Effects of the nitrogen doping configuration and site on the thermal conductivity of defective armchair graphene nanoribbons

  • Ahmet Emin Senturk
  • Ahmet Sinan Oktem
  • Alp Er S. KonukmanEmail author
Original Paper


The influence of the nitrogen (N) doping configuration on the thermal conductivity (TC) of armchair graphene nanoribbons (AGNRs) of size 15.7 nm × 7.26 nm was investigated using classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the optimized Tersoff potential at room temperature. The effect of changing the N-doping site in defects on the TC of AGNRs was also investigated in detail. The variations with N concentration of the TCs of AGNRs presenting graphitic N (quarternary N), pyridinic N, and pyrrolic N doping configurations were studied. Results of MD simulations showed that, among these three doping configurations, pyridinic N was associated with the highest TC, and pyrrolic N with the lowest TC. The highest TC values were obtained when the N dopant atoms were located at the edges and at defects in the AGNR. The presence of both pyrrolic N and Stone–Wales type 1 (SW-1) defects led to a higher TC than the presence of both pyrrolic N and SW-2 defects. Phonon–defect scattering was found to be influenced by changes in C–C bond orientation. SW-1 defects were found to exert a greater influence on the TC than graphitic N doping. Furthermore, the influence on the TC of the N-doping site location in SW-1 defects was examined. Doping the central sites of SW-1 defects was found to yield higher TC values than doping the edge sites of defects. Graphitic-N doping of the more central sites in a SW-1 defect led to a higher TC than the random graphitic-N doping of sites in a SW-1 defect.


Molecular dynamics Armchair graphene nanoribbon (AGNR) Thermal conductivity Defects Nitrogen doping 



The authors greatly appreciate the valuable guidance provided by Dr. Bohayra Mortazavi at Bauhaus University. Our numerical calculations were partially executed at TUBITAK ULAKBIM, TRUBA.


  1. 1.
    Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306(5696):666–669Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Katsnelson MI, Grigorieva IV, Dubonos SV, Firsov AA (2005) Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438:197–200Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang YB, Tan YW, Stormer HL, Kim P (2005) Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. Nature 438:201–204Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6(3):183–191Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321(5887):385–388Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F, Lau CN (2008) Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 8(3):902–907Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams JR, DiCarlo L, Marcus CM (2007) Quantum hall effect in a gate-controlled p-n junction of graphene. Science 317(5838):638–641Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghosh S, Calzio I, Teweldebrhan D, Pokatilov EP, Nika DL, Balandin AA, Bao W, Miao F, Lau CN (2008) Extremely high thermal conductivity of graphene: prospects for thermal management applications in nanoelectronic circuits. Appl Phys Lett 92(15):151911Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cai WW, Moore AL, Zhu YW, Li XS, Chen SS, Shi L, Ruoff RS (2010) Thermal transport in suspended and supported monolayer graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett 10(5):1645–1651Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iwamoto Y, Yoshioka A, Naito T, Cuya J, Ido Y, Okawa R, Jeyadevan B, Yamaguchi H (2016) Field induced anisotropic thermal conductivity of silver nanowire dispersed-magnetic functional fluid. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 79:111–117Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faugeras C, Faugeras B, Orlita M, Potemski M, Nair RR, Geim AK (2010) Thermal conductivity of graphene in Corbino membrane geometry. ACS Nano 4(4):1889–1892Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Panchakarla LS, Subrahmanyam KS, Saha SK, Govindaraj A, Krishnamurthy HR, Waghmare UV, Rao CNR (2009) Synthesis, structure, and properties of boron- and nitrogen-doped graphene. Adv Mater 21(46):4726–4730Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deng D, Pan X, Yu L, Cui Y, Jiang Y, Qi J, Li W-X, Fu Q, Ma X, Xue Q, Sun G, Bao X (2011) Toward N-doped graphene via solvothermal synthesis. Chem Mater 23(5):1188–1193Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang C, Fu L, Liu N, Liu M, Wang Y, Liu Z (2011) Synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene using embedded carbon and nitrogen sources. Adv Mater 23(8):1020–1024Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wei D, Liu Y, Wang Y, Zhang H, Huang L, Yu G (2009) Synthesis of N-doped graphene by chemical vapor deposition and its electrical properties. Nano Lett 9(5):1752–1758Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang Y, Shao Y, Matson DW, Li J, Lin Y (2010) Nitrogen-doped graphene and its application in electrochemical biosensing. ACS Nano 4(4):1790–1798Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang X, Li X, Zhang L, Yoon Y, Weber PK, Wang H, Guo J, Dai H (2009) N-doping of graphene through electrothermal reactions with ammonia. Science 324(5928):768–771Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ma FX, Wang J, Wang FB, Xia XH (2015) The room temperature electrochemical synthesis of N-doped graphene and its electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction. Chem Commun 51(7):1198–1201Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang R, Xu C, Sun J, Gao L (2014) Three-dimensional Fe2O3 nanocubes/nitrogen-doped graphene aerogels: nucleation mechanism and lithium storage properties. Sci Rep 4:7171Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang Y, Ge J, Wang L, Wang D, Ding F, Tao X, Chen W (2013) Manageable N-doped graphene for high performance oxygen reduction reaction. Sci Rep 3:2771Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wen ZH, Wang XC, Mao S, Bo Z, Kim H, Cui SM, Lu GH, Feng XL, Chen JH (2012) Crumpled nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets with ultrahigh pore volume for high-performance supercapacitor. Adv Mater 24(41):5610–5616Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lv R, Li Q, Botello-Méndez AR, Hayashi T, Wang B, Berkdemir A, Hao Q, Elías AL, Cruz-Silva R, Gutiérrez HR, Kim YA, Muramatsu H, Zhu J, Endo M, Terrones H, Charlier JC, Pan M, Terrones M (2012) Nitrogen-doped graphene: beyond single substitution and enhanced molecular sensing. Sci Rep 2:586Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang X, Tabakman SM, Dai H (2008) Atomic layer deposition of metal oxides on pristine and functionalized graphene. J Am Chem Soc 130(26):8152–8153Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li X-F, Lian K, Liu L, Luo Y (2016) Unraveling the formation mechanism of graphitic nitrogen-doping in thermally treated graphene with ammonia. Sci Rep 6:23495Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li X-J, Yu X-X, Liu J-Y, Fan X-D, Zhang K, Cai H-B, Pan N, Wang X-P (2012) Synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene via thermal annealing graphene with urea. Chin J Chem Phys 25(3):325–329Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lu YF, Lo S-T, Lin J-C, Zhang W, Lu J-Y, Liu F-H, Tseng C-M, Lee Y-H, Liang C-T, Li L-J (2013) Nitrogen-doped graphene sheets grown by chemical vapor deposition: synthesis and influence of nitrogen impurities on carrier transport. ACS Nano 7(8):6522–6532Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu J, Ma L, Yadav RM, Yang Y, Zhang X, Vajtai R, Lou J, Ajayan PM (2015) Nitrogen-doped graphene with pyridinic dominance as a highly active and stable electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(27):14763–14769Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zheng B, Cai X-L, Zhou Y, Xia X-H (2016) Pure pyridinic nitrogen doped single-layer graphene catalyzes the two-electron transfer process of oxygen reduction reaction. ChemElectroChem 3(12):2036–2042Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Usachov D, Vilkov O, Grüneis A, Haberer D, Fedorov A, Adamchuk VK, Preobrajenski AB, Dudin P, Barinov A, Oehzelt M, Laubschat C, Vyalikh DV (2011) Nitrogen-doped graphene: efficient growth, structure, and electronic properties. Nano Lett 11(12):5401–5047Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jalili S, Vaziri R (2011) Study of the electronic properties of Li-intercalated nitrogen doped graphite. Mol Phys 109(5):687–694Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang X, Sun G, Routh P, Kim D-H, Huang W, Chen P (2014) Heteroatom-doped graphene materials: syntheses, properties and applications. Chem Soc Rev 43(20):7067–7098Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Luo Z, Lim S, Tian Z, Shang J, Lai L, MacDonald B, Fu C, Shen Z, Yu T, Lin J (2011) Pyridinic N doped graphene: synthesis, electronic structure, and electrocatalytic property. J Mater Chem 21(22):8038–8044Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lin Y-C, Teng P-Y, Yeh C-H, Koshino M, Chiu P-W, Suenaga K (2015) Structural and chemical dynamics of pyridinic-nitrogen defects in graphene. Nano Lett 15(11):7408–7413Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mortazavi B, Rajabpour A, Ahzi S, Rémond Y, Allaei SMV (2012) Nitrogen doping and curvature effects on thermal conductivity of graphene: a non-equilibrium molecular dynamics study. Solid State Commun 152(4):261–264Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yang H, Tang Y, Gong J, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhao Y, Yang P, Wang S (2013) Influence of doped nitrogen and vacancy defects on the thermal conductivity of graphene nanoribbons. J Mol Model 19(11):4781–4788Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mortazavi B, Ahzi S (2012) Molecular dynamics study on the thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of boron doped graphene. Solid State Commun 152(15):1503–1507Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Setoodeh AR, Badjian H, Jahromi HS (2017) Atomistic study of mono/multi-atomic vacancy defects on the mechanical characterization of boron-doped graphene sheets. J Mol Model 23:2Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mortazavi B, Ahzi S (2013) Thermal conductivity and tensile response of defective graphene: a molecular dynamics study. Carbon 63:460–470Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yeo JJ, Liu Z, Ng TY (2012) Comparing the effects of dispersed Stone–Thrower–Wales defects and double vacancies on the thermal conductivity of graphene nanoribbons. Nanotechnology 23(38):385702Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu D, Yang P, Yuan X, Guo J, Liao N (2015) The defect location effect on thermal conductivity of graphene nanoribbons based on molecular dynamics. Phys Lett A 379(9):810–814Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Biel B, Blase X, Triozon F, Roche S (2009) Anomalous doping effects on charge transport in graphene nanoribbons. Phys Rev Lett 102:096803Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Biel B, Blase X, Triozon F, Roche S (2009) Chemically induced mobility gaps in graphene nanoribbons: a route for upscaling device performances. Nano Lett 9(7):2725–2729Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zeng H, Zhao J, Wei JW, Hu HF (2011) Effect of N doping and Stone–Wales defects on the electronic properties of graphene nanoribbons. Eur Phys J B 79(3):335–340Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Accelrys Inc. (2017) Materials Studio. Accelrys Inc., San Francisco.
  45. 45.
    Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117(1):1–19Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tuckerman ME, Berne BJ, Martyna GJ (1992) Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 97(3):1990–2001Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lindsay L, Broido DA (2010) Optimized Tersoff and Brenner empirical potential parameters for lattice dynamics and phonon thermal transport in carbon nanotubes and graphene. Phys Rev B 81(20):205441Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tabarraei A, Shadalou S, Song J-H (2015) Mechanical properties of graphene nanoribbons with disordered edges. Comput Mater Sci 96:10–19Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hoover WG (1985) Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A 31(3):1695–1697Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bagri A, Kim SP, Ruoff RS, Shenoy VB (2011) Thermal transport across twin grain boundaries in polycrystalline graphene from nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. Nano Lett 11(9):3917–3921Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Guo Z, Zhang D, Gong XG (2009) Thermal conductivity of graphene nanoribbons. Appl Phys Lett 95(16):163103Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Varshney V, Patnaik SS, Roy AK, Froudakis G, Farmer BL (2010) Modeling of thermal transport in pillared-graphene architectures. ACS Nano 4(2):1153–1161Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wei Z, Ni Z, Bi K, Chen M, Chen Y (2011) In-plane lattice thermal conductivities of multilayer graphene films. Carbon 49(8):2653–2658Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhang G, Li B (2005) Thermal conductivity of nanotubes revisited: effects of chirality, isotope impurity, tube length, and temperature. J Chem Phys 123(11):114714Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wang ZL, Tang DW, Zheng XH, Zhang WG, Zhu YT (2007) Length-dependent thermal conductivity of single-wall carbon nanotubes: prediction and measurements. Nanotechnology 18(47):475714Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Maruyama S (2002) A molecular dynamics simulation of heat conduction in finite length SWNTs. Physica B 323(1–4):193–195Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jiang JW, Wang JS, Li B (2010) Topological effect on thermal conductivity in graphene. J Appl Phys 108(6):064307Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ghosh S, Bao W, Nika DL, Subrina S, Pokatilov EP, Lau CN, Balandin AA (2010) Dimensional crossover of thermal transport in few-layer graphene. Nat Mater 9(7):555–558Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Klemens PG (2001) Theory of thermal conduction in thin ceramic films. Int J Thermophys 22(1):265–275Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmet Emin Senturk
    • 1
  • Ahmet Sinan Oktem
    • 1
  • Alp Er S. Konukman
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringGebze Technical UniversityKocaeliTurkey

Personalised recommendations