Abstract
Objectives
The aim of the present study was a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis on biological complications of removable prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition.
Materials and methods
A systematic literature search in established medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciSearch, Cochrane, FIZ Technik Web) and a hand search of relevant dental journals was conducted. The search terms were relevant MeSH terms, free search terms, and combinations of the two. The search included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies with data on biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition with at least 15 participants, an observation period of at least 2 years, and a drop-out rate of less than 25%. The selection of relevant publications was carried out at the title, abstract, and full-text level by at least two of the authors involved. The publications included were tabulated and analyzed.
Results
Of the original 12,994 matches, 1923 were analyzed by title, 650 by abstract, and 111 according to the full text. A total of 42 publications were ultimately included. The following parameters were evaluated.
Tooth loss
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 0 and 18.1% for clasp-retained removable dental prostheses (RDPs), between 5.5 and 29% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 5.5 and 51.7% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Caries
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 0 and 32.7% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 1.8 and 29% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 1.8 and 16.4% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Endodontic treatment
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 3.5 and 19.2% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 6.9 and 16.4% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 0.6 and 13.9% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Tooth fracture
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 1.7 and 5.3% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 12.7 and 40% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 0.4 and 4.4% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Tooth mobility
There were no changes or improvements for clasp-retained RDPs. The better the pre-treatment and supportive care is, the smaller the differences are. For double crown-retained RDPs, a slight increase was found in one study. The results for the parameters probing depth and radiological bone loss were inconclusive.
Gingival recession
Gingival recession seemed to be favored by a mandibular sublingual bar. Compared to fixed restorations, removable restorations seemed to be associated with a more pronounced need for dental treatment. Stringent pre-treatment and supportive care reduced the complication rates.
Conclusions
Heterogeneous study designs and data analyses rendered a meta-analysis impossible, so that an evaluation at the highest level of evidence could not be performed.
Clinical relevance
Within the limitations of this study, it would be correct to state that removable dental prostheses require intensive maintenance. Suitable pre-treatment and supportive care can lower the complication rates, in the absence of which they constitute trigger factors for (additional) biological complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thomason JM, Moynihan PJ, Steen N, Jepson NJ (2007) Time to survival for the restoration of the shortened lower dental arch. J Dent Res 86(7):646–650
Budtz-Jorgensen E, Isidor F (1990) A 5-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed partial dentures compared with removable partial dentures in a geriatric population. J Prosthet Dent 64(1):42–47
Tada S, Ikebe K, Matsuda K, Maeda Y (2013) Multifactorial risk assessment for survival of abutments of removable partial dentures based on practice-based longitudinal study. J Dent 41(12):1175–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.018
Studer SP, Mader C, Stahel W, Scharer P (1998) A retrospective study of combined fixed-removable reconstructions with their analysis of failures. J Oral Rehabil 25(7):513–526
Muller S, Eickholz P, Reitmeir P, Eger T (2013) Long-term tooth loss in periodontally compromised but treated patients according to the type of prosthodontic treatment. A retrospective study. J Oral Rehabil 40(5):358–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12035
Jepson NJ, Moynihan PJ, Kelly PJ, Watson GW, Thomason JM (2001) Caries incidence following restoration of shortened lower dental arches in a randomized controlled trial. Br Dent J 191(3):140–144
Mock FRSH, Stark HK (2005) Eine klinische Langzeitstudie zur Bewährung von Teleskopprothesen. Success of telescopic crowns - a prospective long-term study. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 60(3):148–153
Bergman B, Hugoson A, Olsson CO (1971) Periodontal and prosthetic conditions in patients treated with removable partial dentures and artificial crowns. A longitudinal two-year study. Acta Odontol Scand 29(6):621–638
Budtz-Jorgensen E, Isidor F (1987) Cantilever bridges or removable partial dentures in geriatric patients: a two-year study. J Oral Rehabil 14(3):239–249
Walter MH, Hannak W, Kern M, Mundt T, Gernet W, Weber A, Wostmann B, Stark H, Werner D, Hartmann S, Range U, Jahn F, Passia N, Pospiech P, Mitov G, Bruckner J, Wolfart S, Busche E, Luthardt RG, Heydecke G, Marre B (2013) The randomized shortened dental arch study: tooth loss over five years. Clin Oral Investig 17(3):877–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0761-x
Kapur KK (1989) Veterans administration cooperative dental implant study--comparisons between fixed partial dentures supported by blade-vent implants and removable partial dentures. Part II: comparisons of success rates and periodontal health between two treatment modalities. J Prosthet Dent 62(6):685–703
Kapur KK, Deupree R, Dent RJ, Hasse AL (1994) A randomized clinical trial of two basic removable partial denture designs. Part I: comparisons of five-year success rates and periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 72(3):268–282
Bergman B, Hugoson A, Olsson CO (1995) A 25 year longitudinal study of patients treated with removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 22(8):595–599
Akaltan F, Kaynak D (2005) An evaluation of the effects of two distal extension removable partial denture designs on tooth stabilization and periodontal health. J Oral Rehabil 32(11):823–829
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):e1–e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
Moldovan O, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG (2016) Clinical performance of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review. Clin Oral Investig 20:1435–1447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1873-5
Bergman B, Hugoson A, Olsson CO (1977) Caries and periodontal status in patients fitted with removable partial dentures. J Clin Periodontol 4(2):134–146
Bergman B, Hugoson A, Olsson CO (1982) Caries, periodontal and prosthetic findings in patients with removable partial dentures: a ten-year longitudinal study. J Prosthet Dent 48(5):506–514
Bergman B, Ericson G (1986) Cross-sectional study of patients treated with removable partial dentures with special reference to the caries situation. Scand J Dent Res 94(5):436–442
Bergman B, Ericson G (1989) Cross-sectional study of the periodontal status of removable partial denture patients. J Prosthet Dent 61(2):208–211
Isidor F, Budtz-Jørgensen E (1987) Periodontal conditions following treatment with cantilever bridges or removable partial dentures in geriatric patients. A 2-year study. Gerodontics 3(3):117–121
Isidor F, Budtz-Jørgensen E (1990) Periodontal conditions following treatment with distally extending cantilever bridges or removable partial dentures in elderly patients. A 5-year study. J Periodontol 61(1):21–26
Walter MH, Weber A, Marre B, Gitt I, Gerss J, Hannak W, Hartmann S, Heydecke G, Huppertz J, Jahn F, Ludwig A, Mundt T, Kern M, Klein V, Pospiech P, Stumbaum M, Wolfart S, Wostmann B, Busche E, Boning K, Luthardt RG (2010) The randomized shortened dental arch study: tooth loss. J Dent Res 89(8):818–822
Wolfart S, Marre B, Wostmann B, Kern M, Mundt T, Luthardt RG, Huppertz J, Hannak W, Reiber T, Passia N, Heydecke G, Reinhardt W, Hartmann S, Busche E, Mitov G, Stark H, Pospiech P, Weber A, Gernet W, Walter MH (2012) The randomized shortened dental arch study: 5-year maintenance. J Dent Res 91(7 Suppl):65S–71S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512447950
Witter DJ, de Haan AF, Kayser AF, van Rossum GM (1994) A 6-year follow-up study of oral function in shortened dental arches. Part I: occlusal stability. J Oral Rehabil 21(2):113–125
Witter DJ, De Haan AF, Kayser AF, Van Rossum GM (1994) A 6-year follow-up study of oral function in shortened dental arches. Part II: Craniomandibular dysfunction and oral comfort. J Oral Rehabil 21(4):353–366
Wostmann B, Balkenhol M, Weber A, Ferger P, Rehmann P (2007) Long-term analysis of telescopic crown retained removable partial dentures: survival and need for maintenance. J Dent 35(12):939–945
Rehmann P (2006) Retrospektive Longitudinalstudie über die langfristige Bewährung von Teleskopprothesen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Instandhaltungskosten. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z (8): 403-409
Rehmann P, Orbach K, Ferger P, Wostmann B (2013) Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: a retrospective analysis. Int J Prosthodont 26(2):147–150. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.2959
Heydecke G (2003) Longitudinale klinische Studie zur Bewährung von Teilprothesen mit Feder-Riegel-Geschieben - 5-Jahres-Daten. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z (4):212-218
Stober T, Bermejo JL, Beck-Mussoter J, Seche AC, Lehmann F, Koob J, Rammelsberg P (2012) Clinical performance of conical and electroplated telescopic double crown-retained partial dentures: a randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 25(3):209–216
Piwowarczyk A, Kohler KC, Bender R, Buchler A, Lauer HC, Ottl P (2007) Prognosis for abutment teeth of removable dentures: a retrospective study. J Prosthodont 16(5):377–382
Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K, Lehmann KM (2001) Clinical longevity of removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: outcome of the double crown with clearance fit. Int J Prosthodont 14(3):207–213
Nickenig A (1995) Langzeitbewährung von Teleskop-Prothesen. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z (50): 753-755
Wegner PK, Freitag S, Kern M (2006) Survival rate of endodontically treated teeth with posts after prosthetic restoration. J Endod 32(10):928–931
Dittmann B, Rammelsberg P (2008) Survival of abutment teeth used for telescopic abutment retainers in removable partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 21(4):319–321
Wagner B, Kern M (2000) Clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures 10 years after insertion: success rates, hygienic problems, and technical failures. Clin Oral Investig 4(2):74–80
Au AR, Lechner SK, Thomas CJ, Mori T, Chung P (2000) Titanium for removable partial dentures (III): 2-year clinical follow-up in an undergraduate programme. J Oral Rehabil 27(11):979–985
Schmitt J, Wichmann M, Eitner S, Hamel J, Holst S (2011) Five-year clinical follow-up of prefabricated precision attachments: a comparison of uni- and bilateral removable dental prostheses. Quintessence Int 42(5):413–418
Behr M, Kolbeck C, Lang R, Hahnel S, Dirschl L, Handel G (2009) Clinical performance of cements as luting agents for telescopic double crown-retained removable partial and complete overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 22(5):479–487
Besimo C, Gachter M, Jahn M, Hassell T (1997) Clinical performance of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures and extracoronal attachments for removable prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 78(5):465–471
Vermeulen AH, Keltjens HM, van't Hof MA, Kayser AF (1996) Ten-year evaluation of removable partial dentures: survival rates based on retreatment, not wearing and replacement. J Prosthet Dent 76(3):267–272
Shugars DA, Bader JD, White BA, Scurria MS, Hayden WJ Jr, Garcia RI (1998) Survival rates of teeth adjacent to treated and untreated posterior bounded edentulous spaces. J Am Dent Assoc 129(8):1089–1095
Bergman B, Ericson A, Molin M (1996) Long-term clinical results after treatment with conical crown-retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 9(6):533–538
Ericson A, Nilsson B, Bergman B (1990) Clinical results in patients provided with conical crown retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 3(6):513–521
Funding
This study was funded by the German Society of Dental, Oral, and Craniomandibular Sciences (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not include any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
There was no need to obtain informed consent, as no individual participants were involved in this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moldovan, O., Rudolph, H. & Luthardt, R.G. Biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review. Clin Oral Invest 22, 2439–2461 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2522-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2522-y