Adaptation to new complete dentures—is the neuromuscular system outcome-oriented or effort-oriented?
- 64 Downloads
The aim of this study was to observe the adaptation strategy of the stomatognathic system during the adaptation of complete dentures, comprising masticatory parameters and subjective measures. Our hypothesis was that with new dentures, masticatory performance would increase while the effort of the system is kept constant.
Material and methods
Thirty-two patients received standardized new complete dentures. Masticatory performance tests were conducted with old dentures (T1), immediately after incorporation of new dentures (T2) and after an adaptation period of 3 months (T3). Patients habitually chewed the silicone-based artificial test food Optocal. The comminuted test food was analyzed and mean particle sizes (x50) were calculated. Simultaneously, surface EMGs of the anterior temporalis and masseter muscles were recorded. Specific (SMW) and total muscle work (TMW) were determined. Patients filled in the OHIP-49 questionnaire. Test conditions were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA with SPSS 22 (SPSS Inc.)
Masticatory performance increased (P = 0.016) between old (x50 = 4.99 ± 0.28) and adapted new dentures (x50 = 4.80 ± 0.33). TMW deteriorated (P = 0.004) at T2 (from TMW1 = 119.77 ± 56.49 to TMW2 = 92.12 46.27), and increased again (P = 0.028) at T3 (TMW3 = 107.66 ± 44.65). OHIP scores decreased significantly in all subscales (P < 0.001…P = 0.046); the total score was reduced (P < 0.001) from 56.24 ± 29.05 (T1) to 34.66 ± 24.74 (T3).
In complete denture wearers, masticatory performance improves over an adaptation period. Muscle work initially decreased before reaching its original level again after adaptation. Subjective parameters overestimated the functional improvements.
The subjective evaluation does not adequately reflect functional improvements. The assessment of function requires an adaptation period.
KeywordsComplete denture Adaptation Masticatory performance EMG Masseter OHIP
The work was supported by the company BEGO Implant Systems GmbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg (S-208/2010).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D (2002) The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17(4):601–602PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Hedegard B, Lundquist LW (1986) Changes in bite force and chewing efficiency after denture treatment in edentulous patients with denture adaptation difficulties. J Oral Rehabil 13(1):21–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1986.tb01552.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A (1976) Masticatory function—a review of the literature. III. Masticatory performance and efficiency. J Oral Rehabil 3(1):57–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1976.tb00929.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Kappel S, Eberhard L, Giannakopoulos NN, Rammelsberg P, Eiffler C (2013) Immediate loading of two dental implants, in edentulous mandibles, with Locator(R) attachments or Dolder(R) bars: first results from a prospective randomized clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat ResGoogle Scholar
- 32.Eberhard L, Schindler HJ, Hellmann D, Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Giannakopoulos NN (2012) Comparison of particle-size distributions determined by optical scanning and by sieving in the assessment of masticatory performance. J Oral Rehabil 39(5):338–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02275.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Speksnijder CM, Abbink JH, van der Glas HW, Janssen NG, van der Bilt A (2009) Mixing ability test compared with a comminution test in persons with normal and compromised masticatory performance. Eur J Oral Sci 117(5):580–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00675.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Slagter AP, Bosman F, Van der Bilt A (1993) Comminution of two artificial test foods by dentate and edentulous subjects. J Oral Rehabil 20(2):159–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01599.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Schubert D, Proschel P, Schwarz C, Wichmann M, Morneburg T Neuromuscular control of balancing side contacts in unilateral biting and chewing. Clin Oral Investig 16(2):421–428Google Scholar
- 38.Perez P, Kapur KK, Garrett NR (1985) Studies of biologic parameters for denture design. Part III: effects of occlusal adjustment, base retention, and fit on masseter muscle activity and masticatory performance. J Prosthet Dent 53(1):69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90069-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.Sivakumar I, Sajjan S, Ramaraju AV, Rao B (2015) Changes in oral health-related quality of life in elderly edentulous patients after complete denture therapy and possible role of their initial expectation: a follow-up study. J Prosthodont 24(6):452–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12238 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar