Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 2325–2334 | Cite as

Influence of highly concentrated fluoride dentifrices on remineralization characteristics of enamel in vitro

  • R. J. Wierichs
  • S. Westphal
  • J. Lausch
  • H. Meyer-Lueckel
  • M. Esteves-Oliveira
Original Article
  • 274 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the role of highly fluoridated dentifrice on remineralization characteristics of lowly and highly pre-demineralized enamel artificial caries lesions.

Methods

Bovine enamel specimens were prepared (pH 4.95; 21 days) and discriminated in either lowly [L] or highly [H] pre-demineralized artificial caries lesions. Specimens with a mean ΔZbaseline,L (95% CI) of 5120 (4995; 5245) vol.% × μm and a mean ΔZbaseline,H of 8187 (8036; 8339) vol.% × μm were selected and randomly allocated to 12 groups (n = 20). Treatments during pH-cycling (28 days; 6 × 60 min demineralization/day) were brushing 2×/day with fluoride-free (0 ppm F [L0/H0]), 1100 ppm F [L1100/H1100], 2800 ppm F [L2800/H2800], 5000 ppm F [L5000/H5000], 5000 ppm F + glycerin [L5000 + glycerin/H5000 + glycerin], and 5000 ppm F + TCP [L5000 + TCP/H5000 + TCP] containing dentifrices. Dentifrice slurries were prepared with deionized water (1:3wt/wt). After cycling specimens presenting lesion surface loss were discarded and for the remaining 202 specimens, transversal microradiographic (TMR) analyses (ΔZpH-cycle/LDpH-cycle) were performed again. Changes in mineral loss (ΔΔZ = ΔZbaseline − ΔZpH-cycle) and lesion depth (ΔLD = LDbaseline − LDpH-cycle) were calculated.

Results

Significant differences for ΔΔZ could be found between L0, L1100, and L5000 as well as H0, H1100, and H2800/H5000 (p ≤ 0.01; ANCOVA). Except for 0 ppm F, higher ΔΔZ could be found in highly compared with lowly demineralized specimens (p ≤ 0.004; ANCOVA). After pH-cycling, a second lesion front could only be observed in H5000 and H5000 + TCP. The correlation between ΔΔZ and F was moderate for lowly and highly demineralized lesions (rL = 0.591; pL < 0.001; rH = 0.746; pH < 0.001), indicating a fluoride dose response for both.

Conclusion

For both baseline substrate conditions, a dose response for fluoride could be revealed.

Clinical significance

Remineralization characteristics of enamel directly depended on baseline mineral loss.

Keywords

Enamel caries Fluoride Non-cavitated caries lesions pH-cycling Remineralization Toothpastes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as part of the doctoral thesis of S.W.. We would like to thank Rainer Dautzenberg, Axel Honné, and the whole team of the scientific construction laboratory of the RWTH Aachen University for developing, constructing, and assembling the computer-controlled pH-cycling and brushing machine. Furthermore, we would like to thank Klaus Mussler for their excellent collaboration and technical assistance.

Author contributions

R.J.W., J.L., S.W., and M.E.-O. designed and planned the study; S.W. prepared the samples and performed the measurements; R.J.W. and S.W. performed the statistical analysis; R.J.W. and M.E.-O. wrote the manuscript; S.W. and H.M.-L. commented on, and all authors revised the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the authors and their institution.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Sheiham A and Logan S (2003) Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD002278.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002278
  2. 2.
    Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Appelbe P, Marinho VC and Shi X (2010) Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD007868.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007868.pub2
  3. 3.
    Wierichs RJ, Meyer-Lueckel H (2015) Systematic review on noninvasive treatment of root caries lesions. J Dent Res 94(2):261–271.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514557330 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zero DT (1995) In situ caries models. Adv Dent Res 9(3):214–230; discussion 231–234.  https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374950090030501 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Featherstone JD (1992) Consensus conference on intra-oral models: evaluation techniques. J Dent Res 71 Spec No:955–956Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manning RH and Edgar WM (1992) Intra-oral models for studying de- and remineralization in man: methodology and measurement. J Dent Res 71 Spec No:895–900Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wefel JS (1990) Effects of fluoride on caries development and progression using intra-oral models. J Dent Res 69 Spec No:626–633; discussion 634–636.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690S122
  8. 8.
    Buzalaf MA, Hannas AR, Magalhaes AC, Rios D, Honorio HM, Delbem AC (2010) pH-cycling models for in vitro evaluation of the efficacy of fluoridated dentifrices for caries control: strengths and limitations. J Appl Oral Sci 18(4):316–334.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000400002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lippert F, Juthani K (2015) Fluoride dose-response of human and bovine enamel artificial caries lesions under pH-cycling conditions. Clin Oral Investig 19(8):1947–1954.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1436-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ten Cate JM, Exterkate RA, Buijs MJ (2006) The relative efficacy of fluoride toothpastes assessed with pH cycling. Caries Res 40(2):136–141.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000091060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ten Cate JM, Buijs MJ, Miller CC, Exterkate RA (2008) Elevated fluoride products enhance remineralization of advanced enamel lesions. J Dent Res 87(10):943–947.  https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Esteves-Oliveira M, Santos NM, Meyer-Lueckel H, Wierichs RJ, Rodrigues JA (2017) Caries-preventive effect of anti-erosive and nano-hydroxyapatite-containing toothpastes in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 21(1):291–300.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1789-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meyer-Lueckel H, Wierichs RJ, Schellwien T, Paris S (2015) Remineralizing efficacy of a CPP-ACP cream on enamel caries lesions in situ. Caries Res 49(1):56–62.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000363073 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buskes JA, Christoffersen J, Arends J (1985) Lesion formation and lesion remineralization in enamel under constant composition conditions. A new technique with applications. Caries Res 19(6):490–496.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000260887 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wierichs RJ, Kogel J, Lausch J, Esteves-Oliveira M, Meyer-Lueckel H (2017) Effects of self-assembling peptide P11-4, fluorides, and caries infiltration on artificial enamel caries lesions in vitro. Caries Res 51(5):451–459.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000477215 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ganss C, Schlueter N, Preiss S, Klimek J (2009) Tooth brushing habits in uninstructed adults--frequency, technique, duration and force. Clin Oral Investig 13(2):203–208.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0230-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aykut-Yetkiner A, Attin T, Wiegand A (2014) Prevention of dentine erosion by brushing with anti-erosive toothpastes. J Dent 42:856–861.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyer-Lueckel H, Wierichs RJ, Gninka B, Heldmann P, Dorfer CE, Paris S (2015) The effect of various model parameters on enamel caries lesions in a dose-response model in situ. J Dent 43(10):1261–1267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.08.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lippert F, Churchley D, Lynch RJ (2015) Effect of lesion baseline severity and mineral distribution on remineralization and progression of human and bovine dentin caries lesions. Caries Res 49(5):467–476.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000431039 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wierichs RJ, Lausch J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Esteves-Oliveira M (2016) Re- and demineralization characteristics of enamel depending on baseline mineral loss and lesion depth in situ. Caries Res 50(2):141–150.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000444537 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Angmar B, Carlstrom D, Glas JE (1963) Studies on the ultrastructure of dental enamel. IV. The mineralization of normal human enamel. J Ultrastruct Res 8:12–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arends J, Dijkman T, Christoffersen J (1987) Average mineral loss in dental enamel during demineralization. Caries Res 21(3):249–254.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000261028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meyer-Lueckel H, Schulte-Monting J, Kielbassa AM (2002) The effect of commercially available saliva substitutes on predemineralized bovine dentin in vitro. Oral Dis 8(4):192–198.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.01762.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Biesbrock AR, Gerlach RW, Bollmer BW, Faller RV, Jacobs SA, Bartizek RD (2001) Relative anti-caries efficacy of 1100, 1700, 2200, and 2800 ppm fluoride ion in a sodium fluoride dentifrice over 1 year. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 29(5):382–389.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2001.290508.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strang R, Damato FA, Creanor SL, Stephen KW (1987) The effect of baseline lesion mineral loss on in situ remineralization. J Dent Res 66(11):1644–1646.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110801 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brown WE, Gregory TM, Chow LC (1977) Effects of fluoride on enamel solubility and cariostasis. Caries Res 11(Suppl 1):118–141.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000260298 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tschoppe P, Meyer-Lueckel H (2011) Mineral distribution of artificial dentinal caries lesions after treatment with fluoride agents in combination with saliva substitutes. Arch Oral Biol 56(8):775–784.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.01.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karlinsey RL, Mackey AC, Walker TJ, Frederick KE, Blanken DD, Flaig SM, Walker ER (2011) In vitro remineralization of human and bovine white-spot enamel lesions by NaF dentifrices: a pilot study. J Dent Oral Hyg 3(2):22–29PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Karlinsey RL, Mackey AC, Walker ER, Frederick KE (2010) Preparation, characterization and in vitro efficacy of an acid-modified beta-TCP material for dental hard-tissue remineralization. Acta Biomater 6(3):969–978.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mohd Said SN, Ekambaram M, Yiu CK (2017) Effect of different fluoride varnishes on remineralization of artificial enamel carious lesions. Int J Paediatr Dent 27:163–173.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12243 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tuloglu N, Bayrak S, Tunc ES, Ozer F (2016) Effect of fluoride varnish with added casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on the acid resistance of the primary enamel. BMC Oral Health 16(1):103.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0299-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wierichs RJ, Stausberg S, Lausch J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Esteves-Oliveira M (2018) Caries-preventive effect of NaF, NaF+TCP, NaF+CPP-ACP and SDF varnishes on sound dentin and artificial dentin caries in vitro. Caries Res 52.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000484483
  33. 33.
    Alamoudi SA, Pani SC, Alomari M (2013) The effect of the addition of tricalcium phosphate to 5% sodium fluoride varnishes on the microhardness of enamel of primary teeth. Int J Dent 2013(486358):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/486358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goettsche ZS, Ettinger RL, Wefel JS, Hogan MM, Harless JD, Qian F (2014) In vitro assessment of 3 dentifrices containing fluoride in preventing demineralization of overdenture abutments and root surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 112(5):1257–1264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Amaechi BT, Ramalingam K, Mensinkai PK, Chedjieu I (2012) In situ remineralization of early caries by a new high-fluoride dentifrice. Gen Dent 60:e186–e192PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. Wierichs
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Westphal
    • 1
  • J. Lausch
    • 1
  • H. Meyer-Lueckel
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. Esteves-Oliveira
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive DentistryRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Biohybrid & Medical Textiles, Institute of Applied Medical EngineeringRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  3. 3.Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, zmk bernUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations