Effect of double-layer application on the early enamel bond strength of universal adhesives

Abstract

Objectives

The present study aimed to investigate the changes in the enamel bond strengths of universal adhesives in the early phase of specimen creation and evaluate the effect of double-layer application on enamel bond effectiveness using different etching modes.

Method

Four universal adhesives, namely Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, G-Premio Bond, Scotchbond Universal, and Tokuyama Universal Bond, were used. Clearfil SE Bond two-step self-etch adhesive system was used as a comparison. Fifteen specimens per group were used for determining the shear bond strength (SBS) to bovine enamel in the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode. The adhesive was applied to specimens in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions (single-layer application), or the adhesive was applied twice (double-layer application). The bonded specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 5 min or 1, 6, 12, or 24 h before SBS testing. The flexural properties of the resin composite Clearfil AP-X were measured for the same storage periods.

Results

All universal adhesives exhibited increased SBS values with prolonged storage periods regardless of the application technique or etching mode used. Double-layer application was associated with higher SBS values than single-layer application for most universal adhesives over the same storage period.

Conclusion

Phosphoric acid pre-etching and double-layer application of universal adhesives resulted in increased enamel bond strength in the early phase of specimen bonding.

Clinical relevance

Care should be taken when using universal adhesives in the self-etch mode for enamel bonding because the enamel adhesion is sensitive to the duration after filling.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A (2011) State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 27:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Miyazaki M, Tsujimoto A, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Platt JA (2014) Important compositional characteristics in the clinical use of adhesive systems. J Oral Sci 56:1–9. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.56.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ferracane JL (2008) Buonocore lecture. Placing dental composites--a stressful experience. Oper Dent 33:247–257. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-BL2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Petrovic LM, Atanackovic TM (2008) A model for shrinkage strain in photo polymerization of dental composites. Dent Mater 24:556–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Irie M, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G (2017) Performance of class I composite restorations when polished immediately or after one-day water storage. PLoS One 12:e0183381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183381

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Irie M, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Suzuki K, Watts DC (2010) Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations. Dent Mater 26:608–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.02.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Shinagawa J, Inoue G, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Burrow MF, Tagami J (2019) Early bond strengths of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin cements to CAD/CAM resin composite. Dent Mater J 8:28–32. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mohamad D, Young RJ, Mann AB, Watts DC (2007) Post-polymerization of dental resin composite evaluated with nanoindetaion and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Arch Orofac Sci 2:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterthwaite JD (2013) Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin composites at two time intervals. Dent Mater 29:e213–e217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Par M, Gamulin O, Marovic D, Klaric E, Tarle Z (2014) Effect of temperature on post-cure polymerization of bulk-fill composites. J Dent 42:1255–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Par M, Gamulin O, Marovic D, Klaric E, Tarle Z (2015) Raman spectroscopic assessment of degree of conversion of bulk-fill resin composites--changes at 24 hours post cure. Oper Dent 40:E92–E101. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-091-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schneider LF, Consani S, Ogliari F, Correr AB, Sorbrinho LC, Sinhoreti MA (2006) Effect of time and polymerization cycle on the degree of conversion of a resin composite. Oper Dent 31:489–495. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Salz U, Zimmermann J, Salzer T (2005) Self-curing, self-adhesive cements systems. J Adhes Dent 7:7–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT (2009) Curing efficiency of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 25:1104–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zorzin J, Petschelt A, Ebert J, Lohbauer U (2012) pH neutralization and influence on mechanical strength in self-adhesive resin luting agents. Dent Mater 28:672–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent 46:520–530. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-347-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater 32:e9–e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cuevas-Suárez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E (2019) Bonding performance of universal adhesives: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 21:7–26. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a41975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J (2019) Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 107:2121–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kadowaki Y, Kakuda S, Kawano S, Katsumata A, Ting S, Hoshika S, Ikeda T, Tanaka T, Carvalho RM, Sano H (2016) Bond performance of “touch and cure” adhesives on resin core systems. Dent Mater J 35:386–391. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Takeda M, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Suzuki T, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2019) Immediate enamel bond strength of universal adhesives to unground and ground surfaces in different etching modes. Eur J Oral Sci 127:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ogura Y, Shimizu Y, Shiratsuchi K, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, Ando S, Miyazaki M (2012) Effect of warm air-drying on dentin bond strength of single-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater J 31:507–513. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Shiratsuchi K, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, Furuichi T, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M (2013) Influence of warm air-drying on enamel bond strength and surface free-energy of self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 121:370–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2014) Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent 39:489–499. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-203-LR

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Taschner M, Kümmerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petshelt A, Frankenberger R (2014) Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 39:416–426. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-168-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Muñoz MA, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J (2015) Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. Dent Mater 31:e236–e246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fujiwara S, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Nakatsuka T, Miyazaki M (2018) Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77:501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    ISO 29022: 2013 Dentistry-Adhesion-Notched-edge shear bond strength test. 1stedn. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, ISO (2013) 1–12

  30. 30.

