In vitro validation of near-infrared transillumination at 780 nm for the detection of caries on proximal surfaces

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the present in vitro study was to determine the ability of Diagnocam to detect caries at an early stage and to compare it with digital radiography.

Materials and methods

One hundred twenty proximal surfaces composed equally of sound and decayed surfaces were evaluated by assessing images captured with Diagnocam (Kavo, Biberach, Germany) and digital radiography (DR). All images were assessed twice by two calibrated dentists with a minimum interval of 2 weeks between examinations. The results were compared with μCT scans.

Results

Inter-rater reliability showed nearly perfect agreement; a high intra-rater reliability was calculated. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients showed a strong correlation of Diagnocam and μCT (0.82). DR and μCT achieved a slightly lower correlation (0.73). The surfaces were categorized into sound surfaces, enamel lesions, and dentin lesions to determine intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), sensitivity and specificity. ICCs between μCT and DR ranged from 0.20 to 0.63. ICCs between Diagnocam and DR were higher in all categories and ranged from 0.56 to 0.83. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Diagnocam achieved mostly higher values than DR. In detecting enamel lesions, sensitivity was 0.36 for DR and 0.59 for the DC. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of Diagnocam were larger than those of DR in all categories.

Conclusions

Diagnocam is more capable of detecting initial proximal lesions than DR and also has a higher sensitivity for dentin lesions. However, caries progression in dentin cannot be reliably determined with Diagnocam.

Clinical relevance

Diagnocam may be suitable as a supplement to X-ray diagnostics in clinical use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    Carivu corresponds to the Diagnocam distributed in Europe but uses a different software.

References

  1. 1.

    Poorterman JH, Aartman IH, Kalsbeek H (1999) Underestimation of the prevalence of approximal caries and inadequate restorations in a clinical epidemiological study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 27(5):331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Poorterman JH, Aartman IH, Kieft JA, Kalsbeek H (2002) Klinische onderschatting van de prevalentie van approximale dentinelaesies en inadequate restauraties (Clinical underestimation of the prevalence of approximal dentin lesions and inadequate restorations). Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 109(2):47–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Schwendicke F, Tzschoppe M, Paris S (2015) Radiographic caries detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 43(8):924–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Buhler C, Ngaotheppitak P, Fried D (2005) Imaging of occlusal dental caries (decay) with near-IR light at 1310-nm. Opt Express 13(2):573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jones R, Huynh G, Jones G, Fried D (2003) Near-infrared transillumination at 1310-nm for the imaging of early dental decay. Opt Express 11(18):2259–2265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Darling CL, Huynh GD, Fried D (2006) Light scattering properties of natural and artificially demineralized dental enamel at 1310 nm. J Biomed Opt 11(3):34023. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2204603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fried D, Glena RE, Featherstone JD, Seka W (1995) Nature of light scattering in dental enamel and dentin at visible and near-infrared wavelengths. Appl Opt 34(7):1278–1285. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.001278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Abdelaziz M, Krejci I (2015) DIAGNOcam--a near infrared digital imaging transillumination (NIDIT) technology. Int J Esthet Dent 10(1):158–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Söchtig F, Hickel R, Kühnisch J (2014) Caries detection and diagnostics with near-infrared light transillumination: clinical experiences. Quintessence Int 45(6):531–538. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a31533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Abdelaziz M, Krejci I, Perneger T, Feilzer A, Vazquez L (2018) Near infrared transillumination compared with radiography to detect and monitor proximal caries: a clinical retrospective study. J Dent 70:40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kühnisch J, Söchtig F, Pitchika V, Laubender R, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A, Hickel R (2016) In vivo validation of near-infrared light transillumination for interproximal dentin caries detection. Clin Oral Investig 20(4):821–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1559-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Baltacioglu IH, Orhan K (2017) Comparison of diagnostic methods for early interproximal caries detection with near-infrared light transillumination: an in vivo study. BMC Oral Health 17(1):130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0421-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Berg SC, Stahl JM, Lien W, Slack CM, Vandewalle KS (2018) A clinical study comparing digital radiography and near-infrared transillumination in caries detection. J Esthet Restor Dent 30(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ozkan G, Guzel KGU (2017) Clinical evaluation of near-infrared light transillumination in approximal dentin caries detection. Lasers Med Sci 32(6):1417–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2265-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Simon JC, Lucas SA, Staninec M, Tom H, Chan KH, Darling CL, Cozin MJ, Lee RC, Fried D (2016) Near-IR transillumination and reflectance imaging at 1,300 nm and 1,500-1,700 nm for in vivo caries detection. Lasers Surg Med 48(9):828–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22549

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Abogazalah N, Eckert GJ, Ando M (2017) In vitro performance of near infrared light transillumination at 780-nm and digital radiography for detection of non-cavitated approximal caries. J Dent 63:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Banting D, Eggertsson H, Ekstrand K, Zandoná AF, Ismail A, Longbottom C, Pitts N, Reich E, Ricketts D, Selwitz R (2005) Rationale and evidence for the international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS II). Ann Arbor 1001:48109–41078

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Marthaler TM (1966) A standardized system of recording dental conditions. Helv Odontol Acta 10(1):1–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lederer A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R, Litzenburger F (2018) Transillumination and HDR imaging for proximal caries detection. J Dent Res 22034518759957:844–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518759957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Riechert F, Bastian G, Lemmer U (2009) Laser speckle reduction via colloidal-dispersion-filled projection screens. Appl Opt 48(19):3742–3749. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.003742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):676–682 https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.2019#supplementary-information. Accessed 21 Jan 2019

  22. 22.

    Kunzelmann KH (2012) ImageJ I/O utilities. http://www.kunzelmann.de/6_software-imagej-import-export-utilities.html. Accessed 8 August 2018

  23. 23.

    Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Matsuda YHT, Seki K, Araki K, Okano T (2002) Comparison between RVG UI sensor and Kodak InSight film for detection of incipient proximal caries. Oral Radiol 18(2):41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Shahmoradi M, Swain MV (2017) Micro-CT analysis of naturally arrested brown spot enamel lesions. J Dent 56:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ozkan G, Kanli A, Baseren NM, Arslan U, Tatar I (2015) Validation of micro-computed tomography for occlusal caries detection: an in vitro study. Braz Oral Res 29(1):S1806-83242015000100309. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Soviero VM, Leal SC, Silva RC, Azevedo RB (2012) Validity of MicroCT for in vitro detection of proximal carious lesions in primary molars. J Dent 40(1):35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Haiter-Neto F, dos Anjos Pontual A, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A (2008) Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth. Clin Oral Investig 12(3):217–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0173-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wenzel A, Hintze H (1999) The choice of gold standard for evaluating tests for caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28(3):132–136. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.28.3.10740465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Khan EA, Tyndall DA, Caplan D (2004) Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: bitewings vs scanogram. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98(6):730–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/S107921040400544X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Espelid I, Tveit AB (1984) Radiographic diagnosis of mineral loss in approximal enamel. Caries Res 18(2):141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kienle A, Michels R, Hibst R (2006) Magnification--a new look at a long-known optical property of dentin. J Dent Res 85(10):955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Moritz A, Beer F (2006) Orale Lasertherapie. Quintessenz-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology of the University Hospital of the LMU Munich.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Lederer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich, Germany (488-15 UE).

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lederer, A., Kunzelmann, K., Heck, K. et al. In vitro validation of near-infrared transillumination at 780 nm for the detection of caries on proximal surfaces. Clin Oral Invest 23, 3933–3940 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02824-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Transillumination
  • Near-infrared light
  • Proximal caries
  • Caries detection
  • X-ray microtomography
  • In vitro