A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool
- 259 Downloads
To develop a web-based tool to facilitate identification, evaluation and management of teeth requiring endodontic treatment.
Materials and methods
Following a literature search and thorough analysis of existing case difficulty assessment forms, the web-based tool was developed using an online survey builder (Qualtrics, Qualtrics Lab, UT, USA). Following feedback from a pilot study, it was refined and improved. A study was performed, using the updated version (EndoApp) on a cohort (n = 53) of dental professionals and dental students. The participants were e-mailed instructions detailing the assessment of five test cases using EndoApp, followed by completion of a structured feedback form. Analysis of the EndoApp responses was used to evaluate usage times, whereas the results of the feedback forms were used to assess user experience and relevance, other potential applications and comments on further improvement/s.
The average usage time was 2 min 7 s; the average times needed for the last three (Cases 3–5) were significantly less than the preceding two (Cases 1 & 2) test cases. An overwhelming majority of participants expressed favourable views on user experience and relevance of the web-based case difficulty assessment tool. Only two participants (4%) were unlikely or very unlikely to use EndoApp again. The potential application of EndoApp as an ‘educational tool’ and for ‘primary care triage’ was deemed the most popular features and of greater importance than the secondary options of ‘fee setting’ and as a ‘dento-legal justification tool’.
Within the study limitations, owing to its ability to quantify the level of difficulty and provide guidance, EndoApp was considered user-friendly and helped facilitate endodontic case difficulty assessment. From the feedback, further improvements and the development of a Smartphone App version are in progress.
EndoApp may facilitate treatment planning, improve treatment cost-effectiveness and reduce frequency of procedural errors by providing appropriate guidance on endodontic case management.
KeywordsCase difficulty assessment Endodontic treatment Treatment risks Web-based tool
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
PK Shah declares that he has no conflict of interest.
BS Chong declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 3.Ruddle CJ (2004) Nonsurgical retreatment. J Endod 30(12):827–845. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000145033.15701.2d CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Friedman S (2008) Treatment outcome: the potential for healing and retained function. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner J (eds) Ingle’s endodontics, 6th edn. BC Decker Inc., Hamilton, pp 1162–1232Google Scholar
- 19.Canadian Academy of Endodontics (1998) Standards of practice. Canadian Academy of Endodontics, WinnipegGoogle Scholar
- 20.American Association of Endodontists (2006) AAE endodontic case difficulty assessment form and guidelines. American Association of Endodontists. https://www.aae.org/uploadedfiles/clinical_resources/guidelines_and_position_statements/2006casedifficultyassessmentformb_edited2010.pdf Accessed 18 June 2017
- 21.Curtis EK, Simon DC (1999) Endodontic case difficulty assessment: the team approach. Gen Dent 47:340–344Google Scholar
- 22.Messer HH (1999) Clinical judgement and decision making in endodontics. Aust Endod J 25(3):124–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.1999.tb00119.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.American Association of Endodontists (2005) AAE educators guide. American Association of Endodontists. https://www.aae.org/uploadedfiles/clinical_resources/guidelines_and_position_statements/educatorguidetocdaf.pdf Accessed 18 June 2017
- 25.Shah P (2016) The development of a web-based case difficulty assessment tool for non-surgical root canal treatment. Dissertation. Queen Mary University of LondonGoogle Scholar
- 26.Steele J (2009) NHS dental services in England: an independent review led by Professor Jimmy Steele. Department of Health, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 27.Tickle M, McDonald R, Franklin J, Aggarwal VR, Milsom K, Reeves D (2011) Paying for the wrong kind of performance? Financial incentives and behaviour changes in National Health Service dentistry 1992–2009. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 39(5):465–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00622.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Chong BS (2015) No win, no fee. ENDO (Lond Engl) 9:155–156Google Scholar
- 29.General Dental Council (2013) Standards for the dental team. General Dental Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 30.General Dental Council (2013) Scope of practice. General Dental Council, LondonGoogle Scholar