versus polymer electrodes: demonstration of a key energy level alignment mechanism. Appl Phys Lett 82:70–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ludema KC, Tabor D (1968) Friction and viscoelastic properties of polymeric solids. Rubber Chem Technol 41:462–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jon AH, Wayne L, Gladfelter GH (1999) Probing polymer viscoelastic relaxations with temperature-controlled friction force microscopy. Macromolecules 32:3360–3367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fleisher G (1973) Energetische Methode der Bestimmung des Verschleiβes/Schmierungste chnik. Bandolier 4:9–12

  41. Chilan C, Wenxia W, Jianguo Z (2016) The effect of surface functionality of carbon nanotubes on mechanical and tribological behaviours of carbon fibre-filled styrene–butadiene rubber composite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 29(9):1167–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lovely Professional University for providing the computation facility and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, 144411, India

    Raj Chawla

  2. Materials Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, 144411, India

    Sumit Sharma

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar, Jalandhar, Punjab, 144011, India

    Sumit Sharma

Authors
  1. Raj Chawla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sumit Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raj Chawla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chawla, R., Sharma, S. A molecular dynamics study on Young’s modulus and tribology of carbon nanotube reinforced styrene-butadiene rubber. J Mol Model 24, 96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-018-3636-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-018-3636-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation