Abstract
Objectives
Dental caries is the most common chronic disease in humans, caused by the acid produced by the microflora in the mouth that dissolves the enamel minerals. Bioactive glass (BAG) has been used in various clinical applications due to its unique bioactive properties, such as bone graft substitutes and dental restorative composites. In this study, we introduce a novel bioactive glass–ceramic (NBGC) prepared through a sol–gel process under a water-free condition.
Materials and methods
The anti-demineralization and remineralization effects of NBGC were evaluated by comparing the measurements of bovine enamel surface morphology, surface roughness, surface micro-hardness, enamel elements, and mineral content before and after related treatments with a commercial BAG. The antibacterial effect was characterized by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC).
Results
Results showed that NBGC had greater acid resistance and remineralization potential compared to commercial BAG. The fast formation of a hydroxy carbonate apatite (HCA) layer suggests efficient bioactivity.
Clinical relevance
In addition to its antibacterial properties, NBGC shows promise as an ingredient in oral care products that can prevent demineralization and restore enamel.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.













Data availability
The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK (1971) Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res 5:117–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.820050611
Combes C, Rey C (2010) Amorphous calcium phosphates: synthesis, properties and uses in biomaterials. Acta Biomater 6:3362–3378. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2010.02.017
Tschoppe P, Zandim DL, Martus P, Kielbassa AM (2011) Enamel and dentine remineralization by nano-hydroxyapatite toothpastes. J Dent 39:430–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2011.03.008
Hench LL, LaTorre GP, Andersson ÖH (1991) The Kinetics of bioactive ceramics part iii: surface reactions for bioactive glasses compared with an inactive glass. In: Bioceramics. Butterworth-Heinemann, pp 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-0269-3.50025-6
Jones JR (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 9:4457–4486. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2012.08.023
Van Oirschot BAJA, Alghamdi HS, Närhi TO et al (2014) In vivo evaluation of bioactive glass-based coatings on dental implants in a dog implantation model. Clin Oral Implants Res 25:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/CLR.12060
Westhauser F, Weis C, Prokscha M et al (2016) Three-dimensional polymer coated 45S5-type bioactive glass scaffolds seeded with human mesenchymal stem cells show bone formation in vivo. J Mater Sci Mater Med 27:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10856-016-5732-3
Filho OP, La Torre GP, Hench LL (1996) Effect of crystallization on apatite-layer formation of bioactive glass 45S5. J Biomed Mater Res 30:509–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199604)30:43.0.CO;2-T
Wilson J, Pigott GH, Schoen FJ, Hench LL (1981) Toxicology and biocompatibility of bioglasses. J Biomed Mater Res 15:805–817. https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.820150605
Frankel GS, Vienna JD, Lian J et al (2018) A comparative review of the aqueous corrosion of glasses, crystalline ceramics, and metals. Npj Mater Degrad 21(2):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-018-0037-2
Wu C, Fan W, Gelinsky M et al (2011) Bioactive SrO–SiO2 glass with well-ordered mesopores: Characterization, physiochemistry and biological properties. Acta Biomater 7:1797–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2010.12.018
Yadav VS, Narula SC, Sharma RK et al (2011) Clinical evaluation of guided tissue regeneration combined with autogenous bone or autogenous bone mixed with bioactive glass in intrabony defects. J Oral Sci 53:481–488. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.53.481
Froum SJ, Weinberg MA, Tarnow D (1998) Comparison of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal defects. A clinical study J Periodontol 69:698–709. https://doi.org/10.1902/JOP.1998.69.6.698
Macedo NL de, Matuda F da S, Macedo LGS de et al (2004) Bone defect regeneration with bioactive glass implantation in rats. J Appl Oral Sci 12:137–143. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572004000200011
Fernando D, Attik N, Pradelle-Plasse N et al (2017) Bioactive glass for dentin remineralization: a systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 76:1369–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2017.03.083
Greenspan DC (2010) NovaMin and tooth sensitivity–an overview. J Clin Dent 21:61–65
Jones JR, Brauer DS, Hupa L, Greenspan DC (2016) Bioglass and bioactive glasses and their impact on healthcare. Int J Appl Glas Sci 7:423–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJAG.12252
Baino F, Hamzehlou S, Kargozar S (2018) Bioactive glasses: where are we and where are we going? J Funct Biomater 2018, Vol 9. Page 25(9):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/JFB9010025
Zafar MS, Farooq I, Awais M et al (2019) Bioactive surface coatings for enhancing osseointegration of dental implants. In: Biomedical, therapeutic and clinical applications of bioactive glasses. Woodhead Publishing, pp 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102196-5.00011-2
Stanley HR, Hench LL, Bennett CGJ et al (1981) The implantation of natural tooth form bioglass in baboons–long term results. Implantologist 2:26–36
Modh H, Sequeira V, Belur A et al (2018) Newer Trends in endodontic treatment: a review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 17:2279–861. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1701101416
Alhashimi RA, Mannocci F, Sauro S (2017) Bioactivity, cytocompatibility and thermal properties of experimental bioglass-reinforced composites as potential root-canal filling materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 69:355–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMBBM.2017.01.022
Da Cruz LPD, Hill RG, Chen X, Gillam DG (2018) Dentine tubule occlusion by novel bioactive glass-based toothpastes. Int J Dent 2018:10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5701638
Farmakis ETR, Beer F, Kozyrakis K et al (2013) The influence of different power settings of Nd:YAG laser irradiation, bioglass and combination to the occlusion of dentinal tubules. Photomed Laser Surg 31:54–58. https://doi.org/10.1089/PHO.2012.3333
Abbassy MA, Bakry AS, Almoabady EH et al (2021) Characterization of a novel enamel sealer for bioactive remineralization of white spot lesions. J Dent 109:103663. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2021.103663
The effect of bioactive glasses on enamel remineralization: A systematic review | Pocket Dentistry. https://pocketdentistry.com/the-effect-of-bioactive-glasses-on-enamel-remineralization-a-systematic-review/#:~:text=Fluoride has formed the mainstay of enamel remineralization,demineralization by forming fluorapatite on the ename. Accessed 8 Feb 2021
Bakry AS, Abbassy MA (2019) The efficacy of a bioglass (45S5) paste temporary filling used to remineralize enamel surfaces prior to bonding procedures. J Dent 85:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2019.04.010
Aboulnaga M, Hassanien O, JOURNAL AY-D, 2018 U (2018) Effect of NovaMin application with/ without polyacrylic acid-bioactivE glass air abrasion on the remineralization of demineralized enamel lesion: an in vitro study. Dent J 64:1–9
Burwell AK, Litkowski LJ, Greenspan DC (2009) Calcium sodium phosphosilicate (NovaMin): remineralization potential. Adv Dent Res 21:35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895937409335621
Jena A, Kala S, Shashirekha G (2017) Comparing the effectiveness of four desensitizing toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscope analysis. J Conserv Dent 20:269. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_34_17
Hoppe A, Jokic B, Janackovic D et al (2014) Cobalt-releasing 1393 bioactive glass-derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:2865–2877. https://doi.org/10.1021/AM405354Y
Rokaya D, Srimaneepong V, Sapkota J et al (2018) Polymeric materials and films in dentistry: An overview. J Adv Res 14:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JARE.2018.05.001
Kapoor S, Goel A, Tilocca A et al (2014) Role of glass structure in defining the chemical dissolution behavior, bioactivity and antioxidant properties of zinc and strontium co-doped alkali-free phosphosilicate glasses. Acta Biomater 10:3264–3278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2014.03.033
Saeki K, Marshall GW, Gansky SA et al (2016) Strontium effects on root dentin tubule occlusion and nanomechanical properties. Dent Mater 32:240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DENTAL.2015.11.020
Thuy TT, Nakagaki H, Kato K et al (2008) Effect of strontium in combination with fluoride on enamel remineralization in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 53:1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARCHORALBIO.2008.06.005
Groh D, Döhler F, Brauer DS (2014) Bioactive glasses with improved processing. Part 1. Thermal properties, ion release and apatite formation. Acta Biomater 10:4465–4473. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2014.05.019
Liao Y, Zhong Y, Deng R, Dong H (2013) A kind of biological activated glass ceramic material and preparation method thereof and the application in oral care implement. 18
Lasemi E, Hossain M, Motamedi K et al (2017) Effects of different times of glutaraldehyde 2% on Bacillus subtilis Spores (In Vitro). Hosp Pract Res 2:118–121. https://doi.org/10.15171/hpr.2017.28
Aydın B, Pamir T, Baltaci A et al (2015) Effect of storage solutions on microhardness of crown enamel and dentin. Eur J Dent 9:262–266. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156848
Amaechi BT, Higham SM, Michael Edgar W (1999) Caries inhibiting and remineralizing effect of xylitol in vitro. J Oral Sci 41:71–76
Swarup J, Rao A (2012) Enamel surface remineralization: using synthetic nanohydroxyapatite. Contemp Clin Dent 3:433. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.107434
Kiesow A, Menzel M, Lippert F et al (2022) (2022) Dentin tubule occlusion by a 38% silver diamine fluoride gel: an in vitro investigation. BDJ Open 81(8):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00095-8
Wongkhantee S, Patanapiradej V, Maneenut C, Tantbirojn D (2006) Effect of acidic food and drinks on surface hardness of enamel, dentine, and tooth-coloured filling materials. J Dent 34:214–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2005.06.003
Rajesh KS, Hedge S, Kumar A, Shetty DG (2012) Evaluation of the efficacy of a 5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate (Novamin) containing dentifrice for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity: a clinical study. Indian J Dent Res 23:363–367. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.102228
van der Veen MH, de Josselin de Jong E (2000) Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence for assessing early caries lesions. Monogr Oral Sci 17:144–162. https://doi.org/10.1159/000061639
Kim B-I (2019) Quantitative Light-induced fluorescence. Detection and Assessment of Dental Caries. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 159–170
Kühnisch J, Heinrich-weltzien R (2004) Quantitative light-induced fluorescence ( QLF ) - a literature review. Int J Comput Dent 7:325–338
Hannig C, Hannig M (2010) Natural enamel wear - a physiological source of hydroxylapatite nanoparticles for biofilm management and tooth repair? Med Hypotheses 74:670–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.11.007
Yoon S (2015) Supporting Remineralization Dimens Dent Hyg 13(38):40–42
Carey CM (2014) Focus on fluorides: update on the use of fluoride for the prevention of dental caries. J Evid Based Dent Pract 14(Suppl):95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.02.004
Al-Khateeb S, Exterkate R, Angmar-Månsson B, Ten Cate B (2000) Effect of acid-etching on remineralization of enamel white spot lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 58:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163500429406
Willmot D (2008) White spot lesions after orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 14:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2008.03.006
Bock NC, Seibold L, Heumann C et al (2017) Changes in white spot lesions following post-orthodontic weekly application of 1.25 per cent fluoride gel over 6 months-a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Part I: photographic data evaluation. Eur J Orthod 39:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw060
Gazge N (2018) Bioactive materials in dentistry: a groundbreaking review. https://dentalreach.today/what-is-bioactive-dentistry-a-review/. Accessed 17 Nov 2020
Mneimne M, Hill RG, Bushby AJ, Brauer DS (2011) High phosphate content significantly increases apatite formation of fluoride-containing bioactive glasses. Acta Biomater 7:1827–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2010.11.037
Shah FA (2016) Fluoride-containing bioactive glasses: glass design, structure, bioactivity, cellular interactions, and recent developments. Mater Sci Eng C 58:1279–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2015.08.064
Gul H, Zahid S, Zahid S et al (2018) Sol-gel derived fluoride-doped bioactive glass powders: structural and long-term fluoride release/pH analysis. J Non Cryst Solids 498:216–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNONCRYSOL.2018.06.025
Tirapelli C, Panzeri H, Soares RG et al (2010) A novel bioactive glass-ceramic for treating dentin hypersensitivity. Braz Oral Res 24:381–387. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242010000400002
Al-Khafaji TJ, Wong F, Fleming PS et al (2019) Novel fluoride and strontium-containing bioactive glasses for dental varnishes-design and bioactivity in Tris buffer solution. J Non Cryst Solids 503–504:120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.09.037
Loesche WJ (1992) The specific plaque hypothesis and the antimicrobial treatment of periodontal disease. Dent Update 19:68, 70–72, 74
Marsh PD (1994) Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv Dent Res 8:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374940080022001
Theilade E (1986) The non-specific theory in microbial etiology of inflammatory periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol 13:905–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-051X.1986.TB01425.X
Liu J, Rawlinson SCF, Hill RG, Fortune F (2016) Strontium-substituted bioactive glasses in vitro osteogenic and antibacterial effects. Dent Mater 32:412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DENTAL.2015.12.013
Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Higham SM (2004) The validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to quantify acid erosion of human enamel. Arch Oral Biol 49:285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2003.11.008
ten Cate JM, Duijsters PPE (1983) Influence of fluoride in solution on tooth demineralization. Caries Res 17:193–199. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260667
Al-Salehi SK, Wood DJ, Hatton PV (2007) The effect of 24 h non-stop hydrogen peroxide concentration on bovine enamel and dentine mineral content and microhardness. J Dent 35:845–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2007.08.001
Potocnik I, Kosec L, Gaspersic D (2000) Effect of 10% Carbamide peroxide bleaching gel on enamel microhardness, microstructure, and mineral content. J Endod 26:203–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200004000-00001
Lee KH, Kim HI, Kim KH, Kwon YH (2006) Mineral loss from bovine enamel by a 30% hydrogen peroxide solution. J Oral Rehabil 33:229–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01360.x
Osorio E, Fagundes T, Navarro MF et al (2015) A novel bioactive agent improves adhesion of resin-modified glass-ionomer to dentin. J Adhesion Sci Technol 29:1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1030897
Chatzistavrou X, Velamakanni S, Direnzo K et al (2015) Designing dental composites with bioactive and bactericidal properties. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 52:267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2015.03.062
Bertassoni LE, Habelitz S, Kinney JH et al (2009) Biomechanical perspective on the remineralization of dentin. Caries Res 43:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1159/000201593
Pugach MK, Strother J, Darling CL et al (2009) Dentin caries zones: Mineral, structure, and properties. J Dent Res 88:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034508327552
Palmer LC, Newcomb CJ, Kaltz SR et al (2008) Biomimetic systems for hydroxyapatite mineralization inspired by bone and enamel. Chem Rev 108:4754–4783. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr8004422
Guentsch A, Busch S, Seidler K et al (2010) Biomimetic mineralization: effects on human enamel in vivo. Adv Eng Mater 12:B571–B576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.201080008
Shao C, Jin B, Mu Z et al (2019) Repair of tooth enamel by a biomimetic mineralization frontier ensuring epitaxial growth. Sci Adv 5:eaaw9569. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIADV.AAW9569
Acknowledgements
We thank Mr. Xiongying Wang for his training on profilometer and EDS.
Funding
This project was supported in part by the 2019 Chongqing Graduate Mentor Team Funding (Grant No. dstd201903).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Lin Qiu, Yu Lu, Haide Dong, Huan Zhang, Min Zhang, Quanfu Deng, and Jinlin Song conceived and designed the experiments; Lin Qiu performed the demineralization and remineralization experiments, Yu Lu performed the antibacterial experiment and Haide Dong fabricated the NBGC and did the XRD analysis; Lin Qiu analyzed the data together with Quanfu Deng and Jinlin Song; Lin Qiu drafted the paper and Huan Zhang, Min Zhang, Quanfu Deng, and Jinlin Song edited the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, L., Lu, Y., Dong, H. et al. Enhanced effect of a novel bioactive glass–ceramic for dental application. Clin Oral Invest (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04946-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04946-y
Keywords
- Bioactive
- Demineralization
- Remineralization
- Enamel
- Dental