    ISO 4049: Dentistry-Polymer-based restorative materials. Geneva, Switzerland, International Organization for Standardization

  31. 31.

    Yassen GH, Platt JA, Hara AT (2011) Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci 53:273–282. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.53.273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay FR (1999) The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1:299–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J (2010) Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “micro” bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 26:e50–e62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Neves Ade A, Countinho E, Poitevin A, Van der Sloten J, Van Meerbeek B, Van Oosterwyck H (2009) Influence of joint component mechanical properties and adhesive layer thickness on stress distribution in micro-tensile bond strength specimens. Dent Mater 25:4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Marchesi G, Navarra CO, Cadenaro M, Carrilho MR, Codan B, Sergo V, Di Lenarda R, Breschi L (2010) The effect of aging on the elastic modulus and degree of conversion of two multistep adhesive systems. Eur J Oral Sci 118:304–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00736.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Aromaa MK, Vallittu PK (2018) Delayed post-curing stage and oxygen inhibition of free-radical polymerization of dimethacrylate resin. Dent Mater 34:1247–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Thomsen KB, Peutzfeldt A (2007) Resin composites: strength of the bond to dentin versus mechanical properties. Clin Ora Investig 11:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0077-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Koike T, Yukitani W, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S, Fujishima A (1999) Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system. Oper Dent 24:323–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Ando S (2012) Factors affecting the in vitro performance of dentin-bonding systems. Jpn Dent Sc Rev 48:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2011.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B (2006) Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 85:941–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Kuroboshi M, Hayakawa S, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B (2015) Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance. Dent Mater 31:1493–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Cardenas AM, Siqueira F, Rocha J, Szesz AL, Anwar M, El-Askary RA, Loguercio AD (2016) Influence of conditioning time of universal adhesives on adhesive properties and enamel-etching pattern. Oper Dent 41:481–490. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-213-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Siqueira FSF, Armas-Vega A, Izquierdo-Bucheli A, Pinto TF, Hanzen TA, Bauer J, Cardenas AFM, Loguercio AD (2019) Does the conditioning mode and duration of universal adhesives affect the bonding effectiveness to fluorotic enamel? J Adhes Dent 21:525–536. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a43695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wakasa K, Yamaki M, Matsui A (1995) Calculation models for average stress and plastic deformation zone size of bonding area in dentine bonding systems. Dent Mater J 14:152–165. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.14.152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ikeda T, De Munck J, Shirai K, Hikita K, Inoue S, Sano H, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B Effect of fracture strength of primer-adhesive mixture on bonding effectiveness. Dent Mater 21:413–420

  46. 46.

    Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2002) Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentin bonding. J Dent 30:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00002-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of the oxygen-inhibited layer on bonding performance of dental adhesive systems: surface free energy perspective. J Adhes Dent 18:51–58. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a35515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    da Rosa WL, Piva E, da Silva AF (2015) Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 43:765–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Saikaew P, Chowdhury AF, Fukuyama M, Kakuda S, Carvalho RM, Sano H (2016) The effect of dentine surface preparation and reduced application time of adhesive on bonding strength. J Dent 47:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Pashley EL, Zhang Y, Lockwood PE, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH (1998) Effects of HEMA on water evaporation from water-HEMA mixtures. Dent Mater 14:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(98)00003-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Sai K, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Tsujimoto A, Ishii R, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2018) Influence of application time and etching mode of universal adhesives on enamel adhesion. J Adhes Dent 20:65–77. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a39913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Saito T, Takamizawa T, Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Hirokane E, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2020) Influence of application time on dentin bond performance in different etching modes of universal adhesives. Oper Dent 45:183–195. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-028-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ahmed MH, Yoshihara K, Mercelis B, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2019) Quick bonding using a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Investig (in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03149-8

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Nos. 19K10158 and 17K11716, from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This project was also supported in part by the Sato Fund, Uemura Yasuo・Haruko found, and by a grant from the Dental Research Center of the Nihon University School of Dentistry, Japan.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiki Takamizawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study does not contain any studies with human participants and subjects or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hirokane, E., Takamizawa, T., Kasahara, Y. et al. Effect of double-layer application on the early enamel bond strength of universal adhesives. Clin Oral Invest 25, 907–921 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03379-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Enamel bond strength
  • Double application technique
  • Universal adhesive
  • Early bonding performance