Randomised controlled trial on differential learning of toothbrushing in 6- to 9-year-old children
- 264 Downloads
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of differential learning of toothbrushing compared to habitual toothbrushing and instruction/demonstration of toothbrushing on plaque reduction and gingival inflammation of primary school children.
Children (6–9 years) were subjected to a toothbrushing training consisting of 15 days (3 × 5 days, interval 2 days, 3 min/day) and randomly assigned to one of three groups (each n = 18): habitual toothbrushing/control, instruction/demonstration of toothbrushing, differential learning of toothbrushing. The differential learning approach comprised 15 different movement exercises (1/day), while instruction/demonstration of toothbrushing was based on repetitive practice of toothbrushing. Plaque (Turesky-modified Quigley-Hein plaque index (T-QHI)) and papilla bleeding (papilla bleeding index (PBI)) scores were assessed prior to the first toothbrushing (t0, baseline) and 21 (t1), 42 (t2) and 63 (t3) days after beginning of the study. Primary statistical analyses were performed with cumulative logit regression models with repeated measures. The global significance level was set to 5% two-sided.
At all time points, PBI and T-QHI were significantly reduced by differential learning compared to instruction/demonstration of toothbrushing and habitual toothbrushing. Compared to baseline, differential learning improved PBI and T-QHI significantly at all time points. In the other groups, no significant reduction of PBI compared to baseline was observed. T-QHI was significantly reduced by habitual toothbrushing only at t1 and by instruction/demonstration of toothbrushing at t1 and t2. Differential learning had an improved effect on posterior compared to anterior teeth.
Differential learning of toothbrushing improved plaque reduction and reduced gingival inflammation compared to habitual toothbrushing and instruction/demonstration of toothbrushing in 6- to 9-year-old children in mixed dentition.
Toothbrushing skills of children might be improved by differential learning.
KeywordsOral hygiene Child Learning Instruction Movement
This study was funded by the institution of the authors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (No.13/1/16).
Informed consent was obtained from children and their parents or legal guardians.
- 4.dos Santos AP, Nadanovsky P, de Oliveira BH (2011) Inconsistencies in recommendations on oral hygiene practices for children by professional dental and paediatric organisations in ten countries. Int J Paediatr Dent 21(3):223–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01115.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Simmons S, Smith R, Gelbier S (1983) Effect of oral hygiene instruction on brushing skills in preschool children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 11(4):193–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1983.tb01877.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Savelsbergh GJP, Kamper WJ, Rabius J, de Koning JJ, Schöllhorn WI (2010) A new method to learn to start in speed skating: a differential learning approach. Int J Sport Psychol 41:415–427Google Scholar
- 18.Beckmann H, Winkel C, Schöllhorn WI (2010) Optimal range of variation in hockey technique training. Int J Sport Psychol 41:5–45Google Scholar
- 19.Beckmann H, Schöllhorn WI (2006) Differenzielles Lernen im Kugelstoßen. Leistungssport 36:44–50Google Scholar
- 20.Vehof K, Janssen D, Schöllhorn WI (2009) Handwriting acquisition in primary school by means of the differential learning approach. In: Araujo D, Cabri J, Barreiros J (eds) European Workshop on Movement Science. Lisbon, pp 45Google Scholar
- 22.Saxer UP, Mühlemann HR (1975) Motivation and education. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 85:905–919Google Scholar
- 30.Schöllhorn WI, Humpert V, Oelenberg M, Michelbrink M, Beckmann H (2008) Differenzielles und mentales Training im Tennis. Leistungssport 38:10–14Google Scholar
- 31.Schöllhorn WI, Beckmann H, Michelbrink M, Sechelmann M, Trockel M, Davids K (2006) Dies noise provide a basis for the unification of motor learning theories? Int J Sport Psychol 37:1–21Google Scholar
- 32.Rosema NAM, van Palenstein Helderman WH, van der Weijden GA (2012) Gingivitis and plaque scores of 8- to 11-year-old Burmese children following participation in a 2-year school-based toothbrushing programme. Int J Dent Hyg 10(3):163–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00553.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Feldens EG, Kramer PF, Feldens CA, Ferreira SH (2006) Distribution of plaque and gingivitis and associated factors in 3- to 5-year-old Brazilian children. J Dent Child 73:4–10Google Scholar
- 36.Ramberg PW, Lindhe J, Gaffar A (1994) Plaque and gingivitis in the deciduous and permanent dentition. J Clin Periodontol 21(7):490–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00413.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